Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
i agree, trust your gut.
THANKS! =o)
http://www.our-street.com/featured.htm if your interested in SWYC.
new 10ksb/a 3-30-04. http://biz.yahoo.com/e/040330/nnbp.pk10ksb_a.html
nanowatch this week - nsol biph lqmt tgal jmar flml agrd.
BIPH chart looking strong. broke 50 dma holding on low vol. keep on watch for this week.
ff, just took a ride over to RB. there is talk of listing over there. fwiw
SOTK - self cleaning nano windows. http://www.nanoinvestornews.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2530
molecular coatings will be huge business in the very near future.
USGA took her for another ride thursday march 25 for a modest gain but waiting for this sec mess to clear before holding any longer than a few days. a must read. http://www.our-street.com/usga.htm Not taking a position one way or another here. i do however have a problem with OURSTREET.COM having a subscriber base that shorts stocks on a pre-informed basis. they should be investigated by the SEC themselves.
FORBES/WOLFE Nanotech Weekly Insider: MARCH.26.2004
by Josh Wolfe (email: nanotech@forbes.com)
Before we get to nanotech...let's start with a shocking story
and the answer to last week's quiz. Remember my playful
example of DHMO? Banning water!? Well it turns out Aliso Viejo,
California actually struck up a law to ban water! "It's
embarrassing," said City Manager David J. Norman. "We had a
paralegal who did bad research." And the answer to last week's
quiz of your judgement and cognitive biases? Mary's very
studious, deeply concerned with social issues. While an
undergraduate at UC Berkeley, she dual majored in English
literature and environmental studies. Which of the following
three choices was most probable? A) Mary is a librarian, B) Mary
is a librarian and a member of the Sierra Club or C) Mary works
in the banking industry. Remember the question was which is most
probable. Turns out about half of the answers picked choice B,
despite the fact that A includes part of B and is more probable.
33% understood the question and picked A. But the correct answer
was C. Because there are so many more people hired by banks than
by libraries that its far more probable that Mary would work in
the banking industry. Now onto nanotech.
http://forbes.z2c.net/rd4/ck/3072-13370-1839-159?m=1-6&e=b854a3021e58
To start the week, Merrill Lynch's John Roy and I hopped on a
private jet to visit a certain nanotech company. You'll hear who
it was and my take on them in an upcoming monthly issue. We're
about to see a serious wave of momentous interest in
nanotechnology from investors. CNBC started on Wednesday's
Kudlow & Cramer with a promise that the full next week will have
nightly nanotech coverage. I've been shocked thus far by their
choice of CEOs and companies they believe representative of
"nanotech". Seems like a staffer might have been fed misleading
information. But you can be sure that both positive and negative
speculation will drive the sector and the names associated with
it. People ask me if nanotech will turn into a bubble. One thing
I know for sure is this: Technologies change. Companies change.
Industries Change. Human nature? It doesn't change. As long as
people are behind the wheel, emotions dictate decisions and
behavior. It's a balance of greed and fear, and which ever
achieves a critical mass first will drive the direction of the
market. Remember what Warren Buffet says, "Look at market
fluctuations as your friend rather than your enemy; profit from
folly rather than participate in it."
And speaking of participating in nanotech. How will your jobs be
affected? Well, nanotech will definitively increase
productivity. And it will create new jobs. And for better
(or worse) it will also destroy old ones. That's certain. Two
weeks ago, Alan "Mr. Productivity" Greenspan, gave a speech at
Boston College. He said throughout the history of American
generations and all the economic changes we've seen--we've
actually NOT had a net loss in jobs to either new technologies
or other nations. He said that since WWII, the unemployment rate
has averaged 6% and that there's always been a threat of
focus--whether it was low-wage Japan in the 1950s and 1960s,
low-wage Mexico in the 1990s or the current perceived culprits
today of China and India. Turns out Japan isn't low-wage anymore
and Mexicans are complaining of job-loss to China. Even when the
economy is roaring, America churns over 2 million jobs a month.
I'm a believer in innovation. Innovation yields productivity.
