KC, that is one of the 4 items that HLNT will be providing information on during this quarter, possible even this month. There are no guarantees to February, but it is a possibility, none the less.

Have a lot of reading to catch up on as I've been away at a funeral for the last few days. Several people have been asking my opinion on the recent court postings. As I've told them, the company has information about the suits that they will be releasing but they are planning to do so with other information at the same time. For that reason, I've not provided any interpretations as it is the company that deserves the acclaim and credit for the news. This is one of about 4 items that the company will be releasing information on. Looking good!!!

A couple of notes on production. During a tour of the Delta and TMS facilities back in August, the production processes were being put together and worked out. First, TMS works by batch, as they use the same equipment to do work for numerous customers. This requires changing various tooling and die parts for each customer. Delta, on the other hand, is a process flow orientation, setting aside a part of their facilities for work strictly on HLNT's units. In either plant, a 1000 unit production per week was easily possible. The ceiling for production, without any changes to the infrastructure was nearer to 3000 units a week. Above that, TMS would have to invest in more equipment, which they have more than enough space for. Delta would have to subcontract some of the production work but complete the assembly and testing at their facility.

Given the above, based upon an average of 1000 units per week for 50 weeks (allowing for holidays and breaks), that is 50,000 units a year. Given PQ3's sales number of $5200.00 average per unit, that is $260,000,000 for a year. AHS will receive the sales revenue, and as AHS pays for the installation by Velocity, as well as various other expenses, including advertising and promotional fees, will distribute the after expenses revenues equally to AHSGS&M and HLNT.

HLNT's revenues are increasing. While we have been constantly reminded of HLNT's past operating losses, most of which have revolved around certain law suits, all such suits should be resolved early in this year. No more drain due to legal fees. HLNT will be able to focus on and complete the reporting and disclosure, another area of concern for many, with the possibility of it being done before March 31st being very likely. The disclosure should take care of 99% of all complaints about HLNT's lack of release of information, and the Company should be able to finish its clean up of the HOSS and HHHI companies that have been allowed to go dormant on the Arkansas SOS, as well as getting the Arkansas SOS to clear the status of HLNT's registration with the previous overpayment of taxes.

Any other complaints are rapidly becoming insignificant, and shareholders will be able to better enjoy their investments during this year, with the finish of January and going forward.

Based upon information that is developing outside the company, HLNT should be back in the .01 range early this next week, and stay above the .01 line for good. From what I've seen and researched, it is possible, that HLNT could end up above the .0120 level, and somewhat possible to test the .0150 line.

But just for the record, this is my opinion. Everyone take care and have themselves a great weekend.

Interesting information can be had from the L2 when one understands the buying and selling.

CDEL and NITE both have orders to sell at the 'ask' of .0095. What does that mean? For many who have online brokerage accounts, they are able to trade at just about $10.00 for a buy or sell (some have better deals from their broker). At .0095, $10.00 is just over a 1000 shares, or roughly 10% of the total order of 10,000 shares. Most retail investors are definitely not prone to waste 10% of their funds on such a trade (although there are reasons for doing so), so one can conclude that these are trades (CDEL and NITE) that are for the brokers own accounts (brokers don't charge themselves fees, but they still have to pay the DTCC for the transaction handling, which is less than 5% of what we pay to the brokers). Further, CDEL and NITE are using 'conditional' orders, as soon as the 10,000 share ask is filled, a new order automatically is generated at the same asking price. Retail investors don't use the conditional order to put though, for instance, 100,000 shares in 10,000 increments, they will put the entire order of 100,000 shares through at one time.

Autodesk Financial (ATDF) has an order to sell at the 'ask' of .0095 for 64,000 shares. This is a retail seller, not a MM, as Autodesk in a trading mechanism and doesn't truly buy and sell for an internal acccount. UBSS for the most part also is retail investors, the UBSS 'ask' or 230,000 shares at .0099 is also a real retail seller.

