Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I’m gonna put my money on this……..
SFRX will (ahem) decide NOT to disturb things at Juno for the sake of marine life.
Or, they already know there are communications cables that run to the Bahamas and that’s the non ferrous metals they are talking about. Old Charter Salvage located the cables, so it’s in the public record.
We’ll see, but I seriously doubt they are going to announce the tech doesn’t work and waiting for the permit was simply a waste of time.
But I am open to eating crow.
GL. Nice low volume run up the last few days.
NCLA hasn’t touched the hem of the……..
garment, but that’s something that should be addressed.
Is it possible they find something more precious…..
than treasure and decide not to dig?
In order to protect marine life, maybe Kyle and the BOD will choose to forgo profits and take the high road for the sake of mankind.
It’s not like they intend to sell the treasure, right?
They say they so want to find treasure, yet they have no intentions of selling it.
So why find it?
They’ve built quite a business simply talking about finding treasure.
Is finding treasure all the necessary? They’ve sold a lot of stock without ever finding a trinket.
Just saying
What “recovery” is the FB post referencing?…..
Well, that’s being challenged. The SEC can……
explain themselves.
Good thing they a secure X account, huh?
But what gives the SEC the authority to……
collect this data?
Did Congress act to do so?
If so, when?
At least you addressed the merits of the case……
Did you buy Bitcoin when the SEC’s X account……
was hacked?
It’s rhetorical.
The complaint addresses the concerns of many, which have been raised for years.
Glad you’re keeping an open mind and not jumping to conclusions.
Well, NCLA is the only one challenging the……
status quo.
They’re challenging Rule 613…..and
showing the SEC is lax in security of personal information.
I find it amusing you’re suggesting NCLA doesn’t care, while posting links from the SEC suggesting that they do care.
Too funny.
An argument on the merits would be welcomed.
It could, but should it? You admitted……
you haven’t even read the complaint, yet concluded there are far more important issues we face.
I don’t think the possibility of thousands, if not millions of retirement accounts being hacked is something to take lightly.
Isn’t the premise of this board to protect investors from fraudsters?
Well……
I don’t see how much NCLA’s cares or…..
doesn’t care addresses the 4th amendment argument being made.
Again, did you read the complaint?
Well, they’ll have their day in court……
In Q1 2023 SFRX sold .00204’s……In
Q2 they sold .001755’s, and in Q3 they sold .002056’s.
I would imagine those that could sold into the Worm Poop Pop.
Addressing the merits would be welcomed…….
So if they waited too long it’s constitutional?…….
Haven’t folks been crying foul long before now?
Did you read the complaint?
Bill Barr isn’t part of the lawsuit…….FYI
Can you cite any statutory authority the SEC has to collect and store this data?
If not, why?
Regardless, the SEC will have their day to explain themselves.
This lawsuit concerns an unprecedented scheme by an administrative agency, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), to unilaterally set in motion one of the greatest government- mandated mass collections of personal financial data in United States history: the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT).
https://nclalegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/001-2024.04.16-CAT-Complaint.pdf
SEC hit with new lawsuit alleging 'mass surveillance' of Americans through stock market data
"For an agency to argue that it should be able to avoid these hoops to make investigations easier is to assert that it should be exempt from the Fourth Amendment."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sec-hit-new-lawsuit-alleging-mass-surveillance-americans-stock-market-data
What was the pps 3 weeks ago? How……
bout at the peak of the Torres Rally?
The dilution continues, bro!
Dilution rate is about 2.688MM daily since…..
they got the loan in December that longs claimed would end dilution.
8,511,505,065 OS 04/19/2024
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SFRX/security
My hearing? Amusing. Do you know why.......
SFRX hasn't moved the lawsuit forward against the Amazing Blogger who brought the pps to its knees?
Well, that's the "allegation" against him.
