Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yesterday - 4 trades totalling 35 cents LOL To the Moon
Just one trade so far today, and MM spent only 10 cents doing it - go figure !
Too small to be an Income Tax right-off, too small for washing, any idea why MM's are wanting to keep this alive ?
Would sarcastically say laundry, but at 15 cents like today, or even $1 a day volume, this could take ages
Has the CE been removed ?
Up 9,900 % today, MM's who bought at low just got lucky.
Dont need to be a high roller, just need spend $1 a day to keep ticker alive. But why and for what reason ? Any idea ?
MM's keeping it alive for some reason, not going to write this off as tax loss just yet.
Yes $1 can create high trading volume with price so low, or to put it another way, you can buy a lot for a buck.
Although $1 is a strange amount to spend. If it were a trading brokerage writing-off shares, you would think it would be a bigger block. But again as you say, a brokerage writing-off shares would still need a buyer.
And as for "washing" money, doing it at $1 a day is going to take forever.
At least they cant remover ticker if brokerage houses keeping it live, if only trading between themselves.
Do you mean the $1 trades going through each day ?
So is it just market makers trading from now on ?
Looking at the closing prices, I cant see that this ever got higher than 0.00095 but IHub are showing a 52 week high of 0.25 does anyone know what date 25 cents was achieved, or is this an error ?
Is it just SNRS, or are all CE stocks being shut down at end of May ?
I can understand the huge volume if people are wanting to unload prior to May 25th deadline, but that does not explain why people are buying.
Do so many people buy on a pump alone ?
Or unless SNRS is going to become current !
What is your point ?
The point I was making was that, if bid and sell are both at same price (as shown here at IHub), be it 0.00001 or 0.00002 how can you tell which is a sell and which is a buy
But how do you know whether that was a sell or a buy ? As both bid and ask at 0.00002
What's the chance of anymore 2's ?
When did this stock last trade ? How far back to get any volume at all ?
Any explanation for this;
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1512787/000072174814001238/0000721748-14-001238-index.htm
WRONG ! No volume showing for this stock for many months now
But no volume showing here for many months ?
Nobody wants to sell - great news, we should all be reassured
Why buy ICBS when we can soon buy Canwealth stock ? thats where the money is going to be
The relevance being, nothing has happened in 3.5 YEARS !
Why post old news ? That was 3.5 YEARS ago.....
0.30 six months ago - hard to believe now
Thanks for the advice, but I brought in to this long ago & because of the reverse splits I will have to wait till VGPR hits $9 before I break even. Just a bag holder here not wanting to add good money to bad in order to average down.
What makes you think VGPR are able to produce anything yet ? Let alone sell it
So you dont think the DTCC suspension will hold this back then ?
Not G for Grey, market ?
What does the G mean after the ticker ?
I followed your link but SNRS is not on the list of securities.
Only Laidlaw and Bartoszek are mentioned - what have they got to do with SNRS ? What am I missing ?
So SNRS gets shut down because of a broker ?
Through no fault of their own ?
In what way is SNRS related to Oppenheimer & Co ? I read the whole document and cant see SNRS mentioned anywhere....
6 years out of date LOL
Shame he cant be bothered to update us all
Looking good - back trading on an index soon !
Sibby went to rehab - good ridence
You will never convince her, she's quite mad. Still thinks that if two seperate companies, in two seperate countries call themselves the same name by coincidence, then they must be linked somehow....
It did not help that a few people in the PR industry were confused by this coincidence.
BIHC stated on facebook that this coincidence was just that, and no more. Sibby cant get her head round that and move on
Well aware of that, just stating Cammwealth and BIHC are not linked by USG1. At one point many years ago Kimi's group held 10% of BIHC stock. Many years later the same woman (who just happened to be part of a group of people who held BIHC stock) formed a group called USG1 who just happen to have done a R/M with camwwealth.
No connection to BIHC at all as BIHC is dead and buried