Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Alibaba Lands on U.S. Government's 'Notorious Markets' List for Fakes
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has been put back on a U.S. agency's list of global marketplaces known for counterfeit and pirated goods.
Nov 4 (Reuters) - Agria Corp
* Agria comments on trading halt
* Received letter from nyse informing co that nyse has determined to commence proceedings to delist Adss of Agria from NYSE
* According to NYSE, determination to delist company was based on an investigation conducted by NYSE regulation
* NYSE stated identified evidence indicating Co through top executive, other intermediaries engaged in trading intended to "artificially inflate" co's stock price
Source text for Eikon: Further company coverage: REUTERS
My Question:
Other intermediaries meaning possibly Lebed and company?
19th Annual Needham Growth Conference on January 11, 2017 at 12:50 pm ET at the Lotte New York Palace Hotel in New York City.
I would expect with investment managers looking for value. This conference should reward handsomely being that EGHT has not yet reached analysis pricing. Will be an interesting conference to see how the share price performs.
Congratulations King researcher59.
Cash generated from operating activities was $6.9 million, compared with $2.5 million in the same period last year.
I would say this is explosive. This should have investors climbing the walls to buy shares. Again dormancy remains.
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you also.
RTEC. If anyone following my opinion. I sold all out this morning at $23. Incredible one month run, but from experience I know logic makes sense to sell. Pigs get fed and Hogs get slaughtered.
My nerve endings have been twitching.
Thanks RTEC for incredible run.
https://www.google.com/search?q=rtec+stock&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
Nickyko in response to your message. What are my projections? I must confess I feel I am behind the times. I have so much believed 8x8 should be in the $21 to $32 range ever since the success of the global business expansion. I have always believed it was a buy out candidate. So far either has developed. EGHT continues to bring in the business. Amazingly consistently even while project customers are being developed.
I see other companies in comparison who I refer to as toilet sinkers with there share price exceeding even future potentials. I do know that maybe the last four investor conferences found some great investor buyers as it appeared that is when we had out last price surge.
So take my bottom line if you like. $21
Please remember it is my POSITIVE OPINION.
It was one heck of a swing stock for while. Besides what is alleged.
I think the practice of reordering bottles will continue for some time.
I trust the company budgets for the expansion accessories.
I see your to old to joke with. Taxed on "Watching the FUN"
Increase in bottle count is a positive, and having a backlog is positive. But in this business I do not think a back log is very acceptable if the customer is out of product totally. If the customer has product to use and they have revolving orders in then that is positive.
Good work MNGA. Fill those orders.
All that is basically left is the following for fun. You might get taxed on it if caught though.
All the while the management gets paid in full, along with the lawyers involved and whoever else.
How could so many cases rule in favor, but the appeal process broke PTSC in the long run?
One heck of a scummy legal system.
Insider Monkey gave very high positive analysis of EGHT.
EGHT 20 hedge funds
Still going to have coal ash basins, just not have coal emissions with MNGA or limited coal emissions for whatever develops.
Why is it your favorite?
So you think the trending health conscience public is just going to fold under for the coal industry? The trend and the momentum is in motion to space themselves away from coal. The utility companies already have millions in solar and wind projects. You think they are going to reverse course? You ever hear of coal ash basins which are very costly to dispose of, yet if one of the basins has a spillage?
I would tend to believe clean energy jobs are more about the future. No one made Donald Trump the gOd who knows all. Nice to make waves, but there sure going to be a lot of die hard individuals who will fight tooth and nail to preserve the environment.
For those existing coal energy producing stations. MNGA could provide relief for a time period before they exchange there source of fuel over to an alternative.
For 20 years to date just about. The Greenhouse emission cutbacks have done little to adjust the so called global warming. What it has done though is relieve the poisoning of our lands, air and water which sustains this planets food supply. The food supply chain has been adversely affected.
I like everyone else would like to see a coal emission solution. Affordable and workable solution. I would tend to think MNGA would be more welcome with a solution to coal ash discard. I would tend to think the utility world would be more than welcome.
Just casting out a talkative opinion. Thanks for the useful article.
But did they gain anything? I am puzzled, as most I tend to believe.