It was filed in Sept 2014. I don't think OMEX's lawsuit with Spain took that long.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION
Seafarer Exploration Corp
Plaintiff
vs
Darrell Volentine ; Darrell Volentine
Defendant
Case No: 14-CA-008902
Division: L
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT AND/OR DISMISSAL HEARING
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on its own review of the file and being fully
advised in the premises, it is ORDERED that this case has been scheduled for a
dismissal hearing on May 29, 2024, at 9:30 am, before the Honorable Judge Darren D.
Farfante and will be conducted by electronic means only and not in person. The Court's
Zoom link is http://zoom.us/j/4393837898 and Zoom Meeting ID is 439-383-7898 (No
password required). Parties' failure to appear may result in case dismissal.
TIME RESERVED: 5 to 10 minutes
Done and Ordered in Hillsborough County, Florida this 11th day of April, 2024.
14-CA-008902 4/11/2024 10:56:34 AM
14-CA-008902 4/11/2024 10:56:34 AM
Darren D. Farfante, Judge
SFRX has claimed for a year that the Defendant doesn't have an attorney and they were scheduling a hearing.
Well, he has an attorney, but I guess they're having trouble scheduling the hearing.
The counsel for Volentine filed a motion to withdraw which was granted on March 7, 2021, and Volentine was given 60 days to obtain new counsel or proceed without such. The Company is seeking to get such matter to trial as soon as possible. Volentine, as of the date of this publication, has not obtained new counsel.
Attorney: VINICIUS ADAM
VADAM LAW
511 SE 5TH AVE STE 104
FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301
That could have been done by a.....
3rd party long ago when they first claimed the tech worked.
The 5 legged sheep could be another Reynolds…….
invention.
Trying to confirm.
I noticed it’s blue too.
GL
Thanks for that link. It will take…..
you to Surge.
So LOUD sold Surge to KGKG. I wonder why Mr. Integrity didn’t file Surge as a foreign entity in Florida, since it’s a SC entity.
Hmmm
I agree, a good fit.
And to see pricing you have to sign up.
That’s good stuff.
Right. Don’t forget the 80,000 sq ft warehouse……
Well, at least that’s what they’re “operating” out of.
BTW, do you have a link to Surge Distribution?
Just wondering what they distribute and the services they offer. Or maybe a phone number?
Address to the warehouse?
Thanks. Doing my DD.
Surge was formed last October and has already......
been bought out twice.
It's a good fit with APRU.
I was trying to think what else came out of Melbourne.
https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=SURGEDISTRIBUTION%20L240000203050&aggregateId=flal-l24000020305-83913df8-a01f-43dd-b349-293ee1081294&searchTerm=surge%20disdtribution&listNameOrder=SURGEDISTRIBUTION%20L240000203050
Someone who bought 4 years ago could.....
be in the hole.
The good ole Q1 2020 treasure on deck hype from Kyle got the hot balloon flying higher than it is now.
I bet Max is pissed about the 66% drop from the recent multi-year high. Especially after he and Matt took a road trip with Kyle to pump the stock.
GL
Well, the way you attempt to refute the fact…..
is via deflection.
The first today was you pointed out that I called someone who lost a loved one a bro, but it wasn’t your last attempt to deflect.
It’s all you got.
But at least Tony is proud, even if he doesn’t read the board (wink wink).
I reached out to Tony and he didn’t……
respond. Of course you have excused that by saying I was mean to him, while claiming he doesn’t read the board.
Jeff’s post was brief. The one you referenced…..
insulted the Clerk who is REQUIRED to record an application and approval of a transfer of ownership, which would include an approval of licenses. That is what I addressed.
I didn’t read his entire post. What I did read was absurd.
You’re taking the occasion to continue to deflect from the fact Tony LIED.
And instead of refuting that fact, you deflect to something that is irrelevant.
It’s all you got. You can’t prove Tony didn’t LIE.
If you could you would. You don’t even attempt to suggest he didn’t.
You’re amusing Shadow.
I’m sure Tony appreciates your efforts.
How is it a serial LIAR like Tony….
can be lauded, admired, and defended?
