“Shady, unethical people do shady, unethical shit.”

Pot lickers know.

“Banned poster”
I’m skeptical. Too many holes in this story.
I’m leaving it at that for now.

Great idea! Please wait quietly.

“ We shall see if the Cult of Ehrlich will ever abandon their leader ”

"It makes no sense to me....."

Keep in mind that as a privately held company BeaMed is not obligated to publish anything related to FDA communications. It there is anything noteworthy it will probably come from Leo with BeaMed's permission.

Second quarter is coming to a close and we have been led to expect possible news so I'm just reflecting on making it make sense.

I want to be clear that I have not heard any rumors and I have no interest in fostering any.

"if Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc is doomed to the bankruptcy predicted by the 'smooths' why would Leo bother spending the time and money appealing the Cummings case?"
It's not his time and it's not his money but more to your point it's the only shot at survival left for IPIX. It doesn't have the funds to cover the judgment and if the appeal fails all of the Company's meager cash will be absorbed trying to satisfy it.

Your response (italics) supports my statement. For many months Shitposters have been stating an impending Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc BK as a fact. By appealing the initial judgement Leo is attempting to eliminate Cummings as a driver behind a BK. Why would Leo pursue this if he didn't see any future for Brilacidin?

Leo's continued engagement?
Who do you think arranged legal representation for the appeal?

There is one glimmer of amusement which did not escape my appreciation. Your statement about Leo, "It's not his time and it's not his money..." cracked me up because your 100 shares of IPIX certainly seem to have empowered you.

Bored with board. Gorgeous weather today. New tires on bicycle. Gonna carpe the hell outta this diem.

I think the "point" is in response to the numerous shitposts made by smooth brained weapons grade stupid 'experts' where authoritative statements have been made about Leo abandoning IPIX after having worked out a deal with the laser guys on absconding with millions of dollars cash. There is also the ridiculously frequent use of the word "poolside" which is assumed to lend credibility to the accusation.

The "point" is, if Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc is doomed to the bankruptcy predicted by the 'smooths' why would Leo bother spending the time and money appealing the Cummings case? When faced with a walkaway or stay and fight it seems increasingly obvious the goal is to keep Innovation Pharmaceuticals alive to preserve a means of pursuing a plan.

It's my opinion that Leo's continued engagement in the business indicates an increased probability of an ongoing effort to work out some sort of blending BeaMed & Innovation Pharmaceuticals.

The lack of communication from Leo has been frustrating for me but I also keep in mind Leo doesn't having the luxury of making frivolous statements that may or may not prove to be accurate. Also, when considering the decade of attacks by some of the seamiest people in the land of OTC the last thing Leo should do is overshare.

Definition: Shitposting

In Internet culture, shitposting or trashposting is the act of using an online forum or social media page to post content that is of aggressively, ironically, and trollishly pooor quality.

Shitposts are generally intentionally designed to derail discussions or cause the biggest reaction with the least effort. It may even sometimes be orchestrated as part of a coordinated flame war to render a website unusable by its regular visitors

Sorry to deprive you but Leo was long gone before I’d even heard of NNVC.

But, whatever makes your naughty parts tingle. You do you.

"And how many shares have you purchased and do you still hold? For fear of being labelled a fool,"

I maintain a rather high threshold of discretion around discussing finances, health, or other personal matters.

As for your fear of being labelled a fool; a review of your posts may provide some insight. For starters: Asking a person unknown to you specific questions about their investments is foolish.

“ Yes, I purchased 100 of IPIX @ $.0158”

Question was answered in the second sentence.

"A true investor wouldn't be caught dead holding this crap."

Didn't you recently become an IPIX shareholder? "Yes" or "No" are sufficient answers.

"This board has strangely become Lord of the Flies."

An excellent descriptor. Good choice!

I'm old enough to remember when an announcement like this excited me.

