Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I agree but I just want to expose our expert and his repetitive bla bla bla now and then when I am on my pc. Whatever I or he says, we canno change anything but ourselves.
1- If saying that GRST is a high risk sub-sub-sub-penny stock is promoting it, then I did and do.
2- ''you have never been able to shown where I have been wrong''.Afte r years of negative analysises the least we can say is you have not been proven right (yet). I additionally do not have to prove you wrong, just saying regularly that this is a high risk bet means you may be right or you may be wrong. Time will tell. Till then, you know as much as we all do.
If your point is that the company and Leon are having troubles you are right and everybody knows it. One has to wonder why someone as smart as you pretend to be spends that much time trying to prove it ... even more if that someone is not even a shareholder ???????
''The problem Shawn Leon has is that he needs to continue to borrow since the shares are worthless in terms of attracting capital of converting debt.''Now they are blowing the funds of future shareholders with the debt refinancing schemes (obviously people are running into lowning them funds they most likely will never recuperate, according to you).
The problem Shawn Leon has is that he needs to continue to borrow since the shares are worthless in terms of attracting capital of converting debt. QUESTION?Who in that context will lown him money ???
Must be lonesome to be the only smart person around (LOL)
For as long as one can enjoy risking a small money (more or less $400 per million shares) GRST is a nice Bet to try considering the current staus of the company (Large debt, real revenues, market cap of + or - $1,600,000). Doesn't take a genius to figure out this to be a high risk loss/reward bet.
If you decide to get to the table, just enjoy the game and I wish you the best.
''have been correct for a couple of years'' ... Anyone can quote official reports but doing it foreseeing failure for 2 years + doesn't give you much credibility. It suggests however a ''personal animus'' of your own ???
'"just another poster giving his opinion" based on little but personal animus.' I wonder (excpt for expressing my opinion) what the said 'Animus' could be saying that (fact) ''GRST is a sub-sub-sub-penny stock on OTC of a operating and reporting company''.
''the personal guarantee of Shawn Leon's personal financial statement''' ... I wonder why someone able to do that would do it considering your ''analysises''? Desperation or personnal belief? At least he seem to put his money where his mouth is.
Whatever your repetitive reashing of public information you posted for years, GRST is still live and kicking. Personnally, i believe that at current PPS, someone could make a small risky bet offering low loss possibility and high reward potential. All one has to do to play (or not) is notice that behng this bet there is an operationreporting duly.
Once more you repeat the same story that was suppose to terminate that affair for years according to your posts. NOTWITHSTANDING YOUR CONTINUOUS PRETENTION TO KNOW MORE THAN ANYONE ELSE, grst keeps operating and duly reporting quarter after quarter.
As i keep saying this will either succeed or fail (like any other bet). You have one chance out of 2 to finally have been right. Till then you are just another poster giving his opinion, assuming to be smarter than anyone. else.
Wealthy? No but have enough considering my age. As for lashing out at the one person you refer to, I believe he has a secret agenda motivating his agressive behavior and the effort he makes trying to destroy the stock and Leon. He pretend to act in an altruistic context but I absolutely do not believe that.
Finally relative to losing money my net cost is effectively somewhat higher than 0,0004 (cosidering my past trading up and down) but right now, per 1,000,000 shares the current value of my bet is only $ 400 or so. One doesn't have wealthy to keep this sub-sub-sub-penny stock, considering (whatever our infamous analyst says) there is some kind of asset behind it and financials are normally reported. I consider this bet to be high risk but one that's not that much worst than playing roulette in a Casino.
My advice:
- No one should bet more than he can loose without pain,
- If Leon can succeed, not many stocks do offer that high a profit potencial,
- A GRST shareholder should does sit on his bet and wait till the roulette stops
Your ''objectivity'' makes you blast Leon if he issues a lease and blast him again if he doesn't. Sund likes someone frustrated and antagonistic for a reason of is most likely based on an historic between him and Leon.
