completing the mission
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Koma is still not on the National Distributors website.
Brian must have lied again.
http://www.nat-dist.com/products_nonalc_new_age.php
It is deceptive to blame something on the wrong party.I may know and some of you may know ,but how is that helping or adding to the discussion if the dialogue is ended?I see people post about charts when charts have almost zero to do with a manipulated penny stock.Other than to continue the manipulation.Has BRYN started anything real yet like filing with SEC?You know a lawyer is not required to put together filings for SEC and a one man show should learn how to do it properly.I am for my company.
That does not mean that NITE was the shorter.NITE reports for other brokers also.Brokers that are not registered to report trades electronically use NITE as an umbrella.Remember only brokers can legally short a stock.The margin traders could try to short and have to cover when the pps goes up.However,The broker does not have to cover in the same time frame.So the broker can sell and resell the same shares to multiple margin account traders and make many times the face value of the shorts.It's the margin account gambler that has the biggest risk.
If a shorter shorts 1 million shares at $1. and the price gets to $2 you obviously look at it that the shorter has lost 1 million dollars.What a shorter would do is short another million at $2
Now the shorter has 3 million dollars to buy 2 million shares which is $1.5 per share.the shorter can keep shorting until the gap closes .Call it averaging up.After the gap closes then he could even short more until reality sets in and plenty of shares are available.
Why do all share selling schemes lean towards the short squeeze theories?You do realize that 1 share equals 1 share in a short position?And if there is plenty of buying that shorters will just short even more until reality sets in.
With that RS hanging over INOL,gary cannot even buy another useless website like Stemtide using shares.
Young people have experimented with melatonin and caffeine mixed.
http://www.erowid.org/experiences/exp.php?ID=40786
"Within the next five minutes my whole mind is just in a unwilled meditative state that I soon submit to now my thoughts are morphing to a awesome soft euphoria the caffeine is doing its job keeping me up and the melatonin instead of tranquilizing me is providing the same subconscious changes it would while sleeping but I’m in a full state of awakeness all the come down was very gentle, and all I can say is it is not an unalert high."
That must be why Koma is sold at drug paraphernalia stores just like bath salts.
Lotta shares trading here!
Is that the cough syrup that states not to operate machinery after taking?Brian advertised Koma for truckdrivers.Someone is gonna try and unwind and take a bunch of people with them.
By the way,do you know what happens with mixing melatonin and caffeine,such as energy drinks?Maybe your trucker friend will be on the news blaming Brian for not having proper warnings on the can of coma.
Contact FINRA Call Center.
FINRA
1735 K Street
Washington DC, 20006
Phone
FINRA Call Center: (301) 590-6500
"The wheels on the INOL prison bus go round and round."
Next stop Nevada!
Who's fault is it that sellers are asking way more than the market is willing to pay?Some people are just greedy,greedy,greedy.It's not like the company has even started filing with SEC yet.It is just a pr share selling stock until it proves itself.You should buy at ask if you think it is going to eventually show some value.
Now this is an up and commer for sure.I have been to many of the stores owned by Supervalu and they are the best value.
What is going on here today?
No talkee talkee or tradee wadee?
Accounts all coldee woldee?
Welcome to a Berthold share selling scheme.
I agree,why bother sending something so personal to such obvious crooks?They would probably sell your DNA for some other type of scam.
I.R.S. Looks at Mortgage Securities
Yup! investigation coming to a head.
""Published: October 13, 2007
The Internal Revenue Service is checking out dozens of participants in a financial arrangement to see if they are reaping illegal tax benefits by underreporting income on mortgage-backed securities, which make up the bulk of the multitrillion-dollar market for asset-backed securities.
The inquiry, which an I.R.S. official said yesterday was in its early stages, concerns the use of arcane but powerful investment entities known as real estate mortgage investment conduits.
Remics, as they are called, are a complex legal entity through which the vast majority of mortgage-backed securities are sold.
The I.R.S. is looking at whether companies and firms that set up remics — including the giant housing agencies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as Wall Street investment banks, commercial banks and other mortgage originators — have undervalued the interest earned on those securities and thus underpaid their federal taxes, according to a senior I.R.S. official, Barry Schott.""
Oh look!A way for President B.O. to fund his jobs bill.
With 100% of the interest collected thru Freddie and Fannie mortgage fraud/tax fraud scheme.
""The IRS Woke Up-Just Like Ticker Guy Said It Would TWO Years Ago! Here We Go!