Productivity improves our lives. But innovation and productivity
also kill old jobs. One hundred years ago 40 out of every 100
people in the U.S. worked on farms to feed a country with 90
million people. Today, it takes less than two agricultural
workers out of 100 workers to offer excess food to a country
three times larger. What if we would have kept 40% of our
workers on the farm? I guarantee we wouldn't have the man or
womanpower to make houses, telephones, cars, computers,
medicines, and all the other goods and services we can't live
without today. Same thing happened with the telecom industry.
30 years ago, there were nearly 500,000 switchboard operators!
Remember them? Or elevator operators? Time marches on.
I'll be in D.C. next week presenting the White House with a
very special gift made by Carl Batt and others at my alma mater,
Cornell University. Our Forbes/Wolfe Nanotech portfolio is up
+209.97% (vs. Nasdaq + 13.61% and S&P +0.22%) since March 2002.
If you're not already a monthly premium subscriber, click here
to join the others and come aboard for the ride:
http://forbes.z2c.net/rd4/ck/3072-13370-1839-159?m=2-6&e=b854a3021e58
*** im thinking some companies josh bashes on will be highlighted- ngen, alti, who knows maybe even nnbp. but its a long shot.- shane
thx. looks good
this just showed up in my alerts. - Josh Wolfe. CNBC started on Wednesday's
Kudlow & Cramer with a promise that the full next week will have
nightly nanotech coverage. I've been shocked thus far by their
choice of CEOs and companies they believe representative of
"nanotech". Seems like a staffer might have been fed misleading
information. But you can be sure that both positive and negative
speculation will drive the sector and the names associated with
it.
LOL! here ya, that pavp freaked me out! got out allready, so she should move big time this afternoon. lol. Im with ya on it though, should move, but real crazy right now. made a little bank.
10:34AM Nasdaq Composite dips but still well positioned (COMPX) 1968 +1.00: -- Technical -- The index edged slightly above resistance mentioned in The Technical Take this morning at 1970/1972 but has slipped back. While yesterday's surge has extended the market on a short term basis, as long as initial supports at 1960 and 1954/1951 are intact during the current dip it remains positioned for follow through. Next resistance is in the 1980/1982 area
oh man! all the missed profits! they should compensate ya ff.
TMXT on the move.
man, dipped to 0042 back up 0048 must be alot of panic here.
got a little PAVP .0046 =o)
BPA news- coverage.
so theres this guy out mowing his lawn when he looks down and spots this snail crawling in the grass. so he bends down picks up the snail and tosses him over the fence to save his little life and do his good deed for the day. two months later he heres a knock on the front door, he opens it doesn't see anybody, looks around, then down on the porch its the snail. looking up at the guy he says... WHAT WAS UP WITH THAT? =o)
just a little retrace today should hold up nicely got out today for a short consolidation looking for support mid .50 range.
out nnbp awaiting dip in .50- .56 area.
hows that level 2 looking? still have a big seller?
yep, sold nnbp for a buyback on dip.
nnbp? almost had a heart attack. nnpp?
thats why i love this place! thx bro.
that stuff needs to go!
HUH? buy an add.
ff- bumped her head on the 200 today shes a wild one, could be very volatile .50 - 1.00
LOL! ya know this is my first year of paying capital gains! i really should have read up on this whole trading thing. seriously, i dont have a clue. hope it all works out. gonna download gains keeper and study up this spring.
takes five outta twelve months of work to pay uncle sam. whats another month or two? only six more weeks and im all paid up! lol
I think the news and comments from the mayo clinic helped boost confidence, this could be a real gem down the road. suprised the patent news gave only a little push, could take a while to sink in.
would assume they will as a natural progression. still very early in the companies development. as far as i know there is no public mention of it.
NNBP here come the patents. =o) http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040323/235509_1.html
NNBP here come the patents. =o) http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040323/235509_1.html
CINM 38 mil cap 6 mil float. makin waves lately... read up. one to keep an eye on through consolidation.
CINM 38 mil cap 6 mil float. makin waves lately... read up. one to keep an eye on through consolidation.
SWYC awsome news! thx