Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Absolutely!
Exclusive of the extraordinarily accurate and incisive charting skills, which have been showcased here,this stock is event driven. People will see something which hasn't been seen before and no one else has. I believe that such qualifies as an event. A picture is worth a thousand words and we will see multiple pictures, on multiple axis, free of artifacts and visual acuity acceptable for surgical intervention. Enjoy the show. In the spirit of full disclosure I make this statement with the knowledge that no matter what is shown it will be proclaimed a fraud by the con man, penny stock, Godless huckster, pedophilia,shell game practicioner, carnival barker, penny stock ceo and all around evil person/lucifer Dean Janes. DID I MISS ANYTHING???????
I'm not smart enough to predict a stock price. All I know is that we'll see something no one has seen before and no one else has been able to demonstrate. Ain't gonna' be a powerpoint presentation!
Everything I have stated is verifiably factual. I bought that PPM myself. Would you be good enough to provide proof of your accusations? When I say proof, the report that Altounian was at IMGG the other day doesn't count.
They have been for quite awhile as one of their portfolio companies. They own 125,000 shares. Hardly enough to exert any influence. Altounian has no board seat and has no more influence than any other shareholder.
You'll be happy with Friday.
Not real time. Wait for Friday.
Yes. However, there are algorithims which will not be elaborated on, for obvious reasons. One way or another, this will be put to bed on the 13th. There are those here who believe this is a fraud. NO MATTER WHAT IS SHOWN OR HOW, IT WON'T BE GOOD ENOUGH. Use your own judgement after YOU see what you see.
Send what you see on the 13th to Dr.'s Fung and Fishman.
He did so illegally. It triggered multiple audits and a slap on the wrist from OSHA and other regulatory bodies. He will be very careful this time to be totally compliant.
Before you start telling someone they have screws loose consider the fact that it is patently illegal to fire up a radiation emitting device in public forum. Even in Janes own lab they must be six feet away and wear protective clothing. You can't even do it at RSNA.
Showing the device is approved by the FDA as long as such is done within the parameters of the regulations the FDA has set forth. After production is completed the video will be sent to legal counsel to insure that such video falls within the FDA regulations. Assuming that there are no to minimal changes this should take no more than 2-3 weeks. I'm sure that the video will demonsrate 3d real time with more than acceptable visual acuity to all but a FEW INVESTORS. The FDA will not approve a demonstration with a Radiologist, on the video extolling the virtues of the Dominion, don't look for that. Stay tuned. I think MOST investors will like what they see.
"Maybe they are sick of people calling them?" That's entirely possible. Lawyers, especially Washington Lawyers, don't like to be constantly called by shareholders. Beside the facts that anwering anyones questions is a violation of attorney client priviledge and the legal canon of ethics. We are shareholders, not clients. Sounds like someone got a cranky secretary who gave a dissmiswsive answer to stop the calls. How'd you like your lawyer to provide information in response to a phone call from someone they didn't know. I'd fire the lawyer.
Stay tuned. Coming to a screen near you in the next several weeks.
Wait for the images.
Why don't you just call the attorney to verify the information I gleaned? Or is the attorney a liar also?
I'm no fan of MTV. However, It was and is clear that there will be no PMA. A meeting will be scheduled shortly with the FDA, legal consultants and Janes. We will know then what the FDA will require . It will not be a PMA. Unless you have selective hearing,reading or just believe everything is a lie by Dean Janes the penny stock, con man, liar and bunko artist, that's where it's at.If you're in the aforementioned pew, sell your stock or continue to espouse that you are on a moral crusade. Someone posted the name of the attorney And the phone number stating that the liens were removed from the patents.They stated they didn't know why it was still a matter of public record and would look into removing it. In spite of that posts still appear that the liens are still effective. I followed up and called the lawyer he told me the same thing. Factual verification of anything, in light of that, becomes superlous.As far as Janes comments about phases, he was referring to where the submission process was at. If you will recall, the strategy has always been to do a preliminary redo of the application and meet with the FDA to determine if what they have is sufficient for submission or if they need someting else. Again, THERE WILL BE NO PMA. Goodbye again.
The rather succinct synopsis that KKG has posted coincides, almost, exactly with what my own independent sources have stated, up to and including the conclusion that this is a 510K submission.If, in fact, the point made by KKG requires additional support I'm sure the firm doing the redo of the submission will deal with such. They have the same, extensive, FDA credentials as the legal counsel. KKG is definetly not Janes. I have spoken to him (KKG), personally, on the phone. If you are a long investor, the reasons you are here were just, factually, delineated for you.Clarification of the fact that the patent is securely owned by IMGG( Janes assigned such to IMGG). Not my opinion, such is specified in the available public documentation. Stay tuned for clarification. I don't know anyone who has run their own business for any length of time who has not been involved in multiple lawsuits. Such is part of the white noise that is being pandered here. There is only one reason to be invested in IMGG. The Dominion will be the catalyst for a paradigm shift. You can scream, rant, argue the technology, the content of the FDA letters all you want. KKG has delineated the FACTS concomitant to the Dominion, as verfied by experts, for the second time. Yes, there are those who have seen the Dominion perform, live, as advertised.Everything elses is WHITE NOISE!
