Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
As far as believing Jeff goes, he has always been truthful.
How do you figure UP 1600%, wasnt the share price this time last year over 50 cents?
I'd have to say the price is down 70% base on that fact.
Is that why it's up 1600%?
WTF.. As of 12/21 the R/S is being undone...
My fidelity account as of this morning 12/22 shows a transaction on 12/21 undoing the R/S that took place on 12/20.
I'm now holding my original number of shares of CRAP as of today.
They aren't playing around.The Split has taken place.
My Fidelity account is already showing a 1000 : 1 RS on 12/20.
New sym QASPD
I still check in occasionally and no I'm not Kwon.
I lost interest after Mr. Canouse's CC and when I got the impression he's nothing more than Mr. Bradley's bitch.
As for nhsh, I don't care much for sequels.
with HONEST people at the helm.
It's sort of like serving in the legislature under Saddam Hussein.
NON-CONVERTABLE Voting Only Shares means that the holding company can maintain control of the company
unlike Dean's preferred's they cannot convert them into commons and flood the market.
I was late and only started recording at beginning of question session. So I missed the opening comments.
From what I heard I was pretty disappointed with Mr. Canouse's attitude towards Mr. Bradley. Its obvious that Mr. Canouse and Mr. Bradley are a team, and have no intentions of relinquishing control until they've jacked the shareholders for every penny they can.
What is this? I don't understand what "voting only" means.
I'll assume for now you're correct with your data.
Knowing the court appointed Mr. Canouse provisional CEO it goes without saying he's taking on these expenses on behave of QASP.
If it is determined later that Mr. DiGenova was the righful CEO I would think Mr. DiGenova could then sue those who dethroned him for legal fees. Which would include QASP.
Shareholders in turn could sue any of those responsible and exceeded there limits of authority.
MOTION TO PAY ADVANCES BY MACKENZIE CAPITAL CORPORATION
JC gets a free pass whilst borrowing money from Dean Bradley
I told him what was pathetic.
You seem to be painting a picture that if the court rules in favor of Mr. DiGenova, he will meger the 2 companies and pay a dividend to QASP shareholders.
I was under the impression QASP shareholders would be given a change to see centawhatever's financials and then vote on the merger.
Is that no longer the case?
gift those shares to the QASP shareholders.
but these gentleman have never suggested that- but this sounded exactly like something Kwan Straughan would post, the um other K.S. How would you know something like this? That's an outrageous claim, but I suppose if some Q shareholders choose to follow Joe, that they have that right.
what's your point?
My point was Mr. Kendrick is acting as if his hands are clean and anyone speaking contrary are liable.
Yet he's brought this all on himself by dealing with people with dirty hands.
1. He became very close friends with Mr. Bradley
2. He took undocumented personal payments from the acting CEO of QASP Mr. DiGenova.
3. Then he entertained discussions with Mr. Canouse and Mr. Bradley which didn't include QASP shareholders.
4. Next he acknowledges the $900kk of contracts were bogus.
I'm surprised Mr. Kendrick can't understand why others might be dubious of his intentions.
Common knowledge
we can defer to Kendrick's letter today!
Jeff testified under oath that he lent the money to keep the operations of QASP going
..do you think the Judge will allow him to "merge" Trophy resources
the Judge will love this one
Your wasting you breath trying to prove to me who are good and bad guys. I already have a pretty good idea that 80% of those who post here or have anything to do with these companies are slime balls.
I want those who recieved money from Mr. Bradley, claim to be honest and have no ill intentions toward the shareholders of GASP to prove it and return our money.
We then liquidate, refund the remaining to shareholders of record, dissolve the company and prosecute the criminals.
My understanding was they had already tested in an Airship but the new test were to be done in a helicopter.
QASP had committed to pay for the demo.
I can't imagine $1kk plus to transfer an already tested technology from one vehicle to another.
I'm also puzzled by Mr. Kendrick remarks making light of a QASP shareholder verifying the demo date.
Doesn't MS verify the references and work background of its job applicants? And if they do, what happens if one of the references they attempt to contact is discovered to have passed a few days earlier?
From what I recall the shareholder discovered that a demo had never been scheduled for the time PR'd, but instead found a tentative date was being scheduled several months out, Oct as I recall.
