Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I still support IMGG but shocked that non supporters still hang around. I cant say I blame them.
SM, You have a concept at this time as well. At least Dean is taking proper steps to prove his concept. I don't see any posters using their "facts" to prove their concepts.
Sounds like Dean and many posters here have alot in common. Hot air with no results.
No need to keep punching a dead horse. The FDA will approve, put a end to the game or some angry investor files legal action and wins. Putting a end to this.
Untill then your words are as good as Deans.
SM, If Dean stated that he just started seeing images develope after rewriting the platform at end of 2009.
Would you say the Dvis was complete prior to Dean's statement?
7 years since the device was completed?
Who ever said the Dvis was completed 7 years ago?
People here do not understand development stages nor what has happened.
Amen! to that.. BigOwl I do not care the outcome. Just end this so we can move on.
Imaging3, Inc. FDA 510(k) Protocol Meeting Update
Dear Shareholder,
I am able to report to you that our October 17, 2011 meeting with the FDA went as anticipated and we have successfully completed the second milestone of our three phase submission process. The meeting’s primary objective was to submit our imaging protocols for acquiring and reviewing images. This objective was achieved and, overall, the meeting was productive for the Company in several other areas, some of which I will outline here and in future updates as information continues to become available.
Of primary importance, our team confirmed with the FDA that our submission will be a 510(k) as we had predicted. The 510(k) approval process is the most advantageous submission for Imaging3 to pursue, since it provides the shortest route to a potential approval and includes neither complicated nor time consuming clinical trials. The Agency has asked us to provide live patient data, which was a possibility we anticipated and under the 510(k) process this requirement is manageable.
Another important element of the meeting was the opportunity to ask questions and receive guidance regarding the submission. As a result we have gained a great deal of insight as to what is needed to complete our submission, in addition to creating an open line of communication with the FDA. Our questions regarding our past submission(s) received direct answers, providing us helpful information towards creating a successful submission in the future.
In summary, the feedback we received in this meeting has energized our team and, based on the FDA’s input, we immediately began implementing their suggestions. As always we appreciate your continued support and we will update you as permitted while we progress through this final phase.
Sincerely,
Dean Janes
Chairman / CEO
Safe Harbor Statement
Matters discussed in this press release contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this press release, the words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "may," "intend," "expect" and similar expressions identify such forward-looking statements. Actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained herein. These forward-looking statements are based largely on the expectations of the Company and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. These include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties associated with: the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting the Company and its operations, markets, product, and distributor performance, technological obsolescence, competition from other medical instrument(s) and imaging companies, lack of capital, unexpected costs, failure or delay of FDA approval, absence of revenue, the impact on the national and local economies resulting from an economic recession or terrorist actions, and U.S. actions subsequently; unavailability of financing for the Company or its customers, product malfunction and potential product liability claims, and other factors detailed in reports filed by the Company.
We apologize for any inconvenience. If you would like to be removed from this mailing list, please reply to this email with the subject line “Unsubscribe”. Thank you.
MUGS you forgot the BIG BUT in the sentence... "but won't really proceed until the prototype proves viable." I guess the Dvis never proved itself viable...
"icensing and other options as partnerships are also in the works, but won't really proceed until the prototype proves viable."
It is only appropriate that today on Halloween I remind you that tomorrow marks the Anniversary of the cc that notified us of the NSE letter. Boo!
It been a year already.. Is it really going to be that hard to wait another year to submit a new package!
Ps I have NO idea how anything takes a year and I have zero clue as to when IMGG will submit again BUT Im sure a hand full of posters could repeat all their spooky theories. Evil Laugh, Evil Laugh...
Ok i will find those facts myself. Glad you caught the red flag back in 8.19.09
Per Mr. Janes on CC 8-19-09 at 2:59
After changing the platform to C or CC++ Janes just started seeing the construct develop. This was Stage 2 of Development.
Stage 3 is plug in
Stage 4 is realtime
After stage 4 you can take all the images you want.
When Hindsights 20/20 all you can do is vent....
What is the date and copy of the statement from the company stating the Dvis was ready for production. I need THIS! Its very critical as they would have to have the FDA find the Dvis SE to be ready for production.
Hold up. I did not say the device does not produce real time 3D images. I stated that He submitted prematurely. The Dvis was and is producing 3d real time images. It did prior to rewriting of the platform during 8.19.09 Just because all the bugs are not worked out does not be that the device does not work as claimed.
Agree, I can read that in the NSE letter. A NSE was the final determination. The AI letters was not final determination nor did they state this. For all these years the FDA had assumed the Dvis was in its final state.
BUT It was NOT!
Per Mr. Janes on CC 8-19-09 at 2:59
After changing the platform to C or CC++ Janes just started seeing the construct develop. This was Stage 2 of Development.
Stage 3 is plug in
Stage 4 is realtime
After stage 4 you can take all the images you want.
If the construct was just beginning to develop then the Dvis was not SC "substantially complete" meaning it could not be used for its intended purposes / can not do what the label says it can do. Then you can not compare the Dvis to predicate devices without the images / can not produce support data.
