Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You slight the attorney/mine engineer member.
Excellent point, EC! Certainly more topical than most...
I paid $1.95/Gallon for gas today! Showing how energy prices, a major component of copper fundamentals, have been reduced.
NAK's a bigger scam. Ask Anglo, they lost a buck or two.
Take care, EC
2+2=10! oops,hmmm,..i-meant-base3..oops..hmmm-10-is-close-to-11,so-i'm-right!...
warrants are bought and the money goes to the company, so it's not 2 for 1 dollar dilution or whatever mistake you wrote...bye.
i see you don't understand the mechanics of warrants..
Oh you answered it late...but you conveniently didn't answer the question of whether you've ever talked to the ones you've accused of lying in your 12,000+ posts..
"12,000+ posts, have you ever talked to those you accuse of lying?"
But it's ok, because obviously "Words have no meaning".
OK, you're done, go have your beer... Just remember, "Words have no meaning" and an elephant never forgets...and the slogan for Harvard's Eliot house is "It's Irrelephant"
I conveniently left out?LOL..I was quoting the author of the USGS article which said, "They were surprised to find that the critical elements could be in plain sight in piles of rubble otherwise considered eyesores and toxic waste."
Which is less existence or presence?
You on the other hand did conveniently leave out whether you've ever contacted those you accuse of lying in your 12,000+ posts.
Also I think you missed the point of EC's post.
Yet, the USGS is interested in Bisbee and "They were surprised..." according to the author?
"Words have no meaning"..
Why don't you talk to JB? 12,000+ posts, have you ever talked to those you accuse of lying?
"Words have no meaning"
The author said, "They were surprised..." right?
How would I know?...It's my understanding they were anomalous as he has said...12,000+posts, have you ever asked the ones you attack?
"Words have no meaning"
Ahh, the author and JB are wrong, but not the USGS or you...Got it!
Scalia and me, "Words have no meaning".....
Why did he say that? eom
The USGS was surprised, but JB can't be. Love how a "geologist" can be upset with a geologist, but not the USGS for saying what most would think is the same....
Scalia and me, "Words have no meaning.." eom.
https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/gold-rush-era-waste-fuels-050105212.html
"They were surprised to find that the critical elements could be in plain sight in piles of rubble otherwise considered eyesores and toxic waste." USGS AZGS...12,000+posts,...words have no meaning.
https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/gold-rush-era-waste-fuels-050105212.html
eom..
Yup!-"Words have no meaning"..Negatives are negatives and positives are negatives...It's why I've declined to post..Good Luck to Most.
My only comment is, I'm glad that Cooper's Hawk'd...lol?!
I logged on to get my daily dose of acrimony towards LBSR and found none!? What does this portend?
This was first answered two weeks ago... http://agoracom.com/ir/libertystar/forums/discussion/topics/643176-permits/messages/2018564#message
It's a technicality requiring scarce dollars, not a show stopper.
But some here want to blame LBSR not AZ...so be it.
You brought it up not me. BTW: Do you think out-right lies by posters are on-topic?
Thanks!, and just like the USGS did too at Bisbee after JB found his!
I didn't say the topic was off-topic did I? I said that using that PD drilling and saying LBSR's current Hay Mountain claims were abandoned by PD is incorrect. I also think lies should be off-topic. Do you think out-right lies are on-topic?
PD found gold at Hay Mountain!
My point isn't that you or PD said it, it is that these are not LBSR claims... PD had no drilling on current LBSR Hay Mountain claims, but posters are, in my estimation, intentionally misrepresenting this PD drilling to LBSR's current project. This misrepresentation makes dozens of posts off-topic/irrelevant/in-correct when used as a negative for LBSR's current Hay Market project.
Is it correct that PD gave up on LBSR's current claims at Hay Mountain because they found nothing? Because there have been dozens of posts saying such and this is not true, is it?
Frankly, there have been dozens of off-topic/irrelevant/incorrect posts given these holes are not LBSR nor LBSR's Hay Mountain claims!
http://www.northernminer.com/news/phelps-dodge-slashes-production/1000102466/?&er=NA
This shows why PD exploration was stopped.
Wow that's what you assume? Must have some kind of bias to think that one hole would rule out anything...BTW: As you must have read this drilling is not even these Hay Mountain claims.
Isn't it correct that PD was being bought and exploration was discontinued everywhere and that the price of CU was low?
I'm fascinated why a geologist wouldn't set the record straight about why PD stopped drilling...
It's pointless! Facts only exist to be abused for some.
Gee I wonder why PD stopped drilling EVERYWHERE!
You can show where X marks the spot and it's Turd Time...
GLTU, EC
"Every month 'they' need money to exist." is my take on the situation! lol
All explorers today are having difficulty with funding! Geotech did not report LBSR confidential ZTEM...And I trump again with (again): http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=112201436&txt2find=GEOTECH
The point was if you read my "EDIT"'d post...he won't call nor trust me...
So I'm supposed to "ask" for a printed re-clarification for him because he doesn't like it?...
Longs(shareholders) doing "work" for non-shareholders regarding company communication because they (longs and the company) are not trusted by him, when obviously he could/should just do it humself...Remember, the "Little Red Hen"?
EDIT to EDIT(lol):Now I see you don't trust longs, so I won't be telling you! lol EDIT: I answered before seeing your refusal. I guess I'll call then. Don't think funders would necessarily sign the same NC/ND as JV partners...ORIG: Why don't you call and let us know?
It's just a preliminary is how's it's titled. Dates will follow later is how I'm thinking of it.
Tracy nuked you? Wow! Because you're the one I see alluding to that..
FYI: Tracy, as I understand it and like many IRs, is kept out of negotiation details so as to not taint information flow. So, a deal could be imminent...