Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So, Matt gets busted for a $1M scam, and for GS and the big houses, it's "business as usual." What a system!
George, Excellent article -- very worthwhile!
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1171926
Brain, "fish are our friends"?? Say what??... :)
CT, "toxic poison"! That's the bottom line, and I couldn't agree more!! As I'm sure you're aware, mercury is added only as a preservative. 10 dose vials are much more cost effective than single dose vials which would not require mercury preservative.
Have you been personally effected by autism & mercury poisoning, or do you know people who have been effected? I know several children/families.
I knew a 7wk old infant who died within 24 hours of his 1st DPT shot. The death cert called it Sids. But, as it turned out, there was a very high rate of serious adverse reaction in children who were innoculated with the batch # of DPT. One of the network magazine shows did a special on the batch and it's victims.
The mother, well educated and articulated, became very active. Lautenberg and a few other senators got involved, but interest waned. I think because the drug cos are a powerful lobby, and DC is beholden to big pharma. It costs a few thousand $$ to "fully" immunize a child thru age two... Big Bucks!!
President Bush's Policies in Focus
In his 2003 State of the Union Address, President Bush proposed bold steps to address challenges at home and abroad - confident that America will meet these tests. The President set forth the following domestic goals for Congress and our nation to address this year:
Grow the Economy and Create Jobs
Strengthen and Improve Health Care
Encourage Acts of Compassion
Promote Energy Independence While Improving the Environment
View other Policies in Focus »....
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/
Bush Receives Honorary Degree
The Award Ceremony
Excerpts from Bush's Speech, " I am very pleased to receive this degree. I worked hard for it as hard as I did for Harvard MBA. But it means more for me than that degree. This one my Dad did not have to buy for me. I did it on my own."
http://america-russia-news.com/index.htm
Mutually exclusive... Have we ever had a more dishonest Prez?
Seriously, which one was the most dishonest?...
I despise those movies too. That type of violence is the worse form of pornography.
I thought Bush was supposed to restore "honesty" to the Oval Office??...
What happened?
Rick, Great American Patriots Support Neocons! And things are going quite well in Iraq, or so says Rupert.
Haven't you been watching Fox News??...
MIT launches watch on US government
System to empower an informed citizenry
By Egan Orion: Saturday 05 July 2003, 10:05
"Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own governors, must arm themselves with the power knowledge gives." - James Madison
FITTINGLY ENOUGH, Wired chose yesterday -- July 4, the US Independence Day -- to run the story that the MIT Media Lab has built a fully web-enabled system promoting Government Information Awareness.
The MIT system's name consciously echoes the DARPA Terrorist Information Awareness programme. That's a comprehensive domestic snooping plan meant to collect and collate every obtainable scrap of data about everyone in the US population, as betrayed by the name initially given the proposal: Total Information Awareness. It is a chillingly Orwellian departure.
MIT's system is intended to counter-balance the US government's grasp of information about its citizens by providing them with effective ways to gather, organize and share information about governmental activities.
It will hold data about elected and appointed officials at all levels of government, political campaign contributions and legislative action (and the implicit links between those that now so corrupt American politics), regulatory affairs, defence contracts -- everything people can learn.
Given that the Democratic party -- the nominal opposition to the current US Administration -- is widely viewed in the US as subservient, impotent and co-opted by the same big-money influence peddling driving the ruling Republican agenda, such a countervailing populist tool seems timely. µ
L'INQS
Wired
MIT Media Lab
No "depression" if we get a TAX CUT!! I'm kidding, of course. Whom ever takes over in 04 is going to have a rough go of it. The burst bubble is the main culprit. But Bush's policies haven't helped, not that he cares... :)
Didn't Bush bash Clinton for "nation building"??... humm...
Suicide bombing at Moscow rock concert...
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_299586,00050003.htm
==============================================================
Btw, brain, that's GROSS!! :)
ergo, Our county has a governmental Office on the Status of Women. Giving "equal opportunity" to men,
I often wonder why we don't have an Office on the Status of White Guys... 8^}
Mercury in Childhood Vaccines: What Did the Government Know?
http://www.mercola.com/2002/jun/8/mercury_vaccines.htm
I think that hypothesis is that mercury is not "processed" or excreted in some children. We can all agree that injecting infants with mercury is probably not a good thing??..
The issue is controversial... And there certainly is reason to investigate the neuro/vax connection.
CT, thanks for the articles. They're great!
Here's something I find interesting and may have something to do with the dramatic rise in autism disorders:
"In late June of this year, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revealed that some infants who receive multiple doses of vaccines containing thimerosal could be exposed to total amounts of mercury that exceed some federal guidelines.1 Thimerosal is a mercury-containing preservative used in some Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), diphtheria and tetanus toxoids with acellular pertussis (DTaP), hepatitis B, influenza, and other vaccines.2 Federal agencies, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), international agencies, and vaccine manufacturers have responded quickly to address the concern.1, 3, 5
Exposure to ethylmercury from vaccines containing thimerosal in the first 6 months of life ranges from 0 to 187 µg based on which vaccines are administered.2 Since many vaccines do not contain thimerosal, most children receive less than the total amount of mercury indicated in the guidelines during the first 6 months of life. If all thimerosal-containing vaccines are given, the total exposures exceed the EPA guidelines, and possibly other guidelines, for the smallest infants. There are safety or uncertainty factors (10-fold for the EPA) built into the guidelines, and experts believe there is no evidence of harm from exposure to thimerosal in vaccines.1, 2 However, clinicians are uncertain as to how much mercury can be safely given at 1 time when multiple thimerosal-containing vaccines are administered simultaneously."
http://tlredwood.home.mindspring.com/jama_editorial.htm
==============================================================
In the late 80's and early 90's a live pertussis was used and not the acellular which became available later. (There were problems with side effects of the live virus vax.) H-flu and hep-B were not administered until well after the childs first birthday. Only 1 shot was given.
H-flu and hep-B are now administered in several doses during infancy (possibly shortly after birth??), along with the acellular-P vax, and vaccines for other infections that were previously considered fairly innocuous.
Over the last decade the number of immunizations, for the number of infections has increased dramatically. And the movement has been to immunize at earlier, and earlier ages. If a child follows the routine well baby care, the child will receive multiple vaccines at the same time throughout infancy into toddlerhood. The incidence of autism spectrum disorders has also increased dramatically during the same time period.