Nice post. Thanks
1- CEO incompetent: I often mentionned she is a good scientific person having developped a great offering and buying in, I did put my money where my mouth is. My point is that she understand business management as well as I do of scientific topics. The consequence is that our offering is the best kept secret in the industry.
2- Marketing is the answer to everything: No just one of the four skills a business manager should be able to manage directly or indirectly (with R&D, manufacturing and finance).
3- My credentials: 17 years with IBM (regional manager for the last 5 years) 17 years with a startup competing IBM with Japaneeses who developped an outstanding offering. I contributed to make our Canadian company grow from no revenues to $140,000,000 and ended up national vpn of the company
4- I'm now much to old to offer my services and anyhow, I'm sure there are great people better qualified than i am in the understanding of the markets we try to get to.
5- No it all: never hinted I do and could not have done what our CEO did. The fact is she doesn't understand marketing an d I do not pretend knowing what product development is.
6- Finally over the initial years I traded somehat with this stock and now own a lot of shares with a reasonable NET COST (still in the red obviously). I do not need the cash I still have at play and being an optimist, I assume someone will endup getting our CEO to understand that building a multinational company worth more or less $35M after years of effort is the closest thig to failure.
You may believe that this is ''just another meaningless statement'' and that is your opinion that you can have. At least in my case, my opinion is one of someone who still has skin in the fight.
Just another meaningless statement by an incompetent dreamer.
In your dream. I must admit I tought our stupid CEO would finally figure out how ridicule her overall management capacity has been. Here she is with another insignificant move following another disastrous quarter (what acrazy excuse she offers).
This investment I tought I had has become a bet. The bet is: Will she wakeup and look for appropriate help or will she wait till all she has to offer is a pile of patents someone may want to get? At current pps, I keep my bet (net cost after 3 years) running and hope the woman not to br suicidal.
One has to wonder why someone self assumed smart would spend that much time debating suc a stock as if it was a blue chip? The good news: Ridicule is not a mortal decease.
Our ceo is desperate and digging her financial grave. Having had such an opportunity and blowing it gradually because of her incompetence. Saw histories like that (failure with great innovative products) before but never tought this woman was that stupid as a business manager. I'm afraid the worst is to come with that stubborn person in control of the company.
If Imay, ...
Keep your shares. Unless you are financially desperate, why sell shares worth $300/million shares, the business being apparently still operating normally and reporting duly?
I think our CEO will have to contract for some more shelves space since we seem to be in the business to grow the number of shelves we can get to.
Will not be able to listen to the conference. Hope to read a summary herein later.
I hope they will not ask us to submit questions for the conference. In any case the last conferences only included questions they created by themselves.
Whatever you mean ???
How would you like getting 25 or 30 cents per share?
I do not respect our CEO's skills relative to marketing but I do respect her for both her scientific skills and intellectual capacities.
Why in the world would just sell our (her) company for $5,000,000 ??? Pet shops are worth more than that.
THE PROBLEM WE HAVE is marketing, ability to generate revenues and manufacturing costs. The value of the company is based on our products. If someone buys us, he shall have manufacturing inhouse manufacturing facilities and marketing programs to integrate us into at minimum additional cost.
If our CEO decides to open up to offerings (???) she has something to offer that could be atractive to many. I just hope she would accept help negociating. I finally assume that a major in our industry would be happy to make the acquisition thru issuing shares of it own instead of throwing out cash.
The example I gave earlier is just that 'an example'. However current market conditions in our industry should make us a great acquisition target for many.
Thins being said, our stubborn CEO may very well still believe she will be a multi billion $$$ busines within the nex 2 years (objective she set 3 years ago was ($5,000,000,000 within 5 years).
Kind of interesting to see that someone as smart as you (???) does analyse a stock based on its PPS, not even mentionning once that he is discussing a stock whose total market cap is $1,500,000 or so.
