Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That's how I'm seeing it, but I wanted to make sure since I've seen a couple people on here nervous about the Blackwell product.
Does Blackwell GPU compete with or complement LWLG technology? I'm trying to put it together.
The Pumpkin has been here about 20 years. He had another name before he switched.
Assuming that this is a serious question, I will take a stab at an answer. The options are a part of their pay package. You may or may not like this, but it's a typical setup for multitudes of companies. This gives them a reward for their work and buy-in to increase the stock price. Inside Market buys and ownership is great and one possible sign of breakout in price but it doesn't necessarily determine the success of the company.
Ask questions... Look for answers.
I don't understand why you think that "bursts of Nvidia or AMD AI chips are not necessarily a good timing for LWLG." The more AI is in demand is actually better for LWLG. The servers need to keep up with any new technology that is developed and LWLG has the answer to do so.
Years ago I contacted Ciena regarding LWLG polymer, but for whatever reason they went a different direction with Thin Film Lithium Niobate. They bet on the wrong horse.
It sounds to me like Mark, Andy, and Ciena are getting a little nervous about LWLG. However, LWLG does need that clear independent verification from a foundry engineer.
We can all see the big picture Ted... something that you appear to have a hard time doing.This doesn't excuse poor communication from Lebby at times. But the big picture remains intact and with every communication of real technology news advancement the big picture becomes more clear.
Who in the world would have this as 100% of their portfolio? No one is going to do that.
We get the trading. I daytrade most every day. But this one is a little bit of an outlier because of the technology, the market for the product, and extremely dedicated core investors. Of course you can trade LWLG but you are likely not going to convince the long term investors to change their positions based on charts. Good luck.
He can provide whatever information he wants, but he's doing elementary charting and he knows nothing about the technology.
There are way too many variables here, but personally from what I know right now I would be buying hand over fist at that price.
I didn't use the word manipulation. You did!
I'm sitting right here looking at the 4-hour chart. I suppose it's about average in volume this morning, but compared to big days of the past it's still small.
You are taking me out of context. Look at the volume is all I am saying.
These are extremely low volume moves. It looks to me more like small time traders trading, nothing more and nothing less.
You are creative. You've got that going for you.
99 percent here understand market action today is short-term trading fluctuation which opens the door for long-term buying.
Shazam! Thanks. This is why we read the message board... not for all the slamming that goes on here.
If you're willing I will try to catch up with email list at the shareholders meeting next month. It's a shame that the shorties have ruined this board.
Thank you Zerosnoop.This is an excellent review of the current status of Insiders view of the company that any current or prospective investor can clearly read. There aren't many of us here on the board but we see it, and appreciate your diligence.
I'm not reading that it's just one or two. It's multiple foundries.
Thank you for some common sense.
You are the one who is pretending dude.
Well Written. Thanks.
Thanks Herwig. That's a helpful insight. It's also a reminder that there are always other ways of looking at things. I also fell into thinking that we need to have a whole bunch of small deals before a big deal is signed. But, this and what others have written gives more context to the waiting.
My Pumpkin Indicator is going off. The more he posts the greater possibility for a share price increase.
Unfortunately the way it works when there is no real market. Buy/sell bidding is practically non-existent.
Let's call them "challenged communicators".
Lots of old news there. You should get a job as a historian.
LWLG fits here....
"Some of the next generation materials and processes that are being widely adopted now for power, including gallium nitride (GaN) and oxide materials, are likely applicable to quantum. These will be combined with new materials such as rare earth elements, superconductors, and 2D materials to create materials specific to quantum applications.
In order to meet the challenges for quantum development, it is important to see the problems for what they are and what they are not. The challenges are not semiconductor manufacturing problems, at least not yet. Instead, they are materials science problems."
Thanks for the link to the article.
If you do a little more digging on the patents, there are some other connections as well, but it's pushing my brain cells beyond the edge tonight.
Here are a couple of patents that Lebby and Cheskis of Trieye have worked on together.
POROUS DISTRIBUTED BRAGG REFLECTORS FOR LASER APPLICATIONS
Publication number: 20190221993
Abstract: Embodiments described herein provide a layered structure that comprises a substrate that includes a first porous multilayer of a first porosity, an active quantum well capping layer epitaxially grown over the first porous multilayer, and a second porous multilayer of the first porosity over the active quantum well capping layer, where the second porous multilayer aligns with the first porous multilayer.
Type: Application
Filed: January 18, 2019
Publication date: July 18, 2019
Inventors: Rich Hammond, Rodney Pelzel, Drew Nelson, Andrew Clark, David Cheskis, Michael Lebby
Porous distributed Bragg reflectors for laser applications
Patent number: 11201451
Abstract: Embodiments described herein provide a layered structure that comprises a substrate that includes a first porous multilayer of a first porosity, an active quantum well capping layer epitaxially grown over the first porous multilayer, and a second porous multilayer of the first porosity over the active quantum well capping layer, where the second porous multilayer aligns with the first porous multilayer.
Type: Grant
Filed: January 18, 2019
Date of Patent: December 14, 2021
Assignee: IQE plc
Inventors: Rich Hammond, Rodney Pelzel, Drew Nelson, Andrew Clark, David Cheskis, Michael Lebby
Lots of silliness about posts... Just investors and traders here. Make your decision and stop commenting on people's style of posting.
What? Looks like full steam ahead to me.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/synopsysphotonicsolutions_article-by-michael-lebby-ceo-lightwave-activity
Shorts trying to take advantage of overall market weakness.
Fungal Infections impacting more than a billion people world wide. Don't count on IPIX as a corpse just yet.
https://stkt.co/JczGNst yet.oMw
Doable, but what is optimal?
What? If this is true, then possible future income streams are still in play. This is my take on the current status.