Yes, he pretty much was. You?

Arch?

Can you say "liars and thieves"?

DG - With all of his big pharma contacts and expertise in getting funding, he was supposed to be the saviour. With his hiring, Tony would be free to concentrate on what he's good at...or not. They did nothing before Gabriel, and even less after Gabriel. There is no CEO in the world who could save this company, even if you could find one willing to try.

No Tony, no Hector, no Dick. At least they still have Sarah?

That does not predicate an industrial park as being
3rd rate, now does that?....truly?....
Unless a hurrican just hit... yes....truly.

sd3445 - How much is someone going to offer for a receptionist that only knows how to say "We're still looking for financing", a phony lab worker, a broken instrument, and a fallen-down sign?

That must have been where Tony and Hector were - the second office - working behind the scenes. Dreaming up the next big lie.

dgplexus - If your investment in DNAG is indicative of your "established investment strategies", you are in deep trouble.
I guess the best way to cut costs is to shut down operations, which DNAG appears to have done. Let's see how long Sarah gets away with the "just a few weeks" thing. As Porgie said, if you have one income stream, and a broken instrument is preventing you from that one source of income, it does not make sense to let that linger for an indefinite period.
Good luck, as you will need lots of it.

Porgie, this is not a serious stock, and therefore does not require serious discussion.

Something about a 3-way partnership with IBM and the Mayo Clinic.

Not to mention selling their product and then not delivering.

I doubt that current and former stockholders would agree that DNAG has a "stellar reputation". Thanks for the laugh though.

dg - that could be because there is no evidence that DNAG had anything to do with this case. Furthermore, if DNAG did have something to do with it, don't you think it would be publicized by them?

PL1 - We have a difference of opinion. You say the people that have remained positive about DNAG should be commended. I say they should be committed.

PL1 - I don't think anybody here disputes the potential value of personalized medicine. The question is whether or not DNAG is a bonafide player in the field. Most objective observers have concluded that it is NOT. For proof of this, please see PPS.

Time to give thanks: I'm thankful that I sold this POS while it was still worth something. Not much, mind you, but something.

Sam - No you may not be so presumptive. But thanks for posting that 13-month old article. Got me all excited about the prospects for DNAG.

The old familiar line about the relationship between "bashers" and the coming of something BIG. Gee, where have we heard that one before? Sorry, Sam, but the only scammers are the ones trying to convince everyone that DNAG is a viable company. Oh, and of course, DNAG themselves.

altarboy - Difficult environment for a start up company? It's been 10 fricken years! I don't think that qualifies DNAG as a start up company.

dg - Apparently without your email, they will forget to register again next year. Try to be more timely with your email reminders in future. Thanks.

Darn, I was ready to load up tomorrow based on dg's "good news"

Bad Math:
Most of you probably caught this already, but I wanted to correct my math for those of you who bought pre-reverse split.
I said that a half-penny today is really 25/100ths of a penny prior to the split. Not enough zeroes. It is 25/1000ths of a penny, or 1/40th. Did not want to leave the impression that you were doing better than you actually are. Go DNAG.

So it sounds like you agree that this company has been badly mis-managed, has nothing going for it, and deserves to be a half a penny. Thank you. Have a great weekend yourself.

PL1 - Then maybe you can enlighten this board as to why this great company with so many wonderful things going on can't seem to get it's share price over a half-penny? Of course, most here bought prior to the reverse split, so in reality, that price is 1/20th of a half-penny - I believe that is 25/100ths of a penny. Surely you can explain this with all of the DNAG knowledge that you've been able to retain?

If that's true, he's even nuttier than I thought.

Yes, but there is a difference between an insider that may have some knowledge about the company and an over-enthusiastic investor that knows nothing.

mbmun - I didn't click on the link. Is it a book about how to avoid scams?

mbmun - No, I'm not bitter. Nobody forced me to invest in this scam. How's DNAG doing for you?

Hmmm, let's see: 2,026,550 x .0004 = 810.62. Does it really matter, mbmun?

Hold on, FastEddie. Fortune 500 here we come. Tony Baloney said so.

dgplexus - help me out here, as I'm trying to figure out the investor sentiment on this stock. Were the 2500 shares traded today buys or sells? I view the answer to this as significant.
Thanks.

dgplexus - The reason the stock goes down "even after good news", is that people have finally smartened up. There is no good news. What sounds like good news is actually no news at all. They've been announcing "partnerships" for years. Investors used to believe these "partnerships" would result in something. Guess what? They never did. When the buzz about one partnership that never went anywhere died down, they would announce another partnership. The cheerleaders would get excited, the stock would bump up for a day or two before going back down to previous levels, and nothing would ever come of the new partnership. It's all been done and seen before, and most people (obviously not all) have wised up by now.

Cancel it while you still can!

stockboy - "they have never had a thing". Wrong - they had 640 million things (shares, that is). Other than that, you are correct.

uccaducca - If I had any shares left, I would sell them to you at .0001, and feel like I ripped you off.

PL1, I saw the handwriting on the wall a few years ago, so got out in time to salvage something. For some reason, entertainment value I guess, I still come by here to read the posts from time to time.
My comments about Tony are purely based on his performance vs. his public statements. There was never any correlation between the two. Nobody can be that incompetent, can they?

PL1, It's not "speculation, rumor, and innuendos" that people have lost their a$$ on this stock. People here have the right to be upset with Tony, and his talk about being a Fortune 500 company (read on when you have stopped laughing, or crying, whichever is the case), never once completing a project at all, let alone on time. Not to mention his infamous "eat your vegetables" line.
The only thing he had a heart and passion for was for bilking shareholders out of their money, otherwise he wouldn't have been such an abject failure in this enterprise.

lizm67 - My heart goes out to them!

mbmun - Call me crazy, but Hillary Clinton has a better chance of being our next president than DNAG has of getting financing.
Dick's last and best financing alternative is to play the lottery.