Buying and Selling
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Todays chart shows a dump at the open followed by one of those “mini pumps” we hear about then settling lower but still up for the day.. it looks like the pump has started, wait I don’t think the pump has started yet. Maybe tomorrow. Unbelievable bullshit here. Yep Sad Clown Paradox
How is this even possible, is this that doubletalk you speak of? This must be a Yogi Berra quote.
With all theze Z’zzzzzzzzzzz it’s making me want to take a nap
Yep I see lots of lying and no retracting!
My friend bought T @ 20.00 and now it’s 14.00 I told him they were a scam cause it went down. This is an example of the bullshit posted here. NON STOP BULLSHIT!
I guess Stankey is scammin
Actually I expect more since being in Waco, looking forward to seeing how the judge rules in a few of pre trial motions. Not sure of any dates yet.
I follow a few other patent plays and most make an initial pop, on good news then trade down. Court victories and settlements last a little longer. NLST popped to 6.15 or around there and has now been holding in the low 3’s.
The lawsuit is in the best venue in the US for patent holders and is moving fwd, I do wish things happened much faster too. I get the frustration I truly do but if it wasn’t for Waco I wouldn’t be here,
Back in 2019 or 2020 I sold for a loss and waited way more then 30 days till it got down to .015 and even around .007ish I was able to buy 300 pct more shares and have a write off. Then came Waco and I continued to accumulate based on a heavy DD of this Judge and his court which has mirrored East Texas. Read up about the Judge then look at the favorable claim construction. Let’s see how the judge rules on these next few motions and we might get an even better idea of the strength of the case. Good luck to you.
Then the goal post moves to .10 then .20 and so on.
SPOT on!
It’s the filings that say we are getting there and with style. (Favorable Claim Construction and an expert discovery testimony that must incriminate or they wouldn’t throw everything at it like they have).
Mental illness is on the rise.
Someone is so full of themself. Big tech’s used sock puppets must be worried to be working on Sunday.
Thank you for that
It’s all about Waco, Waco, Waco not Wacko, Wacko, Wacko. Similar spelling minus the K like in Knostic ROTFLMAO
Just like when it went to .029 and .03 was support, it did bounce to .10. Should be interesting since the bottom of the gap was .0416..which is now completely filled. So it filled gap and closed above the support.
Rapz great post just reposting since this got buried from all the garbage. Great read.
HayDay
>>...Gee, wonder what this could mean?...<<
Based on previous TMUS filings (including "inequitable conduct") they DO/DID NOT have a patent to prove their technology "HotSpot@Home". Instead, they do the "song and dance", attack the CEO for being one of the inventors on the MG patent, or his role regarding "Avatar", etc. All they have showed are promotional ads campaign for HotSpot@Home in newspapers, etc. claiming it is part of UMA designation since 2005-2006, not an issued US patent. If anyone does google-search of US or foreign patents or technical literature for HotSpot@Home, there was/is no patent. So VPLM's search of prior art did not reveal anything about HotSpot@Home and hence it was not included in our prior art compilation for MG patent. But TMUS counsel declares VPLM has a problem! Yes, that is why AMZN settled on MG patent. If I find my notes/research on this, I'll post.
VZ is in a similar predicament. Caught without a solid patent for defense. The trial will disclose. It is good for VPLM to go through the challenge.
Both TMUS and VZ fear a possible jury trial and Mr. Hudnell's ability to convince the jury of "willful" infringement.
Last two zoom calls revealed the decency of AMZN's counsel Mr. Daniel T. Shvodian arguing the MG patent claims and the RBR routing message. The "vibes" from TMUS sound like a "street fight".
MG patent governs the use of location identifier (say GPS) on your smart phone to connect to an incoming call, avoiding "roaming" charges, not requiring "calling cards", etc. (Claim 30). TMUS completely missed to address it!
Shareholders deserve a jury trial to enforce not only MG patents but also RBR patents for audio and video calls as well as e commerce. RBR damages will be huge and both defendants can afford to pay the damages.
An advantage of a trial is that the Judge will give a ruling with or without the willfulness and it will be public. But it could be appealed to a higher court.
On the other hand, if both TMUS and VZ agree for a settlement, it may take a few weeks but the terms may be kept confidential for a period of time. No appeals!
It does not stop there! Check John Minor's report on "apportionment of infringement" damages. Mr. Minor claims a "backhaul" wifi network system a consumer has set up at home at his/her own expense should be part of Telcos' infrastructure expenses. Currently Telcos are dumping your cell audio/video calls on your personal home wifi network set up by you. Google "backHaul" wifi networks and Google's NET MESH wifi systems. Wonder whether Telcos should pay for home wifi systems?
