Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
IJJP is a revoked Nevada shell corporation that previously twice diluted itself into the ground. The first dilution was followed by a 1 for 1000 reverse split followed by additional dilution to no-bid status.
IJJP has ceased all communications and financial reporting. It's website no longer exists. What kind of news are you expecting that will make this company rise from the dead?
I'm not saying that dead shells never run -- obviously this one had an inexplicable brief run -- but no one should believe that there is any substance here.
Actual PVEC volume on 7/22/14 was 130,976,944 (all at $.0001) reported on multiple sites including QuoteMedia:
http://www.quotemedia.com/finance/quote/?qm_page=76571&qm_symbol=PVEC
iHub/ADVFN shows volume as 96.4 million. For some reason iHub and a few other sites have not always captured the full volume for PVEC, especially after it went to no-bid status.
Six month chart:
At the current share price, e.Digital's market cap of nearly $11 million is vastly more than its intrinsic value. It is certainly not a candidate for a buyout, even by a larger patent troll company.
It was my understanding that Fred Falk goes on daily mountain bike rides during work hours. A previous EDIG employee (Wayne) reported years ago that he was taking lessons to become a private pilot during work hours.
Truly, what does Fred actually do all day? My suspicion is that much of his time over the years has been spent reading Internet message boards.
It's hard to believe that someone who has personally accomplished so little is still employed by the company at all. A competent CEO would have fired him years ago. Unfortunately he IS the CEO and has a BOD that does not care about its fiduciary duty to the common shareholders and actually gives him raises and bonuses.
In fact, the EDIG board chairman, Allen Cocumelli, was paid a monthly retainer for over a year to manage the outside attorneys -- a clear conflict of interest that was never declared.
Replacing Fred Falk would be the most positive move the company could take.
Patent trolls rely on settlements for less than nuisance value. If any of e.Digital's lawsuits truly had merit, the company would have fully litigated them -- especially when it had a full contingency agreement with Duane Morris.
The farthest the company ever went in litigation was the Colorado Markman hearing, which e.Digital lost.
Obtaining tiny settlements through patent extortion is not the same as winning a fully litigated lawsuit. The settlements in the California suits have almost all been miniscule.
The antiquated eVU business losses money and should be discontinued. e.Digital's only real business plan is patent extortion. Such a business plan does not attract new investors.
EDIG does not need a highly-paid CEO who essentially does nothing at all. Handal & Associates, which is paid a retainer of $30,000/month and gets a 30 to 40% contingency (retainer subtracted) on settlements, does all of the work.
Truly, what does Fred Falk do? What has he ever done in the 15 years he's been CEO?
Thank you. That image of your Series C certificate is readable and I can see that PVEC did indeed enumerate the number of shares.
I'm not sure why both you and the previous party chose to blank out the CUSIP number as that should be public record and the same for all of the Series C preferred stock. It's not a number that would identify you. The certificate number however would allow the company to match your true identity with your iHub ID. That's the number I would have suggested blocking.
Interestingly the company has not corrected its typos such as "assassable" instead of "assessable" and the use of the non-word of "assignated."
Your image rotated to horizontal:
Previously posted image:
Source: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102675105
Your submitted image: http://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2014/7/21/ckyrkPVEC_Certificate.jpg
e.Digital has never fully litigated any of its IP lawsuits. Filing meritless lawsuits and receiving settlements that are far less than nuisance value is NOT the same as winning a lawsuit. It is purely patent extortion.
The farthest any of e.Digital's lawsuits got in the litigation process was the Markman hearing in Colorado which, as you know, e.Digital lost.
Has PVEC explained why your Series C certificate does not appear to show the number of Series C shares you are own in the "Shares" box?
Reference: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=104504158
Because the image you posted was too small to be read, it's hard to determine what the certificate states.
However, when enlarged, the "Shares" box in the top right corner seems to contain alphabetic figures in quotation marks rather than a numeric figure.
If you want to prove what your Series C certificate says, you could post an image large enough to read but redacting your personal information.
This image below of the "Shares" box seems to show alphabetic figures rather than the 28,521 shares you claim it shows:
Your original image rotated, cropped and enlarged:
The original image you posted:
Source: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=104496250
Thank you for posting an image of the PVEC Series C certificate you received. Your image looks very similar to a previously posted Series C certificate but was too small to read.
When rotating and enlarging your image (blocking out your name), I note that there does not seem to be a numeric value in the "Shares" box. It looks like there are 5 capital letters in quotation marks. Additionally, even thought it's hard to read, it appears that the "IS THE OWNER OF" section may also not contain a numeric value.
It also appears that a valid CUSIP number is not included.