Coal Train, brainlessone, that's the point:
"A much better evidence pattern would trace the incidence of autism with vaccines containing thimerosal in a linear manner starting in the 1950's. thimerosal has been used since way before then. And it was used in the fifties. Autism has been around certainly since then. If in fact there is a relationship, then I would expect to see virtually no vaccine related autism until the eighties when multiple vaccine injections started ocurring.
Right now the only thing that makes sense to me is Pediatricians allowing the spacing of vaccines to occur too tightly."
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=32988
"According to a recently released report by the California Department of Developmental Services, or DDS, entitled Autistic Spectrum Disorders, Changes in the California Caseload: 1999-2002, the rate of children diagnosed with full-syndrome autism in the Golden State between 1999 and 2002 nearly doubled from 10,360 to 20,377. The report further revealed that "between Dec. 31, 1987, and Dec. 31, 2002, the population of persons with full-syndrome autism has increased by 634 percent." That is a doubling of autism cases every four years, and the staggering increases are not limited to California.
According to data provided by the U.S. Department of Education, the increased autism rate in California is in line with the increases other states are experiencing.
Although once considered rare, during the last two decades the chance of a child being diagnosed with autism has skyrocketed from one in 10,000 to one in 150."
==============================================================
During the last 2 decades, the number of vaccines administered to infants and toddlers has increased dramatically, and there has been a push to immunize earlier, and earlier, with children now being vaccinated within hours of birth, literally, presenting a myriad of issues, such as effect on the immune system, toxicity, and maturity...
No one doubts the need to immunize for deadly or disabling diseases such as small pox, or polio. But there's a real issue with immunizing for basically self limiting infections wherein the overwhelming majority of the population will recover uneventfully. And how much, and at what age...
One thing is for sure, childhood immunization IS BIG business!!... The drug companies are a powerful lobby, and big donors to political campaigns. Imo, autism has become an absolute public health crisis, and causal and contributing factors MUST be thoroughly and independently investigated.
Chomsky presents well reasoned arguments, altho conservatives usually beg to differ. His perspective is worthwhile and educated.
I don't know what to make of the Palestinian birthrate and population growth rate, and it's potential, overall impact on Israel's demographics.
Ultra-Orthodox Jews also have very high birthrates. I think the article you posted said the "average" Palestinian woman gives birth to 6 children. I would imagine the birthrate of ultra-Orthodox women in Israel is similar. As for Jewish immigration to Israel, I would also assume that most immigrants are very religious, especially now. Infant mortality is also a factor, and due to poverty, etc, mortality is probably higher among Palestinian infants.
The high birthrate among Israel's ultra-Orthodox is a concern to the mainstream and the State because many choose welfare and yeshiva rather than employment. It becomes a matter of Israel's ability to support that population.
Regardless, birthrate obviously impacts population demographics. But I don't know what the overall situation is in Israel. We may be seeing population growth in extremists on both sides of the conflict, with secular (usually more moderate) Jews having alot fewer children.
I heard there's some interesting things going on with population growth in Italy too. As I understand it, Italian women are rejecting more traditional roles and having far fewer children. I don't think their birthrate is even replacing population in Italy.
It's interesting...
Physicians Group Reacts to Vaccinations
While researchers look for links between autism, pervasive developmental disorders, and the mercury content of the vaccines which are mandated by law, some physicians are convinced that the dangers of mandatory vaccinations and the vaccines themselves potentially cause more harm than good. As a result, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) passed a resolution at their 57th Annual Meeting that calls for the elimination of laws which require vaccinations for children. According to Dr. Jane M. Orient, MD, the association's Executive Director, "Our children face the possibility of death or serious long-term adverse effects from mandated vaccines that aren’t necessary or that have very limited benefits."
According to the Association, the mandatory vaccine controversy is fueled by the influence of the pharmaceutical companies in the legislative process and the fact that their influence extends into the depths of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, and the Food and Drug Administration. These groups have the authority to approve vaccines and other medical treatments for use in the United States, and their research is flawed because of the influence of the manufacturers. According to the AAPS, "Rampant conflicts of interest in the approval process has been the subject of several Congressional hearings, and a recent Congressional report concluded that the pharmaceutical industry has indeed exerted undue influence on mandatory vaccine legislation toward its own financial interests." They go on to say, "The vaccine approval process has also been contaminated by flawed or incomplete clinical trials, and government officials have chosen to ignore negative results."
While the mass media and the federal government continue to defend their position that vaccinations are perfectly safe and that there is no research to indicate any danger, the facts are clear. Congressman Burton's House Committee on Government Reform heard case after case of permanent disability and deaths which the parents have attributed to vaccinations. The scientific research shows that there are dangers, and the continued denial of any danger is totally in conflict with the evidence. In fact, as a result of the information which was brought to light by the Congressional Hearings earlier this year, Congressman Burton took the unprecedented step of writing Secretary of Health and Human Services Donna Shalala, asking that all vaccines which contain Thimerosal (Mercury) be banned from the American market.
Whether vaccinations are the cause of Autism is still unknown. Research is ongoing on several fronts, however, the fact that vaccines can and do cause harm to some children, and that the harm is much greater than if the child contracted the disease the vaccination is intended to prevent, is enough to convince a Member of Congress and a major medical association to question the validity of mandatory vaccinations. Whether a parent chooses to vaccinate a child is an issue for the parent and the physician involved to decide upon. It is not the province of government to make that decision. Medical care is a personal issue between the patient and the physician. Following your physician's advice is a wise act, however following the advice of a government bureaucrat, sometimes on the payroll of a pharmaceutical company, may not be the best course of action to follow, especially when the lives of our children are involved.
Another study regarding flame retardants, PCB & PBDE...
Smothering the Flames
Polybrominated flame retardants, banned in Europe, have been linked to thyroid problems, learning disabilities in children and even breast cancer. And they're probably emanating from your computer.
By Traci Vogel
http://www.metroactive.com/papers/metro/07.03.03/pbde-0327.html
.."Health and Welfare
When PCBs were banned, in 1976, it was because they were found to suppress the immune system, alter brain development, lower the IQ and cause behavioral problems like attention deficit and hyperactivity in children. They were also eventually found to be cancerous agents and to alter sexual development. PBDEs are similar to PCBs in that they have been shown to affect fetal development.
While scientists like to be cautious in interpreting their data, lab research has shown that a body burden of flame retardants at the levels found in Bay Area women has the potential to disrupt the process of brain development in fetuses and infant children (through breast milk). It is tempting to relate this discovery to the increasing levels of autism, ADD and hyperactivity in Silicon Valley, although the causes of these disorders remain elusive.
