Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm considering sticking around here to see how it plays out...
This keeps getting more and more interesting...
Extremely interesting...
Interesting......
As with most comments that poster has made regarding the company and its officers to damage the company. It is entirely inaccurate or incomplete.
The Prime Star Group address you have posted is an office park/suite. This wouldn't be the first time different businesses in an office park shared the same address. Again - Thank you for your concern.
Any company that is fraudulant should be halted... However this is not the case. The company is very real. Thank you for your concern.
Time PSGI Volume Cost
11:33 0.0580 500 $29.00
10:35 0.0600 6,000 $360.00
9:55 0.0630 38,000 $2,394.00
9:54 0.0600 5,000 $300.00
9:47 0.0580 18,000 $1,044.00
9:45 0.0580 25,000 $1,450.00
9:43 0.0590 10,000 $590.00
9:38 0.0610 10,000 $610.00
9:37 0.0610 20,000 $1,220.00
9:34 0.0600 10,000 $600.00
9:32 0.0600 5,000 $300.00
9:30 0.0600 1,283 $76.98
IntelA-Pac, Inc. is New Age Packaging, Inc., as stated in the press release, the legal filings and at the Nevada Secretary of State.
As far as shares are concerned, if you were a shareholder of record on July 15, 2009 in PSGI then you will be a shareholder in IntelA-Pac after the corporation goes through the entire approval process and is listed on an exchange. If you would like to provide me or the Company with your name, we will be happy to verify whether or not you are a shareholder of record.
The company has an investor relations telephone number that you're welcome to contact to have a discussion.
Regards,
O/S is under 17M - A/S is under 60M.
Full disclosure: I represent PSGI and will address all company related questions to the best of my ability and within the rules of IR. I will not address personal attacks on any of the principals of the company nor will I engage anyone who has that agenda. It is obvious that some of the posters feel it necessary to distract the intent of the board which is to foster a open discussion based on the company itself.
Thank you,
PSGI Investor Relations
The logic escapes me...
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 21243 / October 8, 2009
SEC v. Irwin Boock, Stanton B. J. DeFreitas, Nicolette D. Loisel, Roger L. Shoss, and Jason C. Wong, Birte Boock, and 1621566 Ontario, Inc., Civil Action No. 09 CV 8261 (S.D.N.Y) (DLC)
SEC Charges Five With Dozens of Fraudulent Corporate Hijackings and Unregistered Offerings of Securities and Names Two Relief Defendants
On September 29, 2009, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil injunctive action against Irwin Boock, Stanton B. J. DeFreitas, and Jason C. Wong, all of Ontario, Canada, and two Houston-based attorneys, Roger L. Shoss and Nicolette D. Loisel, charging them with having violated the antifraud and registration provisions of the federal securities laws by effecting dozens of corporate hijackings and making unregistered offerings and sales of shares. The complaint also names as relief defendants Boock's wife, Birte Boock, and a company of which she allegedly was the sole officer and director during the relevant period, 1621566 Ontario, Inc.
The Commission's complaint alleges that the hijackings were effected by identifying inactive or defunct publicly-traded corporations which were no longer operating and either illicitly revivifying the corporations by falsely representing that the defendants were duly authorized officers, directors, or agents of the corporations or by incorporating new corporations using the names of the void corporation. Once an inactive corporation was revivified or a new corporation formed, the complaint alleges that the defendants immediately effected a name change in the corporation and requested from third parties responsible for assigning unique identifiers to each class of securities issued by a publicly-traded corporation a new identifying number known as a CUSIP number and ticker symbol. According to the complaint, these identifiers were obtained by falsely representing that the companies seeking new CUSIPs and ticker symbols were the same companies to which CUSIP numbers and ticker symbols had previously been issued and that the name changes triggering the need for new identifiers were duly authorized corporate actions.
The complaint alleges that Boock recruited Shoss and Loisel in late 2003 to handle the paperwork required to effect hijackings, including submitting false documentation to Secretaries of State, the Standard & Poor's CUSIP Service Bureau, transfer agents, and Nasdaq Corporate Data Operations which, during the relevant period, processed requests for ticker symbols. The complaint further alleges that from November 2003 through March 2006, Boock, Shoss, and Loisel effected at least 22 corporate hijackings. From November 2003 through June 2007, Boock, Wong, and DeFreitas allegedly effected at least another 21 corporate hijackings.
With respect to at least 19 of those corporations hijacked with Shoss and Loisel's involvement, the complaint alleges that Shoss and Loisel were tasked to provide 28 opinion letters falsely representing that offerings of approximately 223 million shares were exempt from the registration requirements of the federal securities laws. The complaint alleges that Boock dispensed with the need for obtaining legal opinion letters concerning the issuance of shares by the 21 hijacking corporations involving Wong and DeFreitas by incorporating his own transfer agency, Select American Transfer Company, which Wong and DeFreitas operated. With respect to these 21 companies, the complaint further alleges that the three men effected the unregistered offerings of up to seven billion shares.
The complaint also alleges that DeFreitas effected unregistered sales in the securities of at least 30 of the hijacked or hijacking entities, generating at least $2.2 million in illicit proceeds. Boock allegedly effected unregistered sales of securities in at least five of the hijacked or hijacking entities, generating at least $267,625 in illicit proceeds. Wong allegedly effected unregistered sales of securities in at least 11 of the hijacked or hijacking entities.
