Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That tells a story, I'd say! Someone or possibly a group have been buying around this range for a while. 5 bagger from here possibly! Let's see if we get a PR, I'm sure Kit Jennings reads this board.
This is most likely convertible debt and not company selling stock. There is a difference. A company that is selling stock is diluting. The company has no control over what individuals do with convertible notes. Waiting to see a 10Q this week. Definitely some large buys at 1's.
Why couldn't they have been mine that sold. I have 2 million for sale at 1's and would appreciate the sell so I can report the loss.
Oh believe me, I do my own DD and have spoken with the company and legal representatives on several occasions. You are watching convertible notes being sold so your Float from April's filings means nothing. Also, called Transfer Agent and they are pretty much gagged with exception of some brokerages which made no sense. I'm a shareholder so no need to get defensive but I'm letting you know your float is inaccurate. GLTU
That's not the current float. What you are seeing in volume is convertible debt which has been selling primarily at .0001. I'm sure float is much higher.
This is convertible debt listed in the filings. 10Q will be out this week most likely.
Yep.
Friendly bet you won't. Maybe at .0001.
I just took another 50000 shares on the ask. News is imminent IMO.
It's ridiculous to have a 18% drop on that trading volume. That may be one seller who is clueless, wacking the bids.
GUYS let it move past trips, don't stack the ask at .0009.
Is there any contact information for the TA?
Yes, there are definitely some consistent fills. Those two trades at the end of the day were on the Ask.
The company needs to help sustain these price levels with PR's, I agree. Moving down .01 in 48 hours with this small trading volume is lame.
Lol yea I read the board and aware of all the Mumbo jumbo. Was looking for thoughts on filings, etc. GLTU
There has been way too much loading at 1's and 2's for that matter for this thing to not see some movement on news. Any feedback appreciated since I'm catching up here.
Exactly, because the "relationship" between Telefix and Verizon, if it still exists, was never defined as Verizon's "Partnership Program". They were never listed in those listings. Our curiosity is the definition of this "relationship" and some details, as far as subscription references were provided in filings.
What does this have to do with the current management of SMAA? Why should I care that some guy named Tony use to call you "Bud"??
What did you do, head over here from the DCAC board?
Lol, you might want to sell and move on because your statement is incorrect and clueless in my opinion. Read the filings and also do the DD concerning Verizon and who and why they partner with specific companies.
Warchest, I've seen you post similiar posts in regard to letting you know when? Clarify what you are waiting for and let's see this ticker go!
I sold the last of my position today for a significant loss. No bid support here and in my opinion a shady CEO who is a one man show. I hope the best for the rest! GLTU
Nice post and this is how tickers move up.
From the response, I would disagree. If there was no relationship, I believe this Executive would have stated that there is no existing relationship, but I have the impression any information concerning a relationship is not being disclosed at this time. I could be wrong, so take it as my opinion. I was pleased that I received a prompt response over a weekend, maybe our CEO could show a similiar courtesy. Anyone have a current email outside of what's listed on webpage?
Date: Saturday, April 30, 2016 at 2:59:23 PM
To: "Tarrant, Kevin R" <kevin.r.tarrant@one.verizon.com>
Subject: [E] Re: Verizon contract
Kevin, can you provide me with any disclosed information concerning a relationship or partnership, between Verizon and Telefix Communications? Approximately a year ago, as you can see in this thread of our email history, you acknowledged their was a relationship. I'm an investor with Telefix Communications and a customer of Verizon. My primary question is, does a relationship/partnership still exist? We shareholders were scheduled for a conference call which was cancelled and never re-scheduled. There has been limited information in past TLFX PR's and filings acknowledging a relationship with Verizon, and I would like to confirm it still exists so current investors and any potential investors are making decisions on viable and current information. I appreciate your help with providing any information which can be disclosed to the public at this time. Have a great weekend!
XXXX
From: Apurva Patel
FW: [E] Re: Verizon contract
Yesterday at 8:41 PM
Hi XXXX,
I hope all is well with you. Thank you for the email.