Again, the image you provided was so small that it can't be read. Below is an enlarged version of your original image, cropped and rotated to horizontal view followed by an image of a Series C certificate submitted earlier. Enlarging a tiny image blurs the enlargement. Your original image is shown at the bottom of this message.
Enlargement of your image:
Previously posted image at http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102675105 below:
Your original image:
Do the PVEC Series C preferred share certificates people are finally receiving look like this?
Have the multiple typos included in this original been corrected in the certificates more recently distributed?
The original source post which includes an external link to the certificate image: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102675105
Direct link to the certificate from that post: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2tN_ds-HmHCZlRVMDhJMVBaNDQ/edit
Tjx2: You are incorrect. The following post provided a fake Series C certificate image posted by Posiden (http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=477935): http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=101836151
Although that image representing the fake certificate was quickly deleted, I had taken the following screen shot of the fake certificate before it was deleted and then posted it on iHub: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=101871656
The following is the fake PVEC Series C certificate:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=101871656
This is supposedly an authentic photo of a PVEC Series C stock certificate (link to image is below):
The original post which includes an external link to the certificate image: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102675105
Direct link to certificate from that post: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2tN_ds-HmHCZlRVMDhJMVBaNDQ/edit
MediaG3 (MDGC) appears to have become an abandoned corporation.
* The website is dead: http://mediag3.com
* The Idaho corporation is revoked. The Idaho SOS declared the 2014 annual report to be undeliverable: http://www.accessidaho.org/public/sos/corp/C197218.html
* The Delaware corporation may also be revoked.
* No financial reports have been issued since QE 6/60/2013: http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/MDGC/filings
* No news or updates have been issued since the 1/28/13 announcement of the new BOD and officers (except automatic OTC tier changes and notices of reports filed): http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=news&symbol=NO%5EMDGC
I suspect that Val Westergard has moved on to a private WiFi venture, abandoning the MDCG shareholders and leaving the public corporation with substantial unpaid debt. If this is true, it's also possible that he could be using assets owned by the public company for his private venture.
I suggest that MDCG investors do an investigation as to what has happened and is currently happening in Boise with MediaG3.
Val and Byron have each privately registered a few "WiFi" websites that do not appear to be owned by MediaG3. Is it possible that they are promoting one or more of .these instead of performing their fiduciary duty to MediaG3 investors?
It's a strange scenario I hope the truth is revealed.
e.Digital did not win a lawsuit against Apple nor any it won a sut against any other company. Apple, like all of the others, settled out of court for less than nuisance value -- often far less.
Particularly after engaging Handal & Associates, EDIG had engaged in patent extortion by suing dozens of companies and quickly offering settlements that are far less than the cost of mounting a defense against even a meritless lawsuit.
This business model keeps Fred and other insiders employed but does not create shareholder value.
When a bid is no longer quoted by market makers for a stock, all transactions are shown as "buys" even though that is misleading.
Transactions are classified as "buys" if they are at the ask and classified as "sells" if they are at the bid. When there is no quoted bid, only unsolicited buy orders are filled. The ask for PVEC has been at $.0001 with no bid for a few weeks yet the stock has continued to trade.
This means that there is a supply of shares for sale at $.0001 and that market makers are willing to fill specific unsolicited buy orders due to sufficient shares available for them to cover.
More information regarding market maker bids and no-bid status:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=103923734
Maria56: It is also my understanding that Investors Hangout blocks all access to some of those who report violations of their own published forum rules. Such action is one of the reasons to believe that it is just a stock tout site that does not care about enforcing its own published rules. In fact, contacting that site with any concern about a violation of their published rules can result in being blocked from all access.
Thank you for the explanation. A group of PVEC investors has congregated there after two former PVEC employees who were hired due to their iHub postings set up their own IR business and later resigned. When Kerry ("PG") and Jason ("eocwizard") resigned, they shut down the PVEC website they created and owned which included a private discussion forum that allowed and even encouraged attacks against iHub or or iHub members.
The attacks being posted on the company's private discussion forum have simply moved to Investors Hangout, which seems fully willing to accommodate content that attacks iHub and iHub members.
That brief pop is what allowed me to exit my EDIG position with a small profit. I had become skeptical of the company for multiple reasons so placed a GTC limit sell order above by cost. My order was taken out during that run, which turned out to be the last opportunity I would ever have had to make a profit or even break even on the EDIG stock I had purchased in the spring of 2000 for $6.00.
My limit sell order was for less than the peak price, but I was very pleased to get out better than whole. EDIG is the only OTC stock I've ever owned. My experience with the stock is what caused me to learn how to do true due diligence research on penny stocks.