What a wonderful display of elegant logic! If one follows your reasoning, Jane's and his management are buying into IMGG's scam. What could possibly make more sense? Stay tuned.
ok and uh-huh
There is no BK planned or contemplated. If Cranshire resolves their issues total dilution will be 20-25M shares. If not, Janes will loan money to the company and there will be zero dilution.
What engineer at IMGG told you this was a scam? What court record are you referring to relative to the veracity of the Domion's technology? Provide that information. The court record, you are referring to is in the public domain, if it exists. Where do I find that. I know 3 engineers that have worked on the Dominion. Who told you that?
Yes on all counts. Resubmission shortly. "I stand by everything in my previous post".
I stand by EVERYTHING I posted yesterday. Legal, protective boilerplate. The financials are the financials. NO PENALTY HAS BEEN IMPOSED AT THIS POINT. The registration issue is not IMGG's. Janes will continue to support the company financially, if required, in spite of the criticism for doing so.
Patent#6754297 granted 6/23/04.
CONTINUATION of patent #6754297 granted 9/12/07.
The patent office does not grant patent continuations to those who do not own the original patent. The DVIS patent is OWNED by Dean Janes.
Not one of the firms you list in your due diligence are lawfirms. They are FDA consultants who are not restricted by law or the legal canon of ethics that a law firm is. Further, a firm similar to the ones you have listed is being employed to do the rewrite, quarterbacked by the attorneys. The attorney's function as legal advocates. Ergo, attorney/client priviledge applies. After the reformatting of the application is completed the attorney's function as legal advocates.
The very first announcement of engagement mentioned MWE by name.Like any noted law firm they were not happy with that, for all the reasons you mentioned. The 8K retraction, which is being beaten to death, caused them to request confidentiality again. In addition to the reasons you mentioned, they were inundated with calls from "certain people" for verification of representation, which they refused to give, as any lawfirm would due to Attorney/client confidentiality. Lobcrab, you can argue this all day. In spite of the fact that it is the law, it makes no difference here.
"Let them decide if Janes has broken the law". Thank you for underscoring the point I have made.Why don't you do the same????
NONSENSE!!! A man who has, allegedly, scammed multiple millions for years is now risking incarceration for $12K a month. That makes elegant sense.
Mr. Taylor have you ever asked yourself why Janes, after getting an NSE letter, didn't exit stage left to a balmy, tropical isle in a country with no extradition treaty? Instead he retained two competent consultants to refile and rewrite the submission, knowing full well that they would scrutinize the technology through their own act of discovery and resubmit.Don't respond to this with the nonsense that he actually retained them to defend himself against what will amount to be nuisance lawsuits. It seems to me that once the con is discovered that the conman escapes to legal safety. Has your emotional state , enhanced by biblical furor, caused you to avoid questioning that? Are you that overwhelmed with irrational furor? "Janes will be stopped", "He has no morals" and "He is a monster".You claim to have called everyone from the FBI to the SEC to the Daughters of the American Revolution. Why is IMGG still listed? Why is Janes still free? Afterall, he is so obviously "A monster with no morals, who will and must be stopped". Why don't the enforcement agencies see the commission of such obviously nefarious and illegal activities and just stop this monster and shut down his company? Do you honestly believe that he is continuing the con for a few more months to enjoy his "Hollywood life style, boat parties and silk suits" just to temporarily continue such a lifestyle while risking incarceration?
You are ahead of yourself. Prior to seeing the light of day in a courtroom the suit must go through the act of discovery, inclusive of depositions from both sides. In addition to prima fascia evidence intent must also be proven. The fact that Mr. Rentea is representing himself is quite telling. As someone once said" A lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client". Don't count on your Nostradamus like prognostications coming true in the near future or at all. The courts require more than conviction on a message board as proof. One is still innocent until proven guilty. America does not subscribe to Napolenic law.
The lawfirm is an ADVOCATE of the company. There is no conflict of interest. Many large companies have Chief Legal Officers who defend their company constantly. They own considerable amounts of stock and/or have significant options. If on the other hand the lawfirm was representing the FDA and held stock in IMGG a conflict would exist.In the 8K the delineation of the penalty for failure of registration was reported. If such fine had been IMPOSED such would have been reported, JUST AS THE PENALTY CLAUSE WAS. The idea that EVERY MEETING, WRITING OF A LEGAL BRIEF OR CONSULTATION WITH THE FIRM RETAINED TO DO THE REWRITE OF THE SUBMISSION or THE FDA SHOULD BE REPORTED IS ABSURD.Such is tantamount to reporting that a salesperson made a sales call OR THE COMPANY HAD A MEETING TODAY. None of the aforementioned events are material. The company is obligated to report materially significant events and milestones.
