Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I fully agree and don't expect to cover my short until mid 20s as the 30 day lock up on some founders shares will come due just before MY Thanksgiving turkey paid for by this air ball.
Came across this today. Started my dd @sec.gov and discovered exla Helmer Directional Drilling filed 7 years ago a form 15-12g removing it from sec registration.
Anyone know how this gets reversed so EXLA can become reporting? Alternate reporting won’t cut it for those looking for a future up list to Nasdaq.
The value proposition here is how the LGBT 100 ETF OUTPERFORMS the S&P 500 because of the corporate behavior of the companies contained. The largely institutional investors chasing yield and with a social investing mandate should be attracted not necessarily a political right/left viewpoint simply profitable investing one can feel good about.
Please think clearly when evaluating the 5% and 2 1/2 % of AUM. Assets under management going anywhere near LFAP.
The plan calls for the “fees” to be split that way not AUM as neither LFAP or the other LGBT sponsor are fund managers and would have the expertise to manage millions of dollars.
It is a fair statement that fee generated income will become one source of lfap revenue but certainly not a % of AUM
Think people as we cheerlead for higher prices.
Simple a/o 15 minutes ago there were 1.5 million shares bough and 2 million shares sold.
Supply vs demand. Demand is <supply! Stock goes down.
Before making revenue projections like 5% of Assets under management AUM etc, I would want to read the fund prospectus which will outline the fees payable not assets distributed. Just saying.
Given the discount and conversion terms how exactly is this GHS financing not “toxic” ?
The sad truth is hundreds of micro caps no matter their potential, through extreme regulation and true limited venture finance are compelled to raise money in this egregious manner.
Go back and read some 8k filings…you will see the company intends to assist an early convertible debt investors shares “shortly” after 10 K is filed. Boatload of shares becoming free trading.
Are you sure this isn’t just a .50 cent stock pretending to be a 2 dollar stock?
You keep screaming dilution. Why? The facts are most startup companies are undercapitalized and have very limited access to capital on reasonable commercial terms. If CEO & co. needed financing that is the reality. Their sales and growth are far more determinative of value. Share issuances will take care of themselves if true investors not flippers and traders discover the Company. IMO
Those 2 prints were market maker squaring trades that are required to be posted to the tape.
They are not buyers or sellers. Nice for you to try and poison the well but this company however much delayed has legs IMO
MCPI has quietly doubled to a new high over the last few months. Seems like they are getting their act together.
See at least a dime in the near term. Currently .055 X .06
Waitng for breakout on news.
Stock looks like it is firming up nicely .045 X .05 on 250,000.
Now if we could just see some filings and get the damn stop sign removed we might have a game!
Once the impact of this is followed by uplisting and current financials as well as subsequent news I think we could see major movement. I like the intl diversification as well as the plans for the OTCQX.
Someone just grabbed a 240,000 share block . Stock is trading well over a million shares and buy/sell volume continues @ at least 2:1 Technically looks great. We need news and current financials.
New 52 week high @ 4 cents still more buys then sells and promised financials will remove stop sign. Looks good.
Watching the daily buy/sell volume ratio there is definitely "quiet" accumulation going on.
So far today 5:1 buy/sell.
Would not be surprised to see this leg higher particularly when the release financials (as promised) and get the STOP sign removed.
First test of management competence: Do what you say.
MCPI looks like it's getting ready to roll with new auditors-- means filings --removes stop sign, financing disclosures, and commencement of Spring development. I'm ready for some upside!
The volume here is picking up. Why??
Those who dumped are better off gone. Hopefully they took their profits and moved on.
We are now in much stronger hands with people who can let BVTK move it's rather extraordinary business plan forward. Day traders and flippers create faux liquidity but add nothing to the success of the enterprise.
Speculate wisely my friends
Nonsense. If you were going to acquire my co. for $2.4 Million in preferred stock and and only $25,000 in cash i would not be converting into common but rather having a senior security offering protection on the downside with upside opportunity. Folks should stop trying to scare people with false claims and no knowledge. BBVTK mgmt brilliantly structured this acquisition to SPECIFICALLY NON DILUTIVE>
Why would ANY public co CEO give up a financing tool which would provide flexibility for acquisitions? Foolish.Keep the option open!
Have had several problems in past calls with "Free Conference Call" . I guess you get what you pay for. This sounds like it was arranged by Pacific....? Must be IR firm.
Any technical charting is made suspicious when the 10/15 O/S is 7,649,743,494 which adds 118.5 +MILLION shares month over month change from Sept.
For newbies please remember those screaming for pennies, dollars, Nasdaq listing etc already own shares and need/want you to buy up this monthly dilution so the price can stay up or go higher.
I actually believe in the business case for BVTK, I think their cap structure and chosen source of funding is completely nuts however and not likely to result in outrageously touted returns by some.
Speculate wisely my friends
Does anyone care that since mid April through mid Sept. our O/S share count has gone up over 5 BILLION shares?
We have gone from 2,152,334,873 to 7,531, 184,221 !!! Almost 350% more shares in 5 months!!
Dilution is not the word...flooding the market with cheap shares while getting us to create a market and support the bid has allowed BVTK and management to create some uncalled for speculation and expectation for ludicrous gains. IMO
Speculate wisely my friends.
