Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Outstanding as usual. I really appreciate the context that you bring to LWLG discussion.
Elijah is going to call down fire on the altar real soon Pumpkin, and then we will see who is left standing.
I agree that they need someone full-time in this role. As far as who he has talked to on the phone, through Zoom, or met in person, who knows?
Question: what does "stakeholders" mean? In ordinary language this would mean someone or some corporation has bought in or made a commitment to buy in.
Atikem Hailemariam says he is, "... looking forward to meeting industry stakeholders" at OFC Lebby session on using heterogeneous integration in future applications.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/atikemstrategy_ofcconference-lightwavelogic-futuretechnology-activity-7167938095802232832-EXRw?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android
Sounds like a strategy, but it leaves shareholders in the dark. This part does not seem to be a good strategy.
6 million dollar share repurchase sets this one up nicely.
How about if you post a couple of times a day like most normal people? Maybe your posts would be taken more seriously.
Ridiculous... eom
Baloney... Druid has some tech knowledge, but he knows nothing about LWLG polymer tech. Maybe he caught some people up on current incumbent technology, but absolutely nothing of consequence for LWLG.
Druid can say whatever he wants and Proto too. I'm just telling you what is in the referenced documents.
"Drivers" plural in both the Marvel and Broadcom products.
Description: "... standard drivers..." You are adamant about grammar, so that's drivers, plural.
Again, we don't know anything about the cost or component to component comparisons.
He added a little dialogue but no one except Lebby has addressed the cost savings possibility of LWLG Polymer utilization.
What is the advantage of a consortium for LWLG?
Thanks Carlin. Obvious Facts that are clearly documented. They don't hire unless they have the fire to light the wood and get it burning.
Blah, blah, blah. Same old, same old
Look forward, not backwards.
The things that you question have little to do with the recent development of the technology or the need for the technology in the marketplace. Do some research on this. Compare LWLG Polymer with other products in the marketplace or upcoming and debate why you think that the other products are superior or will compete with LWLG polymer. Then we have a conversation.
Always good to see articles which reference the expertise of Lebby, but the article is from 2021 and Cory Pecinovsky, who started his own Polariton company (a different one than the European one) in 2021, is listed as a co-author. Not bad that Cory is a co-author... Just mentioning it. Some people formerly tried to make a big deal of Cory leaving LWLG, but he started his own damn company, and he wasn't going to do that if he stayed at lwlg. Good for him.
Michael Lebby is also front and center of the ECOC promo on LinkedIn.
Well that took a lot of effort for nothing.
FudMaster #2 - Do you actually think that the foundries would want to start production without final approval of a key patent? Sure, they could have started, but that's not the point.
According to the Spammers there is nothing here to see. But thanks for the update!
Follow the money.
No spin... Just a moment in time.
The sounds of silence can be interpreted in many different ways.
Your interpretation that there are "problems" is an interpretation of the silence. What are these "problems"? What we hear from the patents and technology updates is that so called problems have engineering solutions. Your interpretation of the lack of deal announcements is that "no customer seems to want to sign a deal with LWLG." How do you know what the customers "want" or "don't want"?
Ask the hard questions, but don't fill in your own answers. Waiting for answers isn't fun, but investors don't want made-up answers from a discussion board, and certainly not from you or the other spammers.
"A favorable financial situation allowing the company more control and flexibility in communication and not to give away its market edge. In fact communication slowed down since the ASM in May 2023..."
A lack of communication doesn't help the shareholders. I understand the flexibility is good for making deals, but it's rough on the share price appreciation in the short term.
Hey Steven. Are you being sarcastic or have you changed your tune to a more positive melody?
Talk about BORING posts... No one cares.
Read the last paragraph in the article and you have your answer. That thing is enormous and driver dependent.
We will see. I'm going with Lebby, Zyskind, the Advisory Board, Pozo, etc., etc. etc.
Link Attribution? Source? Your head?
You don't like his timelines and neither do we, but that doesn't mean it's not happening. These are two separate questions.
Stick to talking about the technology. Agree. But what in the hell are you doing here after all these years?
Director Eric Bunting keeps it rolling.
Big Boys Buy while the Spammers threaten. Hang in there.
C'mon Man. That's not what we're talking about.
We will see in the end if rewarding Lebby was worth it or not. Marcelli was along for the ride. As for Lebby... He is like the star quarterback on the football team. You gotta pay him if he is going to bring home the win.
Well, it wasn't up to Lebby to decide on the bonus. Go after the BOD. If someone offers you a bonus you're going to take it.
Lebby already gave us that answer when he said he wasn't going to sell out for cheap just to get a deal It's negotiations, negotiations, negotiations.
You were NOT an investor at that time. That conversation happened a long time ago . You're just trying to stir up envy with your FUD. Water under the bridge.