Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
don't be surprised if there's another Corporate Action
weeeeeeeee ...with profits
weeeeeeeeee i didn't fleece someones money
peeps should've learned from th 1st R/S ...some people have no morality with other peoples money ... to Co Co Co - produce a film; especially when they have 0 money of their own
P.S. Biggest studios of film industry had tremendous write-downs last several quarters
thanks for th profits
The fact I've been right on th many issues here for two years and the fact your guesses continue to be hypothesis without credentials speaks for itself ....
Closing thought: settlements don’t always translate into shareholder value
What settlement? Oh …”tomorrows” settlement? The 8 – 0 win lol
Keep the fingers crossed …. That’s all there is
IMO
First, lets see if the dilution stops
let me condense ballyhooed MHYS ...dilution brought th price down
Grod dictated his own Debt Conversion Agreement to collect 371,428.50, representing a portion of his accrued salary for Zilch, ZOTZ? ...this year lol
IMO
yea...OK ....first was th ap ... you didn't fall for that Oscar story did you?
somebody is dumping shares after they gave themselves more shares ...after they had R/S your shares
gran-pa [just think, you were a young PUP when this all started] ....ain't gonna happen .....th co blaming their sales and marketing failures on litigation uncertainty and hopeful turn of events goes a long way to say 8-0 means squat... procedural 8-0
IMO
Then why hasn't it?
yea ...they're a "sweeping" giant ...don't ya know ...
keep working that hopeful analysis ...
mega deals in fact show its a big boy world out there; cir not even JV; while continually paying out more than they pull in
That managerial excuse laid out as opinion, that litigation is th ultimate source of their sales, marketing, distribution & production problems, is a doozy ...says it all right there
IMO
Sure, I’ll play along, to a certain degree … Main Stream markets
First feast your eyes on the move Coca Cola & Monster made to INCREASE global control over market share &shelf space http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/08/15/us-coca-cola-idUSKBN0GE2C920140815
For openers, it’s not all in a name: just b/c it’s PB, don’t expect instant popularity…
Unless you’re the Easter Bunny, novelty of the “bunny” kind will only get you so far in the saturated food &beverage field... better off having control of the merchandise lineup, with beverage as supplement to merchandise sales [novelty merchandise usually out performs novelty food &beverage]
With that said ….
Off the top of my head (1) consumer perception [novelty] (2) Funds …are problematic
... powerful distributors jobbers &wholesalers utilize well trained sales teams to control markets and shelf space; experienced distributors know novelty categories usually translate to weak sales and limited appeal; as a result large distributors are reluctant to make those type of products top priority ...unless you make it worth their while;
Mfg incentives [promotional backing, advertising, commission &margin] all play their respective parts in getting your foot [product] in th door…
next up… the box store, super mkt ect incentives [POP incentives, margins, rebates, promotional product ect] – you have to pay to play if you want that desired location or shelf space … backdoor distributor promotions, such as discounted product combinations, part of a weekly / monthly sales program [usually tied in with other established products backed by demo’s / free promotional merchandise] are often utilized by established distributors to grow shelf space … without enormous amounts of cash to back product promotion; and trusted established distributors with strong retail relationships to promote it, very few [of the thousands] products introduced to the shelf survive the limited market trial period or th wrath of competition
Bottom line, unless it’s new, sensational, trending or fronted by an incredible imaginative ad campaign …you’re left begging and fighting the established brands for space
Yes, there are always creative solutions, but that would require executive sacrifice, imagination and money; and still, you’re left with pushing on th family market place a logo emblematic of outdated sex appeal [novelty] …IMO
If their facilities pass specs &funding allows, the focus of co should be to promote those facilities; expand private labeling and push for subcontracting larger brands; best join as many trade & beverage associations producing trade shows b/c it doesn’t look bright for a small distributor of a “stand alone beverage product” in today’s market
Did PB take the time to review the facilities, the financial background, the reach or the experience of this company before entering into a mfg / broker / distribution contract? …maybe PB just felt charitable?
One thing is certain; most companies don’t survive on name alone; it takes much more
Closing thought: settlements don’t always translate into shareholder value
What settlement? Oh …”tomorrows” settlement? The 8 – 0 win lol
Keep the fingers crossed …. That’s all there is
IMO
Inquiring minds wish to know more?