It looked to me as though MS got caught with their pants down and tried to create a diversion by refocusing the attention onto the shareholder's action.
Joe's claims were further complicated by Dean Bradley who has written to the Mineseeker stating that much of the cash advanced, came from him personally, not from QASP. The stated that the QASP books did not show any money due from Mineseeker and that we owned him the money. The statement that no debt by Mineseeker was in the books came at a time when Dean was, undisputedly ( I think) the president of QASP.
who are those two cats at the bottom of your siggy?
I've got serious doubt this report is complete or represents a non distorted window into centaflix's finances.
1. $844k for receivables would lead me to believe this is pledged money from potential affiliates at $5k per.
I wished the CPA had broken out what the affiliate fees totaled, as the remainder would have represented real product sales.
2. They show $67,000 in short term debt, of which most is with parent company and could be revolved at end of 12 months term.
3. Most of the expenses are significantly below average for the revenues, which would imply someone has played around with the cost centers for the expenses.
Meetings + Tel + Computer/Web + Car + Commission Sales + Contract =$418,000, representing 97.7% of total expenses.. I don't buy it considering Rent, utilities, office supplies, etc.
4. Credit card and bank fees don't jive with the income level either. ex. credit card fees of $600 would back into CC sales of only $40k @ 1.5% transaction fee.
I'm guessing this is why CPA had disclaimer. Real income from sales of product, most likely represents a tiny fraction of receivables.
I agree..
Plus I don't see any R&D expense for all that High powered software development and all the patent filings. LMAO..
The financials look like those for a typical mid teer distributor in a MLM structure.
Based on what i see i don't think theres going to be enough money to support Mr. Kendrich's development expenses based on how he burned a million plus bucks in few months and has nothing to show for it.
Despite the fact that AIE states they are an accredited education center, the ED2GO courses they promote are not accredited.
ED2GO's own disclaimer states.
Education To Go (ed2go) is the industry leader in affordable online learning. Through a unique partnership with over 1,800 colleges and universities, we provide hundreds of the highest quality non credit continuing education courses. These courses are engaging and highly interactive – adult learners enjoy the opportunity to connect with their expert instructor and fellow students.
I remember now having wondered that very thing back then.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60294162
All I recall for answer was a bunch of double talk.
I find it even more puzzling, they talk about their production studio yet all their video courses from AIE are from ED2GO.
http://www.ed2go.com/landing-pages/pages/ed2go.php.html
I find it hard to believe an affiliate would pay $5k to join this nonsense.
ROFLMAO... I recall that now? "US patients, copy writes"
Plus Centascam isn't creative, they are nothing more than a middleman, brokering others products or services.
Interesting I can't find AIE listed within DETC's list of accredited schools.
http://www.detc.org/search_schools.php?searchSet=true&name=american&category=A
From my reading of AIE's web page it sounds like they are saying they are accredted by DETC.
The American International University is nationally accredited and supported by the top education curriculum developers, publishers, and credentialing organizations in the distance education field.
ROFLMAO... Why would big shot University list a cell phone for contact info? 770 402 2044
Is it because there isnt enough interest to justify a $25 a month land line?
http://www.aiuedu.us/our-programs/christian-education-program
Looks like Mr Owens is a quick study for Mr Bradley's scam techniques
LMAO.. in this post you said it wasn't because of NDA. "Take it to the BAnk"
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64372592
And then you turn around and post a statement from Mr Kendrick which basically says he wasn't going to violate the NDA to alert the QASP shareholders of the fraud being perpetrated by team Bradley.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64373407
So your evidence that Mr Kendrick was a part of the scam
I didn't mis-read Mr. Kendrick's statement I simply followed the spin the following posts were putting on it.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64354596
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64354761
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64354863
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64354981
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64354985
I'm a shareholder who was swindled by a collection of crooks.
The evidence that I collect I can either consult with a DA to pursue charges or I can turn over to the Feds.
If you have evidence he had prior knowledge that the $900 million contracts were bogus, serve it up to the Feds as they'd love to have.
But Mr Kendrick and several of the pumpers have publicly admitted they knew the contracts were bogus and took no action until now as they brag and make fun.
Wow! I am sure Joe is trembling right now. I guess you should be pushing him for his deposition to be posted, right?