Since we know that MM's are prone to short the stock (especially as indicated by the above behavior), what is to be expected from CDEL and NITE? MM's depend on the 'right' level of volume to profit from the shorting of stock. Too low a volume and there isn't enough profit to be had by 'walking' the stock down until a response can be achieved of retail investors dumping their shares to avoid losses, or by triggering stop loss trades. If the MM's cannot induce enough selling, then they can't effectively cover their short positions, and there is no profit in manipulating the stock. On the other side, if there is too much volume, the MM's cannot perform the 'walkdown' that they use to manipulate investors, the volume will eat up any lowering of the ask too quickly to establish the walk down and will bounce too quickly for the MM's to get their 'bid' transactions filled at lower PPS levels.

So, what are NITE and CDEL up to? Each investor or MM has limited information (not referring to the reporting of HLNT on the OTC 'limited information') in that no one knows completely all the marketplace activity and background information concerning any given stock. That is, all the inside information of a company is not available to each and every employee of a company, let alone to those external to the company, and the stategies and actions of MM's and investors are not known to each other and the company as well. Yet each of us, including MM's, have before us the due diligence that we have been able to perform and that we use in our decision making. That being said, NITE and CDEL believe that they have information that would lead them to believe that they can accumulate their short positions in anticipation of the PPS falling, or being manipulated downwards.

The shorting of penny stocks is documented, all one has to do is go to the FINRA reporting site to see the daily shorting reports, and a bimonthly report of "open short interest" is a requirement of FINRA by the SEC. If one goes to the OTC Website, all one has to do is look up the FINRA brokeaga rules, and you can find out that every "short" transaction has to be identified. WE could have better reporting, but the MM's have fought such requirements because they say that such information is proprietary. Most people protect information about their buying and selling strategies and positions, why should we expect the MM's to be any different, especially if the transactions in question are for their own internal accounts. And by the way, HLNT had open "short interest" postions of more than 300,000 shares at the end of December, 2012. That is documented.

But to wrap up about CDEL and NITE. They are gambling on their knowledge of the Market Place and company information that they can make a profit at shorting HLNT at the .0095 range. What happens if the PPS rises higher instead? MM's have the advantange of getting news releases 15 minutes before it goes public. This is supposedly to allow them to adjust their strategies to accomodate the liquidity to handle an increase in trading based upon the news. Truthfully, it allows them to pull the short sales orders and to start covering any open short positions, or at least be prepared to do so. Because they have Level 3 market data, they can usually respond to changes in the PPS much quicker than the retail investor. So they are willing to take the chance that an adverse movement in the PPS could occur, but they are confident that they can adapt quckly enough to make a profit on an increasing PPS as well.

It will be interesting to see how well CDEL and NITE respond to changes in the Marketplace information.

HLNT/NIR/Ribotsky/Humprhies/Walters/PWC Lawsuits Update 01/23/2013:

As pointed out by Rainmaker, there was an entry today in the New York Scroll System concerning Walters ex-attorney, Mr. Shapiro. Mr. Shapiro is taking the necessary steps to get paid from by Walters for the services he performed for Walters and for the reimbursement for reasonable expenses incurred by Mr. Shapiro in Walters New York Legal case. Walters ex-attorneys bailed on him because he wouldn't pay his bills, he was apparently unhappy with the legal services they were providing, but they were not able to bury HLNT. There isn't much to it other than that.

What is not in the filings, but on the Case Summary is the NOI's (Notices of Issue) have been given the due date of Feb 6th, 2013.
Because of Humphries, HLNT's case against Walters and Humphries has been delayed a good 4 months, but we should see the New York trial scheduled for some time during the month of March. Walters is running out of time and has run out of excuses.

These next two weeks are going to be very interesting as to what action he is going to take. He is not going to do well in front of a jury when he is asked questions about the notes, because he has already embarrased himself in the Motion for Partial Summary Judgement that was denied by the Texas Judge. If Walters thought the Deposition was tough, he has no clue as to what to expect in a full blown trial. The lawyers were nice to him in the Deposition he gave as compared to what they will do in trial.