The FDA can only assume the Dvis is in its final state until they reach a final determination in a NSE or SE letter. Janes assumed his product could produce support data before the april 5th 2010 submittal. Investors assumed he had support data in the packet. Is obvious he either did not believe in their request, did not want to take the time / money to produce or the device could not produce. Until you fully understand the development time lines and prove the intent of Mr Janes all your doing is Venting
All I am saying that it is not be illegal to prematurely submit a 510K.
Homer, The company continues to try to get the Dvis approved because there is not proof of any of the claims on this board. I do know that Janes submitted the 510K prematurely but I do not believe it is illegal to prematurely submit a 510K application. It is obvious the FDA will accept a 510K without knowing the development stage of the product. I also dont believe nor can prove that Janes knowingly submitted prematurely for malicious intent. Im not sure ignorance and make you a scam artist.
HOMER, I do know that the Company got a lot of heat from SEC on the run up. Janes extreme optimism had to stop. Maybe he manipulated the pps maybe he did 'nt? Point is if SEC took notice on a run up one would think they would investigate and still monitor. The Fact that IMGG is still trying to get approval for the Dvis and has not been shut down after all these years of scamming leads me to believe that illegal activities has NOT take place here. LOGIC
Kimble, you lost me. You think the Dvis exist only on paper. That it is not substantially complete but if approved will bring .50 pps? Do you think its possible the FDA will approve a theory or a device that is not in the final stages of development?
Kimble, so your saying imgg is not a scam?
Oh, I can't read... But no way MWE could have been there..
Stockmaster, I agree MWE relationship was terminated per a sec filing. But I don't understand the poster is speaking about the meeting on oct 11? When the meeting did not take place untill the week of the oct 17th!
Mugs, your getting a copy of the meeting? I'm lost.. Your saying Dean must tell the truth because you have access to a recording of the meeting? And why do you state it's a "so called FDA meeting" what should we call it? He had a meeting with the FDA.
If this is a joke then Why would the FDA meet? You need more facts less anger for me to understand you.
We are going to find out late tonight on money Tv. just a little while longer...
IMGG will send out a press release after the money Tv spot.
Becky just sent out email about money TV Friday.
All I know is that it was yesterday. We all should know details soon.
Was yesterday...
I don't know how error was made and I don't know the track record of the law firm. Whatever the cause as a CEO would chew some serious @$$!
It is a error. Just found out. I feel better now.
KingKong. It seems Mr Janes has Imgg in a working relationship with a film
Lux Digital Pictures, Inc.
12021 Wilshire Blvd. #450
Los Angeles, California 90025
http://www.luxdigitalpictures.com/site/
Whatever the relationship or deals going down, can you help me understand if there is anything of value in a deal here for the Dvis? Can Janes use this companys 3d tech to sharpen the images on the Dvis?
Snook, that link has nothing to do with
Lux Digital Pictures, Inc.
12021 Wilshire Blvd. #450
Los Angeles, California 90025
IMHO dean has been buying time with our money because the Dvis can not produce images that are SE to predicate devices. I have been a fan of imgg for over two years. I like Deans patent. I believe the device is substantially complete but The images are still not good enough.... For SE
I got a headache !!!
Uncle Snook thank you for the find. I think No way the Dvis can be used for it's intended purposes if Dean has been talking to LUXD since June on some kind of business deal. What in the world does 3D movies have to do with IMGG? What is Dean up to?
Our Class A and Class B common stock continue to be quoted on the Pink Sheets even though our stockholders will not receive any value for their shares of common stock as part of the Chapter 11 Cases and our corporate existence will be terminated and our common and preferred stock cancelled once we have completed distribution of the proceeds of the Asset Sale.
Our Class A and Class B common stock was delisted from the New York Stock Exchange in July 2010 and since then has been quoted on the Pink Sheets under the symbols “BLOAQ” and “BLOBQ,” respectively. As discussed above, under the priority distribution scheme previously approved by the Bankruptcy Court, our stockholders will receive no value for their shares of common and preferred stock as part of the Chapter 11 Cases and our corporate existence will be terminated once we have completed the distribution of the proceeds of the Asset Sale to our creditors. Accordingly, even though our common stock continues to be quoted on the Pink Sheets, our common stock has no value and our stockholders should not view the trading activity of our common stock on the Pink Sheets or any other market or trading platform as being indicative of the value our stockholders will receive as part of the Chapter 11 Cases or in connection with any Chapter 7 liquidation.
Homer, I could not fill orders at .07-.079 all day. I wanted to see if I could get someone Dumping! I had to come up to .799 late to get a 30k block filled. If dumping was to occur it seems I would pick up large sums considerably lower than this magic .08 number. I guess we are so low you cant dump. The ones still getting out have to hand feed the bag holders like myself. I don't mind holding this bag...
Someone sell! I got orders to fill!
market seems to think so!
Yes, AmericanAirlines to Burbank. Looks like a winner!
Investors of his choice?
Homer, I will tell you now the Dvis is not a bag of rocks. I must read the NDA first to determine what one can and can not talk about but whatever the limitations are I personally do not like sharing valuable information to the public. Its a "throwing pearls before pigs mentality" why give valuable information to someone that will roll it around in the mud. Not to say you would do that but others may. It is only professional to zip it when given the opportunity to veiw such information.
Phil, iPhone says 32 miles from lax to i3. Dallas, Tx
Homer, sadly after signing a NDA I will not be returning to this board.
Phil, I will land at LAX...