Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Missing link.
And the link in your post goes nowhere.
And now a couple of questions for you.
On whose authority did you publish a post that had been deleted due to a TOS infraction?
Would you have abetted the author if the post didn’t serve your agenda?
This appears to be a possible abuse of privilege.
MAC addresses are hardware specific.
IP addresses are site specific
In the conversation I referred to the Admin referred specifically to IP address. Apparently the 'inmate' thought using a different computer (different MAC address) on the same router (IP) would fool iHub.
I didn't "know" anything. I speculated.
A few years ago I was snooping around the iHub jail out of either boredom or curiosity and read where an 'inmate' was arguing innocence with an admin and the subject came up. The admin's comment told me that iHub maintains IP addresses in a database. There is nothing sinister about this. It is akin to a magazine publisher having a physical address database.
Also, I am a retired IT professional so I know some things.
One account per IP address. Attempt to create and use a second account on a known IP address is a TOS violation regardless of post content.
"Crying time is one week away."
This comment says a lot of things about you. And not one of them is a redeeming quality.
"If anything I suspect all this Sturm und Drang..."
Warum bist du gestresst?
"Aren't you going to ask if there was "No reason given?"? Again."
Another teachable moment: 'olden_grumpini' made no mention about my having asked if a reason was given so I think it safe to say no offense was taken. Yet you are the one who mentioned it for the second time ten days later.
I'm not trying to teach an old dog new tricks. I'm illustrating reasons to not heed you.
"No comment regarding the stuff that mattered? That's typical."
'statesman' had some questions and I had the time so I provided a couple links that would provide the sought after information. I felt compelled to mention inactivity fees because it is listed under "Account Fees" and not under "Commission Fees" so there's the possibility of it being overlooked.
You are correct in pointing out that I did not explain the fee structure to 'statesman'. I had no reason the think he wasn't capable of understanding the Commission Fee and how to calculate it.
This is important as it is a teachable moment. The inquiry I responded to was not about how to calculate commissions nor was it a request for an opinion on the fee structure.
Appreciated. Thank you.
A question was asked.
Links that provided answers were listed.
The exchange of information is a primary function of message boards.
I viewed it as productive.
One person out of the approximately 980 board followers found it necessary to demonstrate elementary math skills highlighted with dollop of sarcasm that concluded with a boast about calculator expertise.
Why?
Commission-Fees - https://speedtrader.com/commission-fees/
Account-Fees - https://speedtrader.com/account-fees/ There's an inactivity fee of $30 per quarter to be aware of.
“spending all these fools money!”
Using the argument that they’re even dumber than me isn’t the flex you think it is.
There are people who when asked what time it is will tell you how to build a watch.
If my question was out of line I’ll rely on o_g to advise me.
I’m quite certain your response is the dumbest thing I’ll read today. Unless of course you decide to double down.
No reason given?
“Shady, unethical people do shady, unethical shit.”
Pot lickers know.
“Banned poster”
I’m skeptical. Too many holes in this story.
I’m leaving it at that for now.
Great idea! Please wait quietly.
“ We shall see if the Cult of Ehrlich will ever abandon their leader ”
"It makes no sense to me....."
Keep in mind that as a privately held company BeaMed is not obligated to publish anything related to FDA communications. It there is anything noteworthy it will probably come from Leo with BeaMed's permission.
Second quarter is coming to a close and we have been led to expect possible news so I'm just reflecting on making it make sense.
I want to be clear that I have not heard any rumors and I have no interest in fostering any.
"if Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc is doomed to the bankruptcy predicted by the 'smooths' why would Leo bother spending the time and money appealing the Cummings case?"
It's not his time and it's not his money but more to your point it's the only shot at survival left for IPIX. It doesn't have the funds to cover the judgment and if the appeal fails all of the Company's meager cash will be absorbed trying to satisfy it.
Your response (italics) supports my statement. For many months Shitposters have been stating an impending Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc BK as a fact. By appealing the initial judgement Leo is attempting to eliminate Cummings as a driver behind a BK. Why would Leo pursue this if he didn't see any future for Brilacidin?
Leo's continued engagement?
Who do you think arranged legal representation for the appeal?
There is one glimmer of amusement which did not escape my appreciation. Your statement about Leo, "It's not his time and it's not his money..." cracked me up because your 100 shares of IPIX certainly seem to have empowered you.
Bored with board. Gorgeous weather today. New tires on bicycle. Gonna carpe the hell outta this diem.
I think the "point" is in response to the numerous shitposts made by smooth brained weapons grade stupid 'experts' where authoritative statements have been made about Leo abandoning IPIX after having worked out a deal with the laser guys on absconding with millions of dollars cash. There is also the ridiculously frequent use of the word "poolside" which is assumed to lend credibility to the accusation.
The "point" is, if Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc is doomed to the bankruptcy predicted by the 'smooths' why would Leo bother spending the time and money appealing the Cummings case? When faced with a walkaway or stay and fight it seems increasingly obvious the goal is to keep Innovation Pharmaceuticals alive to preserve a means of pursuing a plan.