You're beating your head against the wall. Let's do a quick synopsis.
1.Janes is a conman.
2. The DVIS has never existed, does not exist and never will because the science is impossible/unproveable. It's a total sham, similar to cold fusion.
3.IMGG is a lifestyle stock which Janes is attempting to perpetuate to continue his Hollywood lifestyle with investors money.
4. He is alledged here to be an arsonist. He started the fire at IMGG to rid himself of excess inventory, pocketed the insurance money and stiffed debtors. Numerous lawsuits were filed, which he is makeing payments on with investors money.
5.The AI letters and NSE letter say don't bother to file again you have been rejected and we're tired of your quack device and your shennigans.
6.MWE is no longer representing IMGG.
7. No human on planet earth has ever seen the device produce 3d real time images because the device doesn't exist.
8.Every utterance from Janes is an outright lie. Don't bother to question him or attend share holders meetings. All you will get are fictional answers to your questions.
9.The SEC is investigating IMGG and will shut it down any day. They are measuring him for an orange suit as we speak.
10. Anyone who continues to be invested in or invests in IMGG is a candidate for citzenship in Jonestown.
11. If MWE is still active it has nothing to do with the FDA. They were actually retained to keep to keep him out of jail.
12. If an FDA application is submitted and the device is approved it will be for a dumbed down version of the Dominion, which will be worthless in the marketplace. If such happens, which it won't because the device doesn't exist, Janes will raise more money from investors for sales and marketing. He will pocket all those funds to continue his Hollywood lifestyle for a few more years.
13.He is such a pirrah he is not entitled to due process, being considered innocent until proven guilty. He has been tried,convicted and sentenced in the court of Ihub.
At this point, you should see the folly of your analyisis. You should be grateful that there are those here, some spending hours, day and night, to save your investment and inform any new investor of the madness of Dean Janes the penny stock ceo and pathological bunco artist. Aren't you thankful?
Not for a nanosecond. As I have repeatedly stated, I know what I know and I know what I've seen. It comes from sources outside of IMGG. Your comfort level is that this is a fraud. Mine is the opposite. Time will tell.
Please read post #'s 37097 & 37375. Rewrite will be completed no later than the end of the first week of March. At completion an additional meeting with MWE and the FDA will take place to insure that everything required is included in the new submission. Resubmission should happen around March 15.
You misunderstand the legal concept of discovery abuse. You have touched on it in your post, correctly stating that a lawsuit has not been served yet. When a lawyer subponeas information from a source and does not serve a lawsuit and then in engages in the action, which Mr. Bogdan has done, of publishing such for other purposes and not serving the lawsuit, which is the case here,you have discovery abuse. Your analogy does not apply.Further, the AI letter states that there was a labeling issue,as Janes stated on the conference call, which Janes responded to. The result of his response was that it changed the intended use of the instrument. One cannot be prosecuted for incompetence.Fortunately, competent help has been engaged.
In response to Mr. Bogdan's post that the government sent him the information, they did so in response to a subpoena, which he sent, requesting the information as part of his act of discovery. Mr. Bogan asked who I am. I'm who I post as, Mr. Bogdan. I'm easy to find.
I will reiterate that this will be filed as a 510K, because that's what it is. Such will happen soon. After the submission it's up to the FDA. That's all the news that's fit to print this morning
This is a blizzard of white noise and is called abuse of discovery. This will shortly be refiled as a 510K. Mr. Bogdan should secure competent federal counsel. Abuse of discovery is seriously frowned upon by the courts and the federal government. I hope he has answering machine in the phone booth he operats out of. Enjoy feeding off each other. This euphoria will pass for a number of you in the short term.
Some of you may wish to remember that the reviewer who wrote that was removed from review of the IMGG application and has subsequently been terminated from the FDA. I will reiterate that both MWE and the company rewriting the submission have 37 years of recent FDA experience behind them and are in concurrence that this is definetly a 510K application with NO PMA requirement.
I know what I have seen and sources I have depended on, technical, medical and legal in other endeavors, whom I have grown to rely on have torn the Dominion apart, inclusive of patent, technology and breadth of application. Do your own independant, due diligence and come to your own conclusions. Or, just continue with what have become evangelical rants. I am more than satisfied with my own intelligence. My sources are, obviously, in conflict with yours. Additionally, I have seen many nse letters. This one is not unusual. This will be resubmitted as a 510K. Have a good day and goodbye.
As I have stated previously and repeatedly, I only rely on sources outside of IMGG. As far as seeing eye to eye with Janes, relative to submission, we have never agreed. I begged him to get outside help for submission for 2 years. The result was the NSE. We are now in competent hands, who he is listening to. We are in better shape than we have ever been. Yes, this instruments works and works well on all counts.