P.S. ' fun to watch... next year.' ... At least you believe it will still be alive next year (LOL)
Gee, you really show objectivity and realism in your analysises. Aren't we lucky to have you play the role of a presumably serious analyst of a sub-sub-sub-penny of a company currently worth (market cap) more or less $1,500,000 ... LMHO!
Not only are you ridicule but you obviously have a secret agenda motivating such a behavior, ... at least I hope.
FOR ANYONE INTERESTED:
GRST is a company trying to pull out of an OLD financial disaster, now operating a serious business under the leadership of an apparently courageous CEO. The risk is obviously serious but the bet you make should be something you can afford to lose without pain. On the otherhand, if the company succeeds, the return should be quite interesting. One should assume our management to be assuming they can succeed otherwise, why try?
Anyone looking at that as a SERIOUS INVESTMENT analyzing it daily is at least ridicule.
Let's be realistic or just move on.
Wow! we were so much desperate to acquire more shelves ???
If only the 'Multi-Billion Dollar Markets' we get in knew we do exist in a busiseness othe than acquiring shleves !!!
The industry will have to react and ASSUMING WE GET FDA APPROVAL, how would our offering address or not this issue?
Whatever the anser, if the company doesn't have the means to inform the market, we shall keep having shelves with boxes no one can figure out what they are all about.
I agree. As for a deep pocket, there are plenty of companies that could buyout our outfit with their pocket change or unused authorised shares of theirs. Our current market cap is less than $50,000,000.
Let's take as an EXAMPLE JUST FOR FUN ... Nestlé who bought Gerber in the past would decide to go after our CEO assuming she still has enough smart to entertain a discussion with them (???)
Nestle current market cap is more than 5,000 times ours ($ 267B, shares being traded at $100). Assuming Nestlé wanted to
- get rid of a potential (??) competitor,
- boost their Gerber offerings and
- acquire our patents,
it could offer us 5,000,000 of their shares or 0.0019 addition to their current O\S).
For Nestlé shareholders adding 2 tenths of 1% of their O/S would be, to say the least, negligeable but for us it would mean 10 times our current PPS.
As for 'advertizing' this move would not necessarely mean adding advertizing budget for Berger, but just would need to add our product to their current budget.
QUESTIONS:
- Is our dreaming CEO available to negotiate with Nestlé/Gerber, following the FDA (hopefully) favourable decision?
- Is the above the best she could get?
Probably not but our dreamer as a CEO has no clue how to get out of the mess she created and up to now stobbornly kept believing that she could make it without help from some one (or many) create a successful environment. I however do not hold my breath, this type of person being frustrated to the point of not doing what has to be done, believing it would make her look bad (To her: Cannot get much worst, you already have proven you are selfish and a frustrated incompetent person related to what is needed in here)
Very happy for him but his successful background is definitely not the main consideration one should expect for such a job in that specific a market. Online marketing is ok but it has to be very extensive so mothers of young children hit such Internet advertizing messages.
I just took a few minutes (Google search) to look for how baby food producers do their marketing. I noted two sentences in particular:
1- As early as in 2015, advertising spending for baby and toddler food, infant formula, toddler milk, and one nutritional supplement brand aimed at young children totaled $77 million in all media, PRIMARILY TV and MAGAZINES
2- I also read that A HIGHER FREQUENCY OF EXPOSURE to formula and baby foods in digital media (self-reported by parents) was associated with greater odds of purchasing these product.
Primarily TV and magazie and higher frequency of exposure on digital medias. Our strategy seems to be putting the chicken before the egg and even then in a not large frequency.
I personally consider these to be critical steps to be covered even before loading shelves with a product no one ever heard about (except shareholders).
I assume our mission to fill empty shelves with boxes no one knows about. We must now be on 1,000,000 shelves (excluding Amazon) but our sales remain negligeable. What a mess ...
That is an opportunity to remind shareholders herein that GRST is not a single business man's venture. Others are behind the scene looking like people who believe that GRST may endup be a success, notwithstanding the disparaging some do relative to the company ... Hard to believe that all these people support as bad a situation as the one you enjoy defining.
