Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
My understanding is that J3 only has the exclusive for marketing and implementation only according to their site.
About Ahgrove, guess no one except a few took the hint from MSE website that said" MSE and Ashgrove cement company were working on a project together" at the same time of gtgp announcing they were going to do a hot run at a cement plant. Then the report done by MSE for gtgp which came out in a PR that the run had taken place.
Finally, if jim wanted to move mbs out of gtgp, he could of called his note anytime in the last several years.
So much for my comments, no need to reply as I won't respond to all the usual comments.
Curious, where did it say in the Proxy pr a date for a proxy vote?
But if counting things, how about keeping a countdown since suspension or from the date predicting revocation in a week or two after the suspension. Hmmmmm just in months would be sufficient. Here is some help 14 months.
As for the pump, most of us here know who was responsible for that and actually admitted it.
Again, some clarity about the SEC. If they call a poster or anyone about a about a "scam" they usually call people who were trading in the stock or associated with the company while it was going on.
A little clarification of what the office of the inspector general does. He audits and monitors the SEC.
I normally don't post here as it is most contentious and some of it is ???
To answer numerous statements as to "nothing done since" and "Zero" Old Video etc. Would have been nice to also post this from the same page as the video. Jeezzzzz. Bye again. EOM
http://j3aet.com/uploads/MBS_Overview___Case_Studies_j3.pdf
It has been one year since all the talk about revocation coming next week many times since that date.
Uh no. But that statement goes hand in hand about your statement that gtgp will be revoked set for last Friday.Also that gtgp would be revoked weeks after suspension. Guess that was also not quite correct. Lets see now.. Oh, over a year now.
What ever happened to the statement that GTGP will be revoked set last Friday? Guess that was another ploy as always.
It seemed to have worked out for all the folks that sold all the way up. Not much "complaining" from them. Keep forgetting to mention that for quite a few shareholders.Like OH, up 1000% etc.Don't see many of them complaing. And oh, the ATM comments as well. Should look at all the posts pre sept as well.
Of course he does, he did the sec registration and is on the filing as well in 04. only 9 years ago.What is new about that, or did some folks just find that out. Glad we have so many shareholders that excel in DD.
I find it interesting that predicting a revocation next week is not the way the SEC works. For those who do not know
1. A notice is given by the SEC posted by them publicly that an administrative hearing is being set up with 10-25 days for a company to respond to it before anything even begins to happen. No such notice has been posted or put out by them. So next week is total fantasy no matter who knows who. Be helpful to at least know the rules.
That would be amazing as it is 2 hours earlier
in MT so you spoke to someone at 6:00am there?
Global Technologies Group, Inc. Has Negotiated an Acquisition of the Company and Upcoming Shareholder Vote
Global Technologies Group, Inc. (GM CE) (USOTC:GTGP)
Global Technologies Group, Inc. (PINKSHEETS: GTGP) -- James Fallacaro, President announced that GLOBAL has negotiated a sale of the company contingent upon shareholder approval and will move to close upon conclusion of the vote. The terms of the sale will be fully disclosed in the voting statement and the shares held by Ms. Fallacaro will abstain from voting as this will be a non-arm's length transaction.
Global Technologies Group, Inc. (GLOBAL) is a company that is in the business of acquiring exclusive licenses and distribution and reseller contracts on proven technologies in the environmental, green and war fighter industries. The criteria for the licensing or distribution agreements of the technologies are: they must be proven, validated and in use. The business plan of Global is to sublicense the technologies it acquires to companies in Countries covered under the original license grants and for its own use. For our exclusive distribution and reseller agreements, we partner with appropriate representatives in the covered countries for resale of turn key projects. Currently, J3 Advanced Engineering Technologies, Inc. is the exclusive marketing company for Global.
Contact:
James Fallacaro
Email Contact
941-685-1616
www.glbtech.com
That was dismissed also. Try posting the withdrawal and dismissal as well.
Try reading the document. Nowhere does it say GTGP home etc was repode.
Clarifying for you? what. If you even read the entire post you will see how wrong the "clarification" is in your response
You don't seem to understand the meaning of shareholder vote with jim etc not voting.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=90774391
Nothing has been explained by you.How can a deal be cut between jim and gtgp when it is up for shareholder approval without their votes. explain that for us. What I really find pitiful is the following statements made in the ozone.
1.MBS doesn't work. 2.there is no contracts 3. b&w shot them down etc over and over. Then I hear their is a plot to steal what has been called worthless assets. How does anyone fathom that thinking.I am through responding to comments even I don't comprehend.
Please explain how they are cutting a deal with themselves when they are leaving it up to the shareholders and withholding their stock voting which is the majority shares.They could just call their note period without any vote or notice.And what game is J3?
Wrong again and again and again. Try reading the finacials for Falcon to see a. Where the money went and how much they put in. Sorry I can't do your homework for you. Bye Finally.
Unfortunately what you don't seem to realize is what you quoted was a risk factor only. If you would have copied the document totally you would see they showed the UCC and state of Ct filings which gave them the assets for serious money owed. In addition, the SEC OK'd the registration with that statement in it as well.in 04. Finally, no former shareholders show up as a suit or complaint anywhere I can find, can you? So, what else is new?
Tired of the exchanges. Bye
I would like anyone on this board to point out where taking assets when calling a demand secured note for everything needs anyones consent or any agency that is needed in statutes of any kind.enough of speculation and assumptions about what jim can or can't do.
Right. That quote is way off. Guess he forgot that they own J3 and GTHI, why else for a non arms-length transaction if they aren't even voting, and who would approve that as shareholders. They could have called the note at any time and didn't. They don't need anyones approval to do that. jeezzzzz.
Again, wrong. By calling the note, they don't have to do anything else with Finra , SEC and you.Here you go again.
Really, then why a shareholder vote without them voting their majority shares? Why erase 2 plus million in debt when they could just call their note?How could they get it for themselves by having a vote?
if a 3rd grader wrote that and you don't understand it, what does that say about folks who don't understand it. It has been there in all release for years.
Then how did you sell shares at .035 if they are matched when there is a lower offer.?
Really? what benefit does the gtgp shareholders have now if no deal is done?
Wouldn't that mean the bid was .035 at that time
Guess you missed the sell at .035
Then why would they want to buy the company or the assets?
You have it wrong again. they are buying the entire company. also a full shareholder vote without them voting. Helps if you cite the text from the 8k.
GREAT ANSWER. EXPECTED THAT KIND OF REPLY. ADDS A GREAT DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE FOR THE BOARD. THANK YOU.
INTERPRET. SPELLING CLASS NOW?
THEN WHY NOT JUST CALL THE NOTE AND TAKE THE ASSETS INSTEAD OF A PROXY VOTE WITH JIM NOT VOTING?
jEEZZZZ
WHAT I EXPECT IS MY OWN THOUGHTS. THINK FOLKS SHOULD INTERPRATE AS THEY ALWAYS DO THEIR OWN THOUGHTS.
WHAT PRICE WOULD THAT BE. THE CURRENT VALUE IS .03?WHATEVER THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR IS BETTER THAN .03.PLUS THEY DON'T NEED A SHAREHOLDER VOTE TO TAKE THE ASSET.
THEY DON'T NEED SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL IF THEY WANTED THE ASSET ONLY. THEY COULD HAVE CALLED THEIR NOTE WHICH THEY DIDN'T. TIME TO GIVE UP THE GHOST. DONE HERE TODAY. HAVE FUN THOUGH. IT IS AT TIMES AMUSING AND RIDICULOUS AT THE SAME TIME.
GREAT ASSESSMENT BUT TOTALLY WRONG.