Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
'failed miserably in your attempts to define me. ... I assume you skipped the end when I put '...' so I do not write somethin unacceptable on our board.
As for 'bailed out' once more you cannot differenciate between your dreams and reality. I did not sell a single share.
You are so borring ... I said what I had to say, was honest relative to my view on the company and having a life I shall be a lot less active in here.
If you are not paid then you are an absolute moron or a frustrated loser who lost a lot in the old days of that business.
Enjoy you posting (but I shall stop helping you making more money) and of 2 things one, Leon will succeed in what it is he is working on or he will not. In any case I (as many here in) take a chance considering the positives (I mentionned multiple time already) and I have the honesty to define this as what it is instead of as I would like it to be like you do.
You may be a great historian but for the rest ...
'more debt and a built out treatment center with known income that doesn't cover the bills'
I assume you believe those financing the debt are so stupid, they keep adding to Leon's debt even if that is killing the business all together?
According to your exrtise, Leon is so smart that his creditors keep either giving him more money or increasing the debt by shylock type interest rates ???
Are these lenders so stupid that they try to kill the chicken they get golden eggs from or is GRST worth enough for them to keep increasing the value of the loans without concern?
I know it would be hard for to imagine it but, coulld it be that they all (including Leon) smart enoug to effectively create something that will be worth owning? After all maybe you are not the only smart person in here and maybe (just maybe) these people are not stupid?
This being said, this is currently a high risk, high potential bet and non of us yet have any knowledge of what will happen.
As I said, it is imagination going positive vs your continuous negative imagined scenarios of dilution, splitting, Leomite activities, ...
I could have imagine government funding, someone throwig cash, ... The point is I do not have a clue what Leon is up to as you are not also and where you see disastrous outcome 5+ times a day, I say this is a risky bet with whatever odds one accept, leading to an interesting return.
We are both in fantasy land but I at least recognize I am where you try to sound smart by putting up scenarios based on the past having no clue what Leon is up to or not.
'They get cold hard cash and must be very happy'
Who from tell me.
At the opposite to your continuous negative prediction, let's 'imagine' something Leon could propose to his creditors. That as your predictions is just imagination since none of us knows what is going on behind the scene.
If by miracle the debt was to just go away, capitalization would become around $64,000,000 using a conservative multiplier of 12
Assume that Leon could convince his creditors to erase the debt in return for up to 7,000,000,000 new shares.
Then the credtors would have an immediate $45,000,000 asset (7,000,000,000 shares worth12 x $8,000,000 divided by 10,000,000,000 O/S) to replace their loans and ongoing exposure to a total loss or almost if Leon shut down over night or declare bancrupcy.
Then R\S could be done and normal borrowing to expand the business could become possible.
Starting with shares at $0,0045 (before r\s) or so for a company with no debt and a good business plan would then be a pretty interesting investment for all, creditors in particular.
May sound foolish but in theory, the creditors could go for it instead of recuperating less than more or less 30% of their ongoing exposure.
'Monday morning may be a blood bath.'
The only thing that could look like 'blood bath' would be a final closing of the company or outright bancrupcy (would be great for the creditors).
Just in case you did not notice, the pps is at more or les 0005 or 6 ... That's not much blood to bath from (LOL)
'Suddenly you don't believe it' ... a
As per your infamous analysis you make up scenarios of your own and misinterpret what you readd ... as usual.
I did not say I do not believe, I sasid it presents a risk (in case you do not know that's a characteristic of what a stock really is, in particular on OTC and foe sub sub penny ones.
' If I were paid I would disclose it' ... LOL
No wonder you have no credibility ... LOL! LOL! LOL! LMHO!
'We know what Shawn Leon is up to'
We do not and you do not. That goes for you also. We believe you are paid to post but we do not know for sure. Just that if you are not the explation of your behavior is most likely not good at all ???
You cannot understand something as simple as 'this is a bet presenting high risk but high gain if it ends up right' definition.
How do you want anyone to believe your analysis assuming this to be the same as a Dow Jones market blue chip type investment (?).
You know what? You and everyone else on this board may be right or may be wrong. None of us knows what Leon is really up to ... or not.
As I said earlier, I hope you're paid by the post otherwise you are ... (Not nice qualifier)
You know as much as any of us who cares ... historic data and no clue how it is going to end. For you to be positive saying it will continue to be a loser is to say the least be presumptuous.
Call it an investment or a bet is quite irrelevant. One look at it the way he wants and for as loong as he accept the risk what he calls it is not of your business. I hope you effectively are paid to do what you do, otherwise, I prefer not to qualify your behavior in here.
Putting history aside, this is a high risk high potential bet and I still do not understand why some keep analyzing the situation as if it was a serious INVESTMENT.
