Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
imo some is from positioning of early money to selected miners and much of it from wanting to harbor powder out of $usd jeopardy
Look at EXK over past 7 or 10 days priced in ounces if silver per share
The more the pressure from funds flow to the precious metals the more the effort to periodically slam those prices down, with the by-product of harvesting some gain
It appears to be a matter of who will end up with the stronger hand as the metals physically continue to move out of the west
jmo
today makes sense to me viewed in light of continued resitstence of silver to be slammed. Yes it may indeed be part of a step up of the sheeple for a rough shrearing, but today it is renewed belief that the silver rally has legs
jmo
Did I say something you took personally ? Sorry if so.
My intent was only to point out somw alternative views of whay might be goimg on.
Oh yes, also from OTC Markets, the company is now classified as in the home appliance industry - so muc for tires in Italy
Grab some shares while cheap for a quick flip . . . are you the actual sucker once all is said and done ??
What new mgmt ? Heard anything from him ? Is "New mgmt" one person?
Is Robert still a director ?
OTC Market's company profile
shows new Santa Monica home base,
shows no info for directors,
shows Richard Martel as President, CEO
shows accounting handled by firms in Montreal and Orlando
shows Investor Relations firm as "Wanderport Corp"
(remember that is a legally declared name used by Andrew's
number-named Canadian corporation identified in the AMF case)
and show that "Wanderport Corp" as having contact
352-533-4801 - that's Florida
info@wanderportcorporation.net
Miners at the topping zone
Precious metals at point of slam and feed off the other side
I hear you. I can mostly only watch at this point. My belief is whatever "who" gets publicly named as the players they are just the front-runners for "the WHO" sitting behind the curtains directing, but the govs of main nations and global orgs like Intl Bank of Settlements, etc are certainly in the front-runners masking were the reins lead
Although from different movers than your tech analysis I have to agree with your assessment passing 1340 is one criticial thing here, even if followed by a slam, but it is hard to not notice the recent large scale change in short and long warehouse contracts
http://www.gotgoldreport.com/2014/07/comex-silver-traders-in-commitments-of-traders-cot-mexican-standoff-short-squeeze-remains-likely.html
No prob JD Maybe its just setting up for a grand slam, although this time looks quite unique Until players show depth of conviction and strength of their hands it is a wait and see unless one takes the risk as part of pre-positioning As was said, to be seen
PS (to be) proposed replacement of London fix by CME / Thompson Reuters is continuation of banker's having upper hand
Silver Rabbit poking head cautiously above 21.4
Whatever might this mean ?
COMEX Silver Traders in Commitments of Traders (COT) Mexican Standoff, Short Squeeze Remains Likely
http://www.gotgoldreport.com/2014/07/comex-silver-traders-in-commitments-of-traders-cot-mexican-standoff-short-squeeze-remains-likely.html
Gold and Silver Disaggregated COT Report (DCOT) for July 11 http://www.gotgoldreport.com/2014/07/gold-and-silver-disaggregated-cot-report-dcot-for-july-11.html#more
Swap Dealers ‘Goal Line Stand’ for COMEX Silver Futures in Jeopardy, Squeeze Very Possible Now
http://www.gotgoldreport.com/2014/07/swap-dealers-goal-line-stand-for-comex-silver-futures-in-jeopardy-squeeze-very-possible-now.html
Surely it is not just the approach os the end for th London fix.
To be seen . . .
imo what we're seeing with this upside is nothing more that change in risk trade sentiment and silver mostly but gold also upswing (also part from risk shift and part from loosened grip on precious metals - for now)
tomorrow, next week, ???
Agreed, much potential here, always has been, but now with the mega-battery thing and zero ( 0 ) other possibilities in North America . . .
plus with the bonding underwriting this whole high-end cobalt mine through refiner and flexible supply chain has been put together so far with minimal dilution,
plus missing $ to get going are small compared to estimate on entire mega-battery thing ... enough said
jmo
Congrats all who had been looking for exit and took it in the earlier trading, esp if profitable although lower bags than hoped
Not sure on rinse repeat but this hasn't seen so much life in a long, long time so could be for a while
Andy certainly took pains to make appearance of clear distance between WDRP and himself
Last I recall on Robert, besides waiting on the slow China boat, was when they called him a director
What I don't get if all in PR is taken literally is who called the shots ? not that I am at a loss to guess
glta
at end of NR . . .
too bad it took so long
You mean there will be no dead tires to oil or crumbs business ?
Surprise surprise surprise
We are in same camp as far as that DD I feel it to be a company failing that investors are left with that task or uncertainty The market needed EMXX assessment on that long ago
JMO
Agreed. Transparency would go far toward restoring share price support in this market environment. Has anyone gone through the effort for DD on the companies partnered to EMXX through royalty streams or option arrangements ? How that portfolio is performing, how hunkered down weathering the storm (or victim) etc ? Having this info out there clearly NR'd imo would help investor confidence about earlier positioning into EMXX
JMO - been here some years, just quiet mostly
No, not really, although I do have preferred one, but all is very speculative due to the heavy manipulation/intervention and especially when/if it and the shorting of sector ends For most part I keep in mind for mostly pure silver what they have for all in production cost and have had to do to get it down
So I'll try 123 As you commented the chart is all confounded, having input price history that includes whatever investor sentiment might exist overwritten with the equity shorting of both the day and momentum traders and the more organized manipulation, and on top of this is overwritten fluctuation in price of silver. There is no surprise the chart is choppy and hard to use. Changes to Ag price have at least a couple impacts on producers. The equity valuation adjusts for the in ground value of the resource/reserve and there is usually a multiplier to this. With EXK this multiplier is / has been at the higher end (larger) than for many Ag producers. If the input to charting is share value in dollars this input will change when Ag changes but if input is share value in ounces of Ag this does not change (at least not due to the change in Ag price). My thinking is that the in situ value of resource/reserve gets masked out by doing this, and likely some if not all of the leveraging multiplier. It is just use share price and divide by Ag spot for each day as input to charting. Now we both know there is intervention and manipulation in miner equities and also in precious metal prices, that these get elevated and slammed for profit skimming opportunities as well as for central bank objectives. I was only suggesting that use of share value in ounces could mask out much of the share price changes that is due to Ag price manipulation, which in my view is large compared to changes from the other sources
Wow, I think I have digested your comments, without much of any disagreement on the facts of the matter.