A Swedish study published in 2001 by Eriksson, Jakobsson and Fredriksson showed that neonatal male mice exposed to even low levels of brominated flame retardants exhibited permanent behavioral changes, including erosion of "habituation capability" (the ability to adjust to environments), learning and memory.
The theory, advanced by yet another Swedish study, is that PBDE institutes these changes by interfering with thyroid hormone function. The chemical compound of PBDE mimics the natural hormone, binding with transthyretin, a protein crucial to normal thyroid hormone function. The thyroid is central to brain development."..
==============================================================
Computer usage has also increased exponentially over the last several years...
Who knows??...
Mercury May Be a Cause of Autism
AFP
June 18. 2003 — Mercury has been fingered in a study as a possible cause of autism, the British weekly New Scientist reports in its upcoming issue on Saturday.
A US team compared mercury levels in hair that had been kept from 139 babies when they had their first haircuts, when they were around 18 months old.
Mercury levels among 94 children who were later diagnosed as autistic was 0.47 parts per million (ppm), while among the 45 other children who developed normally, the levels were eight times higher, at 3.63 ppm.
The lower the level of mercury, the worse the degree of autism, the scientists found.
The results are remarkable but until more work is carried out, the conclusions are open to dispute, New Scientist says.
http://health.discovery.com/news/afp/20030616/mercury.html
Vaccines fueling autism epidemic?
Report: U.S. infants exposed to mercury beyond EPA, FDA limits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: June 9, 2003
5:00 p.m. Eastern
..."Although once considered rare, during the last two decades the chance of a child being diagnosed with autism has skyrocketed from one in 10,000 to one in 150.....
For years there has been a debate about the cause or causes of autism, but the vast majority of finger-pointing has been directed at childhood vaccines as the culprit. And considering what is put into the vaccines injected into hours-old infants, it is easy to understand why they are at the top of the list of suspects: formaldehyde (used in embalming), thimerosal (nearly 50 percent mercury), aluminum phosphate (toxic and carcinogenic), antibiotics, phenols (corrosive to skin and toxic), aluminum salts (corrosive to tissue and neurotoxic), methanol (toxic), isopropyl (toxic), 2-pheoxyethanol (toxic), live viruses and a host of unknown components considered off-limits as trade secrets. These are just part of the vaccine mixture.
For those who believe there are elements in vaccines that may be responsible for the increased number of autism cases and other neurological disorders, thimerosal currently is at the top of the list of possible culprits being investigated.
Despite official insistence that the evidence linking injected thimerosal to autism is inconclusive, the data suggest otherwise....
A recently published study in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons by Mark Geier, M.D., Ph.D., and president of the Genetic Centers of America and his son, David Geier, president of Medcon Inc. and a consultant on vaccine cases, was titled "Thimerosal in Childhood Vaccines, Neurodevelopment Disorders and Heart Disease in the United States." It presents strong epidemiological evidence for a link between neurodevelopmental disorders and mercury exposure from thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines."..
==============================================================
Today, I heard that another very young child I know was diagnosed with autism, and it's always very sad to hear a child has been diagnosed. But it's a diagnosis that has grown exponentially over the last several years.
As we discussed, the number of immunizations given to newborns, infants and toddler has also grown during the same period, causing some to attribute the rise in autism cases to childhood vaccines. One study recently showed that autistic children have were found to have lower mercury levels in their hair samples, leading researchers to conclude that autistic children were less able to "process" or metabolize mercury.
Regardless of the cause, the enormous increase in autism cases has to concern parents of very young children and must be of paramount concern to public health officials.
Tragic!!
Who's Watching You Surf?
Citizen-rights groups turn to courts, Congress to keep tabs on legal surveillance.
Elsa Wenzel, special to PCWorld.com
Friday, July 04, 2003
Privacy watchdog groups and members of Congress are making grim guesses about how often the FBI peeks into records of U.S. citizens' Internet activity and phone calls.
But because the Department of Justice has blocked much of the content of its reports, the watchdogs can't get enough information to draw conclusions.
The Justice Department does release the number of surveillance orders approved by a closed court established in 1978 by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The FISA court, which has jurisdiction over noncitizen criminal suspects, is composed of 11 federal district judges who rotate duties every seven years.
According to the FISA court's own records, spying orders approved by the secret court jumped 30 percent between 2001 and 2002. However, federal and state court orders approving surveillance dropped by 6 percent, say recently released government reports.
It's impossible to glean from this data exactly how many people, hard drives, or Web site visits are being monitored. But the conclusion that some privacy advocates have come to is that the Justice Department is dispensing with normal procedure and going straight to the foreign-intelligence court.
Avoiding Oversight?
The government is using secret orders for cases that should normally fall under the other category, says Jameel Jaffer, a staff attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union.
The Patriot Act of 2001 allows the government to secretly monitor the recipient names and subject lines of suspects' e-mail messages and to seize certain personal records--which could include library books, credit card receipts, and medical histories.
"Even if the FBI never abuses these powers, the powers are so broad on the books that they will inevitably create a chilling effect that would discourage people from exercising their First Amendment rights," Jaffer says.
Government searches of peoples' electronic communications and property have been steadily rising since the early 1990s, the watchdog groups point out. Domestic surveillance nearly tripled and FISA orders nearly doubled in the past decade, according to the court's own reports. Between 1992 and 2002, domestic wiretaps increased from 350 to 1358. In the same years, orders under FISA grew from 484 to 1228, according to government records.
Some of the increase is attributable to increased use of new devices that can be monitored. "Portable devices" such as cell phones and pagers have comprised an average of 68 percent of domestic surveillance since 2000, when the new category was added.
"The threat that the government may engage in surveillance because you borrow a particular book from the library, or because you join a particular organization, or because you visit a particular Web site will dissuade people from exercising their First Amendment rights," Jaffer says.
Sunshine Efforts
The ACLU recently lost a suit seeking more information about wiretaps. The ACLU had invoked the Freedom of Information Act to demand that the Justice Department release documents detailing its surveillance practices.
The ACLU wanted to know if and how many times the Justice Department obtained library or bookstore records of patrons' reading habits, eavesdropped on U.S. citizens, or tapped the phone calls of noncriminal suspects. But the court upheld the Justice Department's position that making such information public could hamper investigations and threaten national security.
The FOIA may not be the best route for the public to get such information, Jaffer says now. The ACLU is pursuing legislative fixes, and is watching two such "sunshine" bills now before Congress.
Congress has also requested reports on how the Justice Department uses the Patriot Act. The response has not entirely satisfied some citizens' groups, however.