The complaint alleges that each of the defendant received illicit proceeds in the form of remuneration for services, proceeds from the sale of the shell companies to buyers, and/or from the sale of shares in purported private placements or into the secondary market.
Based on the foregoing, the Commission's complaint alleges that the five defendants violated Sections 5(a) and (c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint further alleges that Boock violated a penny stock bar instituted against him in 2002 in a settled administrative proceeding (see In the Matter of Birte Boock and Irwin Boock, Admin. Proc. File No. 3-10960 (Ex. Act Rel. No. 46952)), thereby violating Exchange Act Section 15(b)(6)(B)(i). With respect to each of the five defendants, the Commission is seeking a permanent injunction, a judicial penny stock bar, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. The Commission is also seeking officer and director bars against Boock and Wong.
On September 23, 2009, the Commission issued an order suspending trading in the securities of 17 of the above-mentioned issuers pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(k). See Ex. Act Rel. No. 60707. The Commission previously instituted a trading suspension on March 13, 2008 with respect 26 issuers, 11 of which are identified in the Commission's complaint as having been newly incorporated by Boock, Shoss and Loisel and used in the scheme. See Release No. 57486 (March 13, 2008).
Any person with information relating to this matter should contact John Polise, Assistant Director, Division of Enforcement of the Securities and Exchange Commission by calling 202-551-4600 or by sending an email to ENF-17suspensions@sec.gov.
The Commission acknowledges the assistance and cooperation of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Ontario Securities Commission, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Florida in Tampa, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey in Newark, the Newark and Tampa Field Offices of the U.S. Secret Service, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
I don't know why I get the feeling the biggest impact news is still to come.
Logically - if I were negotiating a contract for territory - I would want as much as I could capture in a contract. With the new administration I imagine the embargo would be lifted in the near future. IMO.
I'm sure the company saw what was happening with the stock and didn't want to just throw news into a sell off. Let the weak hands bail. Slow and steady wins the race!
There was a press release saying there was only 8M free trading. How do you know they're selling shares back and forth? That's a shady assumption...no? NITE and others have been on both sides of the bid/ask. I can understand being cynical because you were burned...
BLVI is building a base....
BLVI! BLVI! BLVI! Getting ready for a run!
News Out!!! German Based Braustolz Brewery Exports Black Art Beer to USA.
About Braustolz Brauerie AG.
Black Art pilsner beers are brewed and bottled by Braustolz GmbH, having its principal place of business just outside Bavaria at D-09116 Chemnitz, Am FeldschloBchen 18, Germany. Braustolz has been in operation since the year 1868, brewing beer according to the German Purity Laws of 1516, which allow beer to contain only four ingredients: Water, Malted Grains, Hops and Yeast. This is the standard that is maintained until this day which results in its superior quality. Braustolz is a wholly owned subsidiary of a Brewery Group headed by Kulmbacher Brewery all based in Germany
The Kulmbach Brewery Corporation (German: Kulmbacher Brauerei AG) was founded in 1895 by Johann W. Reichel, Johann K. Scheiding and Johann M. Hübbner under the name Reichelbräu. The company is situated in Kulmbach, Germany.
Share owners
Brau Holding International GmbH + Co. KGaA (Munich): 62,66%****
Ireks GmbH (Kulmbach): 26%
Other shareholders: 11,4%
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brau_Holding_International
Brau Holding International GmbH & Co. KGaA is a holding company for several breweries in Germany. It the third largest holding company of breweries in Germany. It was founded in 2002 with Schörghuber Unternehmensgruppe owning (50,1 %) and Heineken International (49,9 %).
You have no understanding of the beverage industry. Its obvious you got burned on the previous company that occupied this shell and you're taking it out on the new company.
News Out!!! German Based Braustolz Brewery Exports Black Art Beer to USA.
About Braustolz Brauerie AG.
Black Art pilsner beers are brewed and bottled by Braustolz GmbH, having its principal place of business just outside Bavaria at D-09116 Chemnitz, Am FeldschloBchen 18, Germany. Braustolz has been in operation since the year 1868, brewing beer according to the German Purity Laws of 1516, which allow beer to contain only four ingredients: Water, Malted Grains, Hops and Yeast. This is the standard that is maintained until this day which results in its superior quality. Braustolz is a wholly owned subsidiary of a Brewery Group headed by Kulmbacher Brewery all based in Germany
The Kulmbach Brewery Corporation (German: Kulmbacher Brauerei AG) was founded in 1895 by Johann W. Reichel, Johann K. Scheiding and Johann M. Hübbner under the name Reichelbräu. The company is situated in Kulmbach, Germany.
Share owners
Brau Holding International GmbH + Co. KGaA (Munich): 62,66%****
Ireks GmbH (Kulmbach): 26%
Other shareholders: 11,4%
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brau_Holding_International
Brau Holding International GmbH & Co. KGaA is a holding company for several breweries in Germany. It the third largest holding company of breweries in Germany. It was founded in 2002 with Schörghuber Unternehmensgruppe owning (50,1 %) and Heineken International (49,9 %).
This gets more and more interesting!
Has anyone been able to attend these hearings in person? I wonder when filings will be coming out letting shareholders know what's happening? Any idea?
Where did you get your info from?
Looks like Delaagarza is out... Which means the divis are history too. This gets more and more painful to watch!
Something is definitely going on here....
I got this on a volume alert... Does anyone know why this lit up?