Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
go metro gooooo! break through 0.10 cents...
maybe because it's not the only one? Anyway, if you look at their laboratory on the web site, it seems they produce large fans that if tipped are sold as vertical take off technology and cam installed on remote controlled helicopter thay you can buy also in a toy shop...
hey! when will this bag roack finally? I'm losing my patiente
I'm not sure if take profit now, I'll hold still for a while and will see what happen. I expect some news coming (real or fake), I'll sell on the news
ok but if it's a scam, surely the company itself is buying (using some MM) to do what then? do you think they are trying to bring the price up in order to resale to the market? ...if we skip their fake transactions, this stock has not volume from the public market to allow them to get rid of the purchased stock.
Maybe be they will pay some sponsor like XS, PSC..before to dump, only at that time we will have the signal..what do you think?
what's going on today? scam or news coming?
do you think we are already in the pump phase? today is 46% up!
XS is not more pushing on SNRS, the stock is no more included in their featured profile...this means that their previous alerts were only for scam purpose, otherwise there's not reason why they should change idea on a company from week to week.
What do you think?
has the RS already been announced? if not, in case they will decide to do it then this will be communicated with some early PR?
thx
in Italy is SRL (Società a Responsabilità Limitata), it means limited liability...could be the same in french
no, mr magoo!
growthing and growthing...slowly growthing but costantly growthing. So what do you think? ...somebody is accumulating? somebody is waiting for something? ...or simply pumping for suddenly dumping?
-100% how is it possible?
so what we have to expect from this change in your opinion?
what's going to happen on the 15th of june...I was reading a post saying to solicitate an answer from the CEO before that date.
Can you clarify pls?
thank you kim, if you have any chance to call GAM please let me know, I'd appreciate
ciao!
what about this ownership http://data.cnbc.com/quotes/MTCH/tab/8
it seems that 15% of capital it's owned to institutions and that most of them has in charge at more then 3$/share
do you think that all of them took a rip-off?
please post your comment
I've not the history of the O/S, what I'm saying is that they have the same O/S since the last peak of 1.24$ occurred in June '09
don't know guys, anyway let wait for a while and see what happen...maybe it's a scam, maybe we will take benefit from some pump
hello broke,
they did the split on feb '09, then the stock has been high for a while (about 10 mths) and began to lose value. The peak of 1.25 has been reched 7 months after the split...
look at this graph http://data.cnbc.com/quotes/MTRO/tab/2
set parameter at 3 years view and then at the bottom of the chart flag the checkbox "split"
at the time of the second peak the had nothing in place yet but now they are doing lots of new installation of their technology. Don't know, but I believe that I they will go with some good news or if they will pubblish some revenues in their next balance sheet maybe we might have good changes to have a large jump... this's also what actually said PSC on july '09 (the date of the second peak) which is 7 months after the R/S
I don't know if I'm right but putting all together all this few info plus the unjustified volume peak posted recently (feb '10) plus the price that's growthing slowly but day by day maybe something is boiling in the pot
better your link
anyway the ones I've posted was taken directly from a news provided by SNRS saying .com (instead of .cn). Maybe they made a mistake
solartech is fake, the web address provided from SNRS for this company is this http://www.srsolartech.com/ ...and if you open the link it's a company selling BOOKS!!!!
it was 1$ less than one year ago without any installation, without any business in place, without any revenue and with the same outstanding shares. If they had done something in the meanwhile (like I thik they did) it could be! ...maybe as a peak, but it could happen the miracle.
Moreover, consider that this's a completely flat stock in volume, often they have not volume at all and at the end of jan/beginning of feb something has happened as they suddendly exchanged more than 2M stocks without any news came out...maybe they expect something.
Another problem is that for this f. stock there are not news about their progress...
I give you an old link from PSC, have a look and let me know what you think about that
http://pennystockchaser.com/2009/07/15/metro-one-development-pink-mtro-is-heading-down-the-run-way-ready-to-take-off/
I'll stay long, with thi small floating I think this could jump suddently at 1$, their are doing something, I feel it...maybe getting some revenues from current installation and/or expanding to more shops
why you don't call them directly asking for your points? I can't because of my bad english (sorry)
Maybe my post it's uninformed but remember we are in a pink market where the worst craps are admitted...also the fake letters of offer!
I think there are tons of examples of scam in the pink sea
why rothman should recommend TO US to sell at not less than 0,005?
Simply he could leave the buyer to rake as much share as he can on the market at the current price (maybe he's already doing it) and then he can negotiate in private with the buyer to sell his own remaining share (or the ones retained by the company) at higher price than 0,005
In this case, the buyer will collect anyway all the share (giving a discount to the purchase price he can do also at an average lower price) but rothmans & co could get much more return
I give you an example. Assume that out of 13BLN outs share this's the composition:
- 10BLN on the market sold @ 0,0002
- 3 BLN retained by rothmans and co negotiated to be sold @ 0,023 (so further 4,5 times more than 0,005)
..at the end the buyr would pay anyway 70M but giving only 2M at the market and 68M to Rothmans & Co. In this scenario Roth could also decide to incentive purchase giving a discount to the buyerwith mutua satisfaction (less avg price for the buyer and more money for rothmans).
SO, I repeat the question, why Roth should recommend the market do not sell shares at less than 0,005? ..maybe because he is generous? I don't believe!
you are wrong, the sell price is set to 0,005 (not 0,05) and this would make 75,000$ for your 15MLN share!
YOU WILL SEE
...they will invent something before the 15th to pump the price (like preliminary verbal acceptance of the offer)
...then there will be a short period wait where the stock will start to lose value
...and then one day before the 15th or the same date they will say the offer cannot be accepted because a minor formal defect which require to be addressed....sp the stock will start dumpin and never growth.