The recent rise in surveillance approved by the FISA court--which targets only non-Americans--is due to the war on terrorism, and has helped to prevent subsequent attacks on U.S. soil, say Justice Department representatives.
Attorney General John Ashcroft, testifying recently before the House Judiciary Committee for the first time since September 2001, said the government needs more powers to fight terrorism and is seeking to extend the Patriot Act past its 2005 expiration date.
But Ashcroft did not address what kinds of records the government could subpoena under that law.
Watchdog Legislation
Under a bill to be introduced soon by Representatives John Conyers (D-Michigan) and Joseph Hoeffel (D-Pennsylvania), the Justice Department would have to publicly report each year how many people it wiretaps.
"There has been too much secrecy and too much 'trust me' rhetoric from the attorney general," Hoeffel says.
The Senate is considering a similar bill, introduced in February.
The Domestic Surveillance Oversight Act (S. 436) plans to "assess over time whether the government has turned more of its powerful surveillance techniques on its own citizens, as opposed to non-U.S. persons," says Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), who cointroduced it.
"I always feel very uncomfortable" about government surveillance, says Senator Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), a cosponsor of the bill.
Leahy was joined in introducing the bill by Senators Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Arlen Specter (R-Pennsylvania). The measure is in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
If the bill becomes law, it would also require annual reports about how many citizens' financial, library, and educational records the Justice Department seized or read. Grassley says it is intended to circumvent the "roadblocks" to transparency set up by the Justice Department and the FBI.
If the Justice Department releases more details of its investigations, "that chill will disappear," ACLU's Jaffer says. "People would visit Web sites and join organizations they're afraid of right now."
Fostering Fears
The Justice Department's reluctance to release more data "only allows people to speculate and create nervousness and shrill commentary, when most of us just want the facts," says Beryl Howell, a surveillance law specialist at Stroz Friedberg in Washington, D.C. The fears expressed are unfounded and irrational, says Howell, who was formerly counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
"They have a conclusion that somehow there have already been infringements upon our civil liberties, and they try to create a picture of this growing Big Brotherism," says Mark Corallo, a Justice Department spokesperson, of the charges.
The multipage statements on wiretaps and searches approved by the open courts might surprise those people who fear that the government is dipping into and out of their e-mail messages and eavesdropping at any time, Justice Department representatives say.
Government agents are targeting only suspected criminals, Corallo says.
Media attention and myths in popular culture might lead people to think that the FBI has been planting millions of bugs around the country, Howell says.
"It should give comfort to the American people that electronic surveillance is not running amok and out of control. If you told them there are less than 1500 [wiretaps], I think they'd be shocked. There are more murders than that in the United States," she says.
Though critics worry that the FBI will entrap innocent people under FISA, Corallo says the government established the secret court to prevent the type of FBI and CIA abuses performed during the Cold War.
The 1978 law established checks and balances and limited spying in ways that go beyond the protection of the Constitution, he says. And that balance is a goal of both the system's critics and its advocates, even if their approaches differ.
Related Topics: Privacy Legislation
No Child Left Behind brings challenges
By: Kathryn Boughton 06/13/2003
The Housatonic Community PTA took a close look at the ramifications of the No Child Left Behind legislation June 5 and came away with some doubts.
Among the presenters at the session, held at Housatonic Valley Regional High School, were Dr. Theodore Sergi, State Commissioner of Education, and Craig Toensing of Falls Village, chairman of the State Board of Education.
The meeting had been organized by the PTA because reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act-dubbed No Child Left Behind by President George W. Bush-will touch the lives of all Americans, said Housatonic PTA president Therese Duncan of Kent.
The two thrusts of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) are to raise student achievement across the board and to eliminate the achievement gap between students from different backgrounds, Mrs. Duncan explained.
"The law is a reauthorization of a 1965 federal law," she said. "It is another building block that requires new testing and accountability-it is a data-driven law. The PTA has some concerns about this as being a provision that relies too heavily on testing."
She admitted that the states and the federal government have relied on standardized testing to assess the adequacy of educational systems. "We've had testing for long period of time," she said. "Connecticut has tested number one in the nation for [education in] in many different areas, but it has also been number one in its achievement gap. We need to close that gap. There are certain school districts that do much better than others in Connecticut-sometimes even within a district there are gaps.
"Then you have to add the special subgroups," she continued, "groups defined by poverty levels, disability needs, race, ethnicity, migrants, and lack of proficiency in English. The data that tells us how those kids are doing shows a tremendous gap. Under No Child Left Behind, we need to take the lowest achieving kid and him bring up. What [NCLB] is legislating is to have every child at 100 percent of the proficiency level by 2014."
The goal is laudable, but Mrs. Duncan and the PTA worry about the immutability of test scores. "This puts everything in one testing basket," she said. "There is one test that determines how all the kids will do, that assesses strengths and weaknesses. We know from decades of testing kids that different tests will bring different results from the same child."
She said the new law requires that 95 percent of all students take the tests, and said results of those tests can be heavily influenced by handicapped children who do not perform well.
There are other concerns about testing, as well. "If testing were used to drive curriculum that would be one thing," Mrs. Duncan said, "but it is used for other things. It is used to hire and fire [teachers], to compare district to district. And when it is used to test small groups of children, it becomes obvious whose child is not performing well."
At the same time that there is concern about the standardized testing, there is also concern about funding to pay for the mandates. "We're looking at the federal money coming in and we need a bigger piece of the federal pie," she said. "One of the concerns in the educational coalition that the PTA belongs to is that it will take more local dollars if a school does not meet its annual progress. Supplemental services can be requested for children before school and after school, and there is to be a certain amount of money set aside for parents that want this to happen. It is up to local districts to come up with funding for the programs. There is some concern about targeting resources; we don't feel there are enough resources available."
Still, the PTA finds some parts of the new law laudable. Mrs. Duncan applauded the provisions in the law defining parent involvement and "requiring school districts to bring parents on board."
"We embrace the idea of parent involvement and think that it is very important that parents feel part of the process," she said.
"But," she added, "I don't think the public knows enough about [NCLB]. This piece of legislation was passed in January 2002 and it has taken this period of time for people to actually look at the 1,100-page document and to react to it. Connecticut submitted a proposal to the feds a couple of months ago and has just heard back which pieces the federal government will accept. Other pieces were rejected and have to go back to the drawing board."
Connecticut suggested assessing 150 schools this year to determine the students' educational needs. The federal government rejected this proposal as too low, suggesting that 400 schools be identified. A final number has yet to be determined, the PTA president said. "They are going to be looking at these schools to change the way they teach," she said.