At this time, we cannot provide further information or updates.
Best regards,
Apurva
There was some accumulation on this ticker recently especially around .0005. I'm sure many sold for a tick or two because I'm assuming this pump was accompanied with some major dillution so it never had flight. All IMO and GLTU.
It is still a low outstanding share count and I'm assuming the authorized share count is 500 million? Even with the increase in outstanding shares from last year, the drop in share price from .32 is disproportional but warranted considering the company isn't up to date on filings and hasn't maintained a dialogue with shareholders. I thought I had a proper phone number for the TA, but came up out of service.
No volume
Obviously the share structure changed within the last 52 weeks. Can someone who is familiar and has held this stock long explain the drop from .32? What was the share structure at that time and what is it now? Any info. Would be appreciated.
What is the most current share structure? When was the TA contacted last to verify? Has anyone spoken with management?
That's a load of BS. Your judgement news was posted so if that was the case I would have imagined it would have stopped there, the repetitive posts speak differently. I'd have to say that you may be shooting yourself in the foot in regard to payment IMO. You are definitely affecting the share price in the short term, but I believe this CEO has plans leading into the energy exposition which will prove differently in the long term. With an increase in authorized shares, the company can initiate deals and possibly raise capital. I don't like it in the form of dilution, but it happens. If they sell, It won't be at these levels or bid support though and I'm expecting a run. The date on that settlement is so recent and IMO you are premature in your arrival and intentions. Perhaps the company was considering your judgement, you may have awakened a Lion. All IMO
That's so interesting, that post gave me an opportunity to head over to the DEAC board and catch up on your posts there. GLTU
2 million share hit, yet level 2 never shows a bid or ask.
I-Glow, I know the board has addressed his previous business failures, but let's face it, many people endure business failures. It goes with the territory. We can sit here and project what his influence on SMAA will be based upon his past successes and failures, but it would strictly be opinions. Im looking forward to a CC or shareholder update by the man. I'm also looking forward to the energy exposition in August. I'm taking into consideration his military and political background and seeing the leadership potential for SMAA. I'm sure his political background comes with many influential connections and I'd like to assume his military background has instilled some integrity to his character. I've seen many CEO's in pinky land and OTC and I'd take Jennings' background before most of them. There must be some specific reason or opportunity that Austin Jennings sees in order for him to come aboard as CEO of this shell that has some baggage attached to it. Perhaps, government contracts? I hope the best interests of the shareholders are included in that vision. If it's legit, I also feel encouraged that the direction of this company is pointing toward renewable energy. They also relocated head quarters to a building structure that has some serious square footage. This is all in my opinion. In regard, to the gentleman's legal matter with SMAA, let's see how it's handled since that problem and the additional two occurred under previous management. I'm not married to any stock but I'd like to see this run based on a legitimate business plan. All IMO
I was aware of it from filings and I'm sure many investors were also aware. Bringing something to the board as far as DD is encouraged, but if you are here to label fellow investors with derogatory terms or have an agenda to drive the share price down, then your not welcomed here. We have a new CEO with a reputable military/political background so let's see where and how he leads this company forward.
Nice, just seeing the EOD share price now and it's right on the mark regarding what I stated earlier! GLTA and looking forward to seeing price action tomorrow.
If you have 90% of your original investment in TLFX, I'm curious why you choose to shot yourself in your own foot? Everyone is frustrated but attempt to use that frustration by Emailing the CEO or perhaps contact Verizon and pursue an answer regarding the definition of their relationship with TLFX or the existence of one. If one does exist, inquire about the subscription requirement (number of subscribers) mentioned in the PR. Maybe it's all bull or maybe it's not!?!?
We are in several together, I'm feeling you.
That's what I'm waiting for.
Dynasty, I followed you here for a modest position and like what I see. L2 looks thin and it appears the float is locked. I'll consider Increasing my position when I see some stability above .001.