Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Opportunity of a lifetime.
Wow, thank you sir.
Care to share the link?
I’d like to see where this clowns mind is coming from
Well I kind of guessed that part it is the WHO I’m interested in...
Thank you
What is this about bob?
TIA
Firsthand knowledge I suppose...
On February 20, 2020, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Mr. Cooper Group Inc. (the "Company") appointed Shveta Mujumdar as a Director of the Company for a term ending at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.
For her service on the Board, Ms. Mujumdar will receive a $125,000 annual fee for each twelve-month period that she serves on the Board. On May 14, 2020, the date of the Company’s stockholder meeting, Ms. Mujumdar will be granted restricted stock units with a fair market value of $110,000 and an additional $18,500 of restricted stock units for her service on the Board in March and April. The restricted stock units vest on the earlier of (i) the first anniversary of the grant date or (ii) the date of the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders following the grant date.
...sweet gig! Money just falls from the sky...
Lmao! You’re funny Fred...and correct....there’s more than a couple katoeys around here!
The criminals here are unlikely to step back from anything...nor will they likely confess and beg forgiveness before the end.
Too bad for them.
I posted this a couple days ago, but I will post it again in case some missed it. My concern regarding the recent 13...G...filings is that some large holders may be trying to fly under the radar here and have a more activist interest than a 13g would reveal.
https://columbialawreview.org/content/a-little-letter-a-big-difference-an-empirical-inquiry-into-possible-misuse-of-schedule-13g13d-filings/
That is correct. Thank you.
“the only way for it to rise is to do a r/s......”
That’s just pure horseshat!
Smh.
...and the manipulation continues.
Interesting, thank you John.
A little educational tidbit for the curious...:
https://columbialawreview.org/content/a-little-letter-a-big-difference-an-empirical-inquiry-into-possible-misuse-of-schedule-13g13d-filings/
Good morning Az,
I have a question I think may be relevant. If I may..
Was WMIH’s acquisition of Nationstar / Mr.Cooper any kind of luck, coincidence, happy accident or was that acquisition the one and only acquisition that the reorganized WMI ever planned to make?
Thank you for your opinions.
Hope you are having a great day.
I’m suggesting that if nothing is done that’s exactly what we will get.
It’s all about the politics.
Drain the swamp!
...or lose the last fragments of liberty we still hold.
How about this...
If you are correct that the closing of the bk is totally unrelated to the FDIC’s eventual closing of the receivership..and then the issues at the receivership are resolved in such a way that the receivership waterfall would touch equity...for even a small distributable amount...
...then what is the likelihood that the bk would then need to be reopened in order to facilitate that distribution in a manner consistent with the terms of POR 7...?
I think it is quite possible that is exactly what what would need to occur.
IF there was any money that is.
There should have been...there still may well be a chance that could happen...but...imo...the problem is in the swamp. The swamp creatures have always been in control of this bank heist. It was too soon during the previous administration...he, (you know who) and they,(the swamp rats)...were GOOD with this heist they didn’t care. Of course not they did it. But they didn’t want.or NEED to get the receivership closed...it was easy to ignore in the early years. They would have closed it by now with their original plan intact...1.88b...and zero for distribution if the election had gone the other way. Now they are trying to wait it out again, too risky to do it now.
Here’s my predictions...since this board loves just about anyone’s guesses.
1. Nothing happens this year.
2. If they impeach and remove successfully then win in November...they’ll close it with zero ASAP...which may take considerable time because they fear the supremes...
3. If they fail to pull off the removal of a duly elected pres...and he’s re-elected...they will again try to wait it out.
4. And this is important for everyone to fully understand...
We will never receive one dime unless someone brings action against the fdic...
either for closing it without fulfilling their mandate to maximize...
OR...to force them to close it in whatever manner they so choose.
The crime has not been committed until they actually close the receivership with fraudulent numbers.
Either that or AZ is right and there’s a pot of hidden gold with our names on it...
LOL!
