Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
now that is indeed an interesting find
massive dump via warrant appears over, jumped back in here sub 7....hope it was wise.....looking to head back up
apparently warrants expire (Friday?) so people are taking their profits while the pps is high....i'm personally looking for a reversal to jump back in, as i don't think rj has made his eventual plunge....but only time will tell
either way, some nice $ thus far
indeed, and true
by manipulation i was referring to the NSS myth
nervous nelly here, jumped out @ 7.50 will look to come in again after i feel she's settled a bit, and i know what's up with the selling
.012 to .0001 is a lot of downside risk, especially w/o volume, or support, as L2 clearly shows
and it isn't manipulated, but if it was, there is another reason to avoid it like the plaque
yeah i was under that assumption...guess its good and bad...could be setting a nice base here @7.50, but may take a little bit to move up
possible company selling here? seems to be a lot of selling around 7.50, but careful selling
no it wouldn't
innocent of what....Monk himself swore on a legal document that he was selling unrestricted shares..and this was the same time he was telling people to buy and hold....there is no accusation, no speculation, only fact
but, hey, maybe they are LOCKED.....i mean, only 41115 volume for all 4 monk picks today, lol
so you are saying Monk didn't sell unrestricted shares while telling others the float was locked and to "buy and hold?"
#1 He was selling unrestricted shares while telling others to buy and hold and that the float was locked
#2 He denied selling even 1 single share on this very site (which was obviously a lie)
#3 The float wasn't locked, as he himself was selling shares
#4 He was selling shares (via cert) at a discount, so the buyer could profit from them (by selling of course) thus showing the float was not "locked" and in fact, the man who was pumping that idea was unloading his shares onto other, so he obviously could not control them (but was taking profit, while others were "buying and holding")
#5 The bold part is A. common sense, thus does not need to be written and B. not relevant to the civil suit, thus not needed to be written
#6 No matter how much you try to divert attention from the fact that the person who was preaching buy and hold was actually selling, it won't change that fact
-30% perhaps....see the L2, boy it was thin, on the wrong side
he sold shares, and did so while claiming he didn't...and did so at a discount while encourage others to buy at the ask, and did so although it works to the opposite of HIS FLD nonsense
and now they have a court doc where he has admitted to selling shares in cert form...and that method of sale had most likely conveniently side-stepped the traded records shown to the SEC...and that, well that just doesn't look good at all.
I once asked about a Scaminar in the old "Den" page and had about 10-15 private messages from various "family" members urging me to go, no matter what rebuttal, caution, wall, I threw at them.
You darn well know there are/were some people on the payroll.
heh, there is that sig...that didnt take long
yeah, i forget the name, but the cert was for ~840,000 shares
but, but, but....buy and hold right...i thought monk was still holding.....its the nss that dropped the pps, right?
and should be more to come with kirk be able to buy next week (let's hope he comes in with a bang)
in the otc report, it's interesting that in Q4 of 2010 CDIV had $190,000 of cash flow from financing (selling shares perhaps)?
and in Q1 of 2011, they lost money ($8140)
i would assume they mean selling more shares, although being dropped to the gray sheets has put a damper on that
credibility of being down 90+%?
really?
http://www.google.com//finance?chdnp=1&chdd=1&chds=1&chdv=1&chvs=maximized&chdeh=0&chfdeh=0&chdet=1303966659318&chddm=98532&chls=IntervalBasedLine&q=PINK:CDIV&ntsp=0
.71 down to .017 looks like a credible claim to me
http://regsho.com/tools/symbol_stats.php?sym=cdiv&search=search
nope, no shorts here, sorry
it made it's run with a large following...there were many posts pumping the stock, there were paid promotions, there was volume induced by the FLD idea (lies, failure or not, it was there at the run)...now there is nothing
can you get a double here....maybe, maybe not, but it won't make some 20 bagger run....all i suggest if for anyone who wants to jump in, make sure that bid is strong and real before diving in head first, imo
Blah, pic won't link right, but the .71 down to here sure is a telling chart, talk about %s
"the money is all gone"
no kidding...they obviously sold shares, so where did it go? since there is zero business, i would think it didn't go somewhere legit.
wake up, she's a-movin' today
If there is indeed extra shares floating around, something tells me they aren't coming from NSS
sigh
#1 facebook
#2 love how they stay away from the USA, and talk about a canadian broker
#3 love how they yet again fail to give solid info (like most pink scams...what broker? "a broker" isn't going to cut it
#4 when u release years worth of straight out lies in PRs, you better have some actual proof (names, memos, etc.), and just more random cliams with no actual info
#5 what is EIGH's business again? selling shares?
That what I read too.
sad thing is, even a 10 bagger from here only gets people close to .11 cents, and we all know how rare a 10 bagger is, especially after it was already pumped and dumped
yes, it has been working so well, all the way from .71 to here...congrats on a great plan....it was nothing more than a PnD...and that is what the chart really shows for you chartists
Read your "evidence" and that isn't evidence, also, yes, it is gone....and the poor volume and current pps is all the proof one needs to show that people know the FLD is nonsense.
it took months of pumping and 1000s of posts from "the team" backed by paid promos to get this to .70 once.....oh, and the belief in the whole FLD thing.....now that is all gone....the only thing that remains is a worthless company and some unfortunate bagholders who would most likely dump into any move close to .10, let alone .70
LOL, hold them down? They are doing that all by themselves.
shorting, naked shorting, and abusive naked shorting are not the same thing