Opinions expressed herein are my own and each investor should conduct his or her own due diligence and make investment decisions accordingly.

Revenues for HLNT are increasing, which we will hear about within the next 7 to 10 days, in part or in total. This is turning more and more into the quarter that we have long anticipated and expected.

With regards to Walters, the Texas lawsuit trial is now less than 20 days away, and he can look forwards to sitting on the witness stand and discussing his fiduciary malfeasance that led to the creation of the "notes" that he claims he has a right to.

It would be interesting to know how much influence Walters had been peddling both in the court room and in the market place to try to assure himself a victory. However, the truth will be his undoing in the court room, and once the trial is completed, he will have lost his chance to gain any benefit from the Texas case.

Since he is a defendant in the New York case, and HLNT has already gotten a favorable opinion of the judge in her decision on the Counter Claims against Walters and Humprhies, as to the violations of their fiduciary responsibilities, Walters has all but lost that case before it even goes to trial.

This is our quarter, longs, lets enjoy it!!! The PPS should begin to reflect the impact of issues being resolved favorably and company's actions coming to fruition during this quarter.

With regards to PWC and the settlement, PWC is losing money on the liquidation of the NIR funds. The money that was received will not go entirely to PWC, so they have done one thing that was in the favor of NIR investors and themselves, stopped the bleeding that they were facing with lawyers fees in the lawsuit. Yes, that could be considered a win on their part, as it does give them a chance at some recovery, if any, in the future.

I have to disagree with you Blue12. Mr. Rhoades, the CEO prior to Walters, prior to Humphries prior to Chad, borrowed money from NIR. At the time that Humphries took over, the company at that time, in its prior name, still owed NIR 2.5 million, which debt was to be transferred to Walters company Monarch Bay. NIR agreed to the fraud perpetrated by Walters and Humphries, including the transfer of the old debt. But in the lawsuit brought by NIR, NIR sued HLNT for both the prior (that they agreed was transferred to Walters company), and the debt supposed transferred in by Humphries. NIR got nothing from Walters, nothing from Humphries, and a bunch of legal bills for trying to saddle HLNT with all the debt.

No matter how you look at it, NIR lost very big on this, but with regards to the rest, Walters (especially since his crony Humphries is bankrupt) is on the hook for the settlement amount, plus HLNT's legal fees, and any other damages that his violating of his fiducairy responsibility will result in.

By the way, only about 3 weeks left before the Texas trial. Walters better be gearing up for the embarassment that he is going to be facing there.

As I have checked with HLNT about the issue, two years ago, the company overpaid its tax liability to the Arkansas Secretary of State. They have been working on the issue to have the overpayment applied to the current period and next period. Arkansas has not followed through yet, but it will get straightened out.

If you are truely interested in the name of the previous company, or about the time frame in the development of the JV, you can do your due diligence by going back and reading the 1000's of posts here on HLNT. And what information is not here, just call the number that I recommended. They can help you out.

As far as the name, yes, I know it and the time frame of the development of the JV, cause I did call HLNT. Just like I also know that there are patent applications and that if one really tries, they can find out about them with the USPTO.

And as for the HTI updating of the Arkansas SOS registration, thanks for the heads up. I will ask the company about that because they may have overlooked it. And I am pretty sure that it will be updated very quickly. It is true that sometimes critics of HLNT help the company out by the occasional discovery of something like that, which gives the company the alert that they need to take care of it.

Yep, easy to use too! In fact, it's even listed in the Intro Page here!!

1-479-267-6000.

Not all information obtained in doing Due-Diligence is done by sitting at a computer and trying to find stuff. Call the company, go visit them. A person could be greatly surprised by what they learn. Give a call, tell them you would like to come by and visit. You would even get directions on how to get there. Might find out the the HQ has a real address, and that there are real people there, even working none the less.

Nice people, I've met most of them, personally!

On the other hand, if a person doesn't want to make the trip, let alone the call, they have two options, listen to others who have been there (and not just myself by the way), or settle for short changing one's Due Diligence efforts and not really knowing what's going on, which of course leads such people to speculating about HLNT, the wrong way.

