Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
When you click on your link that you provide. It shows a news story from March. Please let me know if you see different.
Thanks for posting old news
Was it called "Produce Marketing"
If its bogus then why not release a 8-k showing its bogus???
Also why not list the ESCROW company they used??
Cause someone could prob buy it for $50,000.
Just kidding
The fact (as you only deal with) is :
Intellicell has the money in escrow to pay the note off.
So in conclusion, the auction will cease to exist. Once the judge has declared who the owner of the secured note is and also the exact amount of the note.
No worries here. This will all be settled in 1-2 weeks. IMO thats when we will see a PR. I also think thats when we will see the 10-k.
Yea I have been here for a few weeks now
I swear this is a bi-polar board. One day its the end of the world and everybody jumping out of the windows. Next its like the stock hit the powerball jackpot. lol
No that actually told the judge they are going to pay the note but dont know who to pay. Because both Ironbrige and TCA claim the note. Read the fillings.
The case is Intellicell vs Ironbridge and TCA. Not just Ironbridge.
From the looks of it. REALLY GOOD NEWS. Especially learning that they did get the temp relief. Because it states that Intellicell wants to pay the note but doesn't know who to pay. Because both Ironbridge and TCA claim they are the secured owner of the note.
To me it seems like they already secured the funds to pay off the note in full. Or maybe ready to give the required shares to the note holder. Not sure. BUT....
Either way this whole auction/Ironbridge/TCA mess will be done with very soon.
It makes sense on to why they haven't released the 10-k. If you really think about it.
I see $.75+ coming really soon.
"Included in the acquisition is a social gaming property with over 10,000 viral games and social quizzes"
10,000 viral games and social quizzes seriously??? I'm sure its more of those social quizzes than games. Sounds like a annoying quiz that I did years ago and never would do again. I am probably considered one of their users lol.
With facebook games or "social quizes" its more about how many monthly active users than anything else. Why didn't they mention that????????? Anybody can get 1 million users.
Out of the 1 million users they will be acquiring how many are active? Thats the big question especially?? I am guessing probably less than 50,000 users. There is usually a big gap between the Monthly Active Users and Users that sign on one time and never come back.
You gotta call again and again till she answers. When you get the voice mail that means she is on the other line.
Maybe after the markets close
NICE POST!
No one is selling at these levels.
The address of the principal business office of IV is:
Harbour House, Waterfront Drive
Road Town, Tortola
British Virgin Islands VG1110
It would suck if IR really did send a written notice.
Null and Void, i think.
You may be right.
Why? Chart would of looked better.
SOMEONE HIT THE .18s real quick. Just a small order will do
I was going to tell you to stay at .014
You will mostly likely get filled
only filled 47,900 huh?
It looks like you can grab the rest at .015 lol
Freaking MMs
I thought you said .025 yesterday???? Sheesh I hate complusive liars .
Looks like we have a Ironridge employee here.
It is not Frozen and it is trading
Like I said... good luck getting SEC to do anything about it.
Good luck trying to get the SEC to do anything.
Also you can't just have a public auction of all the assets. Lol. It does not work that way when you have shareholders. This is funny
Seriously that post is completely fake. This happens a lot in the penny world. But usually it is to create fake hype on fake news. Usually they do it to boost a crappy stock. But this is the opposite. Nothing will happen to the guy that made it up. He is just trying to get cheaper shares.
WATCH! Whoever is crying wolf, scaring people on this board is mostly likely a part of that post. Especially if they have it as a link on their posts. (its a group of people trying to get some cheaper shares)
I don't get what you did here. Why would you multiply it to their stock price?????
SVFC share price if valued against:
ACTC
$173.62M divided by $7.02M = 24.73 * $0.071 or $1.75
STEM
$63.26M divided by $7.02M = 9.01 * $1.59 or $14.32
ASTM
$18.60M divided by $7.02M = 2.65 * $0.40 or $1.06
Shouldn't it be :
SVFC share price if valued against:
ACTC
$173.62M divided by $7.02M = 24.73 * $0.038 or $0.94
STEM
$63.26M divided by $7.02M = 9.01 * $0.038 or $0.34
ASTM
$18.60M divided by $7.02M = 2.65 * $0.038 or $0.10
It was imgg, now its imggq
This is just one of those stocks where it is just going to go crazy up out of nowhere. I have seen it many times before. Once you start seeing 5+ million share days. Then you know its coming. This reminds me of a stock I was in back in '08. It went from .03-.04 to almost 2 bucks in a matter of months. I would say that this has a better story though.