I would tend to think we be seeing some sort of activity. But we are not for what ever reason. Share price staying suppressed.
RTEC: I am wondering what is going on. Above average volume today near RTEC'S 52 week high. No news for a while since the sec financial filing. I am just seeing something good must be happening. In my opinion.
Was a rumored candidate for buy out sometime ago.
Sometimes I make a correct decision. I had stepped aside from VHC. I played the bountiful swings. Was rewarded handsomely for a time being. Today I see why I had such mix feelings about continuing with VHC.
Really disturbing news to say the least.
Federal Circuit Issues Decisions in Patent Office Proceedings
ZEPHYR COVE, Nev., Dec. 9, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- VirnetX™ Holding Corporation (NYSE MKT: VHC), an Internet security software and technology company, announced today that on December 9, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued three decisions in appeals stemming from inter partes review proceedings IPR2014-00237, IPR2014-00238, IPR2014-00403, IPR2014-00404, IPR2014-00481, IPR2014-00482, and inter partes reexamination 95/001,949. In the first decision, Appeal No. 15-1934, dealing with IPR2014-00237 and IPR2014-00238, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision to invalidate claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,504,697 ('697). Judge O'Malley dissented, indicating she "would reverse." In the second decision, Appeal No. 16-1211, dealing with IPR2014-00403, IPR2014-00404, IPR2014-00481, and IPR2014-00482, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision to invalidate claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,188,180 ('180) and 7,987,274 ('274). In the third decision, Appeal No. 16-1480, dealing with inter partes reexamination 95/001,949 the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision to invalidate claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,051,181 ('181).
"We are disappointed by and disagree with the Federal Circuit's decisions affirming the Patent Trial and Appeal Board," said Kendall Larsen, VirnetX CEO and President. "However, we are heartened by the strong dissent in one of the appeals. We are evaluating all of our options, including potentially seeking rehearing en banc."
VirnetX has two currently-pending patent infringement lawsuits against Apple Inc., in United States Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. The Apple I case and Case No. 6:12-cv-00855 ("Apple II") which covers issues of alleged infringement, damages and willfulness by Apple's redesigned VOD in iOS 7 and 8, the redesigned FaceTime in iOS 7 and 8 and OS X 10.9 and 10.10 and iMessage. None of the patents considered in these decisions are at issue in the Apple I or Apple II cases pending against Apple. Those matters include U.S. Patent Nos. 6,502,135, 7,490,151, 7,418,504, and 7,921,211.
About VirnetX
VirnetX Holding Corporation is an Internet security software and technology company with patented technology for secure communications including 4G LTE security. The Company's software and technology solutions, including its secure domain name registry and Gabriel Connection Technology™, are designed to facilitate secure communications and to create a secure environment for real-time communication applications such as instant messaging, VoIP, smart phones, eReaders and video conferencing. The Company's patent portfolio includes over 115 U.S. and international patents and over 50 pending applications. For more information, please visit www.virnetx.com
Forward Looking Statements
Statements in this press release that are not statements of historical or current fact, including statements regarding the strength of VirnetX's intellectual property, constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections about the markets in which the Company operates, management's beliefs, and certain assumptions made by management and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other unknown factors that could cause the actual results of the Company to be materially different from the historical results or from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to (1) the outcome of any legal proceedings that have been or may be initiated by the Company or that may be initiated against the Company, including pending and future inter partes review proceedings in the Patent and Trademark Office; (2) the ability to capitalize on the Company's patent portfolio and generate licensing fees and revenues; (3) the ability of the Company to be successful in entering into licensing relationships with its targeted customers on commercially acceptable terms; (4) potential challenges to the validity of the Company's patents underlying its licensing opportunities; (5) the ability of the Company to achieve widespread customer adoption of the Company's Gabriel Communication Technology™ and its secure domain name registry; (6) the level of adoption of the 3GPP Series 33 security specifications; (7) whether or not the Company's patents or patent applications may be determined to be or become essential to any standards or specifications in the 3GPP LTE, SAE project or otherwise; (8) the extent to which specifications relating to any of the Company's patents or patent applications may be adopted as a final standard, if at all; and (9) the possibility that Company may be adversely affected by other economic, business, and/or competitive factors. In addition to statements which explicitly describe such risks and uncertainties, readers are urged to consider statements labeled with the terms "believes," "belief," "expects," "intends," "anticipates," or "plans" to be uncertain and forward-looking. The forward-looking statements contained herein are also subject generally to other risks and uncertainties that are described from time to time in the Company's reports and registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including those under the heading "Risk Factors" in Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 9, 2016. Many of the factors that will determine the outcome of the subject matter of this press release are beyond the Company's ability to control or predict. Except as required by law, the Company is under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this press release to conform to actual results.