"Some of this is so above the thinking of the typical parent," she concluded. "Most don't know what it's talking about, but it impacts program quality. It is a 1,100 page document-even to scratch the surface and begin to understand it is quite an undertaking."
©The Kent Good Times Dispatch 2003
Copyright © 1995 - 2003 PowerOne Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved
What's Happening?
Atilio A.Boron Interviews Noam Chomsky
Atilio A. Boron: Looking at the recent US policies in Iraq, What do you think was the real goal behind this war?
Noam Chomsky: Well, we can be quite confident on one thing. The reasons we are given can't possibly be the reasons. And we know that, because they are internally contradictory. So one day, Bush and Powell would claim that "the single question," as they put it, is whether Iraq would disarm and the next day they would say it doesn´t matter whether Iraq disarms because they will go on and invade anyway. And the next day would be that if Saddam and his group get out then the problem will be solved; and then, the next day for example, at the Azores, at the summit when they made an ultimatum to the United Nations, they said that even if Saddam and his group get out they would go on and invade anyway. And they went on like that. When people give you contradictory reasons every time they speak, all they are saying is: "don't believe a word I say." So we can dismiss the official reasons.
And the actual reasons I think are not very obscure. First of all, there´s a long standing interest. That does not account for the timing but it does account for the interest. And that is that Iraq has the second large oil reserves in the World and controlling Iraqi oil and even ending up probably with military bases in Iraq will place the United States in an extremely strong position to dominate the global energy system even more than it does today. That's a very powerful lever of world control, quite apart from the profits that comes from it. And the US probably doesn't intend to access the oil of Iraq; it intends to use primarily safer Atlantic basin resources for itself (Western Hemisphere, West Africa). But to control the oil has been a leading principle of US foreign policies since the Second World War, and Iraq is particularly significant in this respect. So that's a long standing interest. On the other hand it doesn't explain the timing.
If you want to look at the timing, I think that it became quite clear that the massive propaganda for the war began in September of last year, September 2002. Before that there was a condemnation of Iraq but no effort to whip people into war fever. So we asked what else happened then September 2002. Well, two important things happened. One was the opening of the mid term congressional campaign, and the Bush´s campaign manager, Karl Rove, was very clearly explaining what should be obvious to anybody anyway: that they could not possible enter the campaign with a focus on social and economic issues. The reason is that they are carrying out policies which are quite harmful to the general population and favorable to an extremely narrow sector of corporate power and the corrupt sectors as well, and they can't face the electorate on that. As he pointed out, if we can make the primary issue national security then we will be able win because people will flock to power if they feel frightened. And that is second nature to these people; that's the way they have ran the country – right through the 1980´s – with very unpopular domestic programs but accustomed to press into the panic button – Nicaragua, Grenada, crime, one thing after another. And Rove also pointed out that something similar would be needed for the presidential election.
And that's true and what they want do is not just to stay in office but they would like to institutionalize the very regressive program put forward domestically, a program which will basically unravel whatever is left of New Deal social democratic systems and turn the country almost completely into a passive undemocratic society, controlled totally by high concentration of capitals. This means slashing public medical assistance, social security; probably schools; and increasing state power. These people are not conservatives, they brought the country into a federal deficit with the largest increase in federal spending in 20 years, that is since their last term in office and huge tax cuts for the rich, and they want to institutionalize these programs. They are seeking a "fiscal train wreck" that will make it impossible to fund the programs. They know they cannot face an election declaring that they want to destroy very popular programs, but they can throw up their hands in despair and say, "What can we do, there's no money," after they have made sure there would be no money by huge tax cuts for the rich and sharp increase in spending for military (including high tech industry) and other programs beneficial to corporate power and the wealthy. So that's the second, that's the domestic factor and in fact, there was a spectacular propaganda achievement on that. After the government-media propaganda campaign began in September they succeeded in convincing a majority of the population very quickly that Iraq was an imminent threat to the security of the United States, and even that Iraq was responsible for September 11th. I mean, there is not a grain of truth in all that, but by now majority of the population believes those things and those attitudes are correlated strongly with the commitment to war, which is understandable. If people think they are threatened with destruction by an enemy who´s already attacked them it is likely that they'll go to war. In effect, if you look at the press today they describe soldiers as saying: "we are here for revenge – you know – because they blew up the World Trade Center, they will attack us,” or something. Well, these beliefs are completely unique to the United States.
No one in the World believes anything like this. In Kuwait and Iran people hate Saddam Hussein, but they are not afraid of him, they know they're the weakest country in the region. In any event the government-media propaganda campaign worked brilliantly as the population was frightened and to a large extent it was willing to support the war despite the fact that there was a lot of opposition. And that's the second factor.
And there was a third factor which was even more important. In September the government announced the national security strategy. That is not completely without precedent, but it is quite new as a formulation of state policy. What is stated is that we are tearing the entire system of the international law to shreds, the end of UN charter, and that we are going to carry out an aggressive war – which we will call "preventive" – and at any time we choose and that we will rule the world by force. In addition, we will assure that there is never any challenge to our domination because we are so overwhelmingly powerful in military force that we will simply crush any potential challenge.
Well, you know, that caused shudders around the world, including the foreign policy elite at home which was appalled by this. I mean it is not that things like that haven't been heard in the past. Of course they had, but it had never been formulated as an official national policy. I suspect you will have to go back to Hitler to find an analogy to that. Now, when you propose new norms in the international behavior and new policies you have to illustrate it, you have to get people to understand that you mean it. Also you have to have what a Harvard historian called an "exemplary war", a war of example, which shows that we really mean what we say.
And we have to choose the right target. The target has to have several properties. First it has to be completely defenseless. No one would attack anybody who might be able to defend themselves. That would be not prudent. Iraq meets that perfectly: it is the weakest country in the region, it's been devastated by sanctions and almost completely disarmed and the US knows every inch of the Iraq territory by satellite surveillance and overflights, and more recently U-2 flights. So, yes, Iraq it is extremely weak and satisfied the first condition.
And secondly, it has to be important. So there will be no point invading Burundi, you know, for example, it has to be a country worthwhile controlling, owning, and Iraq has that property too. It´s, as mentioned, the second largest oil producer in the world. So it's perfect example and a perfect case for this exemplary war, intending to put the world on notice saying that this is what we´re going do, any time we choose. We have the power. We have declared that our goal is domination by force and that no challenge will be accepted. We've showed you what we are intending to do and be ready for the next. We will proceed on to the next operation. Those various conditions fold together and they make a war a very reasonable choice in taking to a test some principles.