What have I been writing about for ..... a couple of years now?""
http://socialapocalypse.com/2011/04/the-irs-woke-up-just-like-ticker-guy-said-it-would-two-years-ago-here-we-go.html#tp
""(Reuters) - The Internal Revenue Service has launched a review of the tax-exempt status of a widely-held form of mortgage-backed securities called REMICs.
The IRS confirmed to Reuters that the review comes in response to mounting evidence that banks violated tax requirements by mishandling the transfer of mortgages to REMICs, short for Real Estate Mortgage Conduits.
You mean, for instance, like evidence that the trust never actually got the so-called loans (until, in some cases, they wanted to foreclose on them of course)?
Oh, and the penalty, as I've noted?
But if the IRS concludes that the REMIC investments failed to comply with strict requirements in the federal tax code, the REMIC would have to pay a 100 percent tax on the income from those investments.
That means that the IRS could confiscate the full amount. Tax law experts said the REMICs also could be subjected to additional penalties for failing to file tax returns on the income.
Hold on to your seats on this one folks....
""
Any potential investor that did do DD would not buy at these overly inflated prices.Com'on .09 for a non reporting stock that claims to be getting into mining.Big red flags.
Second financial sunami gaining girth!
3 trillion dollars worth with 100% tax penalty by the IRS.
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE73Q7UX20110427?irpc=932
""By Scot J. Paltrow
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Internal Revenue Service has launched a review of the tax-exempt status of a widely-held form of mortgage-backed securities called REMICs.
The IRS confirmed to Reuters that the review comes in response to mounting evidence that banks violated tax requirements by mishandling the transfer of mortgages to REMICs, short for Real Estate Mortgage Conduits.
Should the IRS find reason to take tough action, the financial impact could be enormous. REMIC investments are held by pension funds, in individual retirement plans such as 401(k)s and by state and local government entities.
As of the end of 2010, investments in REMICs totaled more than $3 trillion, according to data supplied by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.
In a brief statement in response to questions from Reuters, the agency said: "The IRS is aware of questions in the market regarding REMICs and proper ownership of the underlying mortgages as set out in federal tax law, and is actively reviewing certain aspects of this issue."
The statement said the IRS would not make any further comment. An IRS spokesman declined to say anything about the extent of the review, or whether the agency is likely to take action.
The review, however, is a sign that the widespread bank misdeeds in home foreclosure cases are spilling over to threaten the interests of investors in mortgage-backed securities. The banks originated the mortgages and packaged them into securities.
These banks' transgressions, confirmed in court decisions and through recent action by federal bank regulators, include the failure to formally transfer ownership of mortgages to the trusts that invested in them and the subsequent creation of fraudulent mortgage assignments and other false documents.
These investment trusts already have suffered big drops in income because of vast numbers of mortgage defaults after the housing boom collapse. They have been hurt too because in an increasing number of instances they have been blocked by courts from foreclosing on defaulted mortgages. The courts ruled that because the trusts never received the required documents establishing that they owned the mortgages, they have no standing to foreclose.
PROFITS AT STAKE
For investors, one of the big attractions of REMICs has been that they aren't "double-taxed." While individual investors pay taxes on income they receive from REMICs, the securities themselves are exempt from business income tax.
But if the IRS concludes that the REMIC investments failed to comply with strict requirements in the federal tax code, the REMIC would have to pay a 100 percent tax on the income from those investments.
That means that the IRS could confiscate the full amount. Tax law experts said the REMICs also could be subjected to additional penalties for failing to file tax returns on the income.
James Peaslee, a partner at law firm Cleary Gottlieb who is an expert on taxation of securitized investments, said that even if the IRS finds wrongdoing, it might be loath to act because of the wide financial damage the penalties would cause. He notes that the REMIC investors, who he called "innocent parties," would have to pay rather than the banks that were responsible for any wrongdoing in transferring mortgage ownership.
But Adam Levitin, a Georgetown University Law School professor and expert on taxation, said that if the IRS fails to act, "it would be a backdoor bailout of the financial system."
If the IRS did impose penalties, the REMICs could turn around and sue the banks for causing the problems and not living up to the terms of the agreements establishing each REMIC, thus transferring the costs to the banks. If the IRS finds wrongdoing but fails to act, the IRS would forego "potentially enormous tax revenue that would be passed on to the federal government," Levitin said. "Given the federal budget deficit that's not something to sniff at," he added.
At least for some REMICs, though, prospects for suing the banks may be limited. April Charney, a Florida legal aid attorney and leading expert on mortgage backed securities and foreclosures, said that the agreements establishing the REMICs specify strict time limits for investors to sue the banks for any deficiencies in turning over promised mortgages.