Arch Therapeutics will present AC5 again at the spring Symposium on Advanced Wound Care on May 14-18. CEO Terry Norchi said: “Prior presentations at SAWC included a case of limb salvage in a 32 year-old patient with a necrotic spider-bite; management of post-Mohs surgery wounds; and treatment of recalcitrant wounds that previously failed to respond to other modalities. Clinicians manage a broad array of acute and chronic challenging wounds, often in patients with concurrent medical problems that interfere with healing.”

“Your last appearance had you asking…”

What a yenta. Sheesh!

I agree that there's a lot of interest in anti-fungal drugs particularly if continued climate change will increase and possibly compound the issue.

While I believe that B showing promise is the legitimate driver I'm wondering if applying for a patent is regarded simply as a way of placing a marker on what could be a promising drug. Also, there has to be an awareness of B nearing the end of license and does that have anything to do with the surge in patents?

I would hate for B to be swooped up by someone after IPIX investors have spent so much time and money pushing it to the 49 yard line. It would suck to have to watch some pharma with money, resources, and FDA influence spike 'our' B in the end zone.

Leo did not demonstrate well in his management of the office lease. Over the past few years I do not feel Leo has been putting forth the effort to advance B as his compensation should warrant. I guess we wait and see if Leo has the capability and the motivation to pursue bringing B to some degree of fruition.

Does anyone know what the fee is for filing a patent application such as the one PJ007 posted? A cursory look indicated that a "non-electronic" application is $200-$400 and getting a patent approved spins up numbers between $8 - $15k all the way to pharmaceutical patents costing over $2M.

What I'm trying to determine is a degree of seriousness behind these patent applications. If it's just a few dollars for an online application it could be somewhat frivolous, a low budget attempt to cover all bases, or a desire to muddy the waters. If it's the University of Sao Paulo I imagine there would be some justification required before spending even a few hundred dollars. Universities tend to be frugal with research expenditures.

I understand that there are obstacles beyond the patent office and would appreciate if responses centered on what the application stage costs.

"You are such a pertinent person and powerful influencer of IPIX that the evil forces somehow manipulated the system to label you as bearish"

Although I have never viewed myself in that manner who am I to question your judgement?

"My guess is IPIX supplied the Brilacidin"

Good point. Makes sense.

*NOTE: I do not understand how my original post came to have the "Bearish" sentiment. I have never used this particular icon. It was not there when I reviewed my post after submission yesterday. This morning it was. Whether my error, a hiccup, or something nefarious I plan to be more diligent.

Thank you for posting this. I’m a little perplexed by Innovation having provided funds. Perhaps it was quite some time ago?

Funding

“This study was supported by funds from the University of California, San Francisco, Valley Fever Solutions, the Valley Fever Americas Foundation, the Foundation for Research in Infectious Diseases, the California Institute for Medical Research, the David and Mary Larwood Family Charitable Fund, and Innovation Pharmaceuticals.“

One only had to look at the sticky posts to see who was controlling the narrative. It wasn’t unusual to see 80% mod posts with the remaining 20% submitted by the mod aligned.

I regarded the degree to which they’d tipped their hand with a smidgeon of begrudged amusement.

“ And today for the first time in over a year you saw fit to comment.”

🗑️

"...now have to look at their IPIX investment and face reality."

And this affects you how?

While I don’t claim to know what PJ007 was referring to the first thing that came to my mind was LADD (Laser Assisted Drug Delivery).

“… and bagholders continue to suckle.”

🍒
Fixation?

"By definition there are no investors left in IPiX, merely extremely ill-informed speculators."

(_*_)

Buk, buk, buk. 🐓

Your post presents an ideal opportunity to demonstrate your forensic chops. Please enlighten us on how you arrived at your suppositions of frenchbroad's gender, real name (Bean), personal financial situation, relationship with Mr Ehrlich, and that frenchbroad is now in hiding. Your research seems like it entailed a lot of gumshoe work. What is your process? What are your most used investigative techniques? Did you you enlist the help of your gang members?

I'm curious about whether others on this board feel these are fair questions. I guess a positive emoji would be one way they could state how they feel about it.

"Talking of scams and those who promote them, I wonder what's happened to our fake Franglais friend, frenchbroad (aka Mr. Bean) who has been missing in action almost as long as IPIX' phantom CEO, Leo Ehrlich?