Wrong? It was speculation, nothing more than an opinion that has no basis in what the company is doing.

"I wonder why HLNT and AHSGSM didn't say anything about the revenue split, ..."

When a partnership or Joint Venture is announced, unless something is said otherwise, the first assumption is that when they say there is a 50/50 Split, that encompases both ownership and revenues. Because it hasn't been specifically stated, anyone can speculate that there is some other percentage of revenue split, but speculating doesn't make it real, just entertaining.

Such speculation, and really unfounded. But that is all it is, unfounded speculation.

The lawyers working for and with HLNT want to be sure that they are not incurring any undesireable liability, therefore, they want good documentation, not guesses.

So after the Walters/Humphries suits are complete that is it for any existing suits against HLNT correct?

So far, the cases being litigated are just the New York Case and the Texas case of Walters. Humphries has tried to sue HLNT, but didn't have the capacity to do so. The Bankruptcy Trustee is looking into the possibility, as the party of real 'standing', but will decline to do so, as the Trustee will know that it would be worthless to contend with Humphries actions and activities as the CEO of SSEV. Other than that, HLNT may file cases as to issues of libel and slander, and for economic interference, if it is deemed appropriate to do so.

What is our potential exposure with these suits to your best guestimate?

In the Texas Case, Walters is suing for two notes (bogus by the way) which total $130,000. I won't guess as to any other amounts if we were to possibly lose, as I will not set a benchmark. In the New York case, we stand to recover some, if not all, of our expenses with regards to Walters, including any losses in the Texas case as that would be an additional determining factor for damages in the New York case. For Walters, its a lose/lose situation, regardless of if he wins in Texas. One of his (not mentioned) purposes was to cause HLNT more cash drain in the hopes that HLNT could not continue the lawsuit battle, which by the looks of it, will not happen. I will not guestimate here what we could make as again, I don't want to set a benchmark.

How long do you think it will take until HLNT is fully reporting. They only have to report for the last 2 years correct?

There are two reporting levels for filings, the SEC's standard and the OTC's alternative standard (The OTC also follows the SEC standard where companies are able to do so, but the alternative standard simply allows the filing to be done unaudited.). In either standard, a large part of the reporting is the transactions concerning stock. For many companies, the lack of filing or failure to file is financially related, but in HLNT's position, the lack of information from Humhpries, especially as to all the wheeling and dealing before Robinson and Foster became directors, is what most concerns HLNT. Supposedly, from Humphries filings in the New York case, he had sent several binders of documents to the FBI(?) which contained stock transactions as well. That is the information that he is supposed to have provided all, or in part, to HLNT attorneys. This is not a case where some numbers can be guessed at and thrown together for reporting, and while the T/A has information on the shares outstanding, they don't have the ability to determine if any of those shares were issued for invalid reasons. Remember, Humphries was caught forging signatures for stock issuances since he wasn't getting any funding from Ribotsky. I have not heard about the status of the documents received, but I have heard from Mr. Zeller that they are working on the OTC alternative filing and would like to get it finished. But I don't have any more information than that.

But as to your question, once they (HLNT) have determined that they have all the supporting documetation, it could take about a couple of weeks to finish the write up and submission. In other words, it could happen during this quarter.

Nothing has changed, the 4th quarter of any company is due 90 days after the close of the fiscal year. The other 3 quarters are due in 45 days.

February 11th.

So what if Delaware charges for their services. I've paid to get information from them, because I really wanted to know. If the information is important to an investor, they will pay to improve their due diligence. I also pay for my access to PACER, where I can keep track of the different court cases. That is all a part of doing due diligence, including contacting the company and identifying myself, going to see the company, etc. I was and am very interested in HLNT and its performance, so I don't rely on self imposed restrictions to prevent my learning about my investment. Others should do the same, unless they are not interested in investing in HLNT.