It's my opinion that Leo's continued engagement in the business indicates an increased probability of an ongoing effort to work out some sort of blending BeaMed & Innovation Pharmaceuticals.
The lack of communication from Leo has been frustrating for me but I also keep in mind Leo doesn't having the luxury of making frivolous statements that may or may not prove to be accurate. Also, when considering the decade of attacks by some of the seamiest people in the land of OTC the last thing Leo should do is overshare.
Definition: Shitposting
In Internet culture, shitposting or trashposting is the act of using an online forum or social media page to post content that is of aggressively, ironically, and trollishly pooor quality.
Shitposts are generally intentionally designed to derail discussions or cause the biggest reaction with the least effort. It may even sometimes be orchestrated as part of a coordinated flame war to render a website unusable by its regular visitors
Sorry to deprive you but Leo was long gone before I’d even heard of NNVC.
But, whatever makes your naughty parts tingle. You do you.
"And how many shares have you purchased and do you still hold? For fear of being labelled a fool,"
I maintain a rather high threshold of discretion around discussing finances, health, or other personal matters.
As for your fear of being labelled a fool; a review of your posts may provide some insight. For starters: Asking a person unknown to you specific questions about their investments is foolish.
“ Yes, I purchased 100 of IPIX @ $.0158”
Question was answered in the second sentence.
"A true investor wouldn't be caught dead holding this crap."
Didn't you recently become an IPIX shareholder? "Yes" or "No" are sufficient answers.
"This board has strangely become Lord of the Flies."
An excellent descriptor. Good choice!
I'm old enough to remember when an announcement like this excited me.
Arch Therapeutics will present AC5 again at the spring Symposium on Advanced Wound Care on May 14-18. CEO Terry Norchi said: “Prior presentations at SAWC included a case of limb salvage in a 32 year-old patient with a necrotic spider-bite; management of post-Mohs surgery wounds; and treatment of recalcitrant wounds that previously failed to respond to other modalities. Clinicians manage a broad array of acute and chronic challenging wounds, often in patients with concurrent medical problems that interfere with healing.”
“Your last appearance had you asking…”
What a yenta. Sheesh!
I agree that there's a lot of interest in anti-fungal drugs particularly if continued climate change will increase and possibly compound the issue.
While I believe that B showing promise is the legitimate driver I'm wondering if applying for a patent is regarded simply as a way of placing a marker on what could be a promising drug. Also, there has to be an awareness of B nearing the end of license and does that have anything to do with the surge in patents?
I would hate for B to be swooped up by someone after IPIX investors have spent so much time and money pushing it to the 49 yard line. It would suck to have to watch some pharma with money, resources, and FDA influence spike 'our' B in the end zone.
Leo did not demonstrate well in his management of the office lease. Over the past few years I do not feel Leo has been putting forth the effort to advance B as his compensation should warrant. I guess we wait and see if Leo has the capability and the motivation to pursue bringing B to some degree of fruition.
Does anyone know what the fee is for filing a patent application such as the one PJ007 posted? A cursory look indicated that a "non-electronic" application is $200-$400 and getting a patent approved spins up numbers between $8 - $15k all the way to pharmaceutical patents costing over $2M.
What I'm trying to determine is a degree of seriousness behind these patent applications. If it's just a few dollars for an online application it could be somewhat frivolous, a low budget attempt to cover all bases, or a desire to muddy the waters. If it's the University of Sao Paulo I imagine there would be some justification required before spending even a few hundred dollars. Universities tend to be frugal with research expenditures.
I understand that there are obstacles beyond the patent office and would appreciate if responses centered on what the application stage costs.
"You are such a pertinent person and powerful influencer of IPIX that the evil forces somehow manipulated the system to label you as bearish"
Although I have never viewed myself in that manner who am I to question your judgement?
"My guess is IPIX supplied the Brilacidin"
Good point. Makes sense.
*NOTE: I do not understand how my original post came to have the "Bearish" sentiment. I have never used this particular icon. It was not there when I reviewed my post after submission yesterday. This morning it was. Whether my error, a hiccup, or something nefarious I plan to be more diligent.
Thank you for posting this. I’m a little perplexed by Innovation having provided funds. Perhaps it was quite some time ago?
Funding
“This study was supported by funds from the University of California, San Francisco, Valley Fever Solutions, the Valley Fever Americas Foundation, the Foundation for Research in Infectious Diseases, the California Institute for Medical Research, the David and Mary Larwood Family Charitable Fund, and Innovation Pharmaceuticals.“
One only had to look at the sticky posts to see who was controlling the narrative. It wasn’t unusual to see 80% mod posts with the remaining 20% submitted by the mod aligned.
I regarded the degree to which they’d tipped their hand with a smidgeon of begrudged amusement.
“ And today for the first time in over a year you saw fit to comment.”
🗑️
"...now have to look at their IPIX investment and face reality."
And this affects you how?
While I don’t claim to know what PJ007 was referring to the first thing that came to my mind was LADD (Laser Assisted Drug Delivery).