Atilio A. Boron: According to your analysis then the question is: who is next? Because you don´t believe that they are going to stop in Iraq, wouldn't you?
Noam Chomsky: No, they already made this clear. For one thing they need something for the next presidential election. And that will continue. Through their first twelve years office this continued year after year; and it will continue until they manage to institutionalize the domestic policies to which they are committed and to ensure the global system they want. So what's the next choice? Well the next choice has to meet similar conditions. It has to be valuable enough to attack, and it has to be weak enough to be defenseless. And there are choices, Syria is a possible choice. There Israel will be delighted to participate. Israel alone is a small country, but it´s an offshore US military base, so it has an enormous military force, apart from having hundreds of nuclear weapons (and probably a kind of chemical and biological weapons), its air and armed forces are larger and more advanced that those in any Nato power, and the US is behind it overwhelmingly.
So Syria is a possibility. Iran is a more difficult possibility because it´s a harder country to dominate and control. Yet there is a reason to believe that for a year or two now, efforts have been under way to try dismantle Iran, to break it into internally warring groups. These US dismantling efforts have been based partly in Eastern Turkey, the US bases in Eastern Turkey apparently flying surveillance over Iranian borders. That´s another possibility. There is a third possibility that can not be considered lightly, and is the Andean region. The Andean region has a lot of resources and it´s out of control. There are US military bases surrounding the region, and US forces are there already. And the control of Latin-America is of course extremely important. With the developments in Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil, Bolivia it´s clear that US domination is challenged and that can´t be accepted, in particular in a region so close and so crucial because of its resource base. So that is another possibility.
Atilio A. Boron: This is really frightening. Now the question is, do you think that this situation in Iraq, the invasion and the aftermath would affect in a non-reparable manner the political stability of the region? What are likely to be the side effects of this invasion in countries with a very fragile political constitution like the South Arabia or even Syria, Iran or even the Kurds? What may be the future of the Palestine question, which still is of paramount importance in the area?
Noam Chomsky: Well, what's going to happen in the Arab world is extremely hard to predict. It´s a disorganized and chaotic world dominated by highly authoritarian and brutal regimes. We know what the attitudes are. The US is very concerned with attitudes in the region so they have pretty good studies made by US Middle East scholars on the attitudes in the region, and the results are pretty dramatic. One of the more recent ones, a University of Maryland study covering from Morocco to the Gulf to Lebanon, the entire area, shows that a very large majority of the population wants religious leaders to have a greater role in government. It also shows that approximately another 95% believe that the sole US interest in the region is taking its oil, strengthening Israel and humiliating the Arabs. That means near unanimity. If there is any popular voice allowed in the region, any moves toward democracy, it could become sort of like Algeria ten years ago, not necessarily radical Islamists but a government with some stronger Islamist currents. This is the last thing the US wants, so chances of any kind of democratic opening very likely will be immediately opposed.
The voices of secular democracy will also be opposed. If they speak up freely, about violation of UN resolutions for example, they will bring up the case of Israel, which has a much worse record than Iraq in this respect but is protected by the United States. And they will have concerns for independence that the US will not favor, so it will continue to support oppressive and undemocratic regimes, as in the past, and as in Latin America for many years, unless it can be assured that they will keep closely to Washington's priorities.
On the other hand these chaotic popular movements are so difficult to predict. I mean, even the participants can't or don't know what they want. What we know is this tremendous hatred, antagonisms and fear – probably more than ever before – on the Israel-Palestine issue that is, of course, the core issue in the Arab world. The Bush administration has been very careful not to take any position, though there are actions, which undermine the prospects for peaceful resolution: funding more Israeli settlement programs, for example.
They don't say anything significant. The most they say is that we have a "vision," or something equally meaningless. Meanwhile the actions have been taken, and the US had continued to support the more extremist positions within Israel. So what the press describes as George Bush's most significant recent statements, then later reiterated by Colin Powell, was the statement that said that settlement in the occupied territories can continue until the United State determines that the conditions for peace have been established, and you can move forward on this mythical "Road Map."
The statement that was hailed as "significant" in fact amounts to a shift in policy, to a more extremist form. Up until now the official position has been that there should be no more settlements. Of course, that's hypocritical of the United States because meanwhile it continues to provide the military, and economic, and diplomatic support for more settlements, but the official position has been opposed to it. Now the official position is in favor of it, until such time as the US determines unilaterally that the "peace process" has made enough progress, which means, basically indefinitely. Also it wasn't very well noticed that last December, at the UN General Assembly, the Bush administration shifted the US policy crucially on an important issue. Up until that time, until last December, the US has always officially endorsed the Security Council resolutions of 1968 opposing Israel's annexation of Jerusalem, and ordering Israel to withdraw the moves to take over East Jerusalem and to expand Jerusalem, which is now a huge area.
The US had always officially opposed that, although, again hypocritically. As of last December the Bush administration came out in support of it. This was a pretty sharp change in policy, and it is also significant that it was not reported in the United States. But it took place. So this is the only concrete act, and continues like that. The US has in the past vetoed the European efforts to place international monitors in the territories, which would be a way of reducing political, violent confrontations. The US undermined the December 2001 meetings in Geneva to implement the Geneva conventions and as almost all the other contracting parties appeared the US refused and that, essentially, blocked it. Bush then declared Sharon to be "a man of peace" and supported his repressive activities, as was pretty obvious. So the indications are that the US will move towards a very harsh policy in the territories, granting the Palestinians at most some kind of meaningless formal status as a "state". Of course, this would dress up as democracy, and peace, and freedom, and so on. They have a huge public relations operation and it would be presented in that way, but I don't think the reality looks very promising.
Atilio A. Boron: I have two more questions to go. One is about the future of the United Nations system. An article by Henry Kissinger recently reproduced in Argentina argued that multilateralism is over and that the world has to come to terms with the absolute superiority of the American armed forces and that we've better go alone with that because the old system is dead. What is your reflection on the international arena?
Noam Chomsky: Well you know, it's a little bit like financial and industrial strategy. It is a more brazen formulation of policies which have always been carried out. The unilateralism with regard to the United Nations, as Henry Kissinger knows perfectly well, goes far back. Was there any UN authorization for the US invasion of South Vietnam 40 years ago? In fact, the issue could not even come up at the United Nations. The UN and all the countries were in overwhelming opposition to the US operations in Vietnam, but the issue could literally never arise and it was never discussed because everyone understood that if the issues were discussed the UN would simply be dismantled.
