Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
LOL - Yes, I see who the posters are! Keep reading, Matt!
Star
Brig's married? I don't remember that - or at least I never thought so. Oh my, I need to have a talk with that girl! LOL
Star
Rawnoc: I can't respond to your PM any other way than with a public post.
First of all, I am neither senile nor a genius. Were you not taught respect or is abrasiveness just your style?
Secondly, I refer you to post # 11718. I would also refer you to post # 11722 but somebody with more wisdom than you had the decency to delete it.
Now if you're going to hang out here behave and play nice.
Starshine
About a month ago I went thru the process of taking all my money out of Citibank. I don't know if they are one of your big three but they are one of mine.
Star
Whoa! Brig! How the heck are ya? Long time no see. What brings you around?
Sure have missed partaking of your well-delivered insight! Believe it or not - you were the first person I thought of when I heard Mr. O wants to close Gitmo and give terrorists rights. I'm sure you have strong opinions on a lot of what is going down about now.
Hope this finds you well and in old form
Star
I found this on Bloomberg yesterday. It's health care reforms being sneaked thru under the radar as part of the stimulus bill. Read it - it will make your blood run cold - especially for the seniors (us?)
Ruin Your Health With the Obama Stimulus Plan: Betsy McCaughey
Commentary by Betsy McCaughey
Feb. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Republican Senators are questioning whether
President Barack Obama's stimulus bill contains the right mix of tax
breaks and cash infusions to jump-start the economy.
Tragically, no one from either party is objecting to the health
provisions slipped in without discussion. These provisions reflect
the handiwork of Tom Daschle, until recently the nominee to head the
Health and Human Services Department.
Senators should read these provisions and vote against them because
they are dangerous to your health. (Page numbers refer to H.R. 1 EH,
pdf version).
The bill's health rules will affect "every individual in the United
States" (445, 454, 479). Your medical treatments will be tracked
electronically by a federal system. Having electronic medical records
at your fingertips, easily transferred to a hospital, is beneficial.
It will help avoid duplicate tests and errors.
But the bill goes further. One new bureaucracy, the National
Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments
to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems
appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs
and "guide" your doctor's decisions (442, 446). These provisions in
the stimulus bill are virtually identical to what Daschle prescribed
in his 2008 book, "Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care
Crisis." According to Daschle, doctors have to give up autonomy
and "learn to operate less like solo practitioners."
Keeping doctors informed of the newest medical findings is important,
but enforcing uniformity goes too far.
New Penalties
Hospitals and doctors that are not "meaningful users" of the new
system will face penalties. "Meaningful user" isn't defined in the
bill. That will be left to the HHS secretary, who will be empowered
to impose "more stringent measures of meaningful use over time" (511,
518, 540-541)
What penalties will deter your doctor from going beyond the
electronically delivered protocols when your condition is atypical or
you need an experimental treatment? The vagueness is intentional. In
his book, Daschle proposed an appointed body with vast powers to make
the "tough" decisions elected politicians won't make.
The stimulus bill does that, and calls it the Federal Coordinating
Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (190-192). The goal,
Daschle's book explained, is to slow the development and use of new
medications and technologies because they are driving up costs. He
praises Europeans for being more willing to accept "hopeless
diagnoses" and "forgo experimental treatments," and he chastises
Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system.
Elderly Hardest Hit
Daschle says health-care reform "will not be pain free." Seniors
should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead
of treating them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt.
Medicare now pays for treatments deemed safe and effective. The
stimulus bill would change that and apply a cost- effectiveness
standard set by the Federal Council (464).
The Federal Council is modeled after a U.K. board discussed in
Daschle's book. This board approves or rejects treatments using a
formula that divides the cost of the treatment by the number of years
the patient is likely to benefit. Treatments for younger patients are
more often approved than treatments for diseases that affect the
elderly, such as osteoporosis.
In 2006, a U.K. health board decreed that elderly patients with
macular degeneration had to wait until they went blind in one eye
before they could get a costly new drug to save the other eye. It
took almost three years of public protests before the board reversed
its decision.
Hidden Provisions
If the Obama administration's economic stimulus bill passes the
Senate in its current form, seniors in the U.S. will face similar
rationing. Defenders of the system say that individuals benefit in
younger years and sacrifice later.