Who are the shareholders PVEC has identified as having participated in activities, directly or indirectly, publicly or privately, who supposedly caused harm to the company, its shareholders or share price who are not eligible for Series C preferred share distribution despite holding the stock on the record date?
How were these ineligible parties identified? Did Kerry or anyone at the company try to obtain message board IDs along with an investor's name and contact information?
What public or private, direct or indirect activities would be considered to have caused harm to the company, its shareholders or share price that would cause someone to be ineligible for the distribution?
What criteria does the company use to determine that someone has caused harm and should be excluded from the distribution? Could making just one post on a stock message board that PVEC considered negative make someone ineligible?
Disclosing confidential company information was stated as one of the things that could cause someone to be excluded. This criteria would seem to apply only to insiders so this criteria would not need to be mentioned to all shareholders.
Interestingly Kerry included me as a primary recipient (not just a cc) of an email addressed to others in the company regarding the termination of the contract with Business Travel Advisors (BTA) as well as the termination of an apparent BTA associate named Yamile who had been employed by Zeus Travel. Would Kerry's sharing of this information with an outsider like me make her ineligible for the Series C distribution?
FWIW, I believe that PVEC, under its Zeus Travel subsidiary, should have disclosed that it quickly terminated the agreement with BTA so that shareholders would be properly informed. However, it chose to keep it confidential. When I received Kerry's email I responded to her and all of her recipients asking why I was included with zero response. A month later I went public with the information as PVEC was not properly informing shareholders regarding the status of this terminated contract.
For the background of this message, iHub member "ahall" reported that the letter he received with his Series C certificate signed by CEO Peter Villiotis, contained the following statement:
This part of the letter from PVEC is ridiculous and unbelievable!
FWIW, the discovery of CM Research, LLC, the IR business venture of established by Kerry and Jason was made in less than 5 minutes incidentally. It did not take "hours and hours" of research.
On Saturday, I re-read the post to which I am replying and realized that I had never reviewed the "whois" information for PVEI's URL so looked it up. Indeed, it was registered by Jason but the registrant company (which owns the site) was listed as CM Research, LLC. I quickly did a Google search for CM Research, LLC and found its website. I then quickly researched "whois" information for that website and found that it was also registered by Jason.
It took me a few more minutes of reading the CMR website to realize that Kerry also seemed to be one of the principals involved. However, reading the site made that fact clear. Kerry later admitted that my discovery of this venture between her and Jason was correct:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=104240980
It appears that CM Research, LLC actually owns PVEC's websites, not Jason individually as Kerry claimed. Kerry seems to be involved in the deactivation of the PVEC websites Jason created as his business partner in CMR, which technically owns the websites.
The "whois" information for pventerprisesinternational.com that led me to CM Research, LLC:
http://who.godaddy.com/whoisstd.aspx?domain=pventerprisesinternational.com&prog_id=GoDaddy&k=AyvujtCPmDCWU4ad7J07c28QHEMENMVutE0J2g0kcAS50TPd7SWMeKT9Nb+qhVdJ4jVzb7pGTjm8QzxShigmEA%3d%3d
Doing due diligence review is not always time consuming.
One thing I would like to know is if there are any other partners in CM Research, LLC? It could be interesting information.
PVEC should have sent information along with your Series C certificate explaining the redemption process and the date on which it is redeemable. Did you receive any information with the cert?
Sadly, I don't believe PVEC ever intended to actually give away $4 million in cash or stock and that they made the offer twice simply to stimulate buying to facilitate dilution.
An update from Kerry:
An update from Jason:
The CEO is on Kerry's linkedin page. Maybe she invited him to do business with their company Maybe she didn't.
You don't know what any of it means and the company is very good about correct filings with the sec.
Thank you for proving that my screen shot of the CRM client login that was deleted today page was accurate.
It would be interesting to find out what is going on behind the scenes of this company now apparently promoting XRNG without making any disclosure.
This company is run by Kerry, whose iHub ID is "PG" and Jason, whose iHub ID is "eocwizard." They both acknowledged being employed by PVEC and made their identities public.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=104240980
The screen shot I took of CMR's "client login" page is shown below. Kerry and Jason, former employees of PVEC, seem to have quickly removed this page after my mention earlier today that it showed that XUN Energy (XNRG) was a client. Why are they so reluctant to admit XNRG is a client? Something seems very suspicious.
If XNRG is a client, is CRM failing to comply with Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 by not disclosing its compensation? If it's failing to comply, could that be the reason it deleted it's client login page earlier today after it was disclosed that XUN Energy (XRNG) was a client?
The screen shot of the CRM client "login" page as shown earlier today that was later deleted:
I believe it has probably been going on for a few months without the compensation disclosure required by Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933. This disclosure should be on the CRM website.