Contact:
Investor Relations
VirnetX Holding Corporation
775.548.1785
ir@virnetx.com
VirnetX, Gabriel Collaboration Suite, Gabriel Secure Communications Platform and GABRIEL Connection Technology are trademarks of VirnetX Holding Corporation. Other company and product names may be trademarks of their respective owners.
To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/federal-circuit-issues-decisions-in-patent-office-proceedings-300376073.html
SOURCE VirnetX Holding Corporation
Copyright 2016 PR Newswire
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=73107492
Sometimes I make a correct decision. I had stepped aside from VHC. I played the bountiful swings. Was rewarded handsomely for a time being. Today I see why I had such mix feelings about continuing with VHC.
Really disturbing news to say the least.
It looks like the shorts are favored up until approval, and maybe thereafter without marketing monies. CEO said they going to go it alone. I so wonder how true that is? A major partner would be ideal.
I do not think the CEO speaks for the board in regards to going it alone. Not logical. I would expect some sort of partner interaction. That makes sense. I could be all wrong.
Just an opinion.
Watching the slide.
$4.50 a share better than my prior posting. Palladium demanding a fair price and holding in my opinion.
So has your confidence improved enough to buy more shares based on the filing?
Do you not mean he was compensated by the company with shares?
The European UNISEC consortium sponsored Phase 2b results will be very significant in my opinion. I am on the positive side, as I have not read anything that would negate the findings research going forward.
The dollar keeps climbing.
Eventually the company will meet the public flu challenge in my opinion. The pandemics have not been large enough to call out additional remedies which includes unapproved solutions from BVXV even how novel it is and all the claims from the company that it is the real preventive for the flu.
Tis the season to be jolly! We are now and have been in year end tax loss selling mode. The dilution pollution will continue for MNGA. An answer to the exchange before years end to satisfy delisting is not far off. The cash burn ratio is still significant even with revenue generated cash from product sales.
Is the company in growth mode? The answer is YES! Growth is actually spectacular and I expect it to continue. When will growth reward earn enough revenue to turn this thing around? I will say one thing. When it does happen. This will be a day traders delight in my opinion. The longs will even enjoy a good growth on their investment. Until then this stock is basically zero paper.
Happy Thanksgiving to All!
Well at least you might be able to make use of the security certificates with a match and flame, if nothing else. Vaporized!
I like astc better as a trader stock. ASTI is in dive bomber mode. I have nothing to add about ASTI as I only glimpsed at the chart for now. Looks severely risky for now.
52 week low $0.49
I do not believe a delisting will take place. Yes! There is a threat ongoing, but that is the usual process. A lot of big great news would drive it up over a dollar, if that was to occur. A reverse split, so hopefully it does not occur. Plus there is also a chance for a 90 day extension by the exchange. I would guess the later might occur, but that is my opinion.
OR! The company board allows a delisting, which no one really favors, not even the board I would imagine. (This is doubtful, but it is one of the choices.)
I do not believe that this is the finance deal that will conclude closing/buying the coal combustion company that was mentioned.
It is going to have to be something big. Private restricted placements? I do not know about financing? Maybe they get part of it without toxicity. I cannot see the board allowing a toxic financial arrangement to be stuck in. It is not like the company has to buy the coal combustion company.
$0.60 @ 24 million shares minimum would be my calculation. Then go from there. I was just basing it on the known 14 million that is known. So it is not even a real respectable figure in my opinion.
They put the last round of financing together rather well last time in my opinion. Might just get surprised again.
Just say no to toxic financing!
On the other hand I think the financing is already a done deal, as there be no letter of intent in my opinion. What might not be resolved is a mutual price tag.
Just guessing out with assumptions.