Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=10005111
Company Name:
DRAGON LINK ENTERPRISES LTD
Address:
Unit B, 15/F., Way On Commercial Building, 500 Jaffe Road, Wan Chai
Country:
Hong Kong, China
Employees:
Less than 100
Sales:
Profile:
Year of Stablish:
15 years and above
Export Market:
http://hkg.bizdirlib.com/business_directory/DRAGON_LINK_ENTERPRISES_LTD
http://www.vivchina.nl/en/Exposant/Preparations/Freight-Forwarding.aspx
China:
Dragon Link Enterprises Ltd.
Beijing Office, Rm 1203, 1 Tower Genertine Int’l Center
3 Yong’anli East Street
Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
Telephone: +86 (0)10-96096628
Fax: +86 (0)10-58793462
Contact: Ms Ma Changlian
E-mail: pek@dragon-link.com
or
Dragon Link Enterprises Ltd.
Unit B, 15F, Way on Commercial Building
500 Jaffe Road, Causeway Bay
Hong Kong
Telephone: +852 (0)2836 5166
Fax: +852 (0)2838 4856
Contact: Mrs Frances Wong
E-mail: dragonlk@netvigator.com
Dragon Link Industrial Limited
Flat C, 6/F, Valiant Ind. Ctr
12 Au Pui Wan Street
Fo Tan, New Territories
Hong Kong
Tel:+852 26876740
Fax:+852 26876540
http://hk.kompass.com/profile_HK053586_en/dragon-link-industrial-limited-gi.html
markets closed for Good Friday.
get in while the gettin is good...http://www.americanbulls.com/StockPage.asp?CompanyTicker=HLNT&MarketTicker=OTC&TYP=S
when things get settled we may get some sort of thick shareholder letter. i repeat may.
Email: info@highlineinnovations.com and then get back to us...
my point is that you are calling out the "leaders" on a "followers" social network. so if you were to contact the leaders you speak of instead of speaking to the company's following, yes you could be valid. that is the point i was trying to make. now can you please keep? i'm not going to explain again...
there are no leaders here, just followers. now if you contact the company instead of us here, your statement would be a valid one.
i agree when a mistake is made someone is responsible and that someone should be held accountable. however you are dealing with investors mentality here and when any company is in litigation over a crime their stock price is going to suffer. so when your pps is .0186 or 186.00 you are going to take a hit percentage wise. also i'm pretty sure that the employees of the company are working. simply because one of them misspelled something does not reflect on them working or playing texas hold'em in the middle of three five million dollar projects...
not for nothing chad took this company from .0007 up to .0186 before he was hit with some horsefeathers from the prior criminal that was running this company. so it is really pending the judge's decision on the outcome of the trial where the stock price goes, not the ceo. so really what the hell is he or management suppose to do besides hire a team of lawyers? since that is what seemingly is holding the pps down that seems to be the wisest decision one could make considering the circumstances...
of course these are just my opinions.
HLNT must close higher than .0024 today to get the short term moving averages to cross the 200 day moving average. right now whomever is trying to suppress this stock is at .0023 which is the maximum for them. however with all the recent trading around .0027(i.e. two days of 18 million plus in volume) i would not be surprised to see this back at .0027 soon. of course this is my opinion.
you got that right.
lunch break traders will make for a volatile hour! be ready to step away from the computer all you longs...
nice nugget of info glenopto. glenopto is that a single malt?
today is the day. we know what the solution to the problem is so now we have no problem only a solution. i quote al bundy when i say "let's rock".
the 50MA is trending up now. if the 20MA crosses the 200MA this may give the momentum for the 50MA to continue to trend higher. if the 50MA continues higher you will get another crossing of the 200MA(golden cross) which is really what someone is trying to avoid. so listen up everyone keep your head down and your eyes on the prize we are not far from busting this thing wide open.
someone is desperate to suppress the 20MA from crossing the 200MA. the 20MA is currently .0023 while the 200MA is at .0023405. if we can beat this chump, or these chumps, it is blue skies in my opinion. blue skies equals green accounts! go green, go HLNT...
looks like the 20MA is trying to cross the 200MA. this is a bullish indicator! .0023391(20MA) vs .0023475(200MA)
woop! woooooop! wooop! wooooooooooop!
http://www.4885.com/products/362140
http://www.proxibid.com/asp/LotDetail.asp?ahid=2953&aid=36791&lid=10128236
http://www.ecvv.com/selling-lead/1975616.html
http://www.ec21.com/product-details/Full-Terrain-Vehicle--6165062.html
http://sitom-auto.en.made-in-china.com/product/foPJTSECCOVN/China-Hoss-UTV600.html
for those who maybe didn't get to see all of these links for Hoss manufacturing...
P.$. manufacture, produce, sell, and get revenue.
the 50MA is starting to trend back north.
old but relative news...?!
