Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Finally, I thought I was gonna lose the bet but you got a debt ridden shell in there after all.
Now as far as your new gripe. A stock purchase agreement (look, I said it again) is just that because they aren't purchasing assets. If they have to tell shareholders then so be it. An asset purchase agreement is just that because the assets are what's being purchased. Now if a stock is an asset then I guess it could also be somewhat of a stock purchase agreement and if they have to tell shareholders then so be that too.
Now go back up top to the five SEC filings and start at the bottom and work your way up. If you read all them completely and in that order you will see that they kind of tell a story. And if you look real close you will see that we've been told. Go soupq
Actually, I believe me saying stock purchase agreement now is the first time I ever said it in my life but anyway, what's your point. I read your version and well, so. Go soupq
First off I owe you one. I didn't see all of your post at first because of the space and after reading it I realize how uninformed my response was. That info was from Karson's 8k on 9/12. Sorry all.
I don't doubt the court documents. I just don't know where it says anything about the ticker or connection to it. Go soupq
Ah man, there's the problem. All that's from that fake 8k someone threw out there a while back. Is that what you've been going by? Go soupq
Who told you that? Go soupq
None of that has anything to do with us so I guess it doesn't matter who they are. I guess I was just trying to see what fascinates you so much about what happens to the folks that sold the place. Go soupq
Maybe they will just make up another 8k saying their shares are suddenly worth enough to pay it all off. Or maybe one that says anything you want it to say. Either way, it still won't have anything to do with this ticker. Even easier, just use the fitways news right under the last 8k to go by. Go soupq
Glad you're back. Did you hear the news. This whole thing depends on if you post or not.
For the people that are here as a goal of being a part of something, I hope you are right. There is nothing wrong with that. Sometimes a good thing takes a long time. I was mainly posting a way out for the people that are here as an investment venture only as I was. You have to admit that glec's chart does not boast a smart investment. There has been no SEC filing or company news for years so as an investor it is not beneficial but as a person actually putting it together I guess you would be able to see a goal. Well, this is the stock market with investors and not the neighborhood where a few guys are trying to build something to sell. The two do however need each other and the way they connect is through the SEC and PR's to substantiate the money changing hand. We all know the risk in investing but if I'm going to lose Orr make money on a stock, I would like to see why. That's it. Since PU can't put out an 8k or something in years then what do I have to go by other than you telling me to trust a guy that won't speak for himself. I'm an investor and it is a bad investment so I moved on and did better elsewheree. I really do wish all those that decide to stay the very best of luck.
Na, I'll just give up. Stay where you are. Think like you wish. After all you have a degree, or you say. It's obviously done glec well.
Nearly half my money back so far. Insult that.
Wow, really. I don't even know what to say to such a remedial level of thinking.
Since nothing has been said since then I would say that since there has been very low volume as per average it is mostly day traders making them 20 or 30 percent here and there by using low volume trades. Without real news in a while and people selling 1000 shares at the bid so they can buy 100,000 shares at the lowered price well, of coarse the price would go down. I love it myself. I've been quietly increasing my position for next to nothing knowing that if Gallant as much as sneezes it tends to jump to a nickel. That's why. Go soupq
Buy if you want or sell if you want but do your own DD and decide from there. Go soupq
Of coarse they are. If I did all the work and put out all the money they did I would feel entitled to the rewards too. Then there's people like me that just won't sell. Go soupq
I can't speak for everyone but I think it's because they know you're wrong. Go soupq
You forgot to say what that reason is. I'm curious to know why we all bought ours. Go soupq
Really. Wow. I never heard of that sure thing investment strategy. If I had known that all you have to do is watch who is posting I wouldn't have taken all that time to read all those SEC documents. Go soupq
Really. Wow. We are out of straws. How hard could it be to order straws. Go soupq
Everyone can take this for what you will. I got in this 8 or 10 years ago. I followed it and hoped along with everybody. I've whined along with everybody. I even got mad along with everybody. That got me or anybody else anywhere. Well, I decided if anything was to change I would have to do it myself. I sold this joke for a 2400 percent loss after a decade of feeling sorry for myself and took that money and have bought and sold just a few penny stocks and in just 2 months I am sporting a 980 percent profit on that same money. That's getting pretty close to half my money back already. So now you have to ask yourself something. Do you care about getting your money back or getting your money back from glec.
