Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Glad to see yall back. Kinda missed you guys. Hope zeus and tbone made it back in too. You guys did a lot of good dd and were gonna make some real money her IMO.
Dont know, dont care. As long as the one on my brokerage acount is the one flying up, Im good.
Wow. I sure hope all the short positions got covered. You dont see them get hammered this hard very often. I hope they saw it coming cause it caught me by surprise. Glad Im long here.
Mornin to ya tbone. I see weve got some buzz goin on. Arent you glad we are long here. A short position would be pretty costly about now huh.
All joking aside Bruce, thats really what I believe. I actually did sell one of the times based on what jusdafacts was saying at the time. His theories didnt add up to me the more I thought about it so I bought back in. I may have stayed out several times but I kept makin so much of that just money every time I sold thst it doesnt even touch my profits to stay in. Im actually conservative in all my ventures and really dont own that many shares compared to others. I do listen to everybody but if I dont agree with you I dont mean anything personal by it and I hope you feel the same. If you say something I agree with or prove me wrong I will be the first to step up. Hope you have a good night. I just got in from fishing and am headed to bed.
Oh no, not at all. Didnt you see all the news. It just changed ownership is all. The new company that bought it is named Gallant and they even brought it out of chapter 11 bankruptcy. If you look at the top of this page you will see a 13d the sec posted achnowledging there ownership. And in a mere couple weeks they were proud to let the public know that they also even brought it out of bankruptcy. Theres a link to that pr posted at the top of this page in the intro where they also let the public know they now are the new owners of the company. Dont worry, your confusion is understood but were good here. With the old owners petitioning for chapter 7 bankruptcy its easy to get things mixed up but since they sold it they really have no reason to exist since that was their only venture. The prior ceo explained everything in his last 8k before he left. That is posted under the new owners 13d I mentioned above. I think the confusion started when some of the leftover employees thought they were supposed to file an 8k for some reason but since they are no longer conected to soup (q) the sec didnt post it so people wouldnt get the wrong impression of just what the status of the company that used to own soup (q) is after selling. Even though it wasnt relevant to post that useless document, you can still find it on the secs list of filings that they have to keep if you would like to read it anyway. GLTY
Once yet again I dont feel the need to even care at this particular time. How finra feels about Gallant would only interest me in the case of a reverse meger and that happening is only speculation of some of the posters here and has not been mentioned in any relevant news article or sec filing that I can find. I see where your problem is understanding this whole situation. Instead of focusing on the company Im invested in you keep concentrating on the company that owns it and the guy that owns the company that owns the one I am invested in. Not only is that a long wsy to travel for finra to get to Hagan, but its also a long way off topic of the company Im invested in. If you are so interested in Gallant and Hagans ventures msy I suggest a different website because Gallant was formed as a management company that manages Soupman and is not to be confused as Soupman itself as you are trying so hard to connect.
COOOL!!!
Just the kind of guy we need to run Soupman. A guy willing to take the risks to get what hes after. Guess he knew that he himself didnt need to be on finras good side as long as Gallant is. Were you not able to find a link that shows finra has a problem with Gallant. NEXT, I have 3 posts left to prove meaningless posts to be irrelevant but whos counting.
Quite frankly my investment strategies are absolutely none of your business and I am not here to coach anyone on what theirs should be.
I already told you. Nothing. I never even looked because as I told you I dont care about if Gallant is public or private because I am not invested in Gallant. I am invested in a company they own called soupman. You ought to check it out. Acording to posted news its quit posibally a great investment if you can get someone to sell you some shares. Theyre being held pretty tight though. As far as the posted news I mention, youll have to do your own dd on that. I have already done enough of your work for you.
Could someone take over here. I actually have a real job and dont have time to play around with someone that seems to have all the time in the world to try to antagonize me with baseless information.
No its not. So please quit refering to it as if it was by taking it upon yourself to decide what was and wasnt purchased as an assett. And once again, please come up with something new or otherwise just go to the hundreds of previous posts that discuss the opunions of people on the issues you keep resurfacing.
Purchased is the wrong word for that sentence. The correct one would be itemized.
I cant find anywhere that says if the ticker was purcased or not but if it hasnt that irelevant 8k thats not even news worthy would certainly state that its up for sale.
Of coarse. They were bought out and in that purchase agreement they were told by the judge that signed off on it not to release information pertaining to that sale . Youve acknowledged rhat in the past so why are you casually forgeting that now. Have you got any questions or comments that havent already been discussed to death and came full circle yet again. I only have 15 posts a day and dont really want to use them up on old topics.
Went there. Couldnt find anything that said they were a private company. Was it a private company 3 months ago because its the same website and it hasnt seemed to change other than who claims ownership.
Well here we go again. We werent even talking about Gallant. We were talking about the company they own big difference. If you want to know whether Gallant is a private or public company you will have to do your own dd because I couldnt care less either way, Im invested in Soupman.
First off if you want to ask a legitimate question you are going to have to quit putting something in it that doesnt exist. There is no mention anywhere of a private company so exactly who are you refering to. As for time frame, you have to go back to the 8th thst you mentioned and see that the judge has a gag order on things and it must have taken that long to get all parties to agree to let it be released.