What the company provides is a balance sheet that shows the cash position at a moment in time, usually the end of a fiscal quarter. They also provide a statement of cash flows that tell investors how they got from the beginning cash balance to the ending cash balance, but it shows that there is cash coming in and cash going out. For the fourth quarter, the financials are not due until the end of March. Just have to wait and see.

As for the bread and water, yes, but the company at least appears to be adding other things to it, while we wait for the steak, lobster and the baked potato.

There is always the possibility that there could be a settlement, after all, PWC demonstrated good sense and went for a settlement rather than run the risk of losing and paying lawyers fees.

We'll have to see how much good sense Walters has, because Humphries will fall in line with Walters. From Walters track record, I think he will let it go so far as starting a trial before he is ready to settle, if he doesn't find another way to postpone the Texas case (Although the Judge there doesn't seem to want to allow any delays to happen.)

The fact is that HLNT is here to stay, and has proven so with the amount already paid to PWC.

Many have doubted HLNT's sustainability, but there should be no doubt now. Some would hope that HLNT would fail, like Walters and Humphries, who will be facing a jury from the witness stand in less than a month now. That would be an interesting thing to watch, seeing those two explain themselves with regards to the notes that were created out of a fraud scheme. The clock is ticking down on those two right now, and they can't evade the consequences of their actions any longer.

I don't believe, if you'll pardon me, that the pattern of trading yesterday, at the time that it occurred, was the sum total of disgruntled investors suddenly deciding that HLNT was overvalued. That would definitely be a coincidence too hard to imagine.

To be a good investor, one has to seperate the actions of the company from the influence of the market makers. Without that seperation, an investor will get taken for a ride with every movement that is influenced by the MM's, and the MM"s love to take advantage of naive investors. It wouldn't matter if HLNT was trading at .02, .10, or even a Dollar, if the MM's want to manipulate the stock. And that applies to any stock at any level as well, unless there is sufficient trading volume that prevents the kind of manipulation we saw yesterday.

True, we should't put the blame entirely on the MM's, but don't downplay the influence that they have either.

Yesterday's late day run down of HLNT seemed to bear a resemblence to other Pink Sheet STocks in the last few days. CDEL appeared to be agressively manipulating the PPS, as it has with other PS Stocks. It further seems that the possibility of news over the preceeding days was the reason that CDEL did't cause the run down much sooner, and even worse. It is doubtful that CDEL acted alone, but alas, this is all speculation in the first place. Still, seems awful coincidental, after reviewing more than 200 stocks yesterday evening.

Well, now we know why CDEL was loading up on shares the last few days. Looks like they were waiting for the News to be released and then watched to see the reaction. Interesting note, the news was not the only thing that HLNT has been working on. Enjoy the week!

Enjoy this coming week!

HLNT will be making a lot of investors, especially those long term, happier.

The criticisms that have been raised, or rather re-raised, about the formation of the JV by AHSG (which was operating under another name at the time the JV was put together, then reregistered under AHSGS&M), about the Trademark Applications (Which Niko updated for us recently), about the Patent Applications (whose existence can be verified with the USPTO, according to information that was posted here on this board previously), and a great many other concerns, have not deflected the growing conviction that HLNT will succeed, as evidenced by the PPS rising over the last 3 days.

We will be hearing good things from HLNT this next week, and with the upcoming court case in Texas, Walters better be looking forward to what he fears the most, a chance to sit on the witness stand and explain his Fiduciary Failures and the fraud that he failed to prevent with Humprhies, just as Humprhies will have the opportunity to explain his fraud and Walters and Ribotsky's roles in it. The trial in Texas is now about a month away, and the closer it gets, the more pressure these two gentlemen (I say that out of politeness) are going to feel. Wonder how Walters is going to hold up. He should have seen the writing on the wall when the Judge in Texas denied his Partial Summary Judgement Motion.

Everyone have themselves a good weekend and look forward to this next week with anticipation.

Casa, that would involve safety engineering, but it could be done!!