Yea I was just about to say that. I am sure the person that said that didn't know that
Once I hear about Google's expert witness taking the stand and when VRNG witness talks about the new 250 page source code then I think I can make a judgement call of who will win this case. No way we see a settlement tomorrow or first half of next week if things are going in VRNG's way. It would be pretty stupid on Googles part.
The one thing that really scares me is getting all jurors to side with VRNG. I read somewhere that the verdict has to be unanimous, does any body know if that is a 100% correct? If we have one Juror that just doesn't think she has enough 100% proof that Google is guilty. It would end up being a hung jury and means Google wins. I am sure VRNG can appeal, but man that would take a toll on the price.
Yea I did it without the link ;-0, and was replying to the other court review.
HERE IS A BETTER REVIEW
A small tech company is hoping to hit the judicial jackpot in a patent infringement trial against Internet giant Google that started Tuesday in federal court here.
Vringo, which markets video ringtones, claims Google and other companies have been using its newly acquired patents in their Internet advertising programs. Vringo claims it is owed royalties of at least a half-billion dollars, but evidence may raise the damages to more than $1 billion, a company attorney said.
"Nothing in life is free, and this is no exception," Vringo attorney Jeffrey K. Sherwood told a jury in U.S. District Court during opening statements Tuesday.
Google denies that it has infringed, or used without permission, the patents held by Vringo.
One of Google's lawyers, David A. Nelson of Chicago, told the jury that the patents don't say anything about how to make money off the technology.
"This is the story of someone stretching it into something that it isn't," he said.
Last year, New York-based Vringo purchased I/P Engine, a company with no revenues, but with patents as assets. Vringo listed its assets last quarter at $3.7 million.
The patents included two developed by engineers Andrew "Ken" Lang and Donald M. Kosak. Those patents created a system that filters Internet advertising to match the results of individual searches.
The example given to the jury is someone searching Google for a barbecue grill. The top and right-hand sides of the results page will feature links to companies advertising grills for sale. Those companies pay to have those ads placed there. The rest of the page will display the actual search results.
Lang began developing the technology in the 1990s while a graduate student at Carnegie Mellon University. He started a company in Pittsburgh and hired Kosak to assist. They obtained the two patents in question in 1998 and 2001.
Their company was bought out by Lycos, one of the Internet search leaders at the time. As part of the deal, Lang and Kosak gave up their rights to the patent. The two left Lycos and later put together a group of investors to buy back the patents as Lycos was failing. They purchased them for $3.5 million and created I/P Engine.
At the same time, Google had been developing its own advertising program, called AdSense. The attorneys told jurors they will hear different versions of how Google developed its advertising system.
What was not disputed is that Google already settled a similar lawsuit brought by Yahoo. In 2004, Google agreed to pay more than $200 million in stock to settle a suit brought by Yahoo subsidiary Overture to settle allegations that Google infringed on similar advertising-filtering patents.
Lang and Kosak's patents are more advanced than earlier Internet advertising filters, which allowed companies to pay for placement. Another example given in court is a sweepstakes company paying to have its ad placed as high as possible when someone searches for grills. Lang and Kosak's system matches advertisements to searches.
Sherwood, Vringo's attorney, told the jury that since 2004, when Google started using this system, its revenues jumped immediately by 20 percent.
Google reported total revenue of nearly $38 billion at the end of last year and is on pace to top that this year. Advertising accounts for about 96 percent of its revenue.
Sherwood said a royalties formula for what Vringo should be owed adds up to a conservative estimate of $500 million, but he said a more liberal estimate places that figure above $1 billion.
Companies also defending the suit are AOL, IAC Search & Media, Target and Gannett, which use the same Internet advertising technology from Google.
Nelson told the jury that he will also argue that the patents are invalid and never should have been awarded in the first place.
The trial before U.S. District Judge Raymond A. Jackson is expected to last two weeks. The case originally was filed in Alexandria, near where AOL is based, but was transferred to Norfolk as part of a program to divide patent litigation throughout the Eastern District of Virginia.
The district also has become a popular venue among plaintiffs in patent litigation because of favorable jury awards.
We should hit 2 bucks this week. Then who knows. It all depends on what they sell or what they do to maximize their assets.
But IMO I think we see a steady rise till we hear what they do.
YUP Almost $800 bucks WOW!!!!!!