Highline Technical Innovations, Inc. Announces Joint Venture With Dong Feng Motors
Tuesday, 21 Sep 2010 08:49pm EDT
Highline Technical Innovations, Inc. announced that it has completed joint venture with Dong Feng Motors, to manufacture and sell the HOSS line of UTVs. Highline Technical Innovations, Inc. is scheduled to receive the first shipment of UTVs from Dong Feng Motors in the first quarter of 2011. Per the terms of this joint venture, Dong Feng Motors has also acquired the license and rights to manufacture and sell the HOSS UTV within its own distribution channels, and provide royalties for each unit sold to Highline Technical Innovations, Inc. This UTV (Utility Terrain Vehicle) is designed specifically for the sport utility, forestry, and construction industries. In addition to the Hoss 500 plan to introduce a three cylinder diesel powered UTV.
http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/HLNT.PK/key-developments/article/1982839
the 50MA & 200MA were .0025/.0027 at that time. so you could consider this a rebound now.
the 20MA is now above the 50MA
true
brah every time you post one of these types of messages i have an image of you just exhausted and beat up... like rocky
and Cramer just now confirmed it!
if in fact good lawyers were employed by the SEC some more cronies would be behind bars.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crony_capitalism
Tell it to the judge...
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Litigation Release No. 22106 / September 28, 2011
SEC v. The NIR Group, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 11-cv-4723 (EDNY)
SEC Charges Long Island-Based Hedge Fund Manager With Fraud Involving PIPE Transactions
On September 28, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged a Long Island-based investment adviser with defrauding investors in hedge funds investing in PIPE transactions and misappropriating more than $1 million in client assets for his personal use.
The SEC alleges that Corey Ribotsky and his firm The NIR Group LLC repeatedly lied to investors to hide the truth that his PIPE investment and trading strategy was failing during the financial crisis. For example, Ribotsky falsely told investors that despite the adverse market conditions he could liquidate all of the PIPE investments in 36 to 48 months – a practical impossibility given the size of the investments. Meanwhile, Ribotsky misused investor money by writing checks to pay for personal services and such luxury items as a Lexus, Mercedes, and Rolex watch.
A “PIPE” transaction involves “private investment in public equity.” Microcap public companies often engage in PIPE transactions to raise capital. According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal district court in Brooklyn, N.Y., NIR’s family of AJW Funds provided cash financing to distressed, emerging growth, and start-up microcap companies quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board or the Pink Sheets. The AJW Funds were typically invested in 120 to 130 different companies at any given time.
http://www.finalternatives.com/node/19518
The SEC alleges that beginning in July 2004(again, where the hell was the SEC?)*, Ribotsky began siphoning assets from one of the AJW Funds he was managing through NIR. Ribotsky typically wrote checks to himself or to “cash” and then instructed NIR office employees to cash the checks at a nearby bank. They would then give Ribotsky the money. Although Ribotsky was warned by NIR’s head accountant that he could not lawfully take this money for himself, Ribotsky continued to do so anyway for the next five years.
According to the SEC’s complaint(7 years past due)*, NIR’s strategy of investing in distressed and start-up companies began to show signs of failure by mid-to-late 2007. Many of the distressed companies to which the AJW Funds had made loans were by then essentially defunct or on the verge of filing for bankruptcy. The SEC(finally)* alleges that Ribotsky made false and misleading statements to investors while his hedge funds were struggling to create the illusion of success. For instance, an NIR employee prepared an investor chart accurately showing that NIR had invested a total of $31.4 million in 57 deals for the relevant period. When Ribotsky reviewed the chart, he told the employee that “investors can’t see this” and instructed him to “change the number to something near $60 million” before sending it to investors so they would falsely see an average investment of at least $1 million per deal. Ribotsky continued to make false and misleading statements to investors even after the AJW Funds’ outside auditor had calculated that it would take decades – if possible at all – to liquidate all of the AJW Funds’ PIPE investments under NIR’s stated investment and trading strategy.
The SEC further alleges that Ribotsky used money from one group of investors to pay another group of investors in 2007 without adequately disclosing this to any of the investors. Ribotsky’s misconduct also included his failure to conduct any meaningful due diligence before selling a third party $43.2 million of AJW Funds assets in November and December 2008 — a transaction that allowed Ribotsky to book a purported “realized” gain, at a critical time, without his funds actually receiving any money. NIR’s offering materials and investor communications touted that NIR engages in extensive due diligence reviews before making investment decisions on behalf of the AJW Funds. The third-party purchaser soon defaulted on his payment obligations and has never paid for any of the assets.
The SEC’s complaint charges Ribotsky and NIR with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1), 206(2) and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder. The complaint seeks a final judgment permanently enjoining Ribotsky and NIR from future violations of the above provisions of the federal securities laws and ordering them to disgorge any ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest and pay monetary penalties.
SEC Complaint
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2011/lr22106.htm
Home | Previous Page
Modified: 09/28/2011
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2011/lr22106.htm
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2011/ia-3293.pdf
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2011/comp22106.pdf
http://investorswatchdog.com/blog/investorswatchblog/?p=5956#more-5956
*inserted by MontyBrewster
sorry that is where i had my triggers set. you are correct sir...
NO R/S! PERIOD!
HLNT has made a recent move from .0011 up to .0025 which is rather large but not near the maximum potential reached. now we are at .002 with what looks to be some sort of consolidation before a possible move up again. we all know what this stock is capable of. the massive move that was made over a year ago was due to hoss being associated with a dong feng in a business partnership, which is still apparently on going. however if HTI can somehow tie the wildcat booster into a partnership with a name brand company .0179(last year's peak price) will look more like 1.79. once again these statements are all my opinion...