The stimulus bill will affect every part of health care, from medical
and nursing education, to how patients are treated and how much
hospitals get paid. The bill allocates more funding for this
bureaucracy than for the Army, Navy, Marines, and Air Force combined
(90-92, 174-177, 181).
Hiding health legislation in a stimulus bill is intentional. Daschle
supported the Clinton administration's health-care overhaul in 1994,
and attributed its failure to debate and delay. A year ago, Daschle
wrote that the next president should act quickly before critics mount
an opposition. "If that means attaching a health-care plan to the
federal budget, so be it," he said. "The issue is too important to be
stalled by Senate protocol."
More Scrutiny Needed
On Friday, President Obama called it "inexcusable and irresponsible"
for senators to delay passing the stimulus bill. In truth, this bill
needs more scrutiny.
The health-care industry is the largest employer in the U.S. It
produces almost 17 percent of the nation's gross domestic product.
Yet the bill treats health care the way European governments do: as a
cost problem instead of a growth industry. Imagine limiting growth
and innovation in the electronics or auto industry during this
downturn. This stimulus is dangerous to your health and the economy.
(Betsy McCaughey is former lieutenant governor of New York and is an
adjunct senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. The opinions expressed
are her own.)
To contact the writer of this column: Betsy McCaughey at
Betsymross@...
Last Updated: February 9, 2009 00:01 EST
Gold back up to 940's. Gold stocks (AGU, SLW, KGC, DROOY) all looking good today. Guess everyone's finally starting to realize that the country is going to hell in a handbasket and gold looks like a safe haven. No "stimulus" bill in this world is going to help us.
Star
Good Morning Pappy: So go back a few posts and read the personal attacks and foul language used by him against MSGI and Sixty-three. Delete all of his posts and he'll get the meessage we don't want him or his picks on this board.
Star
MSGI: Don't waste your time with this guy. Anybody with half a brain would never believe anyone that said he made over $600,000 on a stock. Put him on ignore - he says nothing worthwhile anyhow.
Star
Oh, perish the thought!!!!!!!
Star
Cripes! Spoken like a true Democrat! Sixty-three's post made more sense! I'm looking for more out of you!
Star
Pappy: Uh, hey - You're the Moderator, right? Time to do your job (See previous post)
Star
Sorry, MSGI. I thought maybe I had another sparring partner! But welcome to my side of the fence. Some days I feel like the Maytag repair man.
You are very right about perception. But then I blame the media for that. If you listen to someone tell you day after day that your are ugly, you start to say "I am ugly". Ergo Bush.
I think what I dislike the most is SHEEPLE - people who can't/won't think for themselves and are led around like sheep. They believe everything the media says because it's easier that way.
Star
So now I've got 2 Dems to fight with - LOL
I really don't care who cleans up this country. I don't care if it's Mickey Mouse - just as long as someone does it.
I don't deny his intelligence. Here's what bothers me. First, Mr. O is a pathological narcissist. He likes being the Messiah because IT'S ALL ABOUT HIM. And pride goeth before a fall.
Second, Big Government is NOT the answer. We're halfway down the road to Socialism now and he's going to get us the rest of the way. He's Robin Hood, right?
I was to be part of a discussion group the other night and the topic was: What should the Eleventh Commandment be? I asked my husband what he thought. Immediately out of his mouth came "Thou Shalt Not Be A Democrat". Enuf said.
Star
OK, you old Democrat you. The market sure as hell didn't have a historic first day!
And further more, what makes you think that Bush even knows enough about economics to be held responsible for failed policies? I'm all for blaming everybody from the Wall St Good Ole Boyz Clubs to the mortgage lenders to the average Joe who spends more than he makes and buys everything on credit.
Go back and research how this all started. Start with Jimmy Carter in 1971 who signed the Community Reinvestment Act into law. Now fast forward to Bill Clinton who strengthened the law by instituting quotas due to pressure from "Community Organizers" - aka Mr. Obama and ACORN. Now go to Oct. '08 when 2 bills were introduced into House committee. One was to repeal the CRA and one was to abolish Fannie & Freddie. Powerful Dems - Mr. Dodd and Mr. Frank - didn't want the bills to come up for vote so they allowed them to die in committee.
Now 'splain to me, Ricky, why, if we have 44 Presidents, only 16 of them were Dems?