Anyone compensated by CRM to market the stock online would also be required to disclose their compensation.
CRM removed its client login link page today after I posted that the entity showed XNRG as a client.
In fact, XNRG appeared to be the only client of CRM.
The deletion of its client login page within an hour of my posting that XNRG was a client is very suspicious. It seems that Kerry and Jason do not want people to know that XUN Energy is a client.
Could this be due to their lack of proper reporting via Section 17(b)?
Yes, it is eye-opening that this venture between Kerry and Jason has been in the works since at least March 2014 when Jason registered their website. I suspect Kerry may have been trying to work with penny stock CEOs far previous to that registration date. Her work with the XRNG CEO seems to predate her work with PVEC CEO Peter Villiotis.
Indeed it is interesting that XNRG appears to have engaged CM Research, LLC for marketing without CRM disclosing that it is paid to market the stock, which is required by Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933. Any message board posters compensated by CRM are also required to disclose their compensation.
The fact that CRM quickly deleted its login page that showed XNRG as a client after I mentioned it earlier today seems to show realization of guilt.
Again, below is the screen shot I took of the login page earlier today before it was deleted after I reported my discovery of this venture and its relationship with XNRG:
XNRG seems to have engaged a company named CM Research, LLC to help market the company. http://www.cmresearchllc.com/
CMR is a business venture between two people, Kerry and Jason, who were formerly employed by PVEC.
I posted about my discovery of this venture earlier today on the PVEC forum and mentioned that the login page of its website indicated that XUN Energy was a client. The login page has since been deleted but fortunately I took a screen shot before the deletion as I suspected they would delete the evidence. The screen shot is at the bottom of this post.
Companies and individuals who are paid to promote a stock are required by SEC rules to disclose their compensation.
Kerry admits that she and Jason are in business together as I previously suggested:
Yes, Jason and I have partnered and have formed a company. Yes, Jason and I have clients. Yes, Jason and I are working to move on, endeavoring to put to work the lifetime of experience garnered. The website is being constructed.
Kerry and Jason appear to be in business together in a venture named CM Research, LLC. Their website: http://www.cmresearchllc.com
Jason registered the website domain on 3/26/14 but the telephone number of 202.322.7182 is to a Washington, DC area code. Kerry's iHub profile of "PG" states that she lives in "Washington, DC burbia."
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=391255
The website reflects Kerry's numerous claims about disgruntled investors, former employees and short sellers damaging companies by posting on websites. All of the content on the site is very "Kerryesque."
CM Research, LLC (CMR) seems to have one client, XUN Energy (XNRG), based upon the client login page and description in the redacted "testimonial."
Have Kerry and Jason been trying to pressure Peter Villiotis to engage CMR as PVEC's IR service?
Jason created websites for Peter that he registered/owns and deactivated them apparently for not receiving sufficient compensation. Is he holding them hostage?
Kerry was able to convince some PVEC investors that she was the savior of PVEC who would rescue the company from all of the nefarious parties she claimed were determined to destroy it. In this recent message she seems to claim that Peter is dishonest and incompetent. She seems to be trying to make herself seem essential to eventual success for PVEC.
Discovering this business venture (that evidence seems to prove is operated by Kerry and Jason) was eye-opening for me. As I have long-stated, I believe that Peter Villiotis is a con artist. Have Kerry and Jason been trying to shake down the con artist for their own benefit?
CRM website domain registration info: http://who.godaddy.com/whoisstd.aspx?domain=cmresearchllc.com&prog_id=GoDaddy
In today's post I mentioned that you could use the following USPS link to discover what kind of tracking number you were given last Wednesday:
https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction!input.action
It's odd that the Martha is giving people USPS tracking numbers for their certificates, but does not seem to be mailing them. The above link can also be used to find the status of a tracking number.
Based upon the USPS link, what kind of tracking number were you given? I.E., what kind of mail service was going to be used given the tracking number you were given?
Do you have a link to the trading data for that date that shows a single buyer bought a billion shares?
Are you able to back-up your claim?
I don't recall that there has ever been a single buyer who bought a billion shares of PVEC stock, even at the low of $.0001 as you just claimed.
It would be appreciated if you would give a link to the date in which a single buyer supposedly bought a billion shares of PVEC stock.
You said:
someone is betting big on this stock....
Romans, you were previously given a USPS "tracking number." Below is a link that defines various types of USPS tracking numbers. Without giving the actual tracking number, can you use this link to explain the category of the tracking number you were given on Wednesday of last week?
https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction!input.action
You would be able to determine this based upon the supposed USPS tracking number you were given by PVEC staff.