For the IRS, one of the main issues will be whether REMICs actually owned the mortgages from which they received income. If not, for tax purposes they wouldn't qualify as REMICs, and the income would become taxable.
The arcane tax rules governing REMICs tax rules require that all mortgages be transferred to them on the dates that they are formed. There is a 120-day grace period for correcting any errors, and after that the rules strictly forbid acquiring any additional mortgages. Levitin said the reason for this limitation is that REMICs are tax exempt because they are considered vehicles for passive, static investments. If they were to continue buying and selling mortgages they would be acting as ordinary businesses, which are required to pay income taxes.
Peaslee said that to date there haven't been any rulings by the U.S. Tax Court on what is required for REMICs to establish timely ownership of mortgages.""
"That is why scam artists seek out useful idiots like Gary and sleazy brokers."
Actually the village idiot put in his financials that he hired consultants to find more market makers for INOL stock.
Seems more of that has occured than selling any type of products at all.
"I have sent a ton of crap to the SEC but I doubt they even open my emails. "
You have posted an equal amount also and we read it all.
I have no doubts that AURC has been an SEC topic seeing as the investigation of their TA and all the other highjacked shells.
People just make improper assumptions because they do not understand that there is no Lone Ranger.Instead they went with Long and Wrong.
More likely the brokers that have actively been trading INOL have been contacted.Many possible tricks brokers can use that FINRA and SEC can find out about.And they cannot be denied.
That is why scam artists seek out useful idiots like Gary and sleazy brokers.
"they will get away with their crimes because they are in Russia and Canada"
That actually does not matter.The SEC has a big reach when they want to,and so does the DOJ.
The sad part is that they take the money for themselves and investors are left with their own civil claims .Dan Ryan had 4 million dollars taken from him and his accomplice.
Besides,there has been a mob war going on and no telling who will be left to prosecute.
http://www.saultstar.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2240235&archive=true
"Nick Rizzuto, 42, was shot six times in the chest while standing next to his black Mercedes SLK 320, according to witnesses."
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/782155
"In recent months, police have said they are exploring possible theories about a Mafia turf war. They include a power struggle pitting Montreal's mobsters versus Toronto's, and a possible battle between Calabrian families and the Rizzutos' Sicilian clan."
I will be here reading everything.And if it goes up,I will still be here to watch it go down.And when the next crew arrives.Yup,I will still be here.
"The wheels on the INOL prison bus go round and round. "
Three buses full,one for the master,one for the maid and one for the little boy in FLA.
All they had to do was read this board because it has all been discovered here.Then with their ability to look at who was trading ,it is all too clear.That's how Dan Ryan got caught ,he thought that FINRA and the SEC never look.
And he was wrong.
I agree that has been the status quo in the past.
However I have seen other companies not allowed to RS when they wanted to so they could be looked at more carefully.I think if investors don't want their shares diluted then they would contact FINRA and continue to do so until there is a filing made.It was you who said the squeeky wheel think before ehh?
So you know that trades can be desked and suckers made to chase shares of a P+D?So far BRYN has been a share selling scheme and I see no reason that is not it's sole purpose of trading.
Explain what was made clear.
If the mm theories of manipulation are correct then you should be able to buy a boatload at .02 and you should go ahead and scoop them up if you think BRYN has some real potential.The legal opinion letter tells me there isn't going to be any real equity made for average investor.Just because a lawyer says all the t's are crossed and i's dotted does not mean that all and any potential revenue won't be skimmed out of the company should any ever be realized.
It took almost a year for Gary to amend his filings to show there were consultants skimming shares.
FINRA has the authority to allow or deny an RS.
If they look thru Gary's filings and look at his PR's then it is obvious he is doing nothing other than selling shares and sharing money with the majority shareholders at the expense of average shareholder.So why should an RS be allowed is the real question.
Maybe shareholders might want to contact FINRA once a week and request info if corporate action form has been filed until the October 24 date .That is the only way you can be heard by an agency that can look out for your best interest.
Is that what it takes for you to understand that Aurus Corp is a sham?All the warning signs are in place that AURC has no real value and should not be traded.Which is much more evidence than you ever saw that Aurus Corp was an actual operating company.
I would like to read that complaint.
Seeing as this stock is trading many times it's value at the .076 ,there is no complaint.Besides MM buy and sell shares for traders.Maybe the manipulators are just checking to see if their man is at his desk?And the answer seemed liked a yes.