Star
I forgot to mention yesterday that my fave gold/silver plays are KGC, AUY, SLW, & HL.
Here's news today on KGC - up about 1.24 USD pre-mkt:
Kinross Gold Corp. (KGC, C$20.28, -C$1.48, -6.8%) said 2009 output should total about 2.4 million to 2.5 million gold equivalent ounces, up about 32% from 2008. It also expects to record a goodwill-impairment charge in the range of $900 million to $1.2 billion at year-end, mainly related to the 2007 Bema acquisition.
Star
OK, I'll start. Here's what I'm thinking of doing for 2009:
Making some plays on Mr. O's presidency:
1. gold & silver have always been in my portfolio and I think they're more important than ever right now since Mr. O sent out engraved invitations for a terrorist attack to test him. Or maybe Iran or Israel will push the red button. But in any calamity the metals always go up since people go to safe havens.
2. Mr. O plans to "change" our dependence on foreign oil. I'm looking to do some alternative energy things. I'm looking at PowerShares Wilder-Hill Clean Energy Portfolio ETF (PBW). I'm also looking at New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). It is a socially responsible fund (not that I give a chit about social responsibility). Both of them invest in ALL areas of alternative energy. NALFX just doesn't invest in oil & coal.
3. But I still like oil & coal. I like RIG for oil exploration in the mid to low 40's. And I like JRCC (coal) with just a little more pullback.
4. Mr. O plans on developing the infrastructure so I think Deere (DE) would be a good long term play and pays a Div. I also think heavy equipment mfgs like JLG may be good.
IF he makes all the "changes" he "promised" then these may be worthwhile. If not, not - they all just go the way of everything else I have - DOWN. I'm not committed to any of this yet -I'm still cogitating.
Star
Hey old man - I'd give ya a dollar but you'd only spend it on booze!
Star
mg - Hey, nice to hear from you. There's only a handful of us left and someone posts about once every 3 months!
The mkt has turned into wet cat crap as Pappy would say. None of us got away unscathed. It's the biggest con job in town!
Are you on any other boards? I read this one but post infrequently - nothing left to say - except OUCH!
Take care and come back to visit. I think we all miss the old days.
Regards,
Star
FRP Dividend Play:
FRP will pay a dividend of 0.2575/share on 01-16-09 for shareholders of record on 12-31-08. At the current price of the stock, the dividend yield is 32.6%. Not too shabby.
Star
You both are making me nuts! I told somebody 4800 - wait till I them this!
Star
I Can Hardly Wait:
Gerald Celente
The man who predicted the 1987 stock market crash and the fall of the Soviet
Union is now forecasting revolution in America, food riots and tax
rebellions - all within four years, while cautioning that putting food on
the table will be a more pressing concern than buying Christmas gifts by
2012.
Gerald Celente, the CEO of <http://www.trendsresearch.com/> Trends Research
Institute, is renowned for his accuracy in predicting future world and
economic events, which will send a chill down your spine considering what he
told Fox News this week.
Celente says that by 2012 America will become an undeveloped nation, that
there will be a revolution marked by food riots, squatter rebellions, tax
revolts and job marches, and that holidays will be more about obtaining
food, not gifts.
"We're going to see the end of the retail Christmas..we're going to see a
fundamental shift take place..putting food on the table is going to be more
important that putting gifts under the Christmas tree," said Celente, adding
that the situation would be "worse than the great depression".
"America's going to go through a transition the likes of which no one is
prepared for," said Celente, noting that people's refusal to acknowledge
that America was even in a recession highlights how big a problem denial is
in being ready for the true scale of the crisis.
I'm wondering if that is such a bad thing - being taken private. As long as it isn't the government - domestic or foreign - taking them private. Maybe big business being run by a consortium would work out better.
And to answer your question: NO, Harvard MBA's couldn't run a corner store. First of all if the store is on the corner where would their office be? And second, who would pay their year end bonus and/or golden parachutes?
This is one mell of a hess!
Star
Geez! Am I prescient or what? - LOL.
And this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Star
Yep! I agree with you totally. I'm all for sending kids to school 11 months of the year with 2 weeks off at Christmas and 2 weeks off in June. But, ya know something? I don't even think that will help. Why? Because schools pushed kids thru and those kids became teachers with less knowledge. Then they taught kids who became teachers with even less knowledge. It's like dumb and dumber.