Folks familiar with home wifi network technologies and business aspects may help us understand this issue.
I used the unrestricted as my float but that may not be correct it’s more of a worse case scenario.
I believe they can only sell 10 pct of volume. At least that’s what my broker friend said. And it’s possible it’s only 5 pct.
So really not that big of a deal. The float is only 42 pct of outstanding. Not bad for a company with no revs yet or that we know about. A pinky I follow has 8 milly plus in revs last 4 qtrs and float is like 60 -70 pct of outstanding and SP is sub penny..
It’s gonna start creeping up into this trial date. One patent play I follow went up 400 pct in a few months leading up to a Waco trial date and their amounts are peanuts compared to the potential here.. not sure what the MG is valued at but if it’s about roaming then my best guess would be a billion or 2 for each of these telco providers.
They haven’t made any numbers public as of yet in any filings. Even at 2 billion Judge could award willful infringement which will make it 8 billion. He will also calculate future infringement and possibly interest. So these suits could potentially cost these two Telcos double digit billions each. That’s if it went to a jury trial and they found the defendants guilty. The judge awards the willful and future infringement.
I don’t know what’s gonna happen here. It’s gone to almost .12 with her selling. Excited to see how this all unfolds. No more excuses or bullshit just 1 plaintiff and two defendants in Waco with Judge Albright. Sounds pretty damn good to me!
I really have no clue of the amounts just being more conservative from any other amounts I’ve seen people post here. This is one of 5 core patents they have. I think they total around 26-28 patents including some global and child patents.
I don’t see a filing by any lawyers, you’re talking about lawyers handling the Waco cases? If you can share the date so I can look it up, and did you find this on otc site? I don’t see it. Thank you in advance
This is the time to read the filings, they say more than what the company can or will say. There is a lot of info redacted but that Hudnell and team are on their game. And a few more lawyers joined in, that’s because they are focused on the location of this case and like in real estate, location, location, location is everything.
Agreed, honestly I was a little bummed last week, pice is trading down to it’s lower end of the range and this board (Yuck) with a bunch of non patent garbage, then this post popped up and truly inspired me. Thank you Youare!
Not at all, it just makes me LAFF OUT LOUD!
GreenBackClub
Re: None
Tuesday, January 24, 2023 7:01:49 PM
Post# of 120295 Go
FOR ANYONE CLAIMING THAT VPLM HAS NOT DONE ANYTHING MEANINGFUL FOR THE COMPANY AND SHAREHOLDERS I OFFER THIS LIST OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS BY VPLM THUS FAR:
* Up-listed from OTC-PINK to OTCQB
* Removed the DTC Chill
* Conducted an annual financial audit to be in full SEC compliance and fully reporting.
* Conducted an initial damages analysis for RBR parent patent.
* Initiated 4 federal infringement lawsuits to enforce VPLM's IP rights against Verizon, Apple, AT&T, Twitter.
* Initiated 1 federal infringement lawsuit to enforce VPLM's IP rights against Amazon.
* Agreed to having all 5 cases venue transferred to Northern California and consolidated for pre-trial purposes.
* Defended and defeated 8 IPR petitions brought before the PTAB by Unified Patents, Apple and Verizon/ATT.
* Successfully defeated a motion, in part, for sanctions by Apple at the PTAB.
* Successfully defeated an Alice motion brought by Verizon & ATT.
* 27 total patents granted and issued as of February 2019 (21 U.S. Patents).
* Granted RBR patent in Europe without any opposition challenge within 9 month challenge period.
* successful efforts to recoup most of the 100 million shares from Richard Kipping et al
* Upgraded the Board of Directors to include new members with extensive experience in M&A.
* Brought on board new boutique NYC law firm (Kevin Malek) to go to battle against the big silicon defendants.
* Brought on board terrific superstar lawyer in luis Hudnell
- ceo malak returned many hundreds of millions of shares back to the treasury to reduce the outstanding share count (to the benefit of shareholders)
And more recently…….
