Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Well said. Hear, hear!!!
Good for you! I believe, hope, and pray you are right.
It makes sense for any shareholder who heard "lawsuits", and said to themselves,
"Lawsuits are a long drawn out purgatory;
My money is not going to lawyers;
The outcome can never be certain."
It makes sense if anyone who didn't hear the news bailed on selling at high volume.
It doesn't make quite as much sense to bail out now if one believes this long-awaited news, in combination with increased retail distribution, portends good things.
It seems like nothing ever satisfies some people. It is just their nature to be eternally suspicious and critical. This serves their psychological needs, somehow, to be disapproving and in control. They are "nobody's fool", but neither are they fulfilled in their personal lives, or ever truly content.
Sounds very conservative.
Often important news on other stocks does not appear on iHub. I suspect most people on this board are underestimating how many shareholders are not on any message board and did not yet even see the news of today.
The very word "lawsuit" sends some people running screaming for the exits. That is because the legal system usually fails individuals. It may be different for corporations if they are reasonable and disposed to settlement. For people who have been following the company closely, I imagine most feel positive about this.
Oh, Interesting. Thank you for explaining this.
Not Microsoft, another company.
Where on Fidelity? Desktop research section?
With all respect, that does not sound quite right, because anyone can write anything and get someone to sign it and mail it to themselves. Would not pass muster as a proof of invention.
Sooner or later, I seem to unintentionally offend nearly everyone. But animals and children seem to like me. They are more forgiving...
Thanks!
Apology! My mother the former English teacher was forever correcting my expressions and pronunciation. It really was quite maddening...
That's why I think the bottom is now .001 -- anything else, those small partial fills is just feeding commissions to others.
Did you mean preceded rather than precluded?
How could such a laser sharp analytical genius almost always be wrong?
About $800 went through at .0008, in 6-7 small trades. Similar amount at .0009. Total activity insignificant.
Not worried this morning - total shares traded under $1700. A lack of willing sellers, it seems.
I don't know, but my impression is that it was a long slog to prevail in the settlement with Microsoft, and that they needed that money to execute on the retail expansion course they are now fully engaged in, but that this all happen too recently for the progress to have shown up in the numbers yet.
Something like that happen to me a few times, so I believe you.
That's an example why a lot of people don't want to start their online security by buying any product online. They want to go to a store and pay cash. Are you old enough to remember cash transactions? imho That is what is going to turn this around and put it on the rocket docket.
Sounds reasonable.
Many people don't want to use credit cards online anymore. Some people are getting tired of data thefts and don't want to use a credit card online until they have anti-key logger tech on their computing device.
You say there are many who could pay 1000 times 22.2 Billion? Is that 20 Trillion! Many could pay 10 Trillion for a small cyber security company, you say, but the fact that they didn't pay that for this one is a proof it is worthless?
Thanks very much for clarifying this.
Not if it was a buyout -- all shares would transfer to the new company at a set price, no?
Thanks, cj! I'm thinking to cancel all my GTC sell orders in the short term. Be a shame to miss 50 cents, having been "in the trenches" so long that 5 cents looked good...
Pride goeth before a fall.
Very nice answer. Thanks so very much for taking the time.
It is known, that one PAST toxic converter got 2 billion shares for .0001-.0005. Add up all the daily volumes since those conversions began, and you will see, assuming they were perhaps half the daily trade, that there are no new shares, but the same crew still filing out at 200-1000% what they got shares for. Those were the only schmucks, if there are any. Also, I will consider it deeply offensive if you refer to Mr. Kay in such terms ever again in this space.
Best of luck to you.
No LOL -- for Real!
I'm looking for 5 cents, but probably will sell some at 1 cent to make some people happy.
Very, very, interesting.
Does anyone know what happens if you have a GTC limit order, and a stock opens above it? Can they sell your stock way below the natural range of the day, because of your prior GTC order?
Great explanation. Thanks!
Why, is also because the largish quantities keep being offered at .001. Some think those sales are folks (on the ask) who bought at much lower prices, and are still unloading them. Let's hope that ends soon.
Please would you explain what you mean by EXTRACTION? Thanks.
Why, is because people like you keep trying to get the lowest possible price - below fair value, and many then sell only 10-20% higher. The strangle-hold channel won't break out until people willingly pay .0011-.0022.
There is a procedure on the OTC site, to request they provide s company's information, and the OTC site then contacts the company.
You might ask the OTC to request the info: they have a request form or procedure on their site