Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It was my understanding that the judge that ordered the receiver to wrap up the bussiness affairs of CLYW had wroked for the same law firm as the receiver. I thought the smell of fish was in the room at the time and stated such on this board. CLYW was at the time of confusion a publickly traded company where shairholders were crying out for legal help from the sec, and none ever came. Funny how the government can make regulations to safegard the public, but when they cry for help, there;s no one there! If this receiver cannot conduct the business ordered by a judge, then who is liable????? I say the judge is now responsible to us the bag holders!!
Testing Testing!!! any bag holders still looking at this message board?? Can someone give a clue as to the dealings with the judge in "MERRY LAND" is going to do since his receiver has had his hands tied??
I guess I have to agree with you on Dave's con job. also why is he not still going after this? truth is , there seem to be no law that will protect 7us shareholders from the likes of the judges and receivers in cases like this!! Shame on us for being investors in a system we once believed in
The remaining problem is not with the past here at all!!! It's with the receiver not following through with the orders given in the Maryland court, and nothing has been done!! How legal is that?? At some point, he has to be heald accountable to us the remaining shareholders, but this must come to an end!!
sounds like anything you know???
I would think that since TM claimed, and won, in court the fact that they were not infringing, Its a free for all on CLYW's 923 and TM can't say a word about it! Receiver isn't saying anything either. But as it stands, we are all still in limbo!! Go figure! My question remains, what is the Judge that ordered the Receiver on this case saying??? How long has it been now???
Yes!! I'd say his people got together with TM's people, they all got together with the last judge and figured out how to retire comfortably in a quiet kind of way, and a deal was made!! We in turn got to catch the bag!! But I have said this all along, haven't I?? Now it's up to the receiver!! and he's keeping his mouth shut!!
SH I still have a small amount of shares 24K I believe is all that's left. I can also be reached at ecd_45 @ icloud.com There has to be a way to finalize this issue
This is true!! we all still own the company!! How would DD deal with that?
I believe you may just have hit the nail directly on the head!! not sure but Sir H's suggestion on the Google deal may just be the digger in T M's side that we been looking for. That is, unless TM pays a buyer off as I am sure they did with the Texas judge. It has long been my opinion that they bribed everyone and anyone involved in this case. That being said, I think you have a real point!! after all, what can TM say?? hey!! that's my stuff that I stole from CLYW!!!!!!
Maybe some how the receiver is waiting us out?? thinking if he does nothing, we will all just go away?? seems to me that's the thinking going on here, because this fellow has not made a peep since he took control of this company's affairs!! I am a little more interested in the judge that gave him his legal orders!! That's the fellow I'd like to have a little chat with.
There is still a final song that needs be sung, and the receiver needs to be the man on the stage when the curtain goes up. A court of law issued that order, and there must be a final say.
AS I have said here many times!! I believe that judges in this case were making preparations for their retirement, and TM came along and fulfilled their dreams!! Diac did not want to, and so the story goes! Is this really the American way?? Yes It is!!and the receiver, along with the rest of us is left holding the bag, even though his buddy the judge tried to hook him up with a case he thought TM would loose. Could I be wrong???
Litton I hear you, but as I said before, We do need to hear something!! Even if it's a timetable to wrap it up!! but some word, Even if the judge were to say tough luck! at least we could close this book.
At this point, I am not really into winners or losers as I am in seeing a final conclusion to the mess we got ourselves in. In this country, I fully expect to see a court of law follow through on any matter before it. Yes, I know we have lost a lot of money collectively, on our belief in this patent, But I have a hard time figuring why in hell it would take three years after an appellate court ruling, for this to be finalized.
I'd also like to see how the Delaware Court of Chancery close out this one in print. As I remember, the receiver's firm with the responsibility for finalizing Calypso's case was where the judge worked?? Or was a partner?? Somehow I don't see him handing them a dead fish! How much more time before the receiver must speak?
Will be here till the end what or when ever that is. Just seems that since the court is involved in this mess, that there would be a conclusion of some kind, Something in print!! A statement by the SEC!! anything!! A judge!! the receiver!! Are we still in America?????
