Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I thought the Will Jordan/Soffin case was over--what did I miss????
.....because they were going to shelve the technology.
Thank you for the info and re-iterating the actual process, as well as the shipment status --- in spite of the rabble-rousing and nay-saying.
I'm in....
#CCTCIncTwitterCampaign
Lets bombard FBN with tweets....
I could not agree more....I am still leading an effort to have Illinois Basin Coal in the mix; it is perfect stock for the original Pristine process.
...just saw this; and all these things shall be added unto you
"...restarting tests on local PRB and international coal samples..."
@coaldriver - What do you think the potential is for the secondary revenue streams with the petroleum byproducts (the macro picture) - how will it be measured, physically and financially?
I don't think I've ever seen such pretty concrete framing in my life - to all the longs - you especially Beebs, remember when this was a 6' horizontal table top device???!!! So exciting to see this come to life~ <~~~SmilesAllAroundThisMuch~~~>
Imagine that.....a commercially viable secondary revenue stream from petroleum waste. Here's the thing: it's already been done, the process has just been "refined", no pun intended.
So why do you persist????
Oh, puh-leeeeeezzzzzzzz. #Drivel
You ROCK! Can't wait to see the progress!
#Persistence
Here's an idea: Dump all your shares.....
Indeed.....there is virtually no fly-ash.
From the get-go, the secondary "waste" has always been the real goal, for profitability. However, in one of the first shareholder meetings, I asked Ignacio whether they were abandoning the original Pristine process. He replied they were not, but the market (due to geopolitics) was not responding as quickly, so they were pursuing the "lowest hanging fruit" with Pristine M.
No spin zone here.....the process was on steriods prior; after UW is finished with putting their magic on it, it will be the Bourne Super Soldier of clean coal processes. That's why they've grant money--to improve, not keep status quo.
Don't twist my words--the process was on steriods before, it will be a super machine/process when all is said and done.
I hear ya - I'd be more concerned about the fissures popping up at Yellowstone....
I'd research what western countries are building coal-fire plants; I'd research where are there shortages, globally - now, who is poised to fill that market demand? You'll be surprised by the answer.
Geopolitics goes both ways; from 2008-2016, we saw a policy that promoted crony capitalist supposed "green" energy processes that basically milked the tax payer (Solyndra, anyone???), and penalized any coal-producing power plant, as well as citizens through skyrocketing monthly electric bills.
The current DC administration has taken the boot off of America's energy producing companies' neck--whether you agree with the policy, or not, is not relevant to this discussion-or perhaps it's coal's turn for a little cronyism--regardless, all the former statements are facts.
With fair winds behind us, and a steady helm, there is no reason why CCTI can't be successful. As the final process is refined, and cross checked, there will only be room for success, when we have the big reveal.
And I've no doubt it will exceed our expectations - and I'm just working off of the old process-- current processes have been exponentially refined since then.
For all those who may or may not know me, my position regarding this company has always been about the technology. It is a fabulous process whose time has come - and no army can stop an idea whose time has come.
It's not the fastest return; we get this. And management has it's own challenges, but Eves & Neary will bring this across the line.
I've been able to play it over the years and make some fairly decent coin--my heart, however, is all about seeing technology being fully commercialized....and we're not that far off, baring an act of g~d or something else.
That just is not true....whoever your sources are, are vastly incorrect....
Whatever, Cman
....if you only knew - let's be logical about this. I've said it before and I'll say it again: do you really think Grover would take a trip just to have face to face with the researchers at the University, when there's Skype, or to look at an empty site lot??????
All opinion.
Indeed - Mr. Grover didn't do the flight just for meetings; there's Skype for that. And he didn't take a 20 hour flight just to see a blank piece of land adjacent to Atlas Carbon. No indeed....lets expand our thinking...
No army can stop an idea whose time has come.
~Victor Hugo (extrapolation of, "On résiste à l'invasion des armées; on ne résiste pas à l'invasion des idées")
It is CCTI's time - and the stage has never been more favorable.
Meanwhile....you, as well as many others, continue to accumulate/trade this company....there's something to it - no matter what the naysayers opine....
The wait time won't be that long....
There have been a few Big companies that have wanted to buy them out, however, they were going to shelve the technology.
Robin&Aiden have taken the hard right over the easy wrong - it was said to me at one time, that it would be a disservice to sell out, let the company wallow and $2/ps and the technology sit idly by.
I do not contest there have been issues with prior management and geopolitical policies; however I believe in the longevity of the technology and the freedom it offers to sovereign nations while addressing a real issue: pollution.
At the risk of being obvious, this is a long hold and not for the faint of heart. I've been at it since 1995.
No quick flips here, but solid returns once the plant is built and processing coal commences. In the interim, it's been fun to trade and make a few dollars along the way....
It will happen.
Well.....you're still accumulating. That being said, it was all legit, prior, just timing & economic policies weren't good - wait--strike that. The original Shanxi Poar deal (when the stock soared to $74/ps) was a bait & switch by the Chinese- they wanted CCTI/SAIC to remediate toxic land and have us pay for the privilege of using our own technology. IMO, that was the only one that was really dubious, as SP had ulterior motives.
The reporting requirements for a University are very different from private institutions - very rigorous & very rigid. From my experience working in research & grant writing, I'd say the UofW partnership is legit.
What if, What if, What if - as if the University of Wyoming would be involved with a dead end project, pulling permits, etc - in fact, we don't know the back story of the University's level of interest/investment; and furthermore, I can tell you from working on grant projects at Northwestern University the process is pretty much hammered out from start to finish--the only thing that will keep this project from going forward is for Yellowstone to blow and we enter a volcanic winter.
Awesome! Good on ya!
~You Have More Than You Know~
Q
The coal will be shipped when the reassembly is completed.
@CCTCInc tweeted the news....
The U.S. is a Constitutional Republic with a representative government. Not a democracy.
Exactly - and don't forget about the other petroleum byproducts that are considered "waste" for the secondary market, like Dow/DuPont, etc....
Rogue prior management, adverse energy policies, and geopolitics have held this up--