I was actually only saying that by applying a filter to factor out the "noise" caused by the leveraged reaction of EXK to silver manipulation lets all the other crank and slam show more clearly.
Thx for the charts and esp link The noise from manipulation of the metal markets is only noise when one doesn't want to focus on but beyond it. The controlling powers most likely have all handles in use much of the time but I suspect also allow one or more to go their own way up to leash end much of time FWIW sounds like we read similar page
Thx totally didn't pick up on that; sorry to say after re-read of past couple PR and my thick skull jist does not let me see that . . .
what energy contracts? limk ?
tia
Thx JDfor bringing the Argentine info to the board recently
Reading this article I read this
nice piece you share there cork
I am thinking Argentine political priorities post-default will end the legacy Kristina has tried to figurehead and result in a pro development including mines atmosphere What dydn't work for the first dozen years post-default has no greater chance after a second. If it avoids default the junta in power will twist it as a success
I had not put the massive inflow on children, unaccompanied, over to border in reconquesta context. They mostly are not from Mexico. But I have wondered over how many crossers here have been held for ransom once in yhe US but vulnerable youth crossing alone are not ransomed ?
If only it was JPMorgan and Goldman that had made the gold bottomig announcement
Thanks JD So nice tu have a play by play ahead of time for a change !
Sad to say but I feel a full default might be the best for MUX although it would also be the slower getting to its final tesult
I owed this board a visit so no problem
I have held some thousands of free shares for years, was active here back then, occasionally since,get notice of new posts here and read on near daily after notice basis, and had the same gut level reaction to that fake PR post
Such would be well deserved, and overdue.
The AMF and SEC seem to be in typical form for semi-gov bureaucracy (:-
I am not too concerned about that questionable PR
Google can only locate it at PRlog
http://www.prlog.org/12341863-ucore-mines-investors-not-land.html
but it is no longer there and it appears anyone could have posted it
(see the submit PR tab)
Yes, pass along that congrats for longs on this
I was getting to be embarrassingly long at some points
I also learned the hard way TT after a while I noticed I could not fully trust Canadian Inside's reporting
Forgive me for saying uptions whereas as your post shows they are warrants (placement ? the records you show are for 1,500,000 shares in public market. 800,000 at the price you mentioned 0.215 and the rest at 0.03
The records also so they are a new reporter that already had 2,400,000 of each : shares and warrants so by them they would end up with 2,400,000 warrants and 3,900,000 shares
Some how the records I had pulled showed them ending up with something like 4,670,000 shares and warrants 4,600,000
don't know on how your pull and mine sort out
Either way they are far from being a required reporter with 10%, which is the reason I went to SEDI after reading the insider report
No you do not
As per my post Canadian Insider often reports things incorrectly
If you were to use the SEDI database directly you would see that the 0.215 you mention is the exercise price of options granted to them
No but your post got me interested
from SEDI database - Canadian insider is nice but often get the what part of the involved quantity wrong, as is case of data in your link
I thought at that numberof share oer adding all 4 of Canadian insider that it must be mgmt, director, etc because not enough to force required filing as having controlling interest
Turns out it is
Insider Name: CONCEPT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LTD
Insider Relationship: 3 - 10% Security Holder of Issuer
Ceased to be Insider: Not Applicable
2014-06-19 Common Shares 4,100,000
2014-06-18 Warrants (Common Shares) 2,400,000 2,400,000
SEE ALSO
https://www.google.com/search?q=Concept+Capital+Management+Ltd&rlz=1C1SNNT_enUS335US336&oq=Concept+Capital+Management+Ltd&aqs=chrome..69i57j0.2555j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=0&ie=UTF-8
still btowsing in this now
oil oil and oil spot; and potential disruptiom at much higher (hitting IS consumer economy stall point) ; and on Thurs from new breath into risk-on trade more than AU increase, AU and AG especially have have only been responding last half of week to aforementioned plus Fed
JMO
from NR: Explor Resources and Brunswick Resources Amend Letter of Intent for the Acquisition of Chester Copper Property
v June 20, 2014
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=62647389&symbol=EXSFF
russian - chinese objects drawing somw policy together for some time (ex currencies & new exchange agreements, brics conf and targets set couple years back)
plus especially
recent Freeport-McMoRan high dollar mostly Cu (now) project agreement with Quaterra Resources
But some witch hunts do catch their target, particularly when so well targetted so the hunt is not too hard.
jmo
or someone finally decided to clear their account of what was at one time a $5,000 purchase