Is taking someone’s call all it takes.
Just curious.
My take is Lena Brewing is not, nor has……
never been a subsidiary of APRU.
The money may have been wired, but like any real estate transaction the money would be in escrow until a closing occurred, and then funds would be disbursed.
APRU and Lena Brewing will be working with Lena’s lenders for transfer of responsibility of outstanding loan covenants and guarantees to APRU and upon lender approval and transfer, APRU and Lena Brewing will file required paperwork with governmental agencies to transfer ownership of Lena Brewing to Apple Rush Company, Inc. as a wholly owned subsidiary.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/389467/content
You can’t transfer ownership until you file required paperwork TO transfer ownership. Even then, an approval is required.
But that wasn't your point. You were following......
the two rules.
1) Hedge is never right.
2) If Hedge is right, refer to rule #1.
The SEC could shut Tony down tomorrow based on the last PR, and guess who would be the target.
This board is so much fun.
That unrelated company told shareholders on more......
than one occasion they were "on the wreck," just as Tony has said on more than one occasion that they owned Lena.
In both cases the evidence showed it was BS.
In both cases longs that spoke with the CEO simply swept the claims under the rug.
In both cases longs identified a boogie man to deflect.
It's the same as the other company you......
have been touting.
Longs were asking if critics would admit being wrong if the device had detected treasure.
I admitted I would, as did another.
Only one long said that would be the last straw if nothing was there.
The others that "talked" with the CEO wouldn't say as much. Oh no.
That guy prolly has Tony beat when it comes to painting a rosy picture, but it's the same type BS claims.
I think that’s the rub here. Tony is…..
like many typical OTC CEO’s.
You all say you have talked to him, but it’s obvious he played y’all for fools regarding Lena.
But not one of you dare call him out.
Why is that?
Because he gained your trust. That’s what confidence men do.
And the victims have a hard time admitting they were wrong.
So they find a boogie man.
The lights will come on at some point….maybe.
The terms of the deal don’t matter. Transfer……
if ownership is public record.
Feel free to reach out to the Village of Lena and direct your comments to them. There was a reason they called Lena Brewing when it was said in the PR Lena Brewing was a subsidiary of Apple Rush.
They are REQUIRED to know about any ownership change. And Tony first claimed they owned the business on 2/14 in the Twitter interview.
Just because you broke bread with Tony doesn’t mean you can’t be wrong. He may have made you feel on top of the world, but regarding that last PR he’s full of it.
Sorry for your loss.
SECTION 3-9: CHANGE IN PERSONNEL OR OWNERSHIP
In the event one or more members of a firm or partnership withdraw from such business,
the business may be continued by the remaining person or persons, partner, or partners under the
same liquor license for the remainder of the period for which the license was issued to the licensee
or licensees. The change in ownership, however, shall be reported immediately to the Village and
the change shall be shown immediately on the original license application then in effect filed. The
failure by any licensee hereunder to comply with the provisions of any part of this section shall be
considered and deemed cause for the revocation and cancellation of the liquor license issued
under this chapter by the Liquor Commission. In the event the total of fifty percent (50%) or more
of the stock of any corporation, or membership interest in an LLC, or interest in a Partnership, is
transferred or sold to another person, corporation, LLC, partnership or other entity, such transfer or
sale shall require a new license be obtained from the Liquor Commissioner and a new license fee
be paid as provided in this chapter. A Certificate of Occupancy must be applied for and issued to
the business owner before a new liquor license can be issued.
K. Upon approval of a liquor license by the Village Board of Trustees, a Certificate of
Occupancy must be applied for and issued to the business owner before a liquor
license can be issued
https://www.villageoflena.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CH3-Alcoholic-Beverages-Updated-10-9-23.pdf
Let me know if you need anything else. I honestly don't think Ross simply took the money for the sale of Lena so that he could then violate the ordinances.
And he probably didn't appreciate getting a call from the powers that be about the PR claiming Lena was a subsidiary.
Tony's cornbread ain't done.