And Az...that is not a dig at you...I can see how it might...MIGHT...be possible that there are some other avenues that were not in the bk and not in the receivership either. That is possible.
All just my opinions.
Because JPMC needed the liquidity.
So the government gave it to them.
I thought you knew this...
.........wow...?....this is about to REALLY happen.
...ain’t that right AZ?
If so...I can’t even begin to describe how perfect the timing would be for me personally.
...man if this comes together now...
With Out Words.
God Bless You All.
Everyone please remember the promises we all made so many years ago...be true to the best of your abilities...what comes around goes around.
That’s an interesting date, thank you RD.
This is very interesting. Thank for sharing your outstanding due diligence.
Hey thanks! ...that’s interesting.
I thought someone said today...
...oh never mind you saw it
Why do people do crap like that?
Smh
Cool.
You know I’ve been both positive and confident and negative and without hope.
That said I have always felt that 1.88B is an absurdly low figure for the FDIC to accept for WMB.
And the distributions to creditors from POR7 certainly don’t add up to enough to explain it all away either.
Thanks for keeping me on track here...
That guy is 100% ...you’re in good hands.
“Either or?
Or both?
... I’m not following these last two questions ...”
So by that I was inquiring if you expect a Final Payment for the merger of FSB or just the returns from the trusts or both.
Thanks again sir!
Steel...your brokerage account has several options to control which shares are sold from your account first.
FIFO - First in First out
LIFO - Last in First out
Are the two most common ones.
You can also direct your broker to sell a specific tax lot.
See here:
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/05/taxlots.asp
And call your broker and have them walk you through how to make these decisions on your platform.
It is very important stuff...you must make this decision BEFORE any transaction is Finalized...T+3.
ALLRIGHT!!!
Now we’re talkin’ !!!
Thank you AZ!
No comment? None?
If I’m lost...just say so...I can take it.
Well, Not ALL of it. But anyway it’s coming to an end. Ratings and targets turning positive.
These amateur pseudo short sellers are being roasted...right before your eyes. No apologies will be necessary!
What kind of retail stockholder shorts his own position!?
LMAO!
It is pretty darn good! Ya gotta love it to be here this long!
YY Rockie...
YY forever my friend.
Only by right of succession.
They need to put them back.
So then, if I understand you correctly,...and let’s take this one step at a time...
you are pointing at possible indirect income producing subs that were never brought in?
Others similar to Washington Mutual Capital Trust 2001?
...so...if so...how many of the named entities we identified when digging around in what became available information over on...our...corporate website?
Some many all? Of the wamu and longbeach related names...others?
Each of those has a related trust?
Each of which name who...exactly...as beneficiaries?
And then...
fsb...how exactly does that part fit in here?
Either or?
Or both?
I hope I’m making sense...I sometimes try to use to few words.
Thank you sir.
Chuckles...
Darn! ...it just totally f$&@%n sounded like something Walter would say.
No bonus for me...
I’m happy with my top ticket choice...I’m going to double down on him. Imo, especially here in Caliunicornia, we should throw all but a few of the others out on their kooky keesters!
Devin is a keeper...love that guy!
“... choices are made and then responsibility goes out the window ... it’s generational’ ... “
LOL! ...ain’t that the truth!
I accept whatever happens with my investment here to be my doing and mine alone.
Meanwhile our Constitution is being destroyed by those who made horrible decisions and may never accept any responsibility for them.
...I sure hope our young voters GROW UP soon!
Well just who did he represent then?
I mean I understand that the S/G firm was the lead counsel for the Equity Committee, are you saying they only represented those actually sitting on the committee?
A share IS a share...I think that much has been proven here. All shares were equally given the opportunity to participate.
I’m not sure what you mean....
Oh, BTW it looks like the MMs are going to smoke those who sold Jan 17 12.50 calls.
LOL!
Especially the kind of legal work he’s done here for WMI...
...I bet the under table payoff was even better!
The Capital Trusts are still trading...on the greys....but not the preferred, rolled into the OBS for them.