Whatever fees have been paid, whatever drill results announced and whatever financials filed, the management of this company TMBXF has squandered a major opportunity to create shareholder value and driven the stock price into the ground...fitting given the corporate name.
Their inability to attract both affordable financing and quality directors speaks volumes about the "Rot at the Top"
IMO
There is today no RS. The CEO has expressed a desire not to do a RS. There is no confirmation of definitive action. In fact a CEO would be derelict to throw away a tool in the financing TOOLBOX WITHOUT REVIEWING ALL OPTIONS. IMO
I agree a Reverse Split will become necessary particularly when ALL the convertible notes convert to discounted shares and we will be knocking on the upper limit of 10,000,000,000 (Ten Billion ) shares. A RS if managed properly could become the launch pad for a SERIOUS Nasdaq quality stock. Let's hope we can get there!
Actually it is not necessarily true there has been no dilution as any recently issued convertible notes that have not defaulted or come due have not yet been converted to discount shares. So the more interesting question is what's up with the convertible debt> Without current financials, we really can't know other than the company is still authorized to issue 3.2 billion more shares if necessary.
I agree. Perhaps you should notify the other board members as they too could have legal liability. We are too close to a score to let something this foolish derail us.
I am working hard to get accurate information not twitter tits and innuendo posted on iBox for this company as there is a real risk of regulatory concern over "false and misleading :" statements that someone relies on to make an investment decision.
I would think anyone concerned with the future success of the company would agree. I also value your sometimes skeptical comments as they inform rather than cloud the investment thesis for BVTK>
Of the 8 Directors listed on the BVTK message board on opening, are ANY of the with the company? Wow a former congressman, an admiral and 6 others, but no Tom Cellucci listed. Why?
Are we being told the truth?
This stock has had a very odd trading pattern with a lot of hype while BILLIONS of new shares are sold into the buzz created. At least we should see accurately who is running the ship.
On Bravatek.com we have only 4 Directors listed not 8 which site is accurate? Are the regulators concerned with disinformation which could threaten my stock position?
Shotsky if others would take your objective, experienced and professional view of how stocks and markets work I think we would have a much more rational discourse about the relative merits of trapshooting in this particular story. BVTK as a sub penny non reporting pink has much to prove IMO.
It appears math is not a consideration for some but rather suspended belief and magical thinking. Believe me I have fallen prey to this several times over a 40 year investing/speculating career and have a DRAWERFUL OF WORTHLESS CERTIFICATES TO PROVE IT.
I am not saying that this company doesn't have bright prospects for future growth just that many expectations appear unrealistic on both price and valuation.
Speculate wisely my friends!
Let me understand your thinking.
Tom has a wealthy partner who will "buy up" outstanding shares presumably from the open market. What then? This maintains the same number outstanding just a different owner.
Do you somehow believe he will "surrender" his shares to BVTK treasury to be cancelled?
Frankly given the hundreds of mostly redundant posts over the last several months I am still trying to do proper due diligence which without financials is impossible. I do however want to thank your constantly reminding us all of how great this opportunity is even if many conclusions defy credulity.
Did you ask Tom how we get to Nasdaq @ 4 /share with 6,750,000,000 (six billion seven hundred and fifty million shares) outstanding? We would need to move from a market cap of $11,500,000 to $27 Billion! to qualify.
I'm an optimist, but do not understand how if we license global (29 Nato countries) rights to our major software prodect and hope for ANNUAL royalties of $2.5 Million other revenues can justify a multi billion dollar valuation.
It's support on the downside, resistance on the upside.
This market on close selling usually is either a capitulation by someone who no longer believes or recognition that it is a crapshoot or playing darts without financials and regulatory filings. Tweets, Facebook and whispered "private" conversations are a very unusual and not very effective strategy for professional investor relations as demonstrated by the recent cratering of BVTK and inability to maintain trading gains. There is a STOP SIGN at www.otcmarkets.com for a reason.
Bet with your head, not over it.
SPECULATE WISELY MY FRIENDS!
According to OTCMarkets.com there are now Six Billion 750 million plus shares outstanding that's
6,750,000,000 shares which is 1 Billion 250 million more than last month. !,250,000 month over month
dilution.
Anyone who thinks this stock without a substantial RS can achieve Nasdaq listing at $4 minimum is not looking at this rationally IMO.
6,750,000,000 X $4 =$27,000,000,000 TWENTY SEVEN BILLION market cap!
Really
. Current market cap as of last Friday is 11,535,000 got a ways to go.
Speculate wisely my friends.
Six years and 68,000 posts later stock has a minmum of 5.5 billion shares outstanding trading actively at .0018. Thank God we have someone else as Chairman who may now what he is doing.
Is this guy deliberately trying to have Tom violate insider information rules?
How does someone not know there are a slew or Regs and laws which should preclude answers to these foolish questions.?
I would advise CEO to stop this loose talk and focus on business . BVTK doesn't need these headaches and time wasters IMO
What is the ORIGINAL date of this?? Apparent private call with BVTK CEO??
This has been posting repeatedly without a date of this "reported private conversation" for weeks too many times to count. I wonder if Tom knew it would be reported to the board??
I ask as newbies might be fooled into believing this was a recent rather than previous reported conversation.
Clarity not repetition will help all of us.
Speculate wisely my friends