As for the Fed causing our problems - you bet they did! It's amazing how they're pointing the finger now at Greenspan and saying it's his fault. Well, maybe it is but Ben ain't no savior either.
Here's something to think about:
(again read the date)
"Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are US government institutions. They are not - They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the US for the benefit of themselves and their foreign and domestic swindlers and rich and predatory money lenders. The sack of the US by the Fed is the greatest crime in history. Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers, but the truth is the Fed has usurped the government. It controls everything here and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks government at will."
Congressman Charles McFadden
Chairman, House Banking and Currency Committee
June 10, 1932
Pappy:
Your dire prediction of reverse stock splits becoming the norm may not be too far off base.
We all know of many stocks that traded in the teens and 20's and now are trading barely above a dollar. Soon the Nasdaq rule of maintaing a $1 bid for 30 days will come into play. If delisting starts to occur then we all know that reverse splits aren't too far off.
There are just as many stocks that were trading in the 50's and 60's just 5 short months ago and are now barely over 5. How long till they fall to barely over one and the senario starts all over again.
No one ever recovers from a reverse split - just ask me.
Star
Please note the date at the top of this article.
Star
NO WAY OUT: A 50% DOLLAR DEVALUATION
by Robert McHugh, Ph.D.
January 14, 2007
Artificial Economics, the brainchild of the Master Planners, has
focused on building an economy where debt — not income — pays for
goods and services. The emphasis upon debt instead of income via
hyper-inflating the money supply in stealth fashion, has destroyed the
dreams of millions of Americans. Artificial Economics is a silent
economic disease. A coming significant devaluation of the dollar is a
likely and necessary consequence.
The use of hyper-inflated money supply to postpone a recession over
recent years has served to create an imbalance between income and
assets. Debt covered the gap for a while, but now debt is extreme,
with a limited useful life. With high paying jobs being exported, and
a limit to what is essentially slave labor from illegal immigrants,
future productivity gains which translate into income are almost
entirely technology dependent. If technology fails us, then the
debt-to-income imbalance, then the asset-to-income imbalance must be
reckoned with. Undoubtedly, that reckoning will either be a nasty
recession/depression — where asset values drop below debt levels,
leaving us with an imbalance between both assets and debt, and income
and debt — or a significant and sudden devaluation of the dollar.
What is accomplished by a significant and sudden dollar devaluation?
It is a way to pay off debt with suddenly-more-available dollars;
cheaper dollars. We have been witnessing a slow meticulous devaluation
of the dollar over the past two decades, with an acceleration over the
past decade. This has come from an increase in the money supply via
the credit creation route — debt. But that has served to replace
income, and postpone a recession, at the great cost of hyperinflation
of real estate, related taxes, and just about everything you buy. The
result is debt. Once the debt creation train stops, then there will be
no way to pay for things; no way to pay off that debt. There will soon
be a point of no return, with an inevitable sudden and significant
dollar devaluation as the only solution. It would require the Treasury
printing an amount of money equal to the current entire money supply,
more than 11 trillion dollars, and literally handing it out to each
household so that the broadest spectrum of people have the ability to
payoff their debt. Debt does not rise in value as the dollar devalues.
It is a contracted amount in former-dollar-value, notional terms.
Thus, if we suddenly hand several hundred thousand dollars to each and
every household, a dollar will become worth 50 cents in real terms,
but in debt terms, it will still be worth a dollar, and folks will
have more of them.
Dollar devaluation would require mandated cost-of-living wage
increases, but also would require issuance of a brand new currency.
Call it the liberty instead of the dollar. If you tied the liberty to
gold, the U.S. currency could keep its world reserve status and
survive the dollar devaluation tsunami. It would require a liberty to
be worth the equivalent of two dollars, where there was only one
dollar in circulation before the fifty percent devaluation event. A
gold-backed liberty would stabilize inflation, and bring monetary
stabilization back, but in a new economic order where debt is
substantially reduced, both private and government. Government debt
would be reduced as folks are required to pay taxes on the
dollar-devaluing household-handout. Of course, this means Gold would
have a bright future. I don't see any other way out. Thank Artificial
Economics for this — the economics practiced for the past decade in
this nation that wasn't mentioned in your child's college economics
textbook.