Put in an order for 100,000 at .02
Doesn't matter if delinquencies are down because such a huge number of mortgages are not properly securitized.Who is going to pay all the taxes owed because of this matter?Fannie and Freddie sold securities that were not secured at all.Now the feds are doing everything they can to help homeowners stick with the fraudulent mortgages so the truth won't hit the mainstream.When in actuality all the DA's of the nation should be prosecuting many more bankers than the few that are in their sites.
No it is not!
"The Company anticipates that the effective date of the Reverse Split will occur on October 24, 2011 (the “Effective Date”)."
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=8173998
The RS still has to be approved by FINRA and Gary must file coporate action form by October 14 for an RS on October 24.
I expect at least a delay in INOL being allowed to carry out an RS if not outright denied.
Actually the real wall is about 3 billion shares unless they find out about a sucker trying to buy big blocks then the wall comes down and the sheep is led to slaughter.
WOW!
No cheerleaders around and it's almost share swapping time.
I guess the new plan is cellar boxing this box scheme until AS is reached.While financing something new.
If a person or persons prints money at the mint that was not supposed to be printed is it not real money to those it is passed onto?
The situations are this.
"Aurus Corp. claims it is a successor to Black Rock Golf, and as of August 29, its stock (symbol “AURC”) was quoted on OTC Link, had seven market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3)."
http://sec.gov/litigation/admin/2011/34-65274.pdf
The piggyback rule means that there was active trading of the symbol seeking to be quoted.Which would be so simple for scammers to simply trade the stock.
The scammers then get their hands on a legal opinion letter or use a transfer agent that would issue shares without a legal opinion letter and the scammers then sell the shares.
"Aurus Corp. has not separately registered its securities under Exchange Act Section 12(g)."
Aurus corp did not register any shares under it's own name.
The scammers simply used the existing AS of Black Rock Golf.
Which is the answer to why there was no increase in AS .
One of the things you held up as evidence there was no P+D occuring.
Well,Black Rock Golf only had an OS of ;
Balance December 31, 1997 3,165,909 $ 3,166 $ 5,518,125 $(4,472,513) $ 1,048,778
===========
http://www.secinfo.com/dsvrp.72Ua.htm
There certainly was many times that sold under the guise of mining in Russia.
"A simultaneous trading suspension against Aurus with the 12(j) proceeding against Black Rock Golf is appropriate because Aurus purports to be the successor to delinquent issuer Black Rock Golf."
http://sec.gov/litigation/admin/2011/34-65274.pdf
The 14 day trading suspension was applied because Aurus claimed it was a successor of a trading company.Which is enough to notify all involved that there is a real problem.
Then delisted from the pinks and kicked into the grey market which is a warning that there are real problems with the stock like investigation of fraud.
The short answer to why Aurus is trading at all is procedure and protocol.
There is no Lone Ranger in government.
In the world of business law there is much room for scammers to put their foot in their mouths.
Look at it like this.
You claimed you got a dividend from Aurus Corp.
Because the amount was so small to you ,you probably did not claim it on your personal taxes.And there is no 1099 to notify the IRS that you got a dividend so you got away without paying taxes on that money.Now you can defend yourself here by saying that myself and anyone else has no idea what you claim on your taxes and therefor I may as well be wrong.
So you attempt to create reasonable doubt.
The same tactic used by the scammers to P+D stock.
I could care less what you claimed on your taxes.
I am just trying to illustrate how scammers like Aurus Corp operate on a fundamental level.
Other than their filing antics they need people like you to continue to make beleive there is some value to the stock they illegally printed.
Are you ready to stop doing that yet?
Are you ready to stop making beleive there must be some value because SEC has not revoked all Aurus shares yet?
There is another reason Aurus continues to trade.
Because it gives an oppurtunity for scammers to make things right and purchase shares back from those who still own the shares they illegally sold.
Which we know would never happen here.
Government agencies typically do not go after companies or indiviuals in order to help other individuals to make a civil claim against others.
Your basically on your own if you want to sue.
And you have the same access to the filings SEC used to suspend Aurus Corp along with their opinion as to the reason of suspension.
Illegally created shares from an illegitimate successor of a bankrupt company.
I would not go toward the market makers because that is a real stretch of coconspirators.
Crooked transfer agent is as far as you have to look because in order for them to defend themselves they must show some proof of their innocence.That would give you names of the appropriate parties along with the evidence needed.And the only evidence you have now is the SEC opinion and suspension.
Gary is just doing the best Chumly can .