10Q Late again
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10153898
told th silly birds way back when there wouldn't be a settlement "tomorrow"
also told the silly birds PB was a novelty and would have trouble finding a foothold in mainstream markets
lets see ..still no settlement; and sales are novelty
apparently you didn't miss th BS in th 10Q ...&thanks for th offer but ... I've made millions in th field of global mfg, private labeling &distribution ...now retired but still very active in one form or another ....
see how simple that was ..short,to th point &concise
oh-boy ...HEE HAW
Sales, revenues and profits are all down ...yea, they're really moving forward
Both the 10K & 10Q have come and gone ...what happened to pps?
And that recent PR "CirTran's First Quarter Results Show a Reduction in Losses from Operations" ...is that all there is to offer?
no one is trying to scare you out of your shares ...keep'em / you're stuck with'em; till as you say you lose your A$$
no one is trying to scare you off th board, you've been saying CIRC is a winner for how long? the market can see that's not th case ....58M plus on th ask, for how long? the fish in th pond jus not nibbling at th bait on th hook for those billions [lol] in damages! ...no one falling for th con that th possible reward is worth th risk
oh, and both the 10K & 10Q have come and gone ...what happened?
classic PR BS ...at least it wasn't th all – purpose liberal excuse ...weather
I'll give you that ...
lol ...file that gasp of air under "bantha fodder"
glad i took all th STLK profits when I DID ...instead of waiting for that "KABOOM" ...
business is down, sales are down, profits are down, Authorized exhausted ...and the market knows it
to all th longs that proclaimed "wait for th 10Q, you'll see" ...well, it's here
there are some pretty smart fish out there
There's some pretty smart fish out there... now 71M plus on th ask at 4's and still really no buyers
no one biting at th bait ..."reward not worth the risk?"
Thanks for th profits, again
just love the pitch line [buy my shares] because STLK will be .008 - 50 cents [soon]
…if I did my DD LMAO …Here’s what you said [so we're clear]
dilution is not prejudicial; company, debt holder, 3rd party dumping shares ...affects price all the same
There's some pretty smart fish out there...61M plus on th ask and no buyers
Are you delusional? no one is trying to scare you out of your shares ...keep'em / you're stuck with'em; no one is trying to scare you off th board,lol, you've been saying CIRC is a winner for how long? well, the market can see that's not th case .... and finally you haven't won anything,the market knows that ....61M plus on th ask, for how long? the fish in th pond jus not nibbling at th bait on your hook for those LMAO billions in damages! lol ...no one falling for th con that th possible reward is worth th risk
stupid? ...buy at .0004 and prove that trader wrong, help out your fellow longs; there are 62M+ shares available on th ask that no one seems to want
I see shareholders, debt holders ect, still can't dump those 55M shares at the ask [no buyers]; while 10’s of thousands of traders think risk here is not worth th reward …I see th longs are still Supertramp fans … “Dreamer, you know you are a dreamer”
FIVE BILLION
Getting very close to that saying …”good-bye dream, hello reality” …interpret at will
of course Macy's will issue that statement, I wouldn't expect them to say anything different; and I didn't expect JCP to do anything else but APPEAL, even though the judge really sided w /JCP ... it's all just optimistic PR dupe for th shareholders and their pps... the judge has already implied DON'T EXPECT MUCH in terms of $$
I would have thought someone with so much experience would understand that
In the end, if CIRC does win the end game, CIRC revenues, before and after the fact, just don't justify an award projected by you &longs
CIRC trouble with past legal proceedings
http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHtmlSection1?SectionID=7577691-136114-147004&SessionID=hUAIFH0cSYp8mD7
i won't waste too much time with you ...WRONG
1.Macy’s vs JCP …HIGH PROFILE CASE; CIRC?
2.MACY’s and JCP large revenue producing companies; CIRC? Or for that matter PB?
3.JCP entered into an agreement with a vendor undermining competitors exclusive contract; PB still argues terms of Contract w/ CIRC were not met thus null &void
4.CIRC entered into litigation w/ PB on the heels of a bankruptcy
5.APPEAL …a word shareholders should keep in mind; if CIRC does win end game, PB would most likely file an appeal IMO…keeping most investors on th sidelines; such as we witness with th type of trading currently taking place
sure sure sure lol ...but the water district litigation held more water as argument lol
In the end, if CIRC does win the end game, CIRC revenues, before and after the fact, just don't justify an award projected by you &longs
Invest in a corporate attorney