Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
We had a judge who ordered a Receiver to maximize shareholders and we had an investors who said to hell with that. I doubt the patent has any value now looking back at the revised claim construction. I wish Drago and Frazier all the luck in collecting.
It is officially over folks.
It appears Frazier sued the Company and the Receiver and he was awarded the Patents.
Any thoughts or comments? Reflecting back, what was in those documents that made the attorneys filed a second infringement case, and why was it later pulled?
Calypso's Dissolution Letter:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByhT6XrNEu-XM1hSQmxwWXNCWEk
Anyone here ever heard of the "prisoner's dilema"?
If you do, we can use this classic business strategy to our advantage.
Miss Doston, not only you are going to lose your license as CFA and CGA, you are going to spend 20 years in a Federal prison for tax evasion. Your offshore bankaccounts will be revealed.
Your best bet is to flip and come on our side, and testify against Mendoza.
Why isn't DE Wine named as a defendant in the lawsuit.
They sold restriced shares which were guaranteed by the patent according to them.
How could they make such a statement when court documents state otherwise.
Mr Turrini, stand up for shareholders and amend the the filing to include DE Wine, unless DE Wine is going to sue you for telling them the patent belongs to CLYW.
If we lose and the 15 shareholders win, what do they get?
If we both win, what do we all get?
I definitely do not like this second lawsuit; my best guess is that the second lawsuit was orchestrated by Mendoza himself. The script is looking like they will win and we will lose.
I want the names of all 15 plaintifs, and they cannot be fictious names like people on the BOD. I want names that I can verify with US Immigration and the DMV.
The class action lawsuit will reveal the settlement and its details assuming there was a settlement.
The chart says this stock can go to 2 cents. Would you buy this stock at 10 cents or at 2 cents if you know you can drive it down to that price?
In addtion to Carlos, Turrini, BOD and DE Wine, we can also name Investors Hub in our class action lawsuit.
They may want to cancel common shares, but this is my speculation. What I do believe, however, is that they want to drive the PPS to 1 or 2 cents, so that their buddies and families can get in on the stock assuming the deals are real.
Firing Turrini is one way for him to accumulate unrestricted shares, because he is no longer an officer of the compnay. I do not know if there is a grace period though.
I cannot believe a person who had a 3.6 GPA at college, and involved in many successful business ventures over the years could get scammed by these South American con artist.
People, stop thinking Turrini is a good guy. Remember, he was hired by Carlos, and Carlos only hires people who he trusts.
Assuming a tape does exist, which I doubt, how do you know that this tape was not made by Carlos, Davila, and Daic to ensure CLYW loses the case so that Carlos and Daic could run off with the patent.
If we had "deals" that have been touted by many, why delay or block them when everyone would benefit. It does not make sense.
Can someone explain why the BOD would do that.
This will not put back the money in our pockets. I totally convince that everyone is involve to steal our money; there were too many coincidences of pending positive news over the last year just when CLYW bank account is empty; this created a demand for PP shares.
BTW, where is my post that possibly identified who ASNAP is?
ASNAP is Carlos, and he is not George; GS writes better English.
400,000 shares to do Carlos's dirty work.
If we all think Cheryl Doston is violating SOX, we should report her to the SEC and the governing body for CMAs.
Also, I thought D.E. Wine and George Schilling were friends; isn't Wine in conflict of interest to oversee this proxy fight.
I am hoping and praying that Turrini's termination is not an orchestrated plan to cover up past or future devious activities.
We have seen pass CEO quit claiming he was not aware of deals signed, and now the same crew is back at the helm.
Does anyone know if the negotiations/potential deals talked about on this board are really legit.
3.6 million
I won't lie: I do own shares in this company; however, I will not rule out that everyone in the company is in on it;
The meaning of the word "confidence man": "The first known usage of the term "confidence man" was in 1849; it was used by the press during the trial of William Thompson. Thompson chatted with strangers until he asked if they had the confidence to lend him their watches, whereupon he would walk off with the watch"
jajajaja
You can write her bio in wikipedia, but be careful not to slander.
Both of us should do it.
In addtion to CLYW_Proxy@comcast.net, send to CLYWProxyFight@gmail.com
I need to compare my result to that of CLYW_Proxy@comcast.net
People, also CC this email: CLYWProxyFight@gmail.com. We need to accurately determine the amount of share we have for the proxy fight.
In the email, put only your discussion board alias and the total shares you own.
I believe fabrication
Final4, someone wrote that the Acacia deal maybe fake. Are you confident that it isn't so?
Here is a plan:
Since most of us is not confident with what is going on behind the scenes, we could use this board to form a group for a proxy fight.
We can all pool our shares in a corporation, assuming majority ownership, and take over this company, and then put it on the right track with the right people.
"There are all kinds of businesses that I don't understand, but that doesn't cause me to stay up at night. It just means I go on to the next one, and that's what the individual investor should do."
-- Warren Buffett
I am not to sure about that; they let a court case went undefended.
I would not be surprised to see another attempt at screwing share holders; remeber, they want to cancel current stock
Unfortunately, only insiders will take advantage of tax loss time. I cannot imagine someone selling all his shares now when news is around the corner.
1,000,000 will be possible if no news before December 31st; expect tax loss selling to pickup from today onwards.
I hope this is not a repeat of something terribly gone wrong just when we think the share price is about to climb. The last time this occured, the stock dropped to 3 cents, and neither Alicia nor ASNAP communicated to us that there was a lawsuit lost. All the information that came out of the company and ASNAP's posts at that time were all positive.
We all heard the stock price declined because the company had changed their business model not to make phones.
Anyone knows the name of the Acacia subsidiary that will license ASNAP, or it has not been formed yet?
Acacia vs. Google
Here is a new case filed by Acacia subsidiary Technology Licensing Corp against Google with patents # 5,276,785 and 5,675,819, which they bought from Xerox.
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-txedce/case_no-2:2007cv00503/case_id-106674/
My research has revealed a few new cases filed by Acacia on Oct 1, 2007 in the state of Texas, a jurisdiction whose jurors favor the plaintiff's in patent infringment cases.
http://dockets.justia.com/browse/state-texas/court-txedce/judge-Clark/noscat-10/nos-830/
Please post something to counter my argument.
I always take into consideration the pros and cons when I analyze anything.
I was under the assummption that anything Acacia touches, there is a degree of certainity that they could win their cases.
I would like to know their win/lost ratio, so I can apply it to the ASNAP patent.
Acacia vs. Mircosoft
Well people, the decision made yesterday in favor of Microsoft may have a huge impact on how ASNAP will be perceived if and when the deal with CLYW is announced.
Acacia managment may suspend all purchases or partnerships of any patents until they fully understand why they lost yesterday.
If ASNAP is a similar type patent to the Computing Device Performace patent, we may see the deal cancelled.
Turrini, timing is everything; as a CEO, you cannnot sleep at the wheel.
A major shareholder and his buddy tried to steal it away from CLYW with a phony lawsuit that went uncontested. Luckily for SH, it still belongs to CLYW, and even this is still unclear until the settlement agreement is made public.