Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Joe Smoe
Yes, I was referring to Apple
After the Webex CC last week when KAY mentioned their lawyers in Washington DC and the number of infringers, that's when I deceided to send word of the day.
The more exposure SFOR receives, each level of share price brings in new investors.
The risk level of a .01 share price is high but the level .50/$1.00 brings SFOR to a lower risk level.
All older investors and new investors should take the time and go to the web site and listen to last weeks WEBEX.
hv a nice day.
Joe Smoe
Todays word of the day is: willfully infringed
David versus Goliath, could be a landmark case,a law school study
SLR
Yes, I deserve a BRAVO today for many other reasons.
Read all my lines in the post carefully.
You seem like a nice person, bashing a company that we all know the history, think of the poor souls that have lost a lot of money. Save your breath for better things. i.e - have a couple of sugar cane drinks that will lift your spirits but don't fly the next day.
BUZZ/JOE
IMHO- If SFOR did achieve numbers as you point out in a "WHAT IF"
projection, the company would be in a different league quickly
* Besides the income, (IP)INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY would have value of many millions of dollars
* This would bring market longer term investors who feel the risk of a penny stock is gone and pave the way for investment grade investors
* Growth projections return would be in the area of 30-40% PA
* The supply versus the demand factor for the stock would be unreal.
* SFOR would be a candidate for NASDAQ,once the prerequisies are met for this exchange.
* Debt would be paid down and restructured at very favorable terms.
* PR firms and investment bankers would be allowed by their risk models to invest in a company like SFOR.
* If these milesones are achieved, the stock will trade in the $1.00 to $3.00 range and be acquired by a larger company.
Well it's an opportunity tomorrow to hear the Webex, maybe the DOUBTING THOMASES will believe
10Q OUT- patient doing better off support,light at end of tunnel.
Would like to have CC with questions.
Joe Smoe
It was posted yesterday on Inverstorshub at 1:20PM
Securities Reg. (S-1/A) from EDGAR (US REGULATORY)
I'm out hiking since last week and it's difficult to borrow a lap top, if you can't find I'll copy and paste details as soon as I can. Thu
Joe Smoe
Any thoughts on yesterdays statement about the DRAW DOWN NOTICE AND DILUTION?
Once precedent is set in the courts, the basis for action becomes alot quicker.
The word for the day is: ENJOIN- to prescribe a course of action with authority or emphasis,to direct or order to do something, charge, to prohibit or restrain by as if by legal injunction, proscribe, ban
from Webster's dictionary
All posters have a nice day off to the airport.
If SFOR a $5.00- $10.00 stock there would be no issue, large companies don't like to be the first and end up with egg on face.
SFOR mgt MUST CLARIFY ISSUES AT HAND.
Buzz
1- Don't think SFOR infringed at that time period as their business was just starting to get income.
2- SFOR must have different or superior technology otherwise US Patent wouldn't issue a duplicate patent.
3- As (OT) stated somthing is in the works.
456- We are sub penny for many reasons:
* large debt
* small revenue
* no large deals closing and PR mentioning rev.
* years ago this stock stared at .75 cents straight down, then R/S, then straight down with a limited uptick to 5-8 cents,down to present levels.
THERE ARE TO MANY STALE LONG POSITIONS AT THE WRONG PRICE.
ie LONGS AT .10 CENTS OR HIGHER
THE TRADING MUST CLEAR OUT THESE POSITIONS. IT CAN ONLY HAPPEN WITH NEWS AND FOLLOWED BY LARGE DAILY TRADING EVERY DAY. PENNY STOCKS CAN'T BE TRADED BY INVESTMENT COMPANIES AS THE RISK IS TO HIGH, ONLY WHEN A LARGE DOMESTIC OR MULTI NATIONAL COMPANY BACKS SFOR WITH STATEMENTS.
Buzz-Let the games begin
It seems that the precedent is set for the basis for patent infringement. It will be interesting to hear the settlement on how to enjoin the infringers either stop doing how they do business or pay a fee to to continue.
This provides the precedent for SFOR, IF WE HAVE GOOD LAWYERS.
Do you see it the same way?
Buzz Patco vs Peoples
IT seems that Peoples utilized 2 basis factor risk from rsa/cyota
after the FFIEC guidelines after 2005, but the client didn't use the instructions from the bank and the bank and client didn't follow up on bogus payments promptly.Client ignored high risk notice?
The FFIEC wants 3 basis factor and out of band for max. protection ,
I assume you are pointing this court case out to us, that SFOR was a better solution? OR is there something I'm missing.
Always thanks for your DD
OT
sorry to hear about your problem but it's sounds like an accounting error, you should talk to your account rep and give him the accounting of your last several days.
Peace be with you.
OT
if you want to put your mind at ease you can BUY shares @.007 and SELL shares @.006
OT
yes, they are in the identity theft protection.
FYI- just rec'd in my mail today a letter to buy "LifeLock" It's a shame that SFOR didn't use their $$$ to get better PR.
