XTRM.s

From what I see of management, they have put their selves in such a position that they are no longer able to dictate EXTM's future ...

Maybe they want to keep a LOW Profile & not bring attention to what's going on...I don't know myself ---- would like to know about their wages & bonuses ..

I couldn't find anything wrong legally. I don't like it & would never try & average down.

It seems that they are financing the company's growth & development by issuing shares. Probability salaries, bonuses & other deals also. Nothing wrong with doing this. should be up-front with shareholders.

Just confounds and worries me that after about a year there's still no name change.

you state "this thing should be getting much more attention" Maybe they don't want people looking deep into their way of doing business.

I can see clearly now. very upsetting.

looking more like a ponzi scheme of sorts.

someone seems to have an inexhaustible amount of shares for sell---been obvious for some time

looks like shorts have started covering

I'm looking for a pr with some meat on it. It would be refreshing to have a simple, honest explanation of the companies plans & direction.

To say just how high xtrm will run, after news. First we must see it.

anunnaki: There's no way tell, I do remember rick changing real_ value_man into a slight variation of it & the spirited post between them. I don't post much these days, good luck to you & all longs................

yes, I do remember some of the exchanges between you & rick. I remember his trying to take your ID. When you first appeared here I thought you were the real real_value_man, but was never sure....

I was referencing the beast as a reverse split with protected shares, You must have quoted what you wanted to .....

MDLG had to know that FINRA would very possibly not allow this beast to get out. MDLG also had to know that he could always issue additional shares to these protected share holders maybe to his advantage, but not to unprotected share holders advantage, depending entirely on the ratio of the reverse split....

Some on this board have expressed more than just a concern about a possible reverse split with anti-reverse / protected shares causing a high percentage of dilution in common shares. Human nature being what it is, FINRA [IMHO] would never allow this beast to feast on shareholders, my concern is that MDLG would even consider this, shows a lack of respect for investors.....

I believe stock price is more important than opinions. NSCT's management seems to be on a winning track.

Sounds like a very biased opinion, although it would be nice to know who.

Nice post concerning factual back-up. It appears that NSCT is positioning itself for a higher share price making a 200 to 1 reverse split unlikely.

That is true, but wasn't made clear. Some may be selling thinking they would be protected if they bought common shares back, thanks for clearing that up.

Too much assuming: Can I sell my old shares & buy protected shares (from a split) ???? To assume or go with what we know to be true. Sherlock Holmes "Never assume".

Logic would seem to suggest that MDLG would want to impress all shareholders with his developmental skills concerning this company. All 902 shareholders a/o Jan. 14 are realistically potential investors in the new vision that he has. Now with 26 employees a/o Dec. 2013, his competent leadership must reach & stay at levels that instill confidence to ALL who would invest in his vision. We can argue about what is competent leadership & reverse splits, & why MDLG would want to pi--off that many potential investors. Tune in after the reverse split for the answer......

I see we have our annual meeting. We again are asked to vote for these three & again asked to vote for compensation for there efforts. Is failure the measure of success ???? Is silence the way to keep shareholders informed???? I think I'll vote my shares same as last year.

Reverse split doesn't concern me, what does concern me is how much revenue was made to lease 12,000 sq ft of space & why so much space.

Even though we know little about business operations, it's some what positive to see some interest. Sad we don't know more.

can you be more specific?

NEWS IS OUT

I guess they will change the name of this board soon???? Maybe that's good, remove all memories of the past, I think they call them stigmas.....

There's news on "OTC markets.com". Looks like maybe something is about to happen at last......

Bflx now has the ability to creat a perfect storm----a buy back--- a perfect (short) storm.

Referring to the incentive plan for 200,000 shares each. I don't spend much time here these days or even check on this stock. Owned this thing for a very long time!

These company representivies show an alarming disintrest with investor relations. This show of managements disreguard tells me the company is run by oil & gas men who either don't know how to manage or don't care. Is it any wonder that the bonus benifit was voted down by shareholders last year.....

Wasn't it Greg Szabo that had the medical background? Maybe it was Greg that helped De La Garza Take over? Anyway I hope it's not fear of litigation that's holding back progress & the release of information.

Low volume, makes me think the play is over. Doesn't act like shorts????? Maybe SEC can sort it out.

Knew R/S was coming but 200 to one-------------

with the float @ 25 mil how could it be anything but shorts?????

It seems to me that the short players must try to take bflx out as they appear to have taken such a large short position. Even one short player with a very large position when buying to cover there position will make the price shoot up fast, thus many shorts will be scarficed once covering begins. Greed should be sitting up in there minds as they seem to be stuck at the current price range, thus the point of diminishing returns.

I am guessing but I'm assuming it's because of the tax credit that the company has accumlated to the tune of 20 million plus.