Again - no connection between Taikone from a business/marketing standpoint to SPNG. All this means is that Dicon sells it's foam products to Taikone and (hopefully) because SPNG owns Dicon, there is money being made in Asia that benefits SPNG. It doesnt mean that SPNG is actually marketing products in Asia. We also dont know what owning Dicon really means to SPNG - it could be a cash cow or a bottomless pit of losses.
Understand, I am long. I just don't think we need to get excited about this and assume that this validates anything beyond the fact that there is a technology and companies are marketing it.
I am on the fence due to the lack of direct communication with the public over the last couple weeks from SPNG themselves. On one hand you have to admit, if the stock activity wasn't what it was there is an underlying product that has proven viability in the marketplace. On the other hand, so was ZZZZ Best in the 80's (I had up close and personal experience with that one!). But there were unsavorable individuals involved at several levels and something that was a good business model was quickly torn apart. Noone saw that one coming until the SEC got involved. In fact it is almost a perfect mirror of SPNG at this point. I hope that is not the case. Both for shareholders, investors and for the company that seems to have a good product.