All we know is historic data and some pretend to know what only Leon does and I for one wait for the dices to stop
Quoting historic data and forecasting events that never did happen. A real genius, that makes no doubt (LOL)
'I have been saying they they should have split the stock and went with the offering. I was correct of course.'
You've been saying it for more than one year. I assume that when it will be ... IF EVER ... you will say that you told us. Monday morning coaches are rarely good at forseeing what's coming, ... or not (LOL)
'Why wasn't this deal done over a year ago'
As I wrote, a monday morning coach (LOL)
'The challenge once again is to find anything that I post which is either deceptive or materially incorrect.'
Nothing to be proud of, you keep saying what the past has been. Here we call that a monday mornng coach. He always knows what should have been done. I wonder why some keep paying you? Obviously it doen't change anyon's idea. Probably you only cost a few pennies per post and those behind these payment do not care (probably having a lot more to lose than any of us).
He obviously is.
You're one of a kind ...
'The Kids Nutrition market revenues were estimated at US$52 Billion in 2022 and are anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 5.5% from 2023 to 2033, according to a recently published Persistence Market Research report. By the end of 2033, the market is expected to reach a valuation of US$94.5 billion. North America accounts for 31.6% of the kid's nutrition Ready to Drink global market.'
That means that serious reputed firms in the domain will keep going agressively after this market. We however just keep issuing PR's to current shareholders and place boxes on shelves hoping someone will notice.
Our leader obviously has no clue relative to what it takes to penetrate a market, even more if the said market is a growing lucrative market occupied by large companies already having large shares of it.
Let's hope she realiize (or have some one help her see it) that she is not qualified to play that game and convince her that the way to go is to sell our great product to rich partners or competitor ...
My hope is she knows that and she just wait for FDA approval to act, otherwise, I most likely will still reduce may position or even walk away putting my money in a more realistic company.
'Unlike you I do not have a current position in this nor am I compensated by anyone.'
If that is true then I wonder what kind of frustrating life you have. Who in his right mind would spend his days posting on a board discussing a stock he doesn' hold?
In respect for you I prefer to believe you are being paid otherwise I,m sorry for you.
If you keep refering to a split you shall endup being right ... if and when that will make sense. Otherwise you only keep making money out of that stock, posting herein (I should probably get a commission out of your gains) LOL\
There yo go again with your comparisons that do make no sense.
'You do not debate the relevant facts that I post directly from the company's print.'
Why would I ? We all know them, Nothing to debate. History is history.
As for the future all one can do is wait or quit. What's to be debated ?
This is a small bet (relative to one's means), not a serious investment in a large company. Look at it as a game and enjoy it (I say you but it cannot be since you are not playing)
'I personally do not need ANY credibility for my posts'.
Effectively and you have none either BECAUSE ALL YOU KNOW IS PAST HISTORICAL FACTS).
You sound like someone predicting the next card (out of 52) after only 30 or 35 have been out. You sound like someone who says: I know what the next card will be because I saw those that came out already. The fact of the matter is you have a chance out of 17 to be right.
The player you try to convince hope the next card will be the one that will make him win. He also have one chance out of 17.
The difference is the guy on the sideline will not win anything if his prediction is right but the player will make a lot if his card comes out.
The only important thing however is that the player should not nave over extended himslf in his bidding.
Low odds, high potential ... The rest is BS. If one doesn't like it he should just stay away from the game.
'you never take the other side of the debate'
Once more you misinterpret what you read. In the debate (???) I present both sides:
- This is a bet (not an investment (as of yet at least)
- The RISK is that Leon may fail (for whatever reason)
- The other side of the risk is that Leon may succeed (neigther you nor I know why he keeps fighting)
You, only knowing what we all know (historic information), are totally affirmative that Leon is misbehaving and has no chance to succeed.
This being said, I do not see what side of the debate I miss. I feel like sitting at the poker table hearing an observer predicting the next cards, My hand may not look good but I keep going, knowing that whatever my odds that's what I want to do. The last thing I want is someone knowing as much as I do trying to tell ne what is coming.
'This CEO has destroyed his credibility with his misinformation in my opinion.'
Your credibility is as good considering that for an eternity you forecasted a split, you alluded to dilution that wasn't for a year, ...
What is credible is that
- the company does operate and normally report (contrary to hundreds of OTC sub-penny stocks).
- the weight of the debt that has been created in the far past
- whoever owns and keeps shares right now is accepting the risk (for as much as we know, the company hasn't failed ... yet
- whoever tought there wasn't any possible success forward must have already sold.
You have been as correct in your predictions as are those holding in here BECAUSE THE LAST CARD HAVEN'T YET BEEN PLAYED.