***Patents have been validated***
***Initial damages analysis done***
***Defeated 12 more IPRS (20 total)**
***IPRs have been appealed and upheld unanimously***
***No patents have been invalidated***
*** Current with all requisite filings***
***current with prosecuting patents and keeping both parent and child patents current***
***Reduction in OS count (thanks Emil!)***
***Some claims (@20) invalidated for RBR but could be overturned with a decision on Axle at the Supreme Court***
***NDCA is a very difficult court to win as it is defendant friendly. Waco is fair and plaintiff friendly***
***Foot in the door in WACO and now some defendants must remain in Waco (Amazon’s writ of mandamus denied!) and face a trial. Other defendants currently stayed in NDCA are tied to Waco results***
***Albright is a judge that is perceived as fair, by the books and fast which means vplm will be given a fair chance to argue / defend patents on the merits (all we could ask for)***
***99% of Albright's cases settle before trial. Albright encourages settlement ALL THE TIME. If defendants get to trial they have been given multiple chances to settle so they can’t expect Leniency from judge Albright***
***Defendants are NOT working together as a formal consolidated group. There is a disconnect - which plays into VPLM’s favor***
***Most big defendants will settle before providing source code when discovery is requested and required. Vplm is well into discovery phase so it is only a matter of when and not if source code will be demanded***
***Apple's own expert admitted in court in virnetx case - on the record - that they use relays to route their calls (imessage, facetime, etc.). This admission will come to bite the apple in the butt***
***Apple tried to file a patent when VPLM was updating their RBR child patent but they failed to do so before VPLM did. We were first to file at USPTO. Now why did they do this? --> because they wanted to get around infringing. Sorry apple, you lose again***
***60+ companies have received letters that notified them of possible infringement AND offered them the chance to take a license. This was years ago. Willful infringement equals treble damages!***
***Apple and others can be brought back into litigation as they were dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE***
Only fools use infringement letters to determine the infringement. Smart investors use claim construction, IPR’s and discovery to determine the infringement. Nuff said! We do need a laff while we wait.
Things that matter:
1. Favorable Claim Construction
2. A successful Discovery which includes expert witness and the Nodal testing.
3. An experienced patent Judge
4. Waco, Texas
5. 2 of the biggest Telco providers globally that are infringing.
6. A great legal team
Bonus is willful infringement
These are the 6 key ingredients to win a patent case, and VPLM has them.
Don’t get distracted by the childish noise that won’t matter one bit on the front steps of court. VPLM is all set for this upcoming battle. Will in take 3 weeks, settle on the first day or earlier? No one really knows but we will all find out.
Here’s a sticky twist, the most recent filing by Hudnell mentions the Nodes. It’s on the 7/7/2023 filing in the MG trial. Whoopsie not another one!
The first patent was approved in 2013, it took 10 yrs, but that’s not important what is important is that trial is only a few months away!
Here is some more of those bizarro facts stickied
Recent Dismissals:
No more instituted IPRs… is this good or bad? VPLM is 20-0 but from what I hear they are costly. It is possible that eliminating this saves us shareholders from possibly up to 500 million more shares of dilution. And what if they lost some claims? Better to not take a chance and you get out of NDCA.
No more Alice 101 is this good or bad?
It’s very tough to win this in NDCA considering they don’t even do claim construction before ruling. Read up on Judge Albright and how he handles 101,s.
Probably saved us more dilution having to fight the Alice.
No more Samsung in Waco is this good or bad?
Well they had IPRs, and my thinking is that since this is a MG patent trial that maybe they don’t infringe as much as a telco provider. Probably saved us more dilution by dismissing this.
All of this was on a press release. What hasn’t been in a press release is this AMZN settlement. The lack of communication hurts but what can they say without litigating in Press releases or tipping off the opposition about your strategy.
SO NOW WE ARE LEFT WITH TWO TELCO PROVIDERS WITH THE MG PATENT AKA (ROAMING CHARGES) IN WACO WITH NO ALICE, NO IPRS AND THE TIME LIMIT TO FILE NEW IPRS HAS PASSED. SAVED US FROM MORE DILUTION WHICH WE KNOW HOW MUCH WE LOVE DILUTION.
To me this sounds like a lean mean fighting machine!!!
Please verify all that was said on this post to assure oneself what kind of position VPLM is truly in.
That’s a bit twisted, so now Rich is a mobster cause one of them was gonna shoot him. Or maybe Rich was a whistleblower and that’s why they put out a hit on him..
conveniently Special. LMAO at the humorous opinions..
Agreed, the original judges were conflicted cause they worked for Apple and T recently so they should’ve recused themselves. Unbelievable what Big Tech used sock puppets will say. Based on the filings they are stepping their game up on social media..
This was said many times don’t make me go back and read all the posts.LMFAO
Never respond to deaf ears! It’s tiresome
WTF, big tech’s used sock puppets are grasping for straws, they know better then to try and attack the patents.