Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Most private companies have a public facebook, it's just better business and communication...period!
They are a private company yes, but that's no reason to force shareholders to join facebook, neither is that a reason to keep facebook private.
Why do i have to join a corrupt third party popularity contest to get information regarding my investment?
I'm still waiting for mine in Canada too.
I'm in, all this scary talk reminds me of 2012, so I'm looking for another 1000-10000%
What does Buffet say? "Buy when others are fearful"
Float doesn't matter anymore, there's no float in private.
Um you're getting what you want, 125% means increase common shareholder ownership, means major shareholders are giving up a percentage.
If they dilute after the restructure, they'll piss off the VC's who invested first, and so on, as the early investors loose... I hope they aren't planning that.
If our percentage of ownership doesn't go lower it doesn't matter to us how many shares they propose, as long as it's much less than the 5bill now it will help meet NASDAQ/NYSE standards for IPO.
Why, because %...
They propose 125% transfer of ownership into InWith, this is the same as a share retirement but done as a restructure, giving more % to the common shareholder. Increasing common shareholder % is actually very generous, but sounds like we will get tied in until IPO or buyout, if you can wait there is still great potential here.
This reminds me of 2012, scary, very scary, and everybody warned us, but they were wrong. We're still up >1000% thanks to Michael Hayes, let's hope he is still as sincere as he was then and can pull it off again.
Here's to the next 1000% or more...
Go EPGL!
I have a copy of that, looking forward to 25 cents!
Well PR said up to 9.8, but then Hayes clarified publicly and said minimum 9.8 up to 25 cents... But now I can't find that statement.
This is true, last communication from Hayes regarding buyout price was min. 9.8-25 cents/share, not up to 9.8, but min. 9.8 to 25 cents/share.
Fact!
Go EPGL!
Go InWith!
Go Hayes!
If Hayes can take InWith and do to it what he did for EPGL there's going to be a lot of wealthy people. Hayes has increased EPGL %1500... As much as %9800 at one time.
Yeah, I was in contact with IR and there is a CDA in place. NYSE company will hopefully be revealed early 2018. As for the prototype, I'm told, is a complete lens with a specific medical application. Like I said years ago we'll see lenses with medical application before AR lenses. Anyway, yes this little startup is still a startup, I know of Pharmaceutical companies that are startups 20 years. Startup is not a timeframe but more of a position in development.
Can't believe this heavy selling all of a sudden...
I think developments keep coming with EPGL.
It'll be a medical device, so my bet is a medical device company, could still be J&J.
Well if funding gets finalised and investors get the 9.8 penny buyout it'll be a big middle finger to those who doubt from Hayes. Also the investors staying on with InWith will have much more opportunity to grow with the new company.
I sent an email to EPGL today, hope I get a reply, they're usually pretty good to reply, I think only once or twice I didn't get a reply.
Final negotiations sounds pretty good to me. Let's hope they don't take too long, drop it on or heads, Bull dog!
EPGL exists. *proof* They were not liquidated. Do your DD.
Ok busy day ahead of me, see you guys later.
Money was there from the start, more in fact so figure it out.
There was articles showing everything I said, look... They're probably still around, 10 sec reply tells me you didn't look.
That's how PWC owns EPGL shares, they assumed them probably paid AJW them, and because AJW is chapter 15. Think about an estate sale, if you where in charge and saw something nice would you not set it aside and purchase it for yourself?
Then you haven't done your DD, type PWC and ajw fund into Google and see what pops up. PWC was/is the court appointed liquidator for AJW fund, which simply means by law they are required to disseminate AJW assets as they see fit... By law.
Drop it on there heads bull dog! Don't give us a clue, the longs are in, leave the flippers chasing! Catch em off guard this time.
Go EPGL!
They were court appointed official liquidators to AJW assets... That's the only thing we know for sure.
That and AJW filled for chapter 15 in 2013...
Maybe there more, please share verifiable facts.
Oh and the restructure with EPGL
Go EPGL!
It's PWC doing, not EPGL, EPGL has nothing to do with that other than being beneficiary to PWC decision. 80 companies put to sleep so that the only one with real potential could survive, PWC decision.
Go EPGL!
Be careful with that 2200%, you took a lambasting suggesting someone might be up that much, even though EPGL is up that much???
Go EPGL! The start of Mega Huge things approaching!
Drop it on their heads, Bull Dog!
$40/share in 10 years!
PWC made it happen.
I believe that is exactly what PWC did for EPGL.
Actually it's down from 24 million in the early days and was there since the beginning of Hayes restructure.
R&D isn't cheap even if they did get Copper to pay for it during a brief stint.
EPGL is likely not dumping, volume is not big enough. What constitutes dumping around here? If Hayes sells 1000 shares for $20 is that dumping?
Keep em coming, thanks for continuing to show the positive aspect of EPGL amidst the constant beratement. How else are new potential shareholders supposed to know. Without sifting through so much opinion.
Are you saying they're dumping shares? What evidence do you have and can I call you on it later?
Volume is way to low to consider any trading here dumping by Hayes, I find the repeated nature of the claim ridiculous.
Michael Hayes took over EPGL when it had a DTC chill on it.
It was said repeatedly that he would never be able to remove the DTC chill.
The DTC chill was removed years ago under Michel Hayes Management.
At that time DTC held importance until the chill was removed, now it's being implied they are not good at their job.
EPGL continues to progress.
Go EPGL!
Dr. David "Rocky" Marcus and Michael "Bull Dog" Hayes going to drop it on our heads! Hope you're in, go EPGL!