IMHO- SFOR needs to close a large contract and announce dollar amounts, that would be the best PR.
Joe Smoe,
Do you think SFOR is in a "QUIET PERIOD"?
Thanks for reply.Always appreciate your DD
Joe Smoe
Do you think SFOR management is setting up for a R/S? as it's only one way selling at each level, lower lows every day on the share price.
Buzztech911 or JoeSmoe
Just came across "DATAMASK BY AOL"
It states it gives Patented Keystroke protection, also states safeguards on line identity.
is this product part of SFOR?
Thu.
Joe,
I agree with all your points but see think the INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES & INFRINGEMENT is the key for this stock to move higher.
Revenue generation is slow and it takes lots of money for R&D,and good PR.
As we all know the revenue over debt must converge.
Buzz,
Oh masterful one, since us boys and girls are subservient to you.
Please explain to us , why if good events are going to happen to SFOR, the common share price has gone down since you started posting about mergers the last several months.
Please explain these actions and what will be the merger price for us commoners ?
FWIW
Presently AOL has less then 5mio paying customers. This info was on the web. (google AOL paying customers)
I do agree they are trying to sell various packaged security that one pays monthly,it's possible that SFOR can be involved in their security to some extent.
YOUR QUESTIONS SFOR
go to the ANNUAL REPORT 10K
issued on April 14, 2012.
Now go to part 1 item1. Business
Read page 4 and SFOR explains some of your questions.
"SEEK AND YE SHALL FIND"
"ASK AND THE ANSWER IS YOURS"
BUZZ-
ref aol believe this is a fit for them, they need a product to induce new clients,as Time Warner didn't work out.
Kay was the speaker.
Conference call- 2012 guidance rev $1.2 mio this is only closed contracts, any newly closed contracts would increase rev,mentioned White Sky and ID Vault as partners,GID sales are 4 mio mostly bundled and Protect ID 12 mio mostly fin,pending deals are in healthcare,fin and tech.Working on several deals now expect to close a few.
They will defend patent and are working with BLANK ROME of Washington DC.
The challange to the patent was re-examined and the patents are ok.
PR company to named shortly.
Cash flow positive by 3rd or 4th quarter.
Equity facility 6mio,3 years-this is a insurance back up, not a death spiral financing, terms of the deal have pricing terms with bid price floor.
PS- Buzz, sorry didn't have time yesterday had family busines in Florida.
In the 1Q announcement they stated that a CC via WEBEX at 1:00 PM
I aasumed you listened?
That's why I listed those 3 posts, I was confused by your comments.
I hope SFOR puts this 1/2 hour event on their web site.
I will high light points THURS., running late for airport lots of traffic.
Message was for BUZZ, but glad you took notice.
Your post 5249 END
Your post 5244 MONEY MAKER
Your post 5236 REAL MONEY
Maybe you should have listened to the WEBEX yesterday, before making comments.
Let's look at this from the positive side.
* Funding in place for 3 years.
* Build up of re-sellers expanded to sell product world wide.
* Patent infringement is being addressed.
* SFOR management has time to develope new stradegies.
Todays announcement about the Form 8
Drawdown equity facility up to $6.0 mio for 3 years.
This can be drawn at $150.thousand each time with restrictions attached but this is dilution.
The hope for the common share holder is the PATENT can produce Revenue or the contracts that they close in this year can offset this dilution.
Does anyone else have comments about todays announcement???
That 19 mio that you state is not the revenue for 2012 its the
"PV MV +Cash" The revenue that they state in model is $1.1 as stated on page 12 of the report.
The PV MV + CASH is an accounting valuation of the present value, and the market value of replacement. IF you google these terms it might this clearer.
IMHO- it's not clear in the their accounting lingo
Listen carefully to CEO Kays interview today.
Attention- MRB PR
Since you are the new PR person Mr. Michael Becca,you should suggest a conference call after the release of the 1st quarter results since CEO Kay mentioned this is going to be a great year for the company in previous announcements. They should be proud of the positive results, then a Q and A afterwards.
This would go a long way to interest new investors.
God-speed.
Well, at the end of the announcement,they mention a new PR firm.
MRB PUBLIC RELATIONS, Let's hope this brings SFOR SUCCESS.
I'm just reporting what it actually states in the latest 10K (P.8)
Legal counsel can be retained on a contingency basis.
It is important to get a opinion on properties for valuation purposes, therefore it gives the company more borrowing power.
FYI- The annual report on page 8 "INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY"
" In December 2011, we executed an exclusive agreement with an agent to represent us in enforcing the patent. etc, etc.
Hi, mud season is when the snow melts and mud is everywhere.
IMHO- The 1st quarter results in May must show revenue at least 300,000 for this penny to get out of the 1 1/2 range plus need serious contracts with revenue mentioned.
SCOTTY- that was the annual report posted by Edgar they are usually a few days late.
Enjoy the mud season if you hanging around CO.
FYI 10K this week under heading :INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
bottom of page 8
"In December 2011, we executed an exclusive agreement with an agent to represent us in enforcing the patent"