Wrong again. It clearly lets you know the company was bankrupt, hence the words emerges from bankruptcy. As far as the filings you mentioned. That would be an 8k on 9/12 and a 13d on 9/13 listed at the top of this message board where all the other relevant filings are.
And why not take to heart the information at the top of the pagr. Its main objective is to clearly state that you are also wrong about being bankrupt.
I like the biggest tin foil hat dream that all the commons will be cancelled for no other apperant reason than spite.
Posted is when it is easilly seen in the list with all the other sec filings for this ticker. Potential investors dont have to look very hard to find the most relevant filings. They are listed right at the top of this message board. The sec does have to keep record of all filings relevant or not and that is the list that I think you are looking at. Also that sec list, this message board and alpha are the only places I have found it mentioned at all. Im sure you can find it somewhere else but if its very hard to find its not relevant IMO. I wouldnt care if they posted it anyway. Im even surprised they dont because if indeed was relevant and the shares were truly in danger one would think that it would be splattered all over the news. Its so weak that it cant even get the pps to the trips in nearly 2 weeks of trading after hearing about it.
IMO when the 31st rolls around and the judge signs the chapter 7 (and I honestly believe she will) depending on the time of day we will see a massive price drop and a lot of screaming. The next morning because of the chaper7 being signed thus finalizing all negotiations the gag order will be lifted and Gallant will release a pr so we can see what this baby can do.
When Karson filed his 8k on the 12th and Gallant filed their 13d on the 13th of September they were posted without any delay. The 8k of the old soupman inc. just doesnt have the relevance needed to post.
Oh and I forgot. Skinnyd
Several reasons actually. At the time it may have been a concern as it states but it is dated right in the middle of the time between the purchase and the the pr on the 28th. Nothing in the pr was negative at all regarding shareholders and if there was, then would have been the time to maybe mention that. Noone knows the intention of that email and then there are some that doubt its authenticity. Finally, nothing other than an 8k and chapter 7 temper tantrum has hinted that it even holds weight.
Like I say, dont doubt it at all. And if it was accepted instead of just being filed it would be posted with all the previous filings. Guess that makes it no more than a meaningless piece of paper that the sec doesnt think is relevant enough to deserve to even be posted. Thats what your 8k is and is exactly what it means to me. Oh, I almost left out the same thing about your chapter 7 without a judges signature.
I dont doubt that or really care. Karsons last 8k and Hagans 13d are posted for eveyone to see but your precious 8k isnt.
There is no law or rule that states that if they sell the company they have to change the ticker simply because there is a different owner.
The part none of us understand is that you keep saying the judge has to sighn anything we post about yet it doesnt seem to have the same bearing on what you post. The things you keep using havent even went to court or get recognized by the sec.
Here is the scoop IMO.
Before I get started just know that I am not going to argue about it or reply to any replies to this post because it is the way I feel and want to feel.
The last 8k has not been posted by the sec because it and the chapter 7 is now irrelevant to this ticker. I believe Karson and Hagan made a deal for the imaterial assetts some time after 9/8 and before 9/28. After that was completed Karson had no more reason to hang around so he bailed. Hagan released the 9/28 pr to let everyone know what had basically happened.
The leftover Soupman inc. People then became for the lack of a better word, bagholders. They obviously werent happy about all this and tried a last ditched effort to convert a failed chapter 11 into a 7 as a grudge against Gallant for putting them in the unemployment line. Thats all it is. Now I believe they will get their chapter 7 but simply to get their name off everything and that is when we will hear that the q was removed several weeks back. Thank you and have a helluva nice day.
If that was the case then why didnt he bail on Sept. 8. Maybe, just maybe he waited around for a deal for the immaterial assets (ticker) and then left with no reason to meet on October 16th. Is that a possibility?
Oops, I meant convert to chapter7, not 11.
Yes, the same one that would be giving up the right to those shares by petitioning to convert to chapter 11. Quick question, why did Karson bail so premature to the court date for rhe chapter 7. IMO, everything was already taken care of.
You and ips posts really simplify everthing and bring up anothe point. The chapter 7 petotion was drawn up on October first and the hearing for the 16th was cancelled because there was no need for further action. Looks like it could very well be that the remaining negotiations were taken care of in between those 2 dates. That would certainly make the one sentence in that petition a theory that is quite premature and make the chapter 7 a quite neccesary formality just to get Soupman incs name off of everything.
I agree and thats why Im staying here.
"And then go private". You guys are getting confusing.
WOULD YOU GUYS AGREE THAT IF THIS SHELL CAN BE SOLD AS TKANE SAYS THAT GALLANT COULD PURCHASE IT JUST LIKE ANYONE ELSE.
Wasnt meant to be. Ive always said I thought Gallant woyld purchase the ticker.
Whys that. Didnt you just read tkanes last post. The ticker is up for sale and GBI/WC own tons of shares and the assets ro go with it so.....
Well there you have it. At least you know the ticker can be sold. Gallant bought everything else so.........
Dont have a pacer account and thats where my mistake was made.
I still dont think of that document as anything more than a formality though. I have to stick with the copyright infringement issue that I will never believe Gallant would be dumb enough to step on.