Since this is soupq and it's what happened here, I would have been impressed if someone would post something about what happens to a company that is brought out of bankruptcy. Go soupq
Wow I love your optimism. I was hoping we'd get 1.00 out of it but if you think we can get 10.00 out of it then I guess it would be smart to hope you're right. Go soupq
I wonder what increments the chart will be in when this thing gets its first real jolt. Go soupq
Sorry, didn't mean to get you all fired up. You could've just said you couldn't come up with a list. Go soupq
Sorry, mine must be missing a page. I was looking for the parts that have the ticker listed as theirs. Go soupq
Nice list. If it is authentic you should be able to dig up a list of all the assets soup liquidation LLC is liquidating from the same source. I would find that interesting if you wouldn't mind getting that out for us. Go soupq
I suppose I should give more respect to Karson's 8k put out on 9/12. It's short and sweet and very simply says they sold substantially everything to Gallant. Go soupq
It's not under Gallant but is under wealth colony. Everything you just asked for is in the 13d put out on 9/13 above these postings on this very page. Just click on that and be sure to check that CUSIP number too while you are there. Go soupq
That's an issue that bothers me as well. Manipulation goes both ways and I can't respect that info any more than the 8k. It violates both the NDA and insider trading laws so therefore I believe it be bogus as well. Go soupq
With all the links that are so proudly posted here, where is the one that shows legal documentation that soup liquidation LLC controls the soupq ticker. Let's be specific about it too. Legal documents would be. Go soupq
24/7 electronic junk and a bankruptcy of the guys that sold the ticker so they're not even a shell. They don't trade under any ticker and that's the way it is. May as well grab any old bankruptcy case and tie it to soupq because that is about all that is being done with this one. Go soupq
Yes, goes to show you that if the SEC doesn't respect it, then no one should. They don't seem to be interested in the chapter 7 conversion either. I guess if it affected the soupq ticker they would be. The SEC authority doesn't seem to matter here though. Go soupq
It's beyond me why people won't focus on how well Soupman Inc is moving forward. Gallant has certainly given us enough reason to believe they are trying and all we talk about is phooie that doesn't have anything to do with this ticker. No wonder the PPS is in the dirt. Think we can GO SOUPQ!
Related J/A debtors does not mean they are the ones filing, only related to the issue. Go soupq
Then why did they have to change their name? Soupq
It's not even a company in bankruptcy. It's a couple of guys that are in bankruptcy because they themselves have debt that they accumulated while they worked for soupman Inc. WC bought everything else for 6.7 million as has been posted here numerous times. We were informed about all this in the 13d, a pr released by Gallant, the asset purchase agreement, and the first paragraph in the chapter 7 conversion petition. I'm somewhat computer illiterate and don't know how to put links up and stuff like that but if I did I likely wouldn't because I prefer for people to do their own homework so they see everything and not just what I am focusing on or discussing at the time. Go soupq
No sir, they bought everything except the few things listed in the excluded assets and the company is not there so it also is included. Go soupq
Sorry to say but Gallant Brands is a private company and therefore wouldn't have a ticker symbol or CUSIP number. However, it just so happens that they just bought a company named Soupman Inc. that is a public company that trades the ticker symbol soupq and it's CUSIP number is 8361199107. I hear it's gonna be doing real good here pretty quick. Go soupq
No need. It's on this page in the last 13d. Go down to the links provided and click on amended asset purchase agreement and scroll down to excluded assets. You will find some employee shares mentioned but nothing about the common shares as a whole. Since it is not listed under excluded assets, then it is indeed included. Hope I was able to help. Go soupq.
The "for whatever reason" is the key. They didn't need to challenge the 51 percent issue for a hostile takeover because they won the bid to outright buy the company and the asset purchase agreement covered everything they needed (commons included) to get what they were after. In actuality the hostile takeover would have cost them more money because ALL the debt would have become theirs where in the asset purchase agreement they only had to pay portions. That is why the old company still has debt. It would have been in their best interest to let the takeover take place. They then could have just walked away leaving WC holding the bag. Go soupq