When the World Court condemned the United States for its attack on Nicaragua, the official response of the Reagan administration, which is the same people now in office, the official response when they rejected World Court jurisdiction was that other nations do not agree with us and therefore we will reserve to ourselves the right to determine what falls within the domestic jurisdiction of the United States. I am quoting it. In this case, that was an attack on Nicaragua. You can hardly have a more extreme unilateralism than that. And American elites accepted that, and so it was applauded and, in fact, quickly forgotten. In your next trip to the US take a poll in the Political Science Department where you are visiting and you will find people who never heard of it. It's as wiped out as this. As is the fact that the US had to veto the Security Council's resolutions supporting the Court's decision and calling on all states to observe international law. Well, you know that is unilateralism in its extreme, and it goes back before that.
Right after the missile crisis, which practically brought the world to a terminal nuclear war, a major crisis, the Kennedy administration resumed its terrorist activities against Cuba and its economic warfare which was the background for the crisis and Dean Acheson, a respected statesman and Kennedy advisor at the liberal end of the spectrum, gave an important address to the American Society of International Law in which he essentially stated the Bush Doctrine of September 2002. What he said is that no "legal issue" arises in the case of a US response to a challenge to its "power, position, and prestige." Can't be more extreme than that. The differences with September 2002 is that instead of being operative policy now it became official policy. That is the difference. The UN has been irrelevant to the extent that the US refused to allow it to function. So, since the mid 1960's when the UN had become somewhat more independent, because of decolonization and the recovery of other countries of the world from the ravages of the war, since 1965 the US is far in the lead in vetoing Security Council resolutions on a wide range of issues – Britain is second – and no one else is even close. All that renders the UN ineffective. It means, you do as we say or else we will kick you in the pants. Now it is more brazen.
The only correct statement that Kissinger is making is that now we will not conceal the policies that we are carrying out.
Atilio A. Boron: OK. Here is my last question: What has been the impact of the Iraqi War on the freedoms and public liberties of the American public? We have heard horrifies stories about librarians been forced to indicate the names of people checking out books regarded as suspicious or subversives. What has been the real impact of the war in the domestic politics of the US?
Noam Chomsky: Well, those things are taking place but I don't think they are specifically connected with the Iraq War. The Bush administration, let me repeat it again, they are not conservatives; they are statist reactionaries. They want a very powerful state, a huge state in fact, a violent state and one that enforces obedience on the population. There is a kind of quasi-fascist spirit there, in the background, and they have been attempting to undermine civil rights in many ways. That's one of their long term objectives, and they have to do it quickly because in the US there is a strong tradition of protection of civil rights. But the kind of surveillance you are talking about of libraries and so on is a step towards it. They have also claimed the right to place a person – even an American citizen – in detention without charge, without access to lawyers and family, and to hold them there indefinitely, and that in fact has been upheld by the Courts, which is pretty shocking. But they have a new proposal, sometimes called Patriot II, a 80-page document inside the Justice department. Someone leaked it and it reached the press. There have been some outraged articles by law professors about it. This is only planned so far, but they would like to implement as secretly as they can. These plans would permit the Attorney General to remove citizenship from any individual whom the attorney general believes is acting in a way harmful to the US interests. I mean, this is going beyond anything contemplated in any democratic society. One law professor at New York University has written that this administration evidently will attempt to take away any civil rights that it can from citizens and I think it´s basically correct. That fits in with their reactionary statist policies which have a domestic aspect in the economy and social life but also in political life.
Atilio A. Boron: Professor Chomsky, it was a great pleasure to have you expressing your words for the Argentine audience. I want to thank you very much for this interview and I hope that we can be in touch again in the future. Have a good day!
Visit the Noam Chomsky Archive for more writings and interviews with Noam Chomsky
This article comes from Alternative Press Review
http://www.altpr.org/
The URL for this story is:
http://www.altpr.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=19
Hap, do you remember why we went to Iraq in the first place??.. There are 230,000 US troops in Iraq. If 230,000 troops can't find weapons of mass destruction, there aren't any. But now that we've destroyed the place, we need to clean it up. So I ask you -- bring WHAT on??...
Oh, yes, we also went to Iraq for "regime change" because Saddam is a very bad person. And citizens, brutalized in Africa, are literally crying for our assistance but Bush is not too gung-ho. Our military is stretched very think with 230,000 US troops in Iraq looking for WMD and Saddam, and Uday & Qusay...
This is beginning to sound a bit like "F-Troop", no??...
Amaunet, It's barbarism, plain and simple. I believe it was Jefferson who said, "Religions is between a man and his God... Separation of Church & State is a prerequisite to a sustained civilized society, imo. But there are too many fundamentalists and theo-political groups around the globe who do not agree with Separation. US Christian Conservatives being one such group. Osama's theo-political and very militant Islam is obviously another. What I find interesting is the contemporary rise in such groups. I think it's an interesting, albeit dangerous phenomenon, why now??... And look who we've got in the Oval Office...
Explosion kills 32 worshippers at Shiite Muslim mosque
Ananova:
An explosion in Pakistan has killed 32 worshippers at a mosque on the Muslim sabbath.
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_796903.html
This is lunacy. Separation of Church & State and personal liberty are the only things that separate a civilized society from barbarians. Yet there are some in our own society that would like to weaken that Separation. If they are permitted to do so, that will be the beginning of the end of personal freedom and all that made this country so successful.
Death toll has risen to 44. What a tragedy!
Strom Thurman favored of "universal conscription" -- the draft.
Good riddance to Strom Thurman!!....
Do You Feel a Draft?
-- Chris Lombardi, CCCO Communications Coordinator
In the past few months, the Pentagon public relations machine has sounded the alarm about its terrible trouble recruiting and retaining personnel. All four services missed their recruiting quotas last year, despite lavish budgets, ready access to their target markets in schools and communities, and a huge full-time sales force that routinely practices deceit.
Ask any recent veteran whether recruiters lie. Or check reports in the Boston Globe, the Albany Times-Union, and the Los Angeles Times. Recruiters have a sales quota, called a "mission," and the collateral damage ranges from forged diplomas to concealment of disabling medical conditions. Small wonder, then, that between 35 and 40 percent of those who do enlist don't complete their first term - discharged on medical or psychological grounds, failing physical training or drug tests, or seeking conscientious objector status once the reality of military life becomes clear to them.
Military leaders call this a "crisis." Some conservative members of Congress (such as Rep. Steve Buyer) have responded by calling for a resumption of universal conscription.
http://www.objector.org/conscription/draft-crisis.html
==============================================================
Obviously, we won't hear the "D" word before the election. Nor will we hear anything about a crisis in enlistment. But who knows after the election (or re-appointment)... Unlike the brain dead, or ultra-complacent parent population, high school and college kids are overwhelmingly opposed to Bush's military antics and the neocon's aggressive agenda.
