Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Tony I have to both agree & disagree with you on this...
I don't think they are trying to capitalize on the misfortunes of others (which I agree shouldn't be done), No one else that covers this has PR'd that fact, but Q trying to establish credibility as a serious network is just letting investors and public know this. sure not a great PR but IMO a decent way of say HEY, We're real and we're out there covering the big stories along side the big boys. It's news that everyone is interested in, gay/not gay. Not sure they needed to segregate it to the GLBT but that's what Q is about. In short if it wern't for the fact Q is establishing itself, I'd say shove the PR up the ass of whom ever released it.
cur I thought it would be more also...
C in K.... thanks!
dingo.... any idea what the 3 *'s represent?
zandant, I'd say that is exactly why
that is just the title on yahoo as they are reporting that according to qtelevision web site the deal is signed. They are just making sure people don't think they are saying a deal has been signed, just that Q says one has been signed.
interesting....
I was trying to figure out why the had the empty space on the home page. your theory makes sense to me, hope it's right. otherwise Q webmaster fill that dead space or remove it, looks horrible.
agreed...
my mistake I should have been more specific... what I was referring to as the top is directly below the the menu tabs at the top.
econnelle...
it wouldn't need to be redesigned. half hour to 1 hour work at most, includes an animated banner. positioned at the top.
i can't believe where the TW Banner is locatedd on the home page. It should be at the top, you have to scroll down to see it. who looks after the website? the webmaster should lay the page out much better. I love the design, but the layout of info on the home page is horrific. TW is huge to us, make sure people see it as soon as they enter the site.
my venting is done. cheers to all.
junk i agree, they should have logo's for advertisers. Personally I like the web design, but layout needs work. would like to see TW logo towards top (perhaps a nice scrolling text saying "Sign Up Today!") and smaller logos (maybe rotating) with advertisers logos.
I've got 5 grand coming into me sometime this week... don't run yet:)
"Time Warner Cable has officially launched (QTN) on channel 286 in Cumberland and York Counties."
Has anyone in Cumberland and/or York County with TW seen Q?
misprint...
I meant thanks KillBid great info....
regardless of what anyone wants to call it, it is good info, thanks econnelle
HUGH! ...eoem
Quit beating a dead horse...
it wasn't filed, they say it will be. no point going on and on about it for now, if it doesn't get done this time then it is a problem.
MELI....
I doubt you'll get good returns at a strip club, a big smile and perhaps a case of the crabs but not good returns.
skunks & zues1...
thanks, you've opened up a whole new view point on this, one that sounds perhaps dead on to me. This is perhaps why Franks seems to see LOGO airing as a help more then hinderance. Once they are up with their own channel gives Q precidence for a g/l/b/t channel.
...the cable companies (outside of RCN) do not want to give the g/l/b/t network a chance....the only reason they are willing to entertain LOGO (IN SOME PLACES ONLY) is because Viacom removed one of their own channels to put LOGO on...
CHEERS Zandant!
can someone post yesterdays news, if there was some, i didn't receive any email.
I read something that it refers something to Canada. Last night i found OutTV on Bell Express View, found it interesting as it claims to be the worlds first GLBT station (seems they all say this). not sure how new it is as it is up in the porn area and I don't tune in up to those channels :)
not sure what it is about, selected it and all it says is channel is moving to 609 which i don't seem to get.
off to the golf course now as there is a strange yellow ball in the sky today, havn't seen it in a while so I'm going outside before it rains again
there is also a quote from the Valcom fella, which would make me think this is a done deal
I'd say so also, just don't want to see anyone jumping to the conclusion that we are buying one from them, even though we don't know that we arn't it won't help to have people think we are without facts saying so.
....sold 6 of its 12 owned/operated Los Angeles studios...
the sale of these took place before Aug 4, 2004
"announced today that its website is receiving more than 1.5 million hits per month from potential subscribers requesting that their local cable or satellite carrier air the Q Television Network."
in my opinion all this means is that the site received approximately 1.5 million hits for potential subscribers. Nothing it in any way makes me think they have 1.5 million requesting/interested in subscribing. Truth of it is the number is between 1 and the exact amount of hits. we need clairification on this, and I for one am not happy that it was written this way as it can be very misleading
just to add a little confirmation for Duke's post. here is thee url for a software product that does just this. I use this one on a couple of my sites.
www.mrunix.net/webalizer/
Our company is fully funded until break even, 2008.
I like this line. wish we knew who was funding Qbid
Interview.....
Just watched the interview....Very very good things said... only downside is Franks interview abilities. He sounds too unsure/nervous about what he is saying.
anyone watch the news clip link on http://www.qtelevision.com/main/investorinfo.asp
i'm stuck on a modem tonight so it is taking too long. anyone with a short summary, i'd appreciate it.
that's what i thought
took awhile but added at .0034
anybody getting filled?
PV...
I would love to see QBID buy PV. I've been in this since 0.0001 and am ready to make some serious money. I do believe in Q but am getting very sceptical at times.
are they serious about buying PV? shit it would be great, but could also be smoke screen for (I know longs don't want to here it but...) the missed PR's. We cannot overlook this, even thouogh this company has made tremendous strides forward. If no deal comes out of this its very easy to say "we tried but they wouldn't sell"
Just my rantings, hope i'm way off track and this thing sky rockets. But my guess is we head lower until some more positive news, everyones watching this so any half decent news could create buying for a spike
smoke i have to agree with most of this. If they had wait until the deal were complete (if they can complete it) an announcement at that time of that magnitude would have been exceptional. I think many have now had the time to think about the PR and see that it is just an offer, hell I can make them an offer. that said imo it is still positive and i really hope they can find a way to make the deal.
does anyone with charts see where this may settle to?
denial....
Of course PV is denying this. Never take first offer. I don't know that they are actively negotiating, but would think that they are at the very least discussing it and trying to come up with FMV.
?? for those who may know.....
this is just my thinking but not sure if this scenerio is even legal.
Would it be considered insider trading if a major carrier was planning on signing an upcoming deal with QBID, for them to be buying up shares as they know once announced it will go higher. I'm not trying to say this is happening, just trying to figure who would be the big buyer and if not illegal this sounds logical to me. TIA
wouldn't it make sense to follow this up in the next day or 2 with more good news?
that's official enough for me Cheers!