Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Your post falls in line with what I was trying to say the other day. Why not just try to make the best of things and quit dwelling on what has happened to this stock in the past. As I said before, the stock has risen to $1 twice in the past....which leads me to believe it can happen again. I would prefer it happens due to legitimate headway in the acquisition department, but if it gets pumped again as it did before, all who have put money into this stock will be rewarded for some patience. All the negativity on this board does not get us any closer to pushing the stock higher. Sometimes this makes me believe that some might want it to sink lower so they can buy it at even cheaper levels.
Well, the first time was for a longer duration (if less than an hour is long) and I believe it was almost 4 years ago when it first came on as CGAQ. Then, the peak was a dollar for the shortest duration I've ever seen around the time of the casino opening. I saw several charts that had the high at $1.01, but most only showed the high of around 65 cents. Not sure which ones are correct. Both times were pumped by penny stock newsletters.
So, if this is just a pump and dump stock...why keep trying to drag it down? Why not pump it for all it's worth and ride the wave back up to $1 and dump like mad? I have seen this stock rise to just over $1 two times in the time I've actually been watching it (3 or 4 years I tihnk). I bought in only after the second jump. Each time it was pumped by a penny stock newsletter. So, why not make the third time a charm? Would I prefer it to make a steady climb, yes, but that is also dependent on positive publicity. All that is happening here, for whatever reason, is negative pub day in and day out. Why take it personally? Why not just try to make the best of it and move forward? JMO
Never kney why Tyler left the IR position. Maybe this came out already, but was news to me.
http://www.pr9.net/business/realestate/9955july.html
Apparently I need a subscription to do that search. Any synopsis on the "long ago" discussion? I've been here a long time, just don't post much...don't recall discussion about this.
I need some help here. Am I the only one that noticed this? How is it that CGAQ is now being listed as formerly BEVERLY HILLS LTD INC and KEYNOTE ACQUISITION CORP, when on their original incorporation paperwork they merged with AAEE GLOBAL HOLDINGS INC and they are constantly shown as formerly ALADDIN TRADING AND COMPANY?
Maybe I just don't understnad how pinkies work, but this stinks to me. Not to mention, I have not received a reply from Mr. Swank to my e-mail questions about serious questions I had regarding the validity of the company. I really want to believe in Mr. Swank, but I'm starting to see so many red flags.
Just curious, did anyone read my earlier post. I feel it is important for those of us still positive on CGAQ to research the items I listed.
Don't mean to sound condescending, but...did you READ my first post? I think I asked all the questions there.
The link in my post
I would like to ask the board to perform some collective research as individually we all seem to come up with results slanted toward our current view of CGAQ. I am on the pro CGAQ side currently, but after my last post on Friday (only have a limited number), I found some other information that I e-mailed Mr. Swank about. I have three items I'd like the board to think about:
1. Check out this link, http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=62988306
2. Research the name Richard Muller (the registered agent when CGAQ was incorporated).
3. Why was this address listed as where to send payments for the fight? 4842 Kilty CT E, Bradenton, FL 34293 (single family residence).
I'm also curious why chade is involved in the first link. Chad, did you request this information? If so, why was it never shared with the board? I apologize in advance if this was discussed previously.
I want this company to succeed, but I also want my questions answered by the company to put all this to rest.
I didn't see his signature on the revised articles of incorporation, but I could have missed it.
That's not exactly why I posted what I found. His involvement was in 2009 and his arrest was apparently for a completely different company after Steven had already taken over. I can't see the connection just yet.
I'd like to believe the items I'm bringing up can be seen as "adult" discussion. Not doom and gloom, but some true DD.
Everyone might find this interesting. It appears Erick Mathe was the incoporator and original CEO for CGAQ back in 2009. Check out this link....first time I've seen some of this information.
https://www.pinkotc.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=33056
Funny, I saw that too, but again it is only speculation that this is the same guy. I thought about adding that to my post, but unless I have facts that this is indeed the same guy, then I won't speculate.
I won't speculate on what Steven does and why he does it. I can only say that HE is the only one that should answer that question. All conjecture on this board will only cause an uproar one way or another. Plus, how do we know for fact that he was selling free trading shares to this company?
Don't really care about BOHICA, just stating what I'm finding.
I have not really done extensive digging on CGAQ in the past, mostly I've just looked into the projects they've advertised in PRs. So, after all the high school shenanigans on the board lately, I thought I'd dig a little. I came up with these things in less than an hour. Maybe if we collectively dig, we can answer all questions with fact and logic.
I'm confused, Steven is NOT listed as the CEO of Borco Trailers, Inc. It is owned by a man named John E. Bortoli, who is the President and CEO. I was just asking if anyone knew of his affiliation with the companies I listed.
Sorry, wasn't criticizing you, just seems if this is new information then maybe Steven is gearing up for bigger things.
