In this case I would have to agree with bigbake... Im sure that BENDIX stands at least four guys on all the parts they manufacture and use in their quaility assurance and structural integrity test, as part of design certification.

Im sure they dont hold Northrup grumman responsible for using their own guys to do the.... standing.

oh i see

Let me ask you avarita, have they solved the issue of how to
replace a faulty turn? or faulty or leaky length of tube? or
does the entire system STILL have to be drained
(along with complete loss of any growing algae), resterilized and then the components replaced?

Arent these design issues that need to be addressed, or is it just me?

Not a single Phycologist,

I just don't know how i feel about the competence of an ALGAE
company, who until just 2 months ago didn't even employ a single
Phycologist or botanist or anyone qualified to determine the best
specifications/operations/procedures for the production of algae.

Does that mean that all the currently developed designs are built
on unqualified untrained reasoning's of uneducated amateurs?

Not only that but look at the unprofessionalism displayed by
their lack of judgement in having a real professional website
built, or engaging the president of the company to build it?

Shouldn't the president of the company have better things to do
than build websites, and if you were going to do it yourself
wouldn't you make sure that you have the technical capabilities
to produce a professional end result, rather than using some
canned website building service which in my humble opinion looks
unprofessional and amateurish at best. I mean with 5 MIL at your
disposal wouldn't you want to put your best foot forward by
making your primary interface with the digital world as
aesthetically pleasing and professional as possible.

Or maybe their money is better spent on backwoods mentality,
trial and error purchase and production, of non-functioning wall
reactor units at more than five thou a pop which all have the
same flaw- instead of paying for the engineering to have one
made right the first time?

What kind of logic is that?

I mean with the money that is thrown away on just one revision
they could have an outstanding web presence.


This is just another example of BEHL's refusal to do things
in any kind of correct manner, or in any way that normal successful companies do business.