If they were to reinstate the draft, I suppose they'd have to draft girls too. They're only kids.....
We shall see...
Do you think Bush will bring back the draft if elected (or appointed) to a second term?? I read somewhere that enlistment is way down. They're not meeting their enlistment numbers.
Also, can I register as a " conscientious objector " opposing my kids going to fight a neocon's war?? Call me "unpatriotic".
I have no need to be macho, anyway... :)
Chicken Hawks as Cheer Leaders
Jim Lobe
Foreign Policy In Focus Advisory Committee, www.fpif.org
jlobe@starpower.net
http://globalization.icaap.org/content/v2.2/lobe.html
Mucho machismo..... 8}
Not very macho at all!.. Bush went AWOL during his service.
Then he did the "Top Gun" thing as President. His performance was outstanding,
even rivaling the performance of Tom Cruise, the original "Top Gun"...
"Bring Em On!"... Mucho machismo -- for the bilingualists... :)
I don't think that Bush is smart enough to have a "plan", but he surrounds himself with ultra-conservatives who are smart enough. Bush is touting his tax cut while escalating the deficit and hanging the states out to dry. And they talk about economic "recovery"??...
I think we do need less gov. But where do we start? Gov has become the 900lb guerilla. The deficit would probably not be an issue if we were to eliminate the various forms of corp welfare. An unregulated capitalist system is a prescription for disaster too. We saw an example of that with the market's staggering rise and fall, recently. And the little guy paid for that too...
But hey, screw the welfare babies. Big Biz need their slice of the American Pie. In fact, they need the whole pie...
Government is a quagmire...
Coughing Up for the State Coffers: Meantime, for all the Fed's chatter about deflation, the position that state and local municipalities find themselves in is pushing up the cost of nearly everything. This is what happens when money gets printed willy-nilly. It leaks out and causes the price of things to go up, even if certain assets are deflating. (At the moment, of course, assets aren't deflating, but the point will survive when they do.) State and local municipalities are basically monopolies, so they can raise prices, which is what they are doing. Along that line, I'd like to share a couple of brilliant observations from Joanie, which she prefaces with a quote from today's New York Times:
"'Fees will rise on studded tires in Alaska, mobile-home inspections in Florida, traffic fines in Iowa, birth certificates in New York, and filing lawsuits in Vermont, according to the governors association. Illinois is increasing taxes on admission to riverboat casinos. Utah is raising fees on hazardous waste storage, and Virginia has imposed new fees for serving subpoenas. Smokers will pay higher taxes in a dozen states, and drinkers will pay more for liquor in a half-dozen. Fuel taxes will rise in Alaska and Michigan.'
"I cut and pasted that from an article in today's New York Times, to give y'all something to think about, noting that these are by no means the only increases in fees being levied, just a few examples. That's how the states are dealing with their respective budget crises, not to mention those that are also lookin' to slap surcharges on those earning over X amount per year. Then the county'll get you, and then the local municipality, as the purse strings are tightened goin' down the food chain. And as you ponder what the new cost of living is gonna' look like shortly, you can think about the stimulus that will be provided by the federal tax relief we are about to enjoy. Just try not to laugh."
States Take De Facto Delivery of Federal Tax Cuts: She goes on to discuss the supposed stimulus, and how folks hope it will lead to a second-half recovery: "So, just think how ridiculous the whole situation is. The federal government is busted. They are giving the states less. At the same time, they are giving us so-called tax relief. This is causing the state and local governments to increase fees (note that they don't call them 'taxes,' which could incite a riot; they're 'fees') on everything imaginable, short of the air that we breathe. How far do you think all that mortgage refi relief is gonna' carry this fiasco?
"Why not stop and think and do the math? If you do, you might not be as quick to blindly recite the latest mantra/propaganda which insists that 'federal tax relief, the advancing stock market, an upturn in consumer confidence' are providing a lock on an H2 economic recovery."
http://www.thestreet.com/_tscrmb/markets/billfleckenstein/10097784.html
Coughing Up for the State Coffers: Meantime, for all the Fed's chatter about deflation, the position that state and local municipalities find themselves in is pushing up the cost of nearly everything. This is what happens when money gets printed willy-nilly. It leaks out and causes the price of things to go up, even if certain assets are deflating. (At the moment, of course, assets aren't deflating, but the point will survive when they do.) State and local municipalities are basically monopolies, so they can raise prices, which is what they are doing. Along that line, I'd like to share a couple of brilliant observations from Joanie, which she prefaces with a quote from today's New York Times:
"'Fees will rise on studded tires in Alaska, mobile-home inspections in Florida, traffic fines in Iowa, birth certificates in New York, and filing lawsuits in Vermont, according to the governors association. Illinois is increasing taxes on admission to riverboat casinos. Utah is raising fees on hazardous waste storage, and Virginia has imposed new fees for serving subpoenas. Smokers will pay higher taxes in a dozen states, and drinkers will pay more for liquor in a half-dozen. Fuel taxes will rise in Alaska and Michigan.'
"I cut and pasted that from an article in today's New York Times, to give y'all something to think about, noting that these are by no means the only increases in fees being levied, just a few examples. That's how the states are dealing with their respective budget crises, not to mention those that are also lookin' to slap surcharges on those earning over X amount per year. Then the county'll get you, and then the local municipality, as the purse strings are tightened goin' down the food chain. And as you ponder what the new cost of living is gonna' look like shortly, you can think about the stimulus that will be provided by the federal tax relief we are about to enjoy. Just try not to laugh."
States Take De Facto Delivery of Federal Tax Cuts: She goes on to discuss the supposed stimulus, and how folks hope it will lead to a second-half recovery: "So, just think how ridiculous the whole situation is. The federal government is busted. They are giving the states less. At the same time, they are giving us so-called tax relief. This is causing the state and local governments to increase fees (note that they don't call them 'taxes,' which could incite a riot; they're 'fees') on everything imaginable, short of the air that we breathe. How far do you think all that mortgage refi relief is gonna' carry this fiasco?
"Why not stop and think and do the math? If you do, you might not be as quick to blindly recite the latest mantra/propaganda which insists that 'federal tax relief, the advancing stock market, an upturn in consumer confidence' are providing a lock on an H2 economic recovery."
http://www.thestreet.com/_tscrmb/markets/billfleckenstein/10097784.html