On what do you base that opinion? (sincere question no antagonism meant)

There are no products and no business. At best the only asset they have is a brand that has inadvertently been built up through this share selling scheme.

Hi all. I haven't checked EESO news for 18 months or so. I am quite amazed that some are still positive about this stock. I guess you might realise some upside if there is a concerted pump but considering this business does not actually exist that is a bit of a gamble.

This is the most blatant shell I have ever followed. No products and a fictitious distribution network.

Good luck anyway. I still have a handful of shares but wrote those off over a year ago.

Jared, Murph and anyone else associated with EESO have no integrity to salvage.

This whole enterprise was a premeditated scam. I feel physically sick when I see the pictures of Jared posing with US servicemen and women. Jared is a snake. He even played the religion card to convince investors to give up cash, which is blasphemy in my eyes.

The sad fact is that Jared and his fellow scammers will undoubtedly end up getting a slap on the wrist for their actions whilst people that have put their lives on the line for him have lost their life savings.

I wish I had the words to articulate how low Jared et al are.

You are crazy.

What is your agenda?

I'm sorry One, I know that you are an inteligent investor who has been following the EESO story for a long time now. I don't wish to cast aspersions but I can't help but question the motive behind your comments on this board.

Perhaps I misunderstand the premise of Investors hub but I strongly feel that you should be standing back and moderating rather than posting numerous pumpettes. Your optimistic nuggets are absurd considering your knowledge base and bordering on an abuse of your position.

Why does everyone have an agenda. IHUB should be about informed discussion not a battle of pump vs bash.

Every 'big release' thus far has been utter tosh.

Please tell me why you think there will be any credible news in the future?

The non-release of audited Q3 numbers will be the next big blow.

I wonder if it will be as good as previous interviews.

Can't wait for another halving of the pps.

I'm down with the sentiment concerning environmentally friendly products and practices but I think you are missing the point here.

Do you really still think this is a bona fide business? This is a share selling enterprise.

I guess it doesn't harm the environment too much so not all bad.

I think that is what we are all aiming for. That is why we are trying to spread the truth about this stock.

Surely that proves the reverse. PRs to date have been full of utter fabrications.

Nice reasoned argument there. Further proves the lack of basis for your pumping.

How would you like me to prove that I hold this stock? I'm cool with that if you really want some evidence. Will show categorically that I have no ulterior motive.

There may well be a run of sorts but if there is it will be based upon fiction not a genuine ongoing concern. I assume your comments are designed to generate such a run and I wish you luck as I stand to recoup some losses too if you are successful. I just don't like blatant pumping when the truth is so obvious. Just because we lost green doesn't mean we have to try to take others down too. The sooner this is exposed for what it is the better for all. It is the real start up companies that deserve our investment not rip off shells such as this.

Mate, I am just speaking the truth concerning this scam. You and I both know this is the fact. Why would I bash when I already hold a not insignificant position in this. Posting my previous comments in your posts only shoes that I have been consistent in my opinion.

Seriously, in light of the fake buyouts, the unrealised contracts and last year's hilarious projections, please guide me through how anyone can see this as anything but a scam?

Give us a break. Nothing is brewing except more BS.

I have been following this for a long time. One of the old timers you speak of is into this stock in a fairly large way but didn't take gigantic profits when they were available. I don't blame that holder for trying to awaken some interest in this.

What exactly is your agenda here?
Do you have a large position?

Fair enough I guess, you do what you have to. I just find it difficult to stand by and watch posts (from obviously inteligent investors) that are misleading.

Yeah, good luck with that.

No I can't. I am purposely not mentioning WOW as I am not sufficiently clued up to comment on their business. They quite possibly partnered up with EESO in good faith.

My opinion is that there are so many scams amongst pinkies that you need to approach all of them with cynicism and suspicion. I am not having a personal pop at anyone who invests in EESO. I just find it amazing that anyone is able to (and inclined to) defend this enterprise with all the evidence that is on the table. The only possible reasons are either naivety or an ulterior motive.

This stock deserves all the bashing we can give it.

