Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sorry, I hadn't noticed it before.
Schwab showed that too.
I don't know if some of the shorting could just be hedging by larger investors?
Bioprod, I was curious in what way you find that an "IGCC would be tech similar to CCTC's tech." I was under the impression that CCTC's technology is compatible with an IGCC, CTL or conventional coal plant since it is a pre-combustion treatment of coal.
Also, I was curious if you had a chance to look into your sulfur concern that was mentioned in your initial post? I believe you were concerned that CCTC's process did not remove sulfur and was under the impression that you were going to review the patent further and update us with your findings after I pointed out that sulfur is in fact one of the contaminants removed. I believe you mentioned that you had a lingering conern about how exactly the sulfur was removed.
TIA
Btw, tio por eso uso mi "tesoro", lol ;)
Lol; I think even the "bashers" only said 0.085. I think March 31st the 10K comes out. I was curious what you are expecting?
Father of Seven, CCTC hasn't contracted anybody for market awareness. Also, I think the idea of an r/s is sort of far-fetched, no, considering they've already done 2 forward splits?
Do you have any information about the technology option agreement announced last March for the CO2 separation technology or know who the partners are?
I don't, imo, envision massive amounts of CO2 being stored underground due to the high costs and risk involved.
Also do you know how CCTC's process would compare to a traditional CCS system with the cost of CO2 transport and storage factored in? (I added this part after the fact to preserve my remaining 3 posts ;)
Btw, Megladon, podria si podria..lol..anyway I put it back for "continuity".
Lol; I realized that after I wrote it; that's why I deleted it, sorry..you're too fast for me ;)
I don't know I'd consider coal that's been stripped of volatiles and other contaminants "clean", jmo.
You did actually, nice call ;)
I revise my guess upwards to 35-40 million ;)
Lol; yup that's my "alias"; apparently we write exactly the same ;)
Sorry I deleted the original for being "Off Topic" lol.
I don't know; someone said there's only about 100k short lol ;)
I agree. Thanks ;)
Is there any significance to the licensing agreement being categorized as a joint venture in the pr this morning? I'm thinking maybe the word "Major" in "Major Joint Venture" means something. Only because I don't know why they'd categorize a contract for one plant that way.. But I didn't know if their original MOU for the licensing agreement was also categorized as a joint venture?
My guess is 20-40 million..but that's a guess. Why do you have a current short count? Or do you know when the number you referenced was last updated?
TIA and GL ;)
Thanks BT; that's great news ;)
If the fees have been paid, why would it not be in there?
Hmmm. I think we've already established that the India contract was signed after the last 10-Q was filed, no?
I agree; I don't think the smart money would be holding anything short right now.
No cada uno es elegante tio ;)
Nevermind. I was under the impression that shortsqueeze.com was only updated twice a month.
Do you know why that date is important; because of the 10K or does it have something to do w/ the restricted shares?
I have a feeling, because of all the bashing, that the short position is larger than was anticipated, jmho..I think somebody was confused about the rules regarding restricted shares..
I didn't know they were working on a deal in the U.S.
Thanks petergriffin ;)
""The Company remains focused on achieving the business goals outlined in previous press releases, including the consummation of its initial Technology Licensing Agreements in both China and India. We are on track to close our first license agreement in the USA prior to the end of this year and continue to move forward in Inner Mongolia. Progress on these, and other activities will be the subject of future announcements.
"The Company is due to file its 2009 10K and audited statements prior to the end of March. This will provide shareholders and the investment community with a comprehensive report on all aspects of the Company's operations, and as such will illustrate that the Company is sound and following it's previously stated objectives."
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Clean-Coal-Technologies-Inc-iw-771277794.html?x=0&.v=1
Tom, I think it was the company prs which mentioned that news was due out. I wouldn't depend on people on message boards to determine when news is coming out. Actually maybe you could call and let us know if they can provide anything more specific. Let us know.