You will see!
somebody is able to see the pre-market?
pleas let us know!
READ PLEASE - All that we are reading seems so ridiculous...
Firstly me, I believe that all the rumors and news which came out appear so inconsistent and ridiculous: the disproportionate offer, the snrs board saying they will think about such offer, the LOI submitted by the lebanon company and published by XS (!), the fact that non news are coming out from SNRS but only by the promoters, the fact that the offer letter from Nourtech appeared today seems to br written by a 7 year old child, the fact that all those negotiation are not private but more or less public though not official sources, the fact tha the internet site of solartech corresponds to a company which sells book (...sell book!), the fact that the snrs balance sheet is ridiculous if compared to the entity of the offer, the 20M LOI in the middle east never signed, the future development in mexico, the fact that nourtech seems doesn't exist or it seems that in the mentioned region no company with more than 5 employees extists, the disgusting web site of SNRS itselfs with stupid pictures (a bull, a boat, some solar panel, some smiling chinese people and a not woking video!!!), the fact that snrs has been declared caveat emp etc etc etc
...but I'm convincing myself that just because all this is ridiculous they cannot do things so bad, they cannot be so shameless in doing an hypotetic scam (if it really must be a scam al least it should be done better!), they cannot think that all the people like us are so stupid to believe all the above elementary moves and stupid letters, mostly for a company like XS which will continue to do their business in the future and who cannot lose their face...maybe snrs will fail after this scam (they have tried it!) but why a company like XS should destroy their reputation just for one stock!?!
...so I'm convincing my self that all the above, just as it's so much ridiculus, just as everithing has been always done in elementary way, maybe this is the real way in which this guys work...so, in a way, all the above it's all true and real!! (I know, it's a paradox but I cannot think otherwise)
There's an old saying that says that many lies are finally a truth!
why do you believe there's a real offer in place? I hope so, but I still think it's just a scam to pump and dump
give me a concrete reason to believe this, thx
SNRS removed from pinksheet.com (cavear empty)
Guys, I don't wanna scare nobody, I'm just concerned about my investment!
The stock quote was at the pinksheet on friday, today no more quote is reported for one of the following reasons (look at http://www.otcmarkets.com/pink/quote/quote.jsp?symbol=snrs):
Questionable Promotion — The security is being promoted to the public, but adequate current information about the issuer has not been made available to the public.
Spam — The security is the subject of spam promotion having the effect of encouraging trading of the issuer's securities.
Investigation of Fraud — There is a known investigation of fraudulent activity involving the company, its securities or insiders.
Suspension/Halt — A Regulatory Authority has halted or suspended trading for public interest concerns (i.e. not a news or earning halt).
Disruptive Corporate Actions — The security or issuer is the subject of corporate actions, such as reverse mergers or serial stocks splits and name changes, without adequate current information being publicly available.
Unsolicited Quotes — The security has only been quoted on an unsolicited basis since it entered the public markets and the issuer has not made adequate current information available to the public.
Other Public Interest Concern — There is, in Pink OTC Markets' view, a public interest concern.
just joined the IHUB,
don't worry I'm only a small investor with a long money losing background, unlikely
My posts highlight just a pessimistic view on a company where anyway I heve invested too. Why? only becaus I'm scared y and need to share opinion with all of you. I know, I've posted comments only with "pessimistic" view but what else if we do not have any real news? the only news we can comment on are the ones we've got and those provide very weak signals as I said (like the false link to solar tech which is emblematic!).
Sorry for that, but It seems I'm not the only one who think this...but anyway I'll stay in and try the fate, hopefully it's all real
have a good holiday
IT'S A SCAM!
look at thi old news "On 2008-11-09, Sunrise Consulting Group, Inc. has signed a joint venture agreement with China's Sunrise Solar Tech Inc..www.srsolartech.com . USA Sunrise Consulting will invest up to 60% of Sunrise Solar Tech. in forms of stocks and capital"
...then click on the posted link of the chinese company Solartech http://www.srsolartech.com/ and you will be surprised to discover that this company has nothing to do with the promising solar business!!!!!
It's incredible, there's nothing good in this company and all the news which came out are always undefined: the SARL company, the LOI of 20MLN never qualified and also the chinese controlled
good post,
and in case of pump and dump which maximum peak can touch the share before the dump? ..maybe the supposed offer price 0,005 or stop before?
in that case do you suggest to place a sell order at a discounted price? what safe price in your opinion?
hi all, if you've read at the news released by XS last weeks but also at what's written in the SNRS web site itself there is reported "Sunrise Consulting Group`s mission is to get involved in the Solar Industry in the fastest and most productive and profitable way possible. – $0.04 – $0.05 is very feasible in the coming months"
...indeed the offer seems to be 0,004 - 0,005, numbers seems similar except for a zero they have missed was this already predicted???
anyway if you've had a look at the web site of snrs, this is really disgusting, it seems a web site built in five minutes with pictures of a bull, a boat crossing the hudson, a picture of wall street building, some solar panel you can copy and paste from anywhere, some old building and some chinese people smiling...it's strange for a company that aims to growth very fast, it' strange for a company whose goal is to approach a huge market.
Who would pay so much money for a company which sales solar panel when you can buy this on internet simply with your credit card or in you want also into a big store by yourself?
Moreover, so far we have seen LOI, intention, statistics about growthing market but nothing real actually....and last but not least, all reference to the company into the XS web site disappeared after the latest news!!!
uhmmm, don't know guys but I smell something bad!
maybe, but at 0,0002$ worth to stay in and wait instead of take profit....or if panic selling was for 0,0004$ buyers they preferred to take loss instead waiting for the possible deal? don't know dude
why the stock price (as normally happens) didn't approach the offer price? ...instead, it has drop to 0,0002$