I wonder which of these apply:

1) He's merely a vastly over-extended and soon to be broke retail investor who pimps this sorry scam because he thinks he can retrieve some of hus ginormous losses.

2) He's a paid stock pimp whose remuneration has suddenly dried up

or

3) He's an insider- possibly even an Ehrlich family member, as has been hinted at on this very message board - and now he has crept away like a thief in the night to count the money he stole from Ehrlich's hapless marks? ""

" There's always the derivative suit."
"A shareholder derivative suit is a lawsuit brought by a shareholder on behalf of a corporation against a third party. Often, the third party is an insider of the corporation, such as an executive officer or director."

"Don't hold your breath for that either."

You sold your shares?

“ I don't think quiet introspection pays the bills.”

In my experience a calm assessment plus follow through has paid more bills than devoting my time and effort into wallowing in the mud while cursing the one who I believe failed me.

“In the end, pumping snowy clowns were merely fate’s cruel bait.”

You couldn’t be more wrong about ‘Snowy’ pumping IPIX. I’ve frequently been criticized for not talking about the company.

It’s weird how people with little to zero investment in IPIX continue to prattle on while flinging their feces. It seems abnormal.

"... come out and say the company is out-of-business and some here would still believe hope exists."

Based on your frequency of posts it's apparent that you obsess about IPIX more than most professed shareholders. Quiet introspection can be extremely valuable.

"but you regret it later."

Depends.

"She wants to blow! Let’s go"

I did not expect this kind of a close today. No idea what it means but it's kind of exciting.

"I know you are proud in your admission of ignorance about this purported biotech, but I would have thought you could at least have made a small effort to find out some specifics about the stock whose supporters you defend so vociferously."

The above is engagement baiting. Anyone willing to hook into it could go round and round with multiple people ad infinitum. I have no knowledge of the company that can't be found on Edgar or hasn't already been discussed on this board. I choose not to compensate by fabricating stories such as someone absconding with a swimming pool and is now sitting money side or something equally speculative.

If I should come into some new, valid, information that for some reason has not made it to the board I promise to engage with those interested.

It's called engagement farming. It's largely repetitious provocation for the purpose of generating a response also known as an engagement. Have you ever noticed how responding to a comment often rouses the others out from the shadows? It often occurs in a matter of minutes.

I hope they weren't promised fame, fun or fortune when they signed onto the Bashturd Chapter of the Ample Bottom Gang. I've heard the gang initiation is "interesting" but other than that it seems boring.

"damn never have I seen such a bunch of DA in my life"

You seem nice.

"Talked to Leo today. Detailed shareholder letter is coming soon."

I'll take "Things that didn't happen" for $500 Alex.

🤣😂😆

You stated this about me, "personal insults are all you’re left with".

Followed by, "Until then, you’re nothing but a two bit grifter with a pen you would like to think is poisoned but in reality uses invisible ink. Just another pathetic grifter, like Leo Ehrlich, the Captain of the IPIX Marie Celeste."

Pot meet kettle.

"Sneery Owl"

Sneery? Really? My initial reaction was to not respond because interacting with a twelve year old on the internet on any level is a foolish endeavor. I justified responding because a twelve year old maturity in an old man body seems to not pose a risk.

I did not "confess" to knowing nothing about IPIX as a company. By some less than clever delusional logic you concluded that I knew nothing about IPIX as a company. Then you and your partner Loanranger joined hands and announced that I had been "put a list" which still elicits guffaws to this day. Choosing not to share what one knows is not the same as not knowing.

Admittedly, the consternation exhibited by the IPIX vigilantes aka "The Ample Bottom Gang" once the IPIX share price crossed $0.01 and continues to hold has been surprising.

Carrry on.

"Sunspotter apparently BeaMed's laser is NOT a me too product as you want people to believe."

"As far as we can tell no other company including Medpace can achieve what their system is expected to do." - Leo Ehrlich

It's like watching Whac-A-Mole.