TIA ;)
Maybe petergriffin ;) I don't know if it was related though to the India or China contracts which have already been announced..
Btw, thanks Coffee. Have a great night; I'm out of posts.
Hi DT; I can't pm, but I think O/S is about 435 million. I don't think the actual O/S increased when the restricted shares became eligible to be sold; I think it just increased the float.
I don't know that CCTC's core technology would be considered a low carbon type of technology; but rather a pre-combustion treatment of coal. Also, I read this:
"According to the MIT report, a clean-coal solution will likely lie in a combination of several new technologies for capturing carbon dioxide and storing it to keep it out of the atmosphere."
http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/18398/?a=f
I was under the impression that CCTC's technology could be used in conjunction with existing or new coal plants (including IGCC?) or to pre-treat coal for use in coal to liquids facilities.
IMHO (that's my legal discliamer ;)
Actually that seems like a pretty standard 10-Q for a late stage development company. I'm curious why, though, you choose to write this line "We also recently began working with another technology development company to evaluate their fuel-to-liquid technology as a precursor to a potential joint marketing agreement, however, these discussions have not progressed and are currently on hold." as:
"We also recently began working with another technology development company to evaluate their fuel-to-liquid technology as a precursor to a potential joint marketing agreement,
BUT!!!!
however, these discussions have not progressed and are currently on hold."
Your way seems more ominous I suppose..;)
Btw, here's a link to edgar w/ company filings:
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001445109&owner=exclude&count=40
I only mentioned doubting that because one of his prior blogs said this:
"It appears that there are approximately 3,000 shareholders who could possibly sell as much as 100,000,000 shares of the stock over a 75-day period (from January 15, 2010 to March 31, 2010)."
http://www.pacificstatescapitalcorp.com/stockprice.html
And I'm still questioning a March 31st deadline (as well as the numbers).
That's not official. I think that may have caused some of the misunderstanding. Wayne Crumpley has a shady past I believe so may not be the most reputable source for information.
Btw, I don't know that anyting in there's not true; I just wouldn't necessarily trust it.
I believe the 10k is due out March 31st, but I could be wrong? Also the China agreement said it would be signed in March so people are expecting a pr..Maybe that's what the confusion was about? I'm really not familiar with the whole restricted share issue.
I think there's been a misunderstanding about some definitive deadline for selling restricted shares. From what I understand that's not the case? I could be wrong, I just don't understand how they would somehow expire? I thought it was just a matter of re-filing the documents with the transfer agent? I was hoping someone knew more about it?
I'd prefer a pr.
I believe several people reported the violations.
I was curious if anyone had an updated short count? I believe shortsqueeze.com has a 2 week delay.
FYI, I spoke with Doug Hague, President and CEO of CCTC, this morning and was told the following:
"I have been made aware of malicious statements that are attempts to damage our company and its shareholders. On behalf of the company I personally assure these statements are untrue and made with malicious intent. Our company has commenced a full investiagtion to determine the identities of parties responsible and we shall pursue all legal remedies to the full extent of the law. Please refer to our company webpage link below for further information."
http://www.cleancoaltechnologiesinc.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2&Itemid=3
Hi Learning, if you get a chance could you please replace the sticky that's up there with the one from my previous post? I included the contact email in this one..
Thank you ;)
Corporate Disclaimer - March 19, 2010
"CCTI has been made aware that certain individuals have made derogatory and untrue statements about the Company and its associates. Our company has commenced an investigation to discover the identities of the parties responsible and shall pursue legal action to the full extent of the law. We wish to assure our shareholders, and the public at large, that these allegations are completely false and without merit. Any questions, or concerns involving these assertions, or the Company in general should be forwarded to the CCTI Fraud function, whose contact information is provided separately on this website" - Doug Hague, President & CEO.
http://www.cleancoaltechnologiesinc.com/
CCTC can be contacted directly via a secure link at CCTCfraudunit@yahoo.com with any questions or concerns.