Such a transparent scam. If anyone thinks otherwise they seriously need to so some objective DD.

Everything PR'ed has been proven to be utter tosh. Does anyone seriously beleive there was a genuine buyout offer? There may have been an offer in as much as a corporate entity penned a letter of intent. However, in reality this was just one Jared's cohorts who has the corporate set up to be able to do this. Just so happens it was the same corp that supposedly made a huge order for product. Basically means both were complete fiction. Nothin illegal here as conveniently turned down anyway.

It also seems obvious that there was limited run of products produced to allow some sales in order to convince people that this was genuine. Let me ask you something, can you buy EESO household products easily? No, of course not. EESO is a pump and dump scam and Jared is sat in his boiler room counting the profits. He has feathered his own nest here and will continue to do so. We have all been taken for a ride.

Sorry mate but you have to be joking.

How can you not see through this play?

Nothing genuine about EESO, that much is obvious. Textbook scam, fake buyouts, unsupported figures bandied around supposedly being generated from remote markets that are impossible to verify. S Korea and S America, do me a favour.

Take comfort in the fact that we have made one person a fortune and he will be living a life of luxury when EESO finally disappears (no doubt after a rs or two and further scam buyout prs).

Enjoy

Anyone who has watched this for the past 18 months know it is complete scam. And don't give me that "where is your evidence" line, for goodness sake, they don't come much more transparent than this. Trade this shell but do not invest. There is nothing here to invest in.

Not just my own opinion but fact. Anyone who actually thinks EESO is genuine is either brain dead or has an ulterior motive for talking this up.

I am sorry for all those who invested 6 months or so ago expecting something tangible to materialise, I am in the same boat. About time we stopped ignoring the obvious truth.

So you can borrow stock can you nc?

I fundamentally disagree. If the company wishes to be taken seriously they should provide factual information. It would be a simple enough task if there was any substance to what they say.

My words have as much meaning as anyone else's as all posts concerning EESO are based on conjecture rather than fact. Please show me some concrete evidence to back-up any of the rhetoric we have seen in PRs.

This is in response to the below reply I received to an earlier post of mine.

Posted by: balihi Date: Friday, July 17, 2009 7:04:21 AM
In reply to: Straker who wrote msg# 163197 Post # of 163606

If you wish to be critical,them provide factual information,and not useless words,with no real meaning.

Whilst proving nothing in itself, I note that Jared has the same props in the latest video that he has used throughout. I guess it means absolutely nothing but my spidey senses tingle when I see him fingering the exact same bag of hag waste that he used in vids made eons ago.

You are either pumping or deluded.

Please guide me to one piece of verifiable information concerning EESO.

Every PR has been a work of rhetoric, crafted in order to pump the stock whilst just stopping short of stating anything that could be litigated against when ultimately found to be fictitious.

Absolutely not. Any buyout mentioned was an obvious complete work of fiction.

Very well articulated. This is the dictionary definition of EESO as far as I'm concerned. Anyone who thinks otherwise is in serious denial.

The WOW Green situation pales into insignificance compared to the raft of other positive announcements that have come to nil. If all the other promised contracts had any substance to them the alleged outstanding payment/s from WOW Green would not be a major issue.

The supposed buyout offers were one of the best works of fiction I have seen on the Pinks to date. Does anyone in their right mind think offers in excess of .10 would have been rejected if they had existed, don't make me laugh.

He cannot disclose these facts as they do not exist. Too much fabricated detail would put EESO in a litigous position. At the moment EESO are obviously surfing the scam info fine-line. These share selling enterprises know how much detail they can get away with. Any more and they might be held accountable.

I doubt whether EESO will take action against the stain pen conpetitor. Most likely they are just buying and rebranding themselves.

Lets not beat around the bush here. The main protaganists at EESO have made killing from this share selling enterprise and are now trying to spin the wheel again.

And to anyone who still maintains there is a buyout could I interest you in some magic beans.

It tanks whenever he PRs because he has nothing of substance to say. Every PR is just further evidence that this is not genuine. The Market, in general, is wise to this whilst Jared hopes there are still new investors out there willing to buy shares based on his flimsy hints of good progress.

