Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Interesting article in PC Magazine about AT&T at CES.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2413977,00.asp
Note the paragraph that states:
AT&T devices will also start to include software which will intelligently switch between 3G and Wi-Fi networks depending on which is better, with "the goal being to be able to give the devices broader, seamless coverage," Chien said. She didn't say anything about whether AT&T would support SMS or calling over Wi-Fi, or any other way to make Wi-Fi networks look to users more like AT&T's own system.
Sounds very familiar......
I wouldn't bet on that too much. Given the latest motion to compel, and the disclosure of the nature of talks regarding the disclosure requests between the two parties, it does not appear that there is much being done in terms of settlement or other being done. If it is true that one of our/Drago's counsel made the "pee on them" comment about the papers found in Kyle Pierce's possession/storage when discussing with T-mobile's counsel - it does not seem that they are pushing with a settlement. In fact, I think they are pushing hard towards their motion to dismiss. I don't believe it will work, but that seems to be their current play.
Does anyone know the number of shares actually held by shareholders? All outstanding shares no longer exist I assume.
I'm no lawyer, but the excerpt HR posted says "Undisputed Terms". My interpretation is that the meaning of those terms are agreed upon by both parties and do not require clarification. It is the substance elsewhere that is in dispute. Just my take.
Pretty sure it was sometime in the first half of August without digging through the board for the exact date. 8th or 10th maybe?
Calypso v. T mobile
Just spoke with Mark Gentile for a few minutes on the phone. He was very courteous and willing to answer any question I had. I asked him the following:
Q: Is there any update for the shareholders and do the quarterly updates apply to us or the court? A:There isn't much to update now as the value of the patent will start to be known based on the trial in Texas. He thought it was a good idea to put something out to all the shareholders saying there would or wouldn't be regular updates just so we aren't in the dark.
So I assume the quarterly updates were not for us, but he is willing to get us some info.
Q: Are you knowledgeable of the forum where many vocal shareholders post ideas on Investor's Hub? A: He was aware and had been maybe twice, however, the hearings in Delaware showed that many of the posts can be misleading or biased, and that it would not be in the best interests for all to be take suggestions from anonymous sources.
Very fair comment, and he offered that I call him anytime with questions, and I think those of us with ideas that are legitimate to potentially increase the value for all shareholders, should email or call him as a shareholder and provide your real name. He was not short in the least and was courteous in every way. If there was a valid idea presented, I think it may have some impact. However, the idea would have to be fairly concise as far as actual people to contact within companies, and not just a company name based on technology they sell or the fact that they are acquiring IP for their portfolio.
Has anyone called the Receiver's office and simply asked when an update would be given to shareholders if at all? If not - do you have the name and city where the firm is located?
Might be a silly question, but has anyone simply called the receiver instead of email? At least to find out if the shareholders are privy to the quarterly report or not?
"since law suits require a foundation in the law"? Really? Anything can be filed if you pay a lawyer. Noone is taking the contingency because the "settlemet" hinges on the outcome of the February hearing. If it is found that Williams is still a board member, the settlement is not valid, because the board would be at the 2-2 deadlock.
A Simple question - if the intent of the current management was to not have a settlement and let Diac win by default and have the intital judgement stand, why go through all this trouble? Why wouldn't they just not show up, or not respond, as was done in the past to cause the initial judgement? I'm sure the knee jerk response is "plausible deniability" based on the extensive conspiracy talk that dominates this board, but it just doesn't make too much sense that they would waste all this time, when they simply could have not shown up in court or dropped the case if that was their intention.
The second would be Dave putting the company into receivership. It might be painful and ugly to get there, but an elected board might not be a bad thing.
So Dave stays in - we get more of the same. We vote Dave out we either get:
-Dave putting the company in receivership
-Turrini and Co making self interested deals and jetting off with their back pay
-Turrini and co actually making a licensing deal(s)
2 out of the 3 here might not be so bad, but continuing to do more of the same old nothing might end up in the judge dismissing the case and we are back to square 1.
I'm curious what, if any, input Diac will get with the Tmobile settlement. Given he has a substantial percentage, I wonder if the attorney costs will be shared along with the profit. If I agreed to a settlement that had no number, I would want some control over the determination of what the number would be that my 28% was coming out of.
