Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Think of where we'll be when the $135M SLA that garbage_trader mentioned goes from possibility to reality! That should get us to even a conservative valuation of a penny or two.... multiply that by the number of shares we're sitting on and $$$$$$$$
Mine are locked up, not going anywhere. In just PM'ing with a few others between 5 of us there are about 1/4 billion shares that are locked down for another year at least.
On that note be carefully of whose DD you listen to on any site.
Even you alluding to the possibility that it might work out is confirmation enough for me!
Stick around, we might make you a long after all.
That's great, that means it's also possible BTL will find orders and the HUGE $135M SLA will remain! Based on the large amount of significant RFQ's I think they on track to securing those orders.
We've already earned a small bit of revenue, 7 figure revenue is what's coming in Q4.
Thanks for confirming G_T! I know you've done a ton of DD on this company so it means a lot.
I'd rather have some DD showing this is a fraud, I don't want to lose any money.
Can you please send them to me as well?
Please elaborate
Only when someone can present some proof of this so called scam. Until then, no proof, no scam. Just lots of opinions and we all know what they say about opinions.
You didn't know? According the concensus of regular posters here TPAC defrauded NAVAIR/US Government to get the certification.
Does Boeing make airplanes? Does Ford make cars? By the definition you're using they don't. The question isn't make or assemble. The question is are they qualified? They are, and according to the SAE specification AS81820, that makes them a manufacturer. The only opinion that matters is that of NAVAIR.
None whatsoever.
Yes, let's rely on a penny stock promo website rather than FINRA. Wait a sec, those are some familiar names in the comment section of the article you posted. Surprise!
Can someone please tell me why this post is stickied?
What about all the 10K sells?
How so? All the 10k share sells?
He knew that, he's just trying to spin.
Your wrong
Common shares were converted to preferred, but the common shares were retired, not sold!
Incorrect.
How are they supposed to pay for services as a start up?
Those two items are not correlated. And frankly, the CEO doesn't and shouldn't care about short term price fluctuations. He doesn't care about traders but his investors who, like himself, are in it for the long term.
Because they are selling shares. The jump to toxic financing is speculation.
Speculation is not proof.
No proof of that at all.
Exactly Boss, nothing has changed, still a great opportunity!
So he's required to show proof with a picture but no one else is required to show proof?
Do you have proof?
No, more like calling a legitimate SEC compliant company a "Tpac absolutely is A PILE OF SHIT SCAM" without any backup. It would be similar to saying TPAC has a contract or order with Boeing, without providing any backup.
Both statements, completely untrue and unsubstantiated.
Saying there is a meeting with no proof and saying the company is a fraudulent scam with no proof are on two way different levels.
No, which is why I put little weight on comments, positive or negative, without some type of backup.
Why hide it until the next quarterly report comes out? It would be incredibly helpful to us current investors if proof of this fraudulent activity is shared.
You've been saying you'll show your proof in "short order" for sometime now. It would be really helpful to all of us if you could please share your information.
How exactly does a startup pay for services if not for issuing stock? Isn't that the entire point of the stock market?
If you compare it to scam you're right, if you compare it to a startup like tpac, your wrong.
Just take a few zeros off the stock price revenue and expenses and they're similar, especially when they were pre-revenue. I don't know what you expect from a start up in an industry with very high barriers to entry.
Yes, and they show exactly what I expected of a pre-revenue company. Even once they start getting revenue I don't expect them to be pretty for a while, ever look at Tesla's financials? Or Amazon when it was getting started?
I don't understand the stock selling scam part?