If any of what we have been told was true it could be verified thriugh the release of just the smallest snippet of concrete, factual information. The fact that we have not been given this confirms the nature of this enterprise.

No buyout (as if there ever was an offer on the table)
No revenue from all of the gigantic contracts previously reported.

And now we are slowly being drip fed info concerning an amazing new product (GS2000..??) which has a 97% success rate in the remediation of petroleum by-product contaminated soil. Don't make me laugh, if this were true EESO would have been front page news in the scientific press. This is the new hook for small time investors like you and me to have penny stock wet dreams over.

Anyone with any sense can see right through this share selling scheme now. This is text book scams-ville. It is time to stop grasping at straws and making excuses for the CEO. Guarantee he has done very nicely from this. We should be warning new investors away from this so that the cycle is not repeated. I am sick of lining Jared's pockets.

By all means trade the peaks and troughs but remember this is a share selling scheme not a genuine business.

I am utterly amazed that the traditionally positive posters on this board are still making excuses for the company.

How much more obvious does the nature of this enterprise have to be? The CC and Shareholders address confirm that virtually everything the CEO has stated or promised is a complete fiction.

Buyout
Do you really think any CEO in their right mind would reject multiple offers above 0.10 for a company that briefly peaked just above 0.05? The one buyout suitor that was announced was on the inside. Oh and coincidentally, is the same party from which huge contracts that were announced have obviously not come to fruition. Household name?

Share Structure
A gagged TA - a promise not to increase the A/S - a clandestine subsequent (gigantic) increase to the A/S. And we are told that this is to raise capital, hmmmm... for a small company with massive contracts in the bag and huge projected future revenues! Not to mention the supposed revenue from their MLM retail partner. This is just painful.

GS20000 (or whatever it is)
So the company has a product that will breakdown 97% of petro related contaminants in soil. Wow, that is amazing, in fact almost unbelievable! Come on fellas, grow some common sense. This is the next vehicle that has been thought up to persuade investors to part with their hard earned dough.

Please...please...please I beg you to come back to me with the usual upbeat rhetoric telling me that this is bona fide.

Why does EESO need to raise capital through an increase in A/S if it has so many contracts in the bag?

I love this stock, it is obviously a complete scam but the soap opera element is priceless.

You seem fairly clued up about the technicalities concerning share structure.

I have a couple of possibly quite naive questions that I would appreciate your views on.

1. Does the increase in A/S have an impact on any proposed buyout?

2. Why do EESO need to increase the A/S to attract customers? Surely customer interest shoudl be product based and not require a sweetener in the form of a share handout?

Like I said, my questions are quite possibly extremely naive.

Thanks in advance for any feedback you can give me on these.

Hate to say i told you so but the pps speaks for itself.

Hands up anyone that still thinks the buyout is genuine?

You still 'all over me' then Drift.

"Hey rookie keep em coming on the EESO board. I am all over you."

Ironically, in my opinion, the best PR for EESO recently was the Belmont law suit announcement.

Would an organisation such as Belmont bother chasing a company if it was just a shell? I guess they might if there was a decent pps, regardless of whether the entity was genuine. Anyone have any views on this?

Apologies for the name calling Firebag. Totally immature of me, my bad.

regards

I hope you are right.

For your own sake you might want to remain at least partially objective on this. Regardless of how deep in you are it doesn't pay to ignore facts.

Where necessary, all pink sheet 'enterprises' produce some products. Trust me, it is financially worth it for them. Many investors are immediately convinced when they see a can of Atomic Dogg in front of them that the producer is a bona fide beverages manufacturer (for example). Unfortunately this isn't always the case.

All the best shows have well crafted props.

No it proves nothing.

If these products are such winners then you have to ask why they are being sold to the public via the MLM model. I think I know the answer.

MLM is a conveniently restrictive way to control the flow of products. If you wanted to maximise growth they would be available directly throught the internet.

I can excuse any genuine company a handful of oversights and seemingly odd practices but when the behaviour of an organisation is consistently questionable, in terms of disclosure, the reason why becomes obvious.