Anita Teslak is VP-Operations, Executive Health & Performance at Ethema Health Corp.
Gerald T. Miller is Founder of Canadian Lawyers Network, is on the board of Ethema Health Corp. and Managing Partner at Gardiner Miller Arnold LLP.
Edward T. S. Chan (Ex-Ceo of Ethema Healrt Corp.), occupies the position of Chairman & Chief Executive Officer for Quark Technology Global, Inc.
Shawn E. Leon is a Canadian businessperson who has been at the head of 8 different companies. Currently, Mr. Leon occupies the position of President, Chief Executive Officer, CFO & Director at Ethema Health Corp. He is also on the board of Sparta Capital Ltd.
GRST is a risky bet for the moment but I, as these people close to the company, believe that current situation inherited from a past you so much enjoy reminding us daily, can succeed. I may be an optimist but i believe there is a probability that this bet may turn out to have been a good one.
Best kept secret in the market.
Your insistence at calling GRST an investment ('This is has become an investment for those ...') demonstrate either your total incompetence or a hidden agenda you carefully try to hide. I however personally do not believe you to be incompetent.
DEFINITIONS OF TERMS
- INVESTMENT : ‘an asset acquired or money committed with a PURPOSE to earn income in future’
- GAMBLE’ an enterprise undertaken or attempted with a RISK of loss and a CHANCE of profit or success
- BET: an act of RISKING a sum of money on the outcome of a future event.
NOTE: Only Investment doesn't focus on the notion of RISK
Not a bad move, granted.
This being said, our CEO has no clue what marketing is all about and what is needed to reach prospect clients, i.e. parents. The whole industry at least advertize their offerings so parents fnd out about their products but WE ADD SHELVES AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVIRTIZING CHANNELS MOTHERS OR PARENTS OF BABIES DO NOT GO TO"
Our CEO loves 'announcing' to her shareholders who probably do not even have kids but doesn't have a clue relative to promoting our product to the market we presumably would want to reach.
What a mess! Here we are with an outstanding product and this remains the best kept secret in the market.
''why not pick one that you do not agree with''
When you repeat ad nauseam facts extracted from official company documents (facts we know already) I obviously agree. What I disagree with is your constant negative interpretaion of what these fact represent, obviously with the objective to destroy the (company, the stock and Leon), whatever the reason.
Based on facts you keep repeating and those you do not cover, I objectively say that this stock is a BET and it may turn out to have been a bad one or a great one. What is crazy in your continuous posting is that you are affirmative it is a failure in the making and cannot even imagine that Leon may succeed. Pick your odds but do not analyse GRST as if it was an INVESTMENT.
Assuming you are not outright stupid (I do not believe you are) analysing the GRST the way you do suggest you have an hidden agenda and that is what I believe.
Came back with a message from my security software (dangerous site) ???
We all know about the words of the company but what we do not care about is you biasses opinions interpreting everything in view of supporting you wish (failure of the company and Leon)
I have the honesty to say this is a bet or gamble and you, I and others herein do not KNOW how it will endup. Facts are the company is operating, financials are duly reported quaterly and debt is critical.
You keep looking at the debt and historical informations obviously aimed at destroying the stock (By the way, you do not KNOW how this will ends ... You will maybe be able to say 'I told you later or alternatively you will really look stupid not even have imagined a profitable outcom, blinded by God know what you went thru with Leon and/or the company in the past.
P.S. I act as a big mouth effectively but at least I do it objectively accepting this bet to present a risk. On the otherand you spend your time rehashing the same known company reports coloring your analisises with your byass opinions, hiding your motivation ??? (sometime I wonder if you do not just try to accumulate at the lowest possible pps???
You really work hard but it's always the same BS repeated on and on and on ... LOL
Did you check this ksd1.klaviyomail.com on Google?
Playing game breaking from my work now and then.
I enjoy exposing this man and his stupid continuous argumentation. As he says ... I do it to help shareholders current or potential (LOL)
Looks like it ...