The Fed is sending out hints that it isn't planning to drop interest
rates any time soon. Chicago Fed chief Michael Moskow stated this week
that inflation risks were his major worry. He oughtta know, the Fed is
causing inflation, which is why it hid M-3. Fed Vice Chair Donald Kohn
said, "There is no guarantee that core inflation will continue to
ease." Chairman Bernanke felt the need this week to address the Fed's
role in crises, citing the benefits of the Fed's regulatory
supervisory role. They know the problem, are likely in denial, but
inevitably, the "buck stops here" decision must be made — devalue the
dollar in half. We believe that decision, if it hasn't been made
already, will be.
M-3 remains hidden by the Fed, so that We the People can't know what
the Federal Reserve is up to. Where's the transparency Ben? Check out
this monster in the chart above — It tells you all you need to know
about what the Fed has been doing with M-3.
First of all, let's examine the pattern. It is a Head and Shoulders
top. These patterns are highly reliable. It is not yet a "confirmed"
pattern, meaning until prices drop below the neckline decisively, say
below 80.00 to 77.00 or so, the probability of the minimum target of
40.00ish being hit is not as great. However, should we see the Dollar
drop down to 77.00ish, we are in a high risk situation of a
devaluation of the dollar all the way down to 40.00. Not all at once,
but over the course of several years. Perhaps all at once, should the
government elect to flat-out issue an edict that a dollar is now worth
50 cents. Would they? Maybe. Why? Again, it is a way to repudiate half
of all the debt in the United States. Why would they want to do that?
Perhaps if a recession became a depression, or the risk thereof.
Perhaps if housing was to absolutely dive into the tank. It would be a
way to relieve mortgage holders of a huge chunk of their obligations
in lieu of mass foreclosures.
The pattern is ominous as far as its size, its timeframe, and as far
as its downside implications. This pattern is textbook. No flaws. In
fact it carries a rare added textbook feature of a weaker right
shoulder than left. That is not good. This is right in line with the
Fed's decision to hide M-3, enabling them to hyper-inflate the economy
with too much money for secret purposes (The Working Group's minutes
are secret, their market buying intervention activities are secret,
the quantity of M-3 being created is secret). Any auditor worth his
salt will tell you that secrecy breeds mischief, often with dire
consequences. The founding fathers established accountability in our
constitution, and the Federal Reserve and the Working Group (a.k.a.
Plunge Protection Team) are managing M-3 in violation of that spirit.
That's in theory only. Reality says we've all become 10 years OLDER - isn't that grand?
Star
Still liking gold, fertilizers and some energy. Oil maybe? Coal maybe? - altho it was said coal will be "bankrupted" by the new administration.
KGC in particular is a great trader in the gold arena. I sold this AM - one point too soon.
Star
Bro - You and I agreed to disagree long ago on the subject of politics.
63 said something that I have said for a long time - Dubya will be vindicated. But by the time that happens, Mr. O will have taken this country to the point of no return.
If you have nothing to do someday, research pathological narcissism. It's an eye-opener.
Now I'm going to do what an "African-American" said to me: "Your white ass is gonna fix it so I don't have to work". Guess that means I better get busy making money!
Ms. Shine
Seems like your thoughts on the next drop coincide with the "international crisis" that will be visited upon us due to the engraved invitations that our new VP Biden sent out.
Interesting
Star
Mr. Designer,
It sure was good to hear from you again. I have thought about you and wondered where you got to.
How I feel about what is happening right now would take more words than any of us have time to read. Suffice it to say that not only is it the end of capitalism but it also will be the end of the republic. We are surely moving toward a socialist state if not already almost there.
The outcome of this election has my husband and I considering leaving the country and moving to either Australia or New Zealand. Both are democracies and English is the spoken language. There are some very serious things for us to consider so it probably won't happen.
What amazes me is that people aren't more informed about the candidate and shocked by what they learn. Sometimes I feel like I'm living among a bunch of aliens from outer space. But then, they are just "sheeple" so I can't expect more. I finally gave up and stopped discussing it with people. I have no patience for stupidity.
As far as your re-affirmation of your faith, good for you. I never had much to start with so there isn't anything there to re-affirm. But along those lines I am recommending to you 5 books by Joel Rosenberg. They are basically a continuing story so you MUST read them in order. Of all people, you will be able to appreciate them and appreciate where the world might possibly be heading.