As listed on corporationwiki.com:
Antonio Rodriguez is VP of Operations for CGAQ
Source: Dun & Bradstreet last refreshed Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Erick L Mathe is associated with CGAQ among a number of other companies.
Source: Florida Department of State last refreshed Saturday, October 22, 2011
Leon F Willis is Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer for CGAQ
Source: Dun & Bradstreet last refreshed Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Theodore O'Connor is Executive Vice-President for CGAQ
Source: Dun & Bradstreet last refreshed Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Might not be a red flag, might actually involve himself with them as an ivestor? Their website states they sell their trailers all over the world, so they must have contacts all over.
Says this information was updated while you were the IR late last year.
Does anyone know if Steven has other business ventures he is currently involved with such as Borco Trailers, Inc., Americas Choice Travel/Marketing Inc., The Waygood Foundation, Inc. and Caribbean Real Estate Inc.?
So, what can anyone tell me about the following names:
Leon Willis
Erick Mathe
Antonio Rodriguez
Theodore O'Connor
These are all listed as officers for CGAQ. Just curious why I haven't heard their names on this board before, but I only come on sporadically (lately, for a good chuckle).
I for one have been quiet until recently. I for one hope that we could at least get some financials from the fight this week. Hopefully, Swank has an accountant on the payroll to help with this!
I think Toshibas Style is taking a proactive approach to adding value to this stock. I am one of those willing to help in this endeavor.
I say it can't hurt to try something a little unorthodox and outside the box. At this point, there is really NOTHING to lose but so much to gain.
I understand the disagreement with this approach by some on the board and normally, I would be inclined to agree with the "what the hell are you thinking?" point of view, but I have been sitting here seeing that Swank does not necessarily have all the puzzle pieces he needs to compete with the big boys. I think he has the vision, but lacks the resources, and if I can help to make his dreams a reality, then this will only benefit me in the end. JMO.
Seems I don't have the privelege to send PM's.
I think that might be the best PR ever written for CGAQ.
I'm an intelligent EE with a background in technical training and writing/reviewing proposals and design change packages (i.e. I'm an excellent writer and reviewer). I also know a thing or two about website development. If that's not enough, I could help in any power upgrade requirments that might be necessary for the horse track. Also, could help with kiosk development and any network requirements that could be necessary for online gambling.
Hey, can't hurt to have some good people behind this business who have a vested interest in the company.
Haven't posted in quite a while.........but, just had to after the PR this morning. I've been adding to my position over the last several months because I believe in this company, but what was this PR all about? As PRs go, this is what should have been posted early YESTERDAY morning!!! Also, can you please read, re-read, and read again before submitting the post.....grammar is atrocious in spots!
Maybe, just maybe the PPS would not have taken a nose dive yesterday with this post timed appropriately. However, that is not a given as the PR had no information of value anyway. This is information that people can get from sports sites, blogs, etc. NUMBERS, PROFITS, etc., are all shareholders care about with regards to this fight.
chade014, I've been on your side....
Can you predict when the horse racing track deal will be sealed? I know it was SO CLOSE back in May, so what the hell happened? How is it that you remain SO positive through all the fluff PRs that tell us absolutely nothing? Just once, I'd like to see you say SOMETHING negative so I know you are not purely a pumper! I don't know about you, but I'M MAD AS HELL AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!!!!
Nope, no upward tick on this dog and pony show! Are we sure Swank isn't in Macao right now working on his next casino venture? Now that would bring the pps up!!
Come on people.....I think we can beat the 52-week low if we really try hard in the next few minutes!!!!!
Well, it's official...we are in the midst of being bamboozled. I have stayed away from the board for quite some time now because I got tired of all the bashers. I thought, the racetrack deal is imminent back in May (or earlier, can't remember exactly). The strock price was up and I was confident this would explode very soon...
What a difference a few months makes...we are now pushing the 52-week low and all I see week after week is the same banter about the track. I have owned stock in this company since it was 22 cents a share (not as bad a loss as some) and had confidence that we were moving in the right direction, but it always seems to be the same story, first it was multiple casinos, next it was kiosk online gaming, then is was slot parlors, then it was the possibility of getting into the DR lottery, now it is the horse racing track.......will it be a streaming casino satellite feed to remote regions of the Amazon (where gaming is about to EXPLODE!!) next??
I have too many shares to post this big of a loss and sell as I'm confident that the next round of suckers will come along and pump the price high enough for me to break even, but at this point I am ashamed that I ever fell for the BS that is being spewed by CGAQ.
I will add one more thought...I can be swayed back to the dark side if we EVER get any PRs with some meat in them and not just fluff, fluff, fluff!!!
Roberto, any chance of providing a link to the stated interview? Wouldn't mind at least taking a look even though my Spanish is horrible!
I don't understand this:
I'm bullish, would consider adding more if I felt it was what was best for my portfolio.
I don't completely disagree with that, but I think status updates help with keeping interest and discussion at a higher level. The PPS will only move with concrete/factual deal completions.