When exactly will this 3 year process run out, If there is anyone out there that know the answer? I am still holding to my point of years ago that some big money must have traded hands from T Mobile and it had t9o be in the hands of the judges. We are just the suckers that took the hit
The bothersome thing that I see here is that the receiver is obligated to carry out the court's instructions, and a of now we the shareholders have not been prive to his findings. So where do we go from here?? Maybe the judge is also asleep at the wheel!!
Litton51 I would think that since he was ordered by the court to perform a certain duty, he should at least state his final findings, regardless what they were. There has to be closure somewhere in this issue. Are you saying that he is just walking away from this?? No statement? Then I would think the court owes shareholders something! don't you?
Question is WHO?? Seems to me,there is no one working on anything, including the receiver ordered to do so by the court. Is there someone here with information on how to contact the court to question the receivers actions?? and can they do so in the interest of all here?
Here is to hope!! and I hope you are right!! also , good to see SirH's face come in the door!! been a while. Wish I really know what the judges orders were to the receiver regarding information to shareholders. I'd feel a lot better right now.
Still no word!! WooHA!!
Maybe we need to talk to the court that gave the receiver his orders?? Just saying
Good point!! seems everyone has done that, except us common shareholders.
If the receiver's responsibility is to maximize shareholders value
Why haven't we heard anything from this fellow?? hello out there !! say something!!
Not going to hold my breath!!
Was hoping that someone here would make a guess or state for fact when we may hear something from the receiver? I would think by now he would have made a decision on what his next moves were in regards to shareholder value. The ball is now fully in his court, however, what can he do to maximize our value, if the judges claim there was no infringements?? Anyone?? Is 923 worth the paper it's written on??
Maybe it was not just TM paying off the judges in CLYW's court cases, Maybe I was right all along in my theory that these judges were all on the take!!
Regardless of all this, it seems no one is willing to take a stab at when the receiver will begin his song. It's pointless to try selling 923 at this time because the applet court just ruled it useless. So then, How does he maximize shareholders value?? Seems a big how ha?? Anyone care to take a crack at this??
At this point< What or when will the receiver speak?? Anyone?
Well , One more thing I must say here! Over the yeas I believed I have read postings from some brilliant minds, and some of which had improved their legal knowledge just through researching bad doings that happened here with CLYW. I still believe these postings can make a good book on what can happen in this market place. And I think it's an insult by the court, to all who contributed their brilliance to this board over the years. Yes!! This stinks!! Maybe TM's money reaches further than we think.
Started buying this stock back in 2003 I believe, and am holding one hell of a bag at this moment. Seems a slap in the face by the court not to publish their findings, But then again , that's the Law for ya!! Sometimes I think these guys make it up as they go. There is still the fat lady in form of an appointed receiver we must hear from, and at this point I will never recover enough in write off at tax time because I too damned old now!! LOL!! $3,000.00 at a time just won't cut it! Good luck to us all when the fat fellow sings. And I am wishing us all LONGGGGG lives!!
Just remember if we take down a loud falling giant, that noise will awaken all other infringers, and we know there are many. So then!! what do we do from there? I'd say that we shake all the trees, and pick up all the falling fruit!
My takeaway is Calypso has a very good shot at reversal.
Question is, If there is a reversal, does it go back before the same judge for a jury trial??
Like I said many times here, there seem to be some pocket lining going on with this judge. Maybe he needs a new house in the Hamptons and just found a way to pay for it??
Sir H I fully understand that point , but bear in mind that I have never attacked anyone here but I have gotten pretty straight to a point in a question format about the company. For instance. I questioned someone's opinion on why they were so heavily critical of a board member at CLYW, and got hammered by a moderator. ...... That post was all about Calypso!!
This was strictly about baseball and had nothing to do with CLYW, and that was my point. Rules must be for all!! not some!
Off my soap box!
Island dweller I am also an Island dweller , and am in full agreement with you on this. I also believe that some of the better tech minds like HR can pull this off to the news Media.
Wish us luck!!
HR, In believe you need to talk to Calypso's lawyers!! Ya think??