Actually, a furnace that burns natural gas is burning a Hydro Carbon chain, just like an internal combustion engine. The difference being that gasoline is a much bigger Hydro Carbon chain than natural gas. You are correct about there being greater efficiency, but Mugwumps is correct that even that can be improved. And HHO technology can be one of those improvements.

Apprenante, more than a year ago, I confirmed the existence of the first patent application. Since then others have too. I also know why you can't pull it up with a search on the USPTO web sites, because I learned about that too. In other words, there are more ways to confirm the the existence of the patent applications than just going to a web site and looking it up, or relying upon the company to tell you that they exist. I did the due diligence, that is why I know that you haven't. And because I understand the need to be able to confirm the evidence, I made it possible for others to do the same thing.

It is for those reasons that I know and say that the statements about there being not patent applications are wrong. Do the Due Diligence!!!

The technology would be great for natural gas fired heaters, but it would be a boon to coal fired heaters, boilers and industrial furnaces, especially since the current administration wants to shut down the use of coad as an energy source. By reducing the particulates, coal fired systems would comply with EPA requirements, and that would be huge to the eastern states around Pennsylvania. That would mean that those relying on the use of coal would not have to convert to other fuels. The savings on not having to convert would in itself pay for any application of the HHO technology.

That is patently wrong. Those who haven't found information about the patents haven't completed the due diligence necessary to get that information.

The shareholders of record are the actual holders of the stock certificates. The beneficial shareholders are the ones that actually own the stock. A brokerage house can be the shareholder of record, such as Etrade, and Etrades clients that have bought shares of HLNT are the "beneficial shareholders". If a person wants to, they can verify this with the SEC or the OTC. Just takes a phone call to do the due diligence to prove that information.

It would have wound up costing HLNT at least as much as the original convertible notes, or about 2.5 million, in legal fees, and HLNT would have gotten nothing out of NIR, as PWC has informed the world that there is nothing there to be had. It put an end to the waste of money and time resources that HLNT could better have spent on product development and production and marketing.

Wrong again.

There were too issues to the original NIR case, the 6 million worth of convertible notes that was transferred from DLAD to SSEV, and the original 2.5 million of convertible notes transferred from SSEV to Monarch Bay (Walters company). So the settlement did several things, stopped the drain being caused by that part of the lawsuit, and reduced the amounts of the actual debts, if any, that HLNT might have owed. The 1.1 million and the 15 million shares was to avoid the cost of further litigation, so essentially, HLNT cleared 8.5 million of debts, and the costs of further litigation. Don't see how anybody could possibly think that HLNT came out a loser in that settlement. But some do, and choose to do so even in light of the tremedous savings that HLNT won. And they did win it with the settlement.

No convertible notes to NIR anymore, they have been wiped from the accounting records! That means that HLNT doesn't have to waste money or stock on all that debt that Walters, Ribotsky and Humphries tried to saddle HLNT with.

Don't have a date yet for the New York trial. The Texas trial begins the 11th of February. Walters didn't want to give a deposition, so it is suspected that he will want to testify at a trial even less so. He screwed up, with Ribotsky and Humphries, and got discovered by HLNT. Not a pretty picture that he's facing in the courtroom, either in Texas or New York.

That's funny, the OTC has HLNT as limited reporting, the "Yield" sign. If HLNT was totally non reporting, the OTC would have them as a "Stop" sign, so HLNT must be satisfying the requirements for the OTC, and not only that, investors are able to find the information, as you have. So, continue to make a big deal out of nothing!

The Nasdaq does not report for the OTC, which hasn't reported yet.

However, if the short positions were all closed, without the MM's playing games, then that would be a good place to be.

The Preferred Stock are have a ratio to 10 to 1 for the Common Stock. Therefore voting rights are 10 to 1, not 1m to 1. The Statements "Seems I saw that the preferred shares for the insiders have 1M votes per share so it doesn't take many preferred shares to be the "majority shareholder" to approve things by "written consent" without needing to ask shareholders for their votes." are false and misleading. Correct Due Diligence would have prevented these false statements.