Noone in their right mind would strike a deal unitl they knew who owned and controlled the patent. If there was in fact intereference on past deals that Turrini had lined up, we will see what happens when (or if) the settlement with Daic is signed. His hands are tied right now unitl that document is done. I look to see what happens in November and could care less what the pps is until we get back on the pinks.
Anyone catch this about the new iPhone 4S?
11:00 a.m. Second: the wireless system. Phil’s talking about the iPhone 4’s stainless steel band. The iPhone 4S will intelligently switch between two antennas to both transmit and receive. It can do this in the middle of a call. It improves call quality and can download data twice as fast as before. It can achieve 14.4 down and 5.8 up (that’s Mbps). Sound familiar? It’s 4G performance, same as the Motorola Atrix 4G, HTC Inspire 4G, LG Thrill 4G.
Where have I heard seamless switching between two network connections before?
I'm all for this, but how is this fund different than the offer made at the forum to cut a check on the spot? Did DW say he would accept it this way vs getting a check there? Doesnt make too much sense.
Any news on the hostage situation with the financials? Has any legal recourse/action been taken to get the documents back to the comapny?
So based on one of todays filings, a firm transferred 30M shares to a family member of one of the firm's members. Could be a good sign.
well, it may not be lying. The congressman may not have heard of GLER, but may be working with Modern Coal. So it is just the selective broadcast of information to serve a purpose. Outright lying, even on this board, to manipulate price can be investigated by the SEC. I've seen it happen in another forum on this board where trading was actually suspended.
OK - but have they heard of Modern Coal?
Proceeds are in the 60,000 USD ballpark from those sales if the big chunk sold at an average of .10. I was curious to see if he was footing the 13K necessary to copy the files. But - if he is getting an audit on those files, the sale could provide the necessary fees. Just a guess.
Has anyone done the math on what Dave sold? Was it in the 13K ballpark?
Much nicer than the letters of credit :)
45 Million in 18 minutes - wow. Where is Stephen? GO GLER BIG RUN.
To hell with .01 - let's see the 20's like in 2009!!!
Make that 10 Million shares over average volume. Seems to be an accumulation going on.
8 Million over daily average. Unless this was put out on a penny stock post - we could be seeing some news in the next day or two.
I wouldn't expect this until after a Tmobile settlement. If there is a 300K expense behind the process, I dont see the BoD pushing to get it done on borrowed money.
someone just sold 100 @.05
Looks like someone has a decent size chunk for sale at .08. Last few trades have been chipping away at it. Not going to be a good Monday for them.
Just curious - for the select few of you who have sell orders in - what are you looking for? Lots of tight fists right now holding - including me.
Currently #21 on the iHub breakout boards. After the first trade lifts the price, people will see the board activity plus a huge percentage jump in share price. Buckle your seat belts guys.
Ships don't turn on a dime. The shareholders flexed a bit of muscle, and now things are moving more in the direction we would like/expect. It isn't perfect, but it is far better than what was considered the norm for the past several years. There seems to be an underlying initiative for the last 2 PR's. First is to identify all of the shareholders in NY. Second is the announcement of a shareholder's forum. As Sosa mentioned, the shareholders must be identified fully before any official voting can take place. Smells like something big is around the corner. I just can't tell if it smells good or bad yet. Hoping for the best, but I've always looked at this stock as a 25% chance of being huge from day 1.
Still looks like 3 ahead of us.
R T Tile InC v McGill Financial
Lozano v Argueta
Cook v Harris County - this one should take no more than an hour or two tops.
Nothing new as far as statuses go. If you go the the state court page, and choose search dockets, enter in 8/15 for the 333rd and you can see each case ahead and the status. The 1st case shows "tried" in the settings, but still shows "in trial" and all other cases awaiting. Hopefully there will be updates later this afternoon/evening.
No - the volume at that point in the day was 870K
The grays may not be as bad as first thought. If there is a favorable outcome, the demand will increase. With the stock being difficult to trade, it could push the price higher than would have been seen on the pinks. Plus, little MM influence here on the grays.
We get it Stephen, you're excited and expecting a big run.
My guess this is priority 3 based on the directors estimate of 100K+ to get all the necessary audits done and handed to the SEC. Priority 1 is the state case, Priority 2 is the federal case, both of which in a perfect world would generate the revenue to get relisted on the pinks. Given the difficulty in trading on the greys, those holding the stock could be in a better situation as it is harder to trade, which could create a much higher premium than you would see in the pinks.