Behind your eyes
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So the one in May was BS?
It is now obvious the first China order was BS, now another? How gullible can pumpers be?
I am trying to think of one with enormous potential that survived legal challenges. Been involved with tickers here that had "world changing" tech patented, and were beaten up by large company lawyers. Maybe you know one?
Not a coin flip. If the patent has value, the tech will be used without license until forced to do so. Not everyone is as nice as you.
T, there is no patent to infringe. Yet it seems from what I read here, once the patent is issued, peeps think it is guaranteed. Far from it, the graveyard list of patent holders on the OTC is longer than the successful ones. Invest early, sell early.
Infringers just infringe, they dont care who the owner is. Then this company has to go to court to stop them. No company with money is afraid to infringe the patents of a small company with no money. They beat them to death with legal costs. That is just the way it is. Doing you a favor explaining what is ahead, dont expect you to listen.
I am not here to bash the company, my recent posts are to let you know what you are in for if the patents have value.
You posed the original question, not me. If you think for a minute that I have not been through the patent wars, think again.
If an infringer challenges the validity of a patent, it is not done at the patent office. It is done at court. If you dont understand this, you have no business holding on a patent play. A patent is only as good as it is written. I have seen a patent invalidated by the meaning of one word (Interdigital vs Nokia).
As I said, issuing a patent isn't validity. Courts make that call, not the patent office.
You are best to invest in this patent play at the begining, before there are any challenges. There are two major challenges-obviousness and prior art. Prior Art could be an issue if any broker dealer registered shares for anyone on a blockchain. Obviousness would be if because the blockchain was designed as a ledger, and you used it as such, you can't patent that. There would only be challenges if this company sees infringement and sues someone. Just because a patent is issued, doesn't mean it is valid. A court can invalidate it after issuance.
The blockchain is a secure "ledger" rather than a cryptocurrency. Cryptos use the blockchain to record ownership, but is not a crypto in itself. Not sure exactly how you can patent a process to record things on it, as that is what it was created to do. I guess we will find out.
I would think he needs something patented in MMJ to be in that space. Does he buy the OWCP ones? Or have someone with patents merge in?
I know you from another place, and you seem quite reasonable. What in hell are you doing supporting Berman, who is easily the biggest scammer ever on any board here? Don't you get he has made up all his revenue and customers, and runs the company from a hotel room?
Actually, its the application date that is important. If there is no prior art challenge, then that is when the patent protection starts, not the issuance of the patent.
Learn to read fins, Skippy. Ok to pump future opportunity, but post BS and you will get corrected.
Zero revenue is phenomenal?
Right now this stock is overvalued, based on revenues vs the outstanding shares. There isnt any massive short position buying, nor is the cannabis market hot. We wont find out the result of the court case till spring, to see which side is full of crap. These are headwinds this stock has to deal with, unless Michael pulls a rabbit out of his hat and soon. This honeymoon will wear off if he sits on his butt going forward. There was criticism of his actions while on CE, doing little. The CE didnt stop him from trying to run a business, and I dont think he did a lot and used the CE as an excuse. Lets hope he gets with it now, he has no excuses any more.
T, this is the crap I am talking about with flippers. They can't stand prosperity, or more than a penny on their tickers. Grrrr.
For some reason, flippers think there is no life beyond .01. There has been a flipper wall there for quite a while. Maybe this one gets past it.
Looks like you are getting good support here T. Kinda hard to predict when they get the SEC and FINRA aboard. Looks like there are about 3400 Broker dealers that can license the tech, so somebody should bite in the near future. But this type application is what the blockchain was invented to do.
Nice to see a runner on the OTC finally. Doing it on smaller volume too.
Still making up nonsense? What in hell does registering that contract with the SEC mean anything? You, as usual, make that some type of guarantee. All they have to do is pump the P out of it like you do, then issue a followup 8k saying its cancelled, like Nate has done before. Feel bad for the newbies that think you actually know anything about this ticker. How about telling us what fins you have read from Park and link them. Outside of that, what basis outside of fantasy are you using to generate your opinions?
Ok Michael, where do we go from here?
Lol, only $499,900,000 to go!!; You just can't make this stuff up here, those two do it for you. What a bunch of horse droppings.
CE removed?????
Gee that's funny, there is no link on that website to John Park. Are we just picking random sites now and linking them to him? How about next using the Little Sisters of the Poor? Makes more sense with the heavy debt and judgements against him that exist.
Some of these morons can't read filings. It is clear that a 2 month old company is merging in, with one guy running it. And that guy couldn't get financing if what he wants to buy is free.
Done more than you apparently.
Actually, they do have a revenue producing operation. They do bitcoin mining, and they spend $3 to produce $1 in revenue. Shrewd businessman Nate is. In the most recent fins, they said that was the only business they were in.
What NYSE company?
Almost 6 months old. And you would have to believe that someone with massive debt they can't pay now will get a half billion from a bank without enough assets to cover it. Right, and pigs fly and it snows in July. Hard to believe that there are exporters in Brazil that can ship right now that don't need financing, that have been shipping to China since there was sugar.
They were posted here earlier. New here?
That is what these lemmings don't get. It is the insiders making coin by creating a ruse to manipulate the share price. They have millions and millions of shares that cost them nothing. They make up a story that is difficult to check (China), then scoop up lemming money while dragging the story out. Amazed that many here still can't see it. The best part is that for a real run to happen, abank has to lend a half billion to a guy with a two month old business, is millions in debt and doesn't eben pay back previous loans, and two of this 3 restaurants failed. On top of that, they have to lend all that money based on a dubious scrap of paper from China in a business that he has no history or experience doing. Sure, that is going to happen when pigs fly and it snows in FL in July.
Not if this is all BS to begin with. I am starting to believe this is all an elaborate ruse that makes zero sense. For this to happen in the first place, a bank will have to do a half billion in financing to a company CEO that is millions in debt, has numerous non payment judgements and has failing businesses. He couldn't get a car loan with his finances, much less a half billion on a 6 month old dubious scrap of paper.
All he did was copy the information from a third party export company in Brazil anyone can use.
Nate is a bitcoin miner now, spending $3 for every $1 he brings in.
When did you speak with John Park?
Sterling, the "who me?" act is getting old. You continue to post highly suspect opinions of grandeur, without one shred of proof or common sense. There are peeps on here like rockie that hang on your every word, assuming you know something. Yet you have not shown you have met and spoke with any of the players, seen any fins or anything from the new company or shown instances that banks lend a half billion to deadbeats heavily in debt. You come on here by way of being an original member, and use that as some type of credibility to your pumping. You have a responsibility in your posting because of that, seeing things that newbies miss. You are better than this I think, be nice to see you address the obvious major problems here instead of minimizing them and posting pie in the sky BS only. Your Pal, zombywolf.
I love a solid kick in the rear end to a clueless pumper. Doesn't happen enough on these boards.