Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If you are in at a low price the dividend is compelling. Also can occasionally write a covered call and gain some more bucks.
Time to buy back my $60 covered calls? Sometimes the slide can be good.
There seems to be a concerted effort to keep this stock where it is or drive it somewhat lower. For my money it can stay here until the Jan calls expire.
My intel calls are covered, 60's, Jan 2019
Companies could use the government in such cases. They had to yell "communist" three times in a crowded room to get attention away from the congressional interns. If I were King I would end the use of interns in Congress.
US companies have struggled to compete all over the world with many foreign governments supporting their industries and the US government indifferent to the whole thing unless the CIA had some mission going on.
Best to you also. I hope intel has not squandered all they once had going for them but so many in the industry have before them.
They must figure another surge is coming in intel and are looking to whack two or three dollars out of today's price to load up.
OMG! This horrible stock is going up! I feel blessed to still own some.
I stayed home from school to watch the Army-McCarthy hearings and decided to become a lawyer because of Joseph Welch. Thanks for the reminders. But I don't really think they apply to McPhudd.
I did sell some 60's for $4. So am in for the exercise period. I probably won't lose the shares.
I think I met my Waterloo a long time ago. Stuck with intel for a very long time but got in at a point where my dividend yield was attractive. Made some pretty good sell decisions, some at 45, some at 50, still have some and have not addressed what to do with it yet.
I don't see anything wrong with consensual relationships but I also see why companies might want (and should be able to) prohibit them.
Do we really know there are process problems? Or could it simply be that they have slowed the rate of introducing them?
We have had similar discussions before. But how do we know that intel has not simply slowed down the implementation of new processes to widen out margins on the old process. At this very moment they do not seem to be pressed hard in any of their traditional lines of business. An ability to slow development and increase margins is what I have been most waiting for.
So my 45, 50 and possible 54 don't look quite so bad.
Sold some at 45, some at 50, earned $4 on some covered calls @ 50. So we shall see.
There seems to be a concerted effort to keep intel from rising much higher although I can see the now-low-yield argument against it. If the data center growth continues though intel will prove to be a bargain even at this level and the yield can rise too. Since I have some covered calls written and outstanding they can keep it here for a bit longer if they want.
I appreciate it also. I found the post on topic and informative.
I am nearing the point of needing new desktop and notebook. Perhaps others are too. A refresh cycle would help.
Looks like Citi and Nomura could not move the price of intel. Maybe the big money is accumulating and then will let it move? If you have not seen the movie Abacus you should. It is business related and having worked in banking some I can feel their pain.
Citi makes intel its' #1 prospect and predicts 18% upside.
Nomura puts $60 target on intel
Thanks for the charts. Made a sale yesterday at $45. Have another order in at $50, we shall see what happens. If the latter order fills I will have sold about 55%. The recent run-up has me overweighted so I am fixing that. In around 20 so still like the dividend yield.
$50!! Me too!
Illinois requires only hands-free device while driving but seemingly cannot or will not enforce it. Now pedestrians who are occupied are becoming a problem too.
Scott Adams, who draws the Dilbert cartoons, suggested that in spite of having some accidents driverless cars may reduce accidents on net if only in that they could eliminate drunk driving. It might prove true of trucks also in that you can eliminate a lot of driver fatigue. Trucking companies will like not having to seek drivers and not having their trucks stop to rest every so often. You might even have long-haul trucks only or mostly operate at night.
Opening volume must be wrong on the chart above. It is way above the norm for this chart.
What if the government shuts down the self-driving cars in such weather or slows them greatly?
Why not sit corrected just to provide some variety for the board? LOL
The problem for the individual investor is that a lot of moves in a lot of stocks make no sense. Too much algorism in the market.
BMO sets street target of 55 on intel. I may have to raise my sell order.
He may be right about apple and intel.
More grateful than the kids over there taking the old stuff apart!
You can say that again! LOL
Clara maybe, Santa Clara not so much.
I have purchased a lot of intel product over the years. It is still available.
I have used a similar laptop-based set up for certain jobs and it made total sense in the context it was used. Now at home exclusively and desktop, giant monitor, keyboard and mouse make work and financial sense. I am mainly writing, doing low level spreadsheets.
This line of attack on intel has been going on for years. Without judging the merits of the attack it is many years stale. I would welcome seeing it dropped in favor of more relevant discussion.
I will subscribe!