Well, it's 9:40 and I missed the open. I can't wait to see how much more I've lost today!
Be well, Chris, and come back soon.
Ms. Star
Yeah, Paul Newman was a good guy. He'll be missed. I love his food.
You can't really believe that photo of Sarah wasn't photo-shopped.
The rest is all BS
Star
My opinion: Most ALL of the banks are ready to go belly-up and "someone" knows this, so they are doling them out to us one at a time. Once the govt "bails out" (read "controls") the banks, then we will move on to the next industry (airlines?). Everything that happens is moving us one step closer to Socialism.
Quote: "The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But, under the name of "Liberalism", they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened." - Norman Thomas, for many years the U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate.
Need I say more?
Star
Hi Pappy & MSGI
Yes, I'm here. There isn't enough time or words to write how I actually feel right now. I'm pissed, disillusioned, untrustful, raped, scared, poorer - the list could go on and on.
But what to do? We are powerless to do anything and that is a really bad feeling.
I agree with you, Pappy. Let them all go under. AND put every last one of them in jail. We should bail out the crooks and pay the bill, too?!?!
I have written daily e-mails to anybody in Washington that may listen. I have threatened my Congressmen with my vote and their jobs. And the jackasses still can't reach an agreement.
My portfolio is overweighted in gold, silver and oil. Right now it looks like crap. But I think down the road it will pay off. That is if TD Ameritrade and my banks don't go under first. Maybe I should be buying gold coins.
So here I sit feeling like a pawn and I'm mad as hell!
Star
Tradable bottom? Do I remember long ago 63 said we'll have an 18 year bear mkt? I don't have that much time left!
Star
Hey MSGI - How ya doing? Yep, Sun Cruz - been there, done that, too.
The first 7 months of the year I was having a grand old time with commodities - oil, gas, gold, silver, fertilizer. Another board I belong to has a year long contest. You pick 10 stocks on Jan. 01 and can't change them all year. The winner gets picked on Dec 31. I was in first place all the way thru July, then the plug got pulled on commodities. So now I'm sitting here licking my wounds.
I'm waiting on Congress to ok off shore drilling, Israel to bomb Iran and Iran to close the Strait of Hormuz. Then we have the election coming up.........
Enuf said. Take care
Star
Hey You - I'm here. I read the posts every day but am keeping a low profile - nothing worth responding to in any event - except when 63 stops by and that's not often enough.
Yeah, I'm at the casino - the stock market casino!!! The Nasdaq & NYSE one-armed bandits are robbing me blind!!! What's the old adage? - "I should've gotten kissed first"
Regards to all (if anyone's left that is)
Star
FWIW: When I belonged to another board, there was a member who was a chartist unlike any other I have seen. He was able to predict dead-on accurately what was going to happen in mkt trends. Last year he said that 2008 was going to be the start of an 18 YEAR bear market. So - how low is that valley?
Star
Hill International to Move Listing to the New York Stock Exchange; New Ticker Symbol to be ``HIL'
8:30:07 AMMARLTON, N.J., Feb 11, 2008 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Hill International (HINT), the global leader in managing construction risk, announced today that it has received approval to list its common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Hill anticipates that shares of its common stock will begin trading on the NYSE on February 22, 2008, under the ticker symbol "HIL". Until that time, Hill will continue to trade on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol "HINT".
In addition, Irvin E. Richter, Hill's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and David L. Richter, Hill's President and Chief Operating Officer, are scheduled to ring the NYSE Opening Bell that same morning,Friday, February 22, 2008, at 9:30 am ET.
"Moving to the New York Stock Exchange is a major milestone for our company," said Irv Richter. "We expect that trading on the NYSE will elevate our company's standing within our industry and the business community in general, as well as our visibility among the investment community," Richter added.
"We look forward to Hill International joining our family of listed companies," said Duncan L. Niederauer, Chief Executive Officer of NYSE Euronext. "By choosing to list on the New York Stock Exchange, the world's largest and most liquid equities market, Hill and the company's shareholders will benefit from our superior market quality as well as our global reach and brand leadership," added Niederauer.
Hill International, with 1,600 employees in 70 offices worldwide, provides program management, project management, construction management, and construction claims services. Engineering News-Record magazine recently ranked Hill as the 10th largest construction management firm in the United States.