Once more, you misinterpret what you read (as you do wit the financials) ...
I wrote ' discussing it as if it was an investment in a blue chip' (note the ' as if it was')
You answer: 'don't go there with the blue chip nonsense' (wasn't blue chip reference that made no sense but you way of discussing the GRST case AS IF IT WAS).
You add: 'Clearly there are much better bets' ... That's a matter of opinion but at least you recognize that you discuss a BET, not an INVESTMENT,
Finally, you ask: 'why would someone consider a long position for themselves' ... The simple answer is that the odds may not be great but the gain potential is great. I'm surprise an analist like you cannot fogure that out.
What I do not understand is: Why for God sake does someone believing he is smarter than most spend that much time analyzing and discussing a HOPELESS bet?
We all know why ...
Again, this is a risky bet and discussing it as if it was an investment in a blue chip says it all ... You're being paid to do it. If not, thenyou must ... (some qualifier I do not dare write herein)
Pretty sure you are right. Otherwise they are outright no life crazy people.
I always laugh when I read comments relative to sub-sub-sub-penny stocks (1 sub per 0) as if he was analysis a blue chip type of stock (LOL). Either the poster doesn't know what he is talking about or he has an hidden agenda justifying his investment in time ???
The good news is ridicule is not a mortal disease.
FACT is, currently GRST is a bet one accept, considering low odds and large gain potential. Anyone looking at it differently currently should get rid of his shares if it involves any significant money (relative to the player's situation).
One has to wonder why someone (not shareholder) pretending to be bright and well informed spends hours every single day debating the state of a company having a total capitalization of more or less $2,000,000. He definitely be a no life frustrated person unless he is paid to do whatever it is he does.
To whoever care ... GRST is a normal company with large debt accumulated in the past. Leon must believe he can save this business but he doesn't yet know if he will or not succeed.
Anyone pretending to know what the outcome will be is full of it. Betting on the outcome of the GRST venture is currently the same as betting on a baseball game result at the start of the 7th inning of the game. ANYONE MAY BE RIGHT BUT HE ALSO MAY BE WRONG. Past performance (good and bad) is more or less relevant. All it gives someone is a way to estimate his odds, not a way to KNOW what the outcome of the ongoing game will be.
Owning or buying shares on GRST right now in a risky bet and pretending how it will end is stupid.
If someone wants to INVEST GRST is not really the place to do it with money one cannot afford to lose. If someone wants to play a risky bet with money he can afford to lose, GRST is a very interesting bet, considering the upward potential if Leon succeeds.
It's that simple.
You've predicted disaster for over 3 years and up to now you've been wrong all the way.
My prediction is that either Leon will succeed or he will not that is 100% certain.
Your prediction keeps saying we will lose whatever money we have in this stock. That prediction has more or les 50% chance to materialize.
Leon had its ups and downs (3 years ago there wasn't a business to report on now there is one) and both you and I can say whatever we want, the fact is we do not yet know why he keeps working at it and report duly every quarter.
Stop pretending you are smarter than any of us or you know anything more than us all (we can read financials also). As for your altruism aimed at protecting naive shareholders let us see how smart you could be by recognizing this is first class BS.
Everyone in here knows you have hidden motive and your credibility is non existant.
Just say the thruth relative to your real motivation and (with pitty) stop making a fool of yourself.
'to offer to the debate other than personal complaint?'
I do not complain, I just OFFER to set the record straight without assuming that I know more than others and draw conclusions out of historic facts. Both you and I must know that this is a risky but potetially profitable bet and we both know that our CEO behaves as someone serious as to saving this company. I for one admit it's risky and do not try to convince other shareholders that the situation is desparate and that they should sell. My only complaint is relative to messages based on history from someone (presumably not shareholder) not having a clue what is going on behind the scene daily.
For whoever ... I do not pay to be on this board therefore cannot directly answer private messages. I howeve thank those feeding me opinions, ideas or informations privately.
Thanks. Retired and back home from a 6 months tour in USA, I have time to play his game, i.e. Quote him then interpret whatever he writes as pleases me ... who cares if i'm right or not?
Quotimg you again: 'The question I have is what plan did they present ... What was offered as security ... LOOK TO ME LIKE ...'
Once more you admit not knowing and all you do is share an opinion of your based on historic data.
The question I have is what motivates you so you spend that much time herein rehashing the same historic data everyone knows about. LOKS TO ME LIKE you have an hidden agenda and you are paid to cripple this company (stock)..
'My track record is much better as you know.'
Except for dilution (none for months notwithstading your previsions) or R/S that never happenned ... among many other thing you said were coming that never came.
